%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : ITP171^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:05:44 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.27s 0.37s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.27s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 17 ( 12 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 26 ( 9 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 116 ( 12 ~; 5 |; 0 &; 95 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 16 ( 7 avg)
% Number of types : 10 ( 9 usr)
% Number of type conns : 17 ( 17 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 14 ( 12 usr; 6 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 30 ( 0 ^; 30 !; 0 ?; 30 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_sort1,type,
m: $tType ).
thf(decl_sort2,type,
docume1935157360tr_d_e: $tType ).
thf(decl_sort3,type,
rObjec1617416918on_j_k: $tType ).
thf(decl_sort4,type,
heap_S1465075775_j_k_l: $tType ).
thf(decl_sort5,type,
n: $tType ).
thf(decl_sort6,type,
heap_E625070648t_unit: $tType ).
thf(decl_sort7,type,
heap_E834686006tion_n: $tType ).
thf(decl_sort8,type,
rObjec2068690451tion_j: $tType ).
thf(decl_sort9,type,
shadow_root_ptr_d: $tType ).
thf(decl_88,type,
put_M_674497586_h_i_l: docume1935157360tr_d_e > ( ( m > m ) > rObjec1617416918on_j_k > rObjec1617416918on_j_k ) > m > heap_E625070648t_unit ).
thf(decl_137,type,
heap_E1683112693tion_n: heap_E834686006tion_n > heap_S1465075775_j_k_l > heap_S1465075775_j_k_l > $o ).
thf(decl_142,type,
heap_E494191872t_unit: heap_S1465075775_j_k_l > heap_E625070648t_unit > heap_S1465075775_j_k_l > $o ).
thf(decl_196,type,
shadow569799008_i_k_l: shadow_root_ptr_d > ( rObjec2068690451tion_j > n ) > heap_E834686006tion_n ).
thf(decl_202,type,
cast_s253715760_r_d_e: shadow_root_ptr_d > docume1935157360tr_d_e ).
thf(decl_203,type,
document_ptr: docume1935157360tr_d_e ).
thf(decl_204,type,
getter: rObjec2068690451tion_j > n ).
thf(decl_205,type,
h: heap_S1465075775_j_k_l ).
thf(decl_206,type,
h2: heap_S1465075775_j_k_l ).
thf(decl_207,type,
setter: ( m > m ) > rObjec1617416918on_j_k > rObjec1617416918on_j_k ).
thf(decl_208,type,
shadow_root_ptr: shadow_root_ptr_d ).
thf(decl_209,type,
v: m ).
thf(conj_4,conjecture,
heap_E1683112693tion_n @ ( shadow569799008_i_k_l @ shadow_root_ptr @ getter ) @ h @ h2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.KvQhWWNMAF/E---3.1_3147386.p',conj_4) ).
thf(fact_4_get__M__shadow__root__put__M__document__different__pointers,axiom,
! [X1: shadow_root_ptr_d,X2: docume1935157360tr_d_e,X3: heap_S1465075775_j_k_l,X14: ( m > m ) > rObjec1617416918on_j_k > rObjec1617416918on_j_k,X15: m,X6: heap_S1465075775_j_k_l,X7: rObjec2068690451tion_j > n] :
( ( ( cast_s253715760_r_d_e @ X1 )
!= X2 )
=> ( ( heap_E494191872t_unit @ X3 @ ( put_M_674497586_h_i_l @ X2 @ X14 @ X15 ) @ X6 )
=> ( heap_E1683112693tion_n @ ( shadow569799008_i_k_l @ X1 @ X7 ) @ X3 @ X6 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.KvQhWWNMAF/E---3.1_3147386.p',fact_4_get__M__shadow__root__put__M__document__different__pointers) ).
thf(conj_3,hypothesis,
( ( cast_s253715760_r_d_e @ shadow_root_ptr )
!= document_ptr ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.KvQhWWNMAF/E---3.1_3147386.p',conj_3) ).
thf(conj_0,hypothesis,
heap_E494191872t_unit @ h @ ( put_M_674497586_h_i_l @ document_ptr @ setter @ v ) @ h2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.KvQhWWNMAF/E---3.1_3147386.p',conj_0) ).
thf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ ( heap_E1683112693tion_n @ ( shadow569799008_i_k_l @ shadow_root_ptr @ getter ) @ h @ h2 ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_4]) ).
