↑ Up

E-SAT---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem  : ITP189^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:05:47 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 2.35s 0.68s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.35s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   13 (  10 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   19 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  136 (   8   ~;   4   |;   0   &; 122   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   6 avg)
%            Number of types       :    5 (   4 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   11 (  10 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   12 (   0   ^;  12   !;   0   ?;  12   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_sort1,type,
    pi: $tType ).

thf(decl_sort2,type,
    name: $tType ).

thf(decl_sort3,type,
    late_freeRes: $tType ).

thf(decl_sort4,type,
    late_residual: $tType ).

thf(decl_25,type,
    par: pi > pi > pi ).

thf(decl_27,type,
    res: name > pi > pi ).

thf(decl_35,type,
    late_FreeR: late_freeRes > pi > late_residual ).

thf(decl_38,type,
    late_transitions: pi > late_residual > $o ).

thf(decl_49,type,
    fresh_1641682979reeRes: name > late_freeRes > $o ).

thf(decl_102,type,
    p: pi ).

thf(decl_103,type,
    p2: pi ).

thf(decl_105,type,
    q: pi ).

thf(decl_107,type,
    alpha: late_freeRes ).

thf(decl_108,type,
    x: name ).

thf(conj_0,conjecture,
    late_transitions @ ( res @ x @ ( par @ p @ q ) ) @ ( late_FreeR @ alpha @ ( res @ x @ ( par @ p2 @ q ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.22bC5picBF/E---3.1_1246149.p',conj_0) ).

thf(fact_11_ResF,axiom,
    ! [X1: pi,X2: late_freeRes,X3: pi,X17: name] :
      ( ( late_transitions @ X1 @ ( late_FreeR @ X2 @ X3 ) )
     => ( ( fresh_1641682979reeRes @ X17 @ X2 )
       => ( late_transitions @ ( res @ X17 @ X1 ) @ ( late_FreeR @ X2 @ ( res @ X17 @ X3 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.22bC5picBF/E---3.1_1246149.p',fact_11_ResF) ).

thf(fact_1__092_060open_062P_A_092_060parallel_062_AQ_A_092_060longmapsto_062_A_092_060alpha_062_A_092_060prec_062_AP_H_A_092_060parallel_062_AQ_092_060close_062,axiom,
    late_transitions @ ( par @ p @ q ) @ ( late_FreeR @ alpha @ ( par @ p2 @ q ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.22bC5picBF/E---3.1_1246149.p',fact_1__092_060open_062P_A_092_060parallel_062_AQ_A_092_060longmapsto_062_A_092_060alpha_062_A_092_060prec_062_AP_H_A_092_060parallel_062_AQ_092_060close_062) ).

thf(fact_0__092_060open_062x_A_092_060sharp_062_A_092_060alpha_062_092_060close_062,axiom,
    fresh_1641682979reeRes @ x @ alpha,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.22bC5picBF/E---3.1_1246149.p',fact_0__092_060open_062x_A_092_060sharp_062_A_092_060alpha_062_092_060close_062) ).

thf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( late_transitions @ ( res @ x @ ( par @ p @ q ) ) @ ( late_FreeR @ alpha @ ( res @ x @ ( par @ p2 @ q ) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0]) ).

thf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( late_transitions @ ( res @ x @ ( par @ p @ q ) ) @ ( late_FreeR @ alpha @ ( res @ x @ ( par @ p2 @ q ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

thf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( late_transitions @ ( res @ x @ ( par @ p @ q ) ) @ ( late_FreeR @ alpha @ ( res @ x @ ( par @ p2 @ q ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

thf(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X1832: pi,X1833: late_freeRes,X1834: pi,X1835: name] :
      ( ~ ( late_transitions @ X1832 @ ( late_FreeR @ X1833 @ X1834 ) )
      | ~ ( fresh_1641682979reeRes @ X1835 @ X1833 )
      | ( late_transitions @ ( res @ X1835 @ X1832 ) @ ( late_FreeR @ X1833 @ ( res @ X1835 @ X1834 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_11_ResF])])]) ).

thf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( late_transitions @ ( res @ x @ ( par @ p @ q ) ) @ ( late_FreeR @ alpha @ ( res @ x @ ( par @ p2 @ q ) ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

thf(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X3: pi,X1: pi,X8: name,X2: late_freeRes] :
      ( ( late_transitions @ ( res @ X8 @ X1 ) @ ( late_FreeR @ X2 @ ( res @ X8 @ X3 ) ) )
      | ~ ( late_transitions @ X1 @ ( late_FreeR @ X2 @ X3 ) )
      | ~ ( fresh_1641682979reeRes @ X8 @ X2 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

thf(c_0_10,plain,
    late_transitions @ ( par @ p @ q ) @ ( late_FreeR @ alpha @ ( par @ p2 @ q ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_1__092_060open_062P_A_092_060parallel_062_AQ_A_092_060longmapsto_062_A_092_060alpha_062_A_092_060prec_062_AP_H_A_092_060parallel_062_AQ_092_060close_062]) ).

thf(c_0_11,plain,
    fresh_1641682979reeRes @ x @ alpha,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_0__092_060open_062x_A_092_060sharp_062_A_092_060alpha_062_092_060close_062]) ).

