↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : ITP198^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:04:39 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.27s 0.49s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.27s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : ITP198^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.22  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.22  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.22  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.22  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.22  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.22  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.22  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.22  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 20:10:47 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.23  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.23  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.23/0.30  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.23/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.kqvONspAUv/E---3.1_1287034.p
% 0.27/0.49  % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 0.27/0.49  % Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSSSSLCHSA.
% 0.27/0.49  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.27/0.49  % Starting pre_casc_6 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.27/0.49  % Starting ehoh_best7 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.49  % Starting new_bool_8 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.49  % Starting new_ho_11 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.49  % pre_casc_6 with pid 1287047 completed with status 0
% 0.27/0.49  % Result found by pre_casc_6
% 0.27/0.49  % Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSSSSLCHSA.
% 0.27/0.49  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.27/0.49  % Starting pre_casc_6 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.27/0.49  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,3,,5,20000,1.0,true))
% 0.27/0.49  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,3,,5,20000,1.0,true)
% 0.27/0.49  % Search class: HGUSM-FFMF31-DHSFFSBN
% 0.27/0.49  % partial match(3): HGUSM-FFMF32-SHSFMSBN
% 0.27/0.49  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.27/0.49  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.49  % Starting pre_casc_6 with 151s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.49  % Starting sh3 with 271s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.49  % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 271s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.49  % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 271s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.49  % pre_casc_6 with pid 1287052 completed with status 0
% 0.27/0.49  % Result found by pre_casc_6
% 0.27/0.49  % Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSSSSLCHSA.
% 0.27/0.49  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.27/0.49  % Starting pre_casc_6 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.27/0.49  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,3,,5,20000,1.0,true))
% 0.27/0.49  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,3,,5,20000,1.0,true)
% 0.27/0.49  % Search class: HGUSM-FFMF31-DHSFFSBN
% 0.27/0.49  % partial match(3): HGUSM-FFMF32-SHSFMSBN
% 0.27/0.49  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.27/0.49  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.49  % Starting pre_casc_6 with 151s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.49  % Preprocessing time       : 0.004 s
% 0.27/0.49  
% 0.27/0.49  % Proof found!
% 0.27/0.49  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.27/0.49  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 0.27/0.49  thf(decl_sort1, type, char: $tType).
% 0.27/0.49  thf(decl_sort2, type, real: $tType).
% 0.27/0.49  thf(decl_sort3, type, set_variable_real: $tType).
% 0.27/0.49  thf(decl_sort4, type, produc104944723e_real: $tType).
% 0.27/0.49  thf(decl_sort5, type, produc1020032539e_real: $tType).
% 0.27/0.49  thf(decl_sort6, type, denotational_interp: $tType).
% 0.27/0.49  thf(decl_sort7, type, produc1993135732e_real: $tType).
% 0.27/0.49  thf(decl_26, type, denotational_Consts: denotational_interp > char > real).
% 0.27/0.49  thf(decl_27, type, denotational_Funcs: denotational_interp > char > real > real).
% 0.27/0.49  thf(decl_28, type, denotational_Games: denotational_interp > char > set_variable_real > set_variable_real).
% 0.27/0.49  thf(decl_29, type, denotational_Preds: denotational_interp > char > real > $o).
% 0.27/0.49  thf(decl_30, type, denota1150374853interp: produc1993135732e_real > denotational_interp).
% 0.27/0.49  thf(decl_40, type, if_real: $o > real > real > real).
% 0.27/0.49  thf(decl_49, type, produc2007437005e_real: (char > real > $o) > (char > set_variable_real > set_variable_real) > produc104944723e_real).
% 0.27/0.49  thf(decl_51, type, produc141013715e_real: (char > real > real) > produc104944723e_real > produc1020032539e_real).
% 0.27/0.49  thf(decl_55, type, produc2125489830e_real: (char > real) > produc1020032539e_real > produc1993135732e_real).
% 0.27/0.49  thf(decl_206, type, i: denotational_interp).
% 0.27/0.49  thf(decl_207, type, d: real).
% 0.27/0.49  thf(decl_208, type, f: char).
% 0.27/0.49  thf(decl_265, type, esk48_0: char > real).
% 0.27/0.49  thf(conj_0, conjecture, ((denotational_Preds @ (denota1150374853interp @ (produc2125489830e_real @ (^[X10:char]:(if_real @ (((X10)=(f))) @ d @ (denotational_Consts @ i @ X10))) @ (produc141013715e_real @ (denotational_Funcs @ i) @ (produc2007437005e_real @ (denotational_Preds @ i) @ (denotational_Games @ i))))))=(denotational_Preds @ i)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.kqvONspAUv/E---3.1_1287034.p', conj_0)).
% 0.27/0.49  thf(fact_0_Preds__mkinterp, axiom, ![X1:char > real, X2:char > real > real, X3:char > real > $o, X4:char > set_variable_real > set_variable_real]:(((denotational_Preds @ (denota1150374853interp @ (produc2125489830e_real @ X1 @ (produc141013715e_real @ X2 @ (produc2007437005e_real @ X3 @ X4)))))=(X3))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.kqvONspAUv/E---3.1_1287034.p', fact_0_Preds__mkinterp)).