thf(c_0_5,plain,
! [X1: shadow_root_ptr_d,X2: docume1935157360tr_d_e,X3: heap_S1465075775_j_k_l,X14: ( m > m ) > rObjec1617416918on_j_k > rObjec1617416918on_j_k,X15: m,X6: heap_S1465075775_j_k_l,X7: rObjec2068690451tion_j > n] :
( ( ( cast_s253715760_r_d_e @ X1 )
!= X2 )
=> ( ( heap_E494191872t_unit @ X3 @ ( put_M_674497586_h_i_l @ X2 @ X14 @ X15 ) @ X6 )
=> ( heap_E1683112693tion_n @ ( shadow569799008_i_k_l @ X1 @ X7 ) @ X3 @ X6 ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_4_get__M__shadow__root__put__M__document__different__pointers]) ).
thf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ ( heap_E1683112693tion_n @ ( shadow569799008_i_k_l @ shadow_root_ptr @ getter ) @ h @ h2 ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
thf(c_0_7,plain,
! [X1661: shadow_root_ptr_d,X1662: docume1935157360tr_d_e,X1663: heap_S1465075775_j_k_l,X1664: ( m > m ) > rObjec1617416918on_j_k > rObjec1617416918on_j_k,X1665: m,X1666: heap_S1465075775_j_k_l,X1667: rObjec2068690451tion_j > n] :
( ( ( cast_s253715760_r_d_e @ X1661 )
= X1662 )
| ~ ( heap_E494191872t_unit @ X1663 @ ( put_M_674497586_h_i_l @ X1662 @ X1664 @ X1665 ) @ X1666 )
| ( heap_E1683112693tion_n @ ( shadow569799008_i_k_l @ X1661 @ X1667 ) @ X1663 @ X1666 ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])]) ).
thf(c_0_8,hypothesis,
( ( cast_s253715760_r_d_e @ shadow_root_ptr )
!= document_ptr ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[conj_3]) ).
thf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ ( heap_E1683112693tion_n @ ( shadow569799008_i_k_l @ shadow_root_ptr @ getter ) @ h @ h2 ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
thf(c_0_10,plain,
! [X1: shadow_root_ptr_d,X2: docume1935157360tr_d_e,X3: heap_S1465075775_j_k_l,X7: rObjec2068690451tion_j > n,X15: m,X14: ( m > m ) > rObjec1617416918on_j_k > rObjec1617416918on_j_k,X6: heap_S1465075775_j_k_l] :
( ( ( cast_s253715760_r_d_e @ X1 )
= X2 )
| ( heap_E1683112693tion_n @ ( shadow569799008_i_k_l @ X1 @ X7 ) @ X3 @ X6 )
| ~ ( heap_E494191872t_unit @ X3 @ ( put_M_674497586_h_i_l @ X2 @ X14 @ X15 ) @ X6 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
thf(c_0_11,hypothesis,
heap_E494191872t_unit @ h @ ( put_M_674497586_h_i_l @ document_ptr @ setter @ v ) @ h2,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[conj_0]) ).
thf(c_0_12,hypothesis,
( ( cast_s253715760_r_d_e @ shadow_root_ptr )
!= document_ptr ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
thf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
~ ( heap_E1683112693tion_n @ ( shadow569799008_i_k_l @ shadow_root_ptr @ getter ) @ h @ h2 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
thf(c_0_14,hypothesis,
! [X1: shadow_root_ptr_d,X7: rObjec2068690451tion_j > n] :
( ( ( cast_s253715760_r_d_e @ X1 )
= document_ptr )
| ( heap_E1683112693tion_n @ ( shadow569799008_i_k_l @ X1 @ X7 ) @ h @ h2 ) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
thf(c_0_15,hypothesis,
( ( cast_s253715760_r_d_e @ shadow_root_ptr )
!= document_ptr ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
thf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : ITP171^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.19 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.19 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.19 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.19 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.19 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.19 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.19 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.08/0.19 % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 20:05:15 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.20 % CPUTime :
% 0.08/0.20 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.24 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.08/0.28 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.KvQhWWNMAF/E---3.1_3147386.p
% 0.27/0.37 % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 0.27/0.37 % Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSMSSLNHHA.