thf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_10]),c_0_11])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : ITP189^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.19  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.19  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.19  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.19  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.19  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.19  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.19  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.19  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 20:09:09 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.19  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.19  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.23  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.22/0.29  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.22bC5picBF/E---3.1_1246149.p
% 2.35/0.68  % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 2.35/0.68  % Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSSNSFA.
% 2.35/0.68  % Scheduled 6 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.35/0.68  % Starting new_ho_10 with 900s (3) cores
% 2.35/0.68  % Starting sh2lt with 300s (1) cores
% 2.35/0.68  % Starting new_ho_5 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.35/0.68  % Starting full_lambda_5 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.35/0.68  % Starting sh9 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.35/0.68  % Starting ehoh_best8_lambda with 300s (1) cores
% 2.35/0.68  % new_ho_10 with pid 1246162 completed with status 0
% 2.35/0.68  % Result found by new_ho_10
% 2.35/0.68  % Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSSNSFA.
% 2.35/0.68  % Scheduled 6 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.35/0.68  % Starting new_ho_10 with 900s (3) cores
% 2.35/0.68  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 2.35/0.68  % No SInE strategy applied
% 2.35/0.68  % Search class: HGHSM-FSLM32-MSFFFFBN
% 2.35/0.68  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 2.35/0.68  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 82s (1) cores
% 2.35/0.68  % Starting new_ho_10 with 91s (1) cores
% 2.35/0.68  % Starting sh5l with 82s (1) cores
% 2.35/0.68  % new_ho_10 with pid 1246172 completed with status 0
% 2.35/0.68  % Result found by new_ho_10
% 2.35/0.68  % Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSSNSFA.
% 2.35/0.68  % Scheduled 6 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.35/0.68  % Starting new_ho_10 with 900s (3) cores
% 2.35/0.68  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 2.35/0.68  % No SInE strategy applied
% 2.35/0.68  % Search class: HGHSM-FSLM32-MSFFFFBN
% 2.35/0.68  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 2.35/0.68  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 82s (1) cores
% 2.35/0.68  % Starting new_ho_10 with 91s (1) cores
% 2.35/0.68  % Preprocessing time       : 0.018 s
% 2.35/0.68  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 2.35/0.68  
% 2.35/0.68  % Proof found!
% 2.35/0.68  % SZS status Theorem
% 2.35/0.68  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 2.35/0.68  % Parsed axioms                        : 434
% 2.35/0.68  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 2.35/0.68  % Initial clauses                      : 1034
% 2.35/0.68  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 146
% 2.35/0.68  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 888
% 2.35/0.68  % Processed clauses                    : 1338
% 2.35/0.68  % ...of these trivial                  : 26
% 2.35/0.68  % ...subsumed                          : 108
% 2.35/0.68  % ...remaining for further processing  : 1204
% 2.35/0.68  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 136
% 2.35/0.68  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 2.35/0.68  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 2.35/0.68  % Backward-rewritten                   : 15
% 2.35/0.69  % Generated clauses                    : 865
% 2.35/0.69  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 583
% 2.35/0.69  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 2.35/0.69  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 2.35/0.69  % Paramodulations                      : 608
% 2.35/0.69  % Factorizations                       : 2
% 2.35/0.69  % NegExts                              : 5
% 2.35/0.69  % Equation resolutions                 : 177
% 2.35/0.69  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 2.35/0.69  % Total rewrite steps                  : 147
% 2.35/0.69  % ...of those cached                   : 63
% 2.35/0.69  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 2.35/0.69  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 2.35/0.69  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 2.35/0.69  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 2.35/0.69  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 2.35/0.69  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 2.35/0.69  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 2.35/0.69  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 2.35/0.69  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 2.35/0.69  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 2.35/0.69  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 2.35/0.69  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 2.35/0.69  % Current number of processed clauses  : 355
% 2.35/0.69  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 89
% 2.35/0.69  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 2.35/0.69  %    Negative unit clauses             : 60
% 2.35/0.69  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 205
% 2.35/0.69  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 900
% 2.35/0.69  % ...number of literals in the above   : 2997
% 2.35/0.69  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 2.35/0.69  % Current number of archived clauses   : 819
% 2.35/0.69  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 253240
% 2.35/0.69  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 71065
% 2.35/0.69  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 69
% 2.35/0.69  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3833
% 2.35/0.69  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 2.35/0.69  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 35
% 2.35/0.69  % BW rewrite match successes           : 16
% 2.35/0.69  % Condensation attempts                : 1338
% 2.35/0.69  % Condensation successes               : 2
% 2.35/0.69  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 95506
% 2.35/0.69  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 17890
% 2.35/0.69  
% 2.35/0.69  % -------------------------------------------------
% 2.35/0.69  % User time                : 0.315 s
% 2.35/0.69  % System time              : 0.019 s
% 2.35/0.69  % Total time               : 0.333 s
% 2.35/0.69  % Maximum resident set size: 7908 pages
% 2.35/0.69  
% 2.35/0.69  % -------------------------------------------------
% 2.35/0.69  % User time                : 0.847 s
% 2.35/0.69  % System time              : 0.069 s
% 2.35/0.69  % Total time               : 0.916 s
% 2.35/0.69  % Maximum resident set size: 5888 pages
% 2.35/0.69  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------