↑ Up

DT2H2X---1.9.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : DT2H2X---1.9.5
% Problem  : ITP209^3 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v8.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 25 08:56:52 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.68s 1.33s
% Output   : Refutation 1.68s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   12 (  12 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   12 (  11 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   85 (   5   ~;   0   |;   0   &;  80   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   3 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   13 (  11 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   13 (   0   ^;  13   !;   0   ?;  13   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(func_def_1,type,
    syntax_ac_operator_a: ( a > a > a ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_2,type,
    a2: a ).

thf(func_def_3,type,
    b: a ).

thf(func_def_4,type,
    c: a ).

thf(func_def_5,type,
    f: a > a > a ).

thf(func_def_17,type,
    sK0: ( a > a > a ) > a ).

thf(func_def_18,type,
    sK1: ( a > a > a ) > a ).

thf(func_def_19,type,
    sK2: ( a > a > a ) > a ).

thf(func_def_20,type,
    sK3: ( a > a > a ) > a ).

thf(func_def_21,type,
    sK4: ( a > a > a ) > a ).

thf(func_def_23,type,
    ph6: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(f52,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f51,f43]) ).

thf(f43,plain,
    ! [X2: a,X0: a,X1: a] :
      ( ( f @ X1 @ ( f @ X0 @ X2 ) )
      = ( f @ ( f @ X1 @ X0 ) @ X2 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f30]) ).

thf(f30,plain,
    ! [X0: a,X1: a,X2: a] :
      ( ( f @ X1 @ ( f @ X0 @ X2 ) )
      = ( f @ ( f @ X1 @ X0 ) @ X2 ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f4]) ).

thf(f4,axiom,
    ! [X1: a,X0: a,X2: a] :
      ( ( f @ X0 @ ( f @ X1 @ X2 ) )
      = ( f @ ( f @ X0 @ X1 ) @ X2 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.9jZzHO5U8A/DTF2THF_30761.p',fact_