%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : ITP191^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:04:38 AM UTC 2026
% Result : ContradictoryAxioms 0.40s 0.39s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.40s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 7 ( 7 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 7 ( 6 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 16 ( 4 ~; 0 |; 0 &; 12 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 3 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 2 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 6 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 8 ( 0 ^; 8 !; 0 ?; 8 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_sort1,type,
name: $tType ).
thf(decl_sort2,type,
late_freeRes: $tType ).
thf(decl_34,type,
late_OutputR: name > name > late_freeRes ).
thf(decl_35,type,
late_TauR: late_freeRes ).
thf(decl_171,type,
ab: name ).
thf(decl_174,type,
x: name ).
thf(fact_216_Late__Semantics_OfreeRes_Odistinct_I1_J,axiom,
! [X230: name,X231: name] :
( ( late_OutputR @ X230 @ X231 )
!= late_TauR ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.3UeVgcEVpP/E---3.1_2993410.p',fact_216_Late__Semantics_OfreeRes_Odistinct_I1_J) ).
thf(fact_1_cComm1_Ohyps_I9_J,axiom,
( ( late_OutputR @ ab @ x )
= late_TauR ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.3UeVgcEVpP/E---3.1_2993410.p',fact_1_cComm1_Ohyps_I9_J) ).
thf(c_0_2,plain,
! [X230: name,X231: name] :
( ( late_OutputR @ X230 @ X231 )
!= late_TauR ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_216_Late__Semantics_OfreeRes_Odistinct_I1_J]) ).
thf(c_0_3,plain,
! [X2438: name,X2439: name] :
( ( late_OutputR @ X2438 @ X2439 )
!= late_TauR ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])]) ).
thf(c_0_4,plain,
( ( late_OutputR @ ab @ x )
= late_TauR ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_1_cComm1_Ohyps_I9_J]) ).
thf(c_0_5,plain,
! [X1: name,X3: name] :
( ( late_OutputR @ X1 @ X3 )
!= late_TauR ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
thf(c_0_6,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : ITP191^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.18 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.18 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.18 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.18 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.18 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.18 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.18 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.18 % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 20:11:28 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.18 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.18 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.22 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.23/0.30 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.3UeVgcEVpP/E---3.1_2993410.p
% 0.40/0.39 % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 0.40/0.39 % Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSMSSSNSFA.
% 0.40/0.39 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.40/0.39 % Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.40/0.39 % Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.40/0.39 % Starting sh4l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.40/0.39 % Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_rwall with 300s (1) cores
% 0.40/0.39 % sh4l with pid 2993425 completed with status 0
% 0.40/0.39 % Result found by sh4l
% 0.40/0.39 % Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSMSSSNSFA.
% 0.40/0.39 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.40/0.39 % Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.40/0.39 % Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.40/0.39 % Starting sh4l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.40/0.39 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.40/0.39 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.40/0.39 % Search class: HGHSM-FSLM32-DSFFFFBN
% 0.40/0.39 % partial match(1): HGHSM-FSLM32-SSFFFFBN
% 0.40/0.39 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.40/0.39 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.40/0.39 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2993427 completed with status 0
% 0.40/0.39 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.40/0.39 % Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSMSSSNSFA.
% 0.40/0.39 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.40/0.39 % Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.40/0.39 % Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.40/0.39 % Starting sh4l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.40/0.39 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.40/0.39 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.40/0.39 % Search class: HGHSM-FSLM32-DSFFFFBN
% 0.40/0.39 % partial match(1): HGHSM-FSLM32-SSFFFFBN
% 0.40/0.39 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.40/0.39 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.40/0.39 % Preprocessing time : 0.015 s
% 0.40/0.39
% 0.40/0.39 % Proof found!
% 0.40/0.39 % SZS status ContradictoryAxioms
% 0.40/0.39 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.40/0.39 % Parsed axioms : 568
% 0.40/0.39 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.40/0.39 % Initial clauses : 1197
% 0.40/0.39 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 259
% 0.40/0.39 % Initial clauses in saturation : 938
% 0.40/0.39 % Processed clauses : 43
% 0.40/0.39 % ...of these trivial : 4
% 0.40/0.39 % ...subsumed : 1
% 0.40/0.39 % ...remaining for further processing : 38
% 0.40/0.39 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.40/0.39 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.40/0.39 % Backward-subsumed : 2
% 0.40/0.39 % Backward-rewritten : 3
% 0.40/0.39 % Generated clauses : 15
% 0.40/0.39 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 10
% 0.40/0.39 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.40/0.39 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.40/0.39 % Paramodulations : 12
% 0.40/0.39 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.40/0.39 % NegExts : 0
% 0.40/0.39 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.40/0.39 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.40/0.39 % Total rewrite steps : 11
% 0.40/0.39 % ...of those cached : 2
% 0.40/0.39 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.40/0.39 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.40/0.39 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.40/0.39 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.40/0.39 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.40/0.39 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.40/0.39 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.40/0.39 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.40/0.39 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.40/0.39 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.40/0.39 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.40/0.39 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.40/0.39 % Current number of processed clauses : 32
% 0.40/0.39 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 24
% 0.40/0.39 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.40/0.39 % Negative unit clauses : 6
% 0.40/0.39 % Non-unit-clauses : 1
% 0.40/0.39 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 900
% 0.40/0.39 % ...number of literals in the above : 3160
% 0.40/0.39 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.40/0.39 % Current number of archived clauses : 6
% 0.40/0.39 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2
% 0.40/0.39 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.40/0.39 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.40/0.39 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 26
% 0.40/0.39 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 11
% 0.40/0.39 % BW rewrite match attempts : 70
% 0.40/0.39 % BW rewrite match successes : 7
% 0.40/0.39 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.40/0.39 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.40/0.39 % Termbank termtop insertions : 75067
% 0.40/0.39 % Search garbage collected termcells : 16975
% 0.40/0.39
% 0.40/0.39 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.40/0.39 % User time : 0.049 s
% 0.40/0.39 % System time : 0.011 s
% 0.40/0.39 % Total time : 0.060 s
% 0.40/0.39 % Maximum resident set size: 8284 pages
% 0.40/0.39
% 0.40/0.39 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.40/0.39 % User time : 0.068 s
% 0.40/0.39 % System time : 0.016 s
% 0.40/0.39 % Total time : 0.083 s
% 0.40/0.39 % Maximum resident set size: 5888 pages
% 0.40/0.39 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------