↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : ITP209^2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:07:11 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 7.87s 3.06s
% Output   : Refutation 7.87s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :   13
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   28 (  18 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   54 (  31 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  218 (   2   ~;   0   |;   2   &; 202   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  12  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   5 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   24 (  24   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   10 (   7 usr;   5 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   98 (  10   ^;  88   !;   0   ?;  98   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(a_type,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(syntax_ac_operator_decl,type,
    syntax_ac_operator: 
      !>[TA: $tType] : ( ( TA > TA > TA ) > $o ) ).

thf(syntax7388354845996824322omatch_decl,type,
    syntax7388354845996824322omatch: 
      !>[TA: $tType,TB: $tType] : ( TB > TA > $o ) ).

thf(syntax2379306206330768139omatch_decl,type,
    syntax2379306206330768139omatch: 
      !>[TA: $tType,TB: $tType] : ( TB > TA > $o ) ).

thf(a2_decl,type,
    a2: a ).

thf(b_decl,type,
    b: a ).

thf(c_decl,type,
    c: a ).

thf(f_decl,type,
    f: a > a > a ).

thf(7,axiom,
    ! [TA: $tType,TB: $tType] :
      ( ( syntax2379306206330768139omatch @ TA @ TB )
      = ( ^ [A: TA,B: TB] : $true ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_4_syntax__nomatch__def) ).

thf(27,plain,
    ! [TA: $tType,TB: $tType] :
      ( ( syntax2379306206330768139omatch @ TA @ TB )
      = ( ^ [A: TA,B: TB] : $true ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(11,axiom,
    ! [TA: $tType,A: TA > TA > TA,B: TA,C: TA,D: TA] :
      ( ( syntax_ac_operator @ TA @ A )
     => ( ( A @ B @ ( A @ C @ D ) )
        = ( A @ ( A @ B @ C ) @ D ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_8_ac__operator_Oleft__assoc) ).

thf(39,plain,
    ! [TA: $tType,A: TA > TA > TA,B: TA,C: TA,D: TA] :
      ( ( syntax_ac_operator @ TA @ A )
     => ( ( A @ B @ ( A @ C @ D ) )
        = ( A @ ( A @ B @ C ) @ D ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[11]) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ( ( f @ ( f @ a2 @ b ) @ c )
    = ( f @ ( f @ a2 @ c ) @ b ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_0) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( f @ ( f @ a2 @ b ) @ c )
   != ( f @ ( f @ a2 @ c ) @ b ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(15,plain,
    ( ( f @ ( f @ a2 @ b ) @ c )
   != ( f @ ( f @ a2 @ c ) @ b ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(12,axiom,
    ! [TA: $tType,A: TA > TA > TA,B: TA,C: TA,D: TA] :
      ( ( syntax_ac_operator @ TA @ A )
     => ( ( A @ ( A @ B @ C ) @ D )
        = ( A @ B @ ( A @ C @ D ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_9_ac__operator_Oright__assoc) ).

thf(42,plain,
    ! [TA: $tType,A: TA > TA > TA,B: TA,C: TA,D: TA] :
      ( ( syntax_ac_operator @ TA @ A )
     => ( ( A @ ( A @ B @ C ) @ D )
        = ( A @ B @ ( A @ C @ D ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(6,axiom,
    ! [A: a,B: a,C: a] :
      ( ( f @ ( f @ A @ B ) @ C )
      = ( f @ A @ ( f @ B @ C ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_3_right__assoc) ).

thf(24,plain,
    ! [A: a,B: a,C: a] :
      ( ( f @ ( f @ A @ B ) @ C )
      = ( f @ A @ ( f @ B @ C ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(5,axiom,
    ! [A: a,B: a,C: a] :
      ( ( f @ A @ ( f @ B @ C ) )
      = ( f @ B @ ( f @ A @ C ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_2_left__commute) ).

thf(21,plain,
    ! [A: a,B: a,C: a] :
      ( ( f @ A @ ( f @ B @ C ) )
      = ( f @ B @ ( f @ A @ C ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(9,axiom,
    ! [TA: $tType,A: TA > TA > TA] :
      ( ! [B: TA,C: TA,D: TA] :
          ( ( A @ ( A @ B @ C ) @ D )
          = ( A @ B @ ( A @ C @ D ) ) )
     => ( ! [B: TA,C: TA] :
            ( ( A @ B @ C )
            = ( A @ C @ B ) )
       => ( syntax_ac_operator @ TA @ A ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_6_ac__operator_Ointro) ).