% 0.27/0.49  thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ~(((denotational_Preds @ (denota1150374853interp @ (produc2125489830e_real @ (^[X10:char]:(if_real @ (((X10)=(f))) @ d @ (denotational_Consts @ i @ X10))) @ (produc141013715e_real @ (denotational_Funcs @ i) @ (produc2007437005e_real @ (denotational_Preds @ i) @ (denotational_Games @ i))))))=(denotational_Preds @ i))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0])).
% 0.27/0.49  thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ((denotational_Preds @ (denota1150374853interp @ (produc2125489830e_real @ (^[Z0:char]:(if_real @ (((Z0)=(f))) @ d @ (denotational_Consts @ i @ Z0))) @ (produc141013715e_real @ (denotational_Funcs @ i) @ (produc2007437005e_real @ (denotational_Preds @ i) @ (denotational_Games @ i))))))!=(denotational_Preds @ i)), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])).
% 0.27/0.49  thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ((denotational_Preds @ (denota1150374853interp @ (produc2125489830e_real @ (^[Z0:char]:(if_real @ (((Z0)=(f))) @ d @ (denotational_Consts @ i @ Z0))) @ (produc141013715e_real @ (denotational_Funcs @ i) @ (produc2007437005e_real @ (denotational_Preds @ i) @ (denotational_Games @ i))))))!=(denotational_Preds @ i)), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])).
% 0.27/0.49  thf(c_0_5, plain, ![X1490:char]:(((esk48_0 @ X1490)=(if_real @ (((X1490)=(f))) @ d @ (denotational_Consts @ i @ X1490)))), introduced(definition)).
% 0.27/0.49  thf(c_0_6, plain, ![X1282:char > real, X1283:char > real > real, X1284:char > real > $o, X1285:char > set_variable_real > set_variable_real]:(((denotational_Preds @ (denota1150374853interp @ (produc2125489830e_real @ X1282 @ (produc141013715e_real @ X1283 @ (produc2007437005e_real @ X1284 @ X1285)))))=(X1284))), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_0_Preds__mkinterp])).
% 0.27/0.49  thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ((denotational_Preds @ (denota1150374853interp @ (produc2125489830e_real @ esk48_0 @ (produc141013715e_real @ (denotational_Funcs @ i) @ (produc2007437005e_real @ (denotational_Preds @ i) @ (denotational_Games @ i))))))!=(denotational_Preds @ i)), inference(lift_lambdas,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]), c_0_5])).
% 0.27/0.49  thf(c_0_8, plain, ![X1:char > real, X2:char > real > real, X4:char > set_variable_real > set_variable_real, X3:char > real > $o]:(((denotational_Preds @ (denota1150374853interp @ (produc2125489830e_real @ X1 @ (produc141013715e_real @ X2 @ (produc2007437005e_real @ X3 @ X4)))))=(X3))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
% 0.27/0.49  thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_8])]), ['proof']).
% 0.27/0.49  % SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 0.27/0.49  % Parsed axioms                        : 581
% 0.27/0.49  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 528
% 0.27/0.49  % Initial clauses                      : 100
% 0.27/0.49  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 17
% 0.27/0.49  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 83
% 0.27/0.49  % Processed clauses                    : 37
% 0.27/0.49  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.27/0.49  % ...subsumed                          : 12
% 0.27/0.49  % ...remaining for further processing  : 25
% 0.27/0.49  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 24
% 0.27/0.49  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.27/0.49  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.27/0.49  % Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 0.27/0.49  % Generated clauses                    : 83
% 0.27/0.49  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 46
% 0.27/0.49  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.27/0.49  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.27/0.49  % Paramodulations                      : 30
% 0.27/0.49  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.27/0.49  % NegExts                              : 2
% 0.27/0.49  % Equation resolutions                 : 30
% 0.27/0.49  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.27/0.49  % Total rewrite steps                  : 1
% 0.27/0.49  % ...of those cached                   : 0
% 0.27/0.49  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.27/0.49  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.27/0.49  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.27/0.49  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.27/0.49  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.27/0.49  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.27/0.49  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.27/0.49  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.27/0.49  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.27/0.49  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.27/0.49  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.27/0.49  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.27/0.49  % Current number of processed clauses  : 24
% 0.27/0.49  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 11
% 0.27/0.49  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.27/0.49  %    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.27/0.49  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 13
% 0.27/0.49  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 92
% 0.27/0.49  % ...number of literals in the above   : 177
% 0.27/0.49  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.27/0.49  % Current number of archived clauses   : 1
% 0.27/0.49  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 28
% 0.27/0.49  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 27
% 0.27/0.49  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 12
% 0.27/0.49  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5
% 0.27/0.49  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.27/0.49  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
% 0.27/0.49  % BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 0.27/0.49  % Condensation attempts                : 37
% 0.27/0.49  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.27/0.49  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 12964
% 0.27/0.49  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 5861
% 0.27/0.49  
% 0.27/0.49  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.27/0.49  % User time                : 0.012 s
% 0.27/0.49  % System time              : 0.011 s
% 0.27/0.49  % Total time               : 0.023 s
% 0.27/0.49  % Maximum resident set size: 5852 pages
% 0.27/0.49  
% 0.27/0.49  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.27/0.49  % User time                : 0.063 s
% 0.27/0.49  % System time              : 0.038 s
% 0.27/0.49  % Total time               : 0.101 s
% 0.27/0.49  % Maximum resident set size: 6400 pages
% 0.27/0.49  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------