% 0.27/0.37 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.27/0.37 % Starting new_bool_8 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.27/0.37 % Starting full_lambda_4 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.37 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.37 % Starting ehoh_best8_lambda with 300s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.37 % new_bool_8 with pid 3147403 completed with status 0
% 0.27/0.37 % Result found by new_bool_8
% 0.27/0.37 % Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSMSSLNHHA.
% 0.27/0.37 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.27/0.37 % Starting new_bool_8 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.27/0.37 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1,,2,20000,1.0))
% 0.27/0.37 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1,,2,20000,1.0)
% 0.27/0.37 % Search class: HGHSM-FFLF32-MHHFFSBN
% 0.27/0.37 % partial match(2): HGHSM-FSLM32-MHHFFSBN
% 0.27/0.37 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.27/0.37 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.37 % Starting new_bool_8 with 151s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.37 % Starting pre_casc_2 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.37 % Starting sh7 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.37 % Starting pre_casc_6 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.37 % sh7 with pid 3147422 completed with status 0
% 0.27/0.37 % Result found by sh7
% 0.27/0.37 % Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSMSSLNHHA.
% 0.27/0.37 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.27/0.37 % Starting new_bool_8 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.27/0.37 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1,,2,20000,1.0))
% 0.27/0.37 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1,,2,20000,1.0)
% 0.27/0.37 % Search class: HGHSM-FFLF32-MHHFFSBN
% 0.27/0.37 % partial match(2): HGHSM-FSLM32-MHHFFSBN
% 0.27/0.37 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.27/0.37 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.37 % Starting new_bool_8 with 151s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.37 % Starting pre_casc_2 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.37 % Starting sh7 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.37 % Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.27/0.37 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.27/0.37
% 0.27/0.37 % Proof found!
% 0.27/0.37 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.27/0.37 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.27/0.37 % Parsed axioms : 570
% 0.27/0.37 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 449
% 0.27/0.37 % Initial clauses : 158
% 0.27/0.37 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 18
% 0.27/0.37 % Initial clauses in saturation : 140
% 0.27/0.37 % Processed clauses : 290
% 0.27/0.37 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.27/0.37 % ...subsumed : 9
% 0.27/0.37 % ...remaining for further processing : 281
% 0.27/0.37 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 13
% 0.27/0.37 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.27/0.37 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.27/0.37 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.27/0.37 % Generated clauses : 63
% 0.27/0.37 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 45
% 0.27/0.37 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.27/0.37 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.27/0.37 % Paramodulations : 49
% 0.27/0.37 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.27/0.37 % NegExts : 0
% 0.27/0.37 % Equation resolutions : 14
% 0.27/0.37 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.27/0.37 % Total rewrite steps : 2
% 0.27/0.37 % ...of those cached : 1
% 0.27/0.37 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.27/0.37 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.27/0.37 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.27/0.37 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.27/0.37 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.27/0.37 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.27/0.37 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.27/0.37 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.27/0.37 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.27/0.37 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.27/0.37 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.27/0.37 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.27/0.37 % Current number of processed clauses : 142
% 0.27/0.37 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 18
% 0.27/0.37 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.27/0.37 % Negative unit clauses : 3
% 0.27/0.37 % Non-unit-clauses : 121
% 0.27/0.37 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 29
% 0.27/0.37 % ...number of literals in the above : 76
% 0.27/0.37 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.27/0.37 % Current number of archived clauses : 137
% 0.27/0.37 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2161
% 0.27/0.37 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1972
% 0.27/0.37 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 4
% 0.27/0.37 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 82
% 0.27/0.37 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.27/0.37 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.27/0.37 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.27/0.37 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.27/0.37 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.27/0.37 % Termbank termtop insertions : 28048
% 0.27/0.37 % Search garbage collected termcells : 9130
% 0.27/0.37
% 0.27/0.37 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.27/0.37 % User time : 0.033 s
% 0.27/0.37 % System time : 0.007 s
% 0.27/0.37 % Total time : 0.039 s
% 0.27/0.37 % Maximum resident set size: 6404 pages
% 0.27/0.37
% 0.27/0.37 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.27/0.37 % User time : 0.110 s
% 0.27/0.37 % System time : 0.026 s
% 0.27/0.37 % Total time : 0.136 s
% 0.27/0.37 % Maximum resident set size: 6400 pages
% 0.27/0.37 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------