thf(33,plain,
    ! [TA: $tType,A: TA > TA > TA] :
      ( ! [B: TA,C: TA,D: TA] :
          ( ( A @ ( A @ B @ C ) @ D )
          = ( A @ B @ ( A @ C @ D ) ) )
     => ( ! [B: TA,C: TA] :
            ( ( A @ B @ C )
            = ( A @ C @ B ) )
       => ( syntax_ac_operator @ TA @ A ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(13,axiom,
    ! [TA: $tType,A: TA > TA > TA,B: TA,C: TA,D: TA] :
      ( ( syntax_ac_operator @ TA @ A )
     => ( ( A @ B @ ( A @ C @ D ) )
        = ( A @ C @ ( A @ B @ D ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_10_ac__operator_Oleft__commute) ).

thf(45,plain,
    ! [TA: $tType,A: TA > TA > TA,B: TA,C: TA,D: TA] :
      ( ( syntax_ac_operator @ TA @ A )
     => ( ( A @ B @ ( A @ C @ D ) )
        = ( A @ C @ ( A @ B @ D ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[13]) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    syntax_ac_operator @ a @ f,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_0_ac__operator__axioms) ).

thf(17,plain,
    syntax_ac_operator @ a @ f,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(14,axiom,
    ! [TA: $tType] :
      ( ( syntax_ac_operator @ TA )
      = ( ^ [A: TA > TA > TA] :
            ( ! [B: TA,C: TA,D: TA] :
                ( ( A @ ( A @ B @ C ) @ D )
                = ( A @ B @ ( A @ C @ D ) ) )
            & ! [B: TA,C: TA] :
                ( ( A @ B @ C )
                = ( A @ C @ B ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_11_ac__operator__def) ).

thf(48,plain,
    ! [TA: $tType] :
      ( ( syntax_ac_operator @ TA )
      = ( ^ [A: TA > TA > TA] :
            ( ! [B: TA,C: TA,D: TA] :
                ( ( A @ ( A @ B @ C ) @ D )
                = ( A @ B @ ( A @ C @ D ) ) )
            & ! [B: TA,C: TA] :
                ( ( A @ B @ C )
                = ( A @ C @ B ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[14]) ).

thf(4,axiom,
    ! [A: a,B: a] :
      ( ( f @ A @ B )
      = ( f @ B @ A ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_1_commute) ).

thf(18,plain,
    ! [A: a,B: a] :
      ( ( f @ A @ B )
      = ( f @ B @ A ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(10,axiom,
    ! [TA: $tType,A: TA > TA > TA,B: TA,C: TA] :
      ( ( syntax_ac_operator @ TA @ A )
     => ( ( A @ B @ C )
        = ( A @ C @ B ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_7_ac__operator_Ocommute) ).

thf(36,plain,
    ! [TA: $tType,A: TA > TA > TA,B: TA,C: TA] :
      ( ( syntax_ac_operator @ TA @ A )
     => ( ( A @ B @ C )
        = ( A @ C @ B ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[10]) ).

thf(8,axiom,
    ! [TA: $tType,TB: $tType] :
      ( ( syntax7388354845996824322omatch @ TA @ TB )
      = ( ^ [A: TA,B: TB] : $true ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_5_syntax__fo__nomatch__def) ).

thf(30,plain,
    ! [TA: $tType,TB: $tType] :
      ( ( syntax7388354845996824322omatch @ TA @ TB )
      = ( ^ [A: TA,B: TB] : $true ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(51,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[27,39,15,42,24,21,33,45,17,48,18,36,30]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : ITP209^2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.0.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.13/0.24  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.24  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.24  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.24  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.13/0.24  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.13/0.24  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.24  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.24  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 20:19:45 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.24  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.24  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 1.05/0.82  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.55/1.04  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (216ms). 
% 1.55/1.05  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 2.22/1.45  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.22/1.46  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.44/1.55  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 12 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.44/1.59  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 12 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.62/1.64  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 2.62/1.65  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.62/1.65  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 7.87/3.06  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 7.87/3.06  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 7.87/3.06  % Time passed: 2673ms (effective reasoning time: 1997ms)
% 7.87/3.06  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 7.87/3.06  % Axioms used in derivation (12): fact_9_ac__operator_Oright__assoc, fact_2_left__commute, fact_10_ac__operator_Oleft__commute, fact_0_ac__operator__axioms, fact_3_right__assoc, fact_4_syntax__nomatch__def, fact_6_ac__operator_Ointro, fact_8_ac__operator_Oleft__assoc, fact_5_syntax__fo__nomatch__def, fact_7_ac__operator_Ocommute, fact_1_commute, fact_11_ac__operator__def
% 7.87/3.06  % No. of inferences in proof: 28
% 7.87/3.06  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 2673 ms resp. 1997 ms w/o parsing
% 7.87/3.11  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 7.87/3.11  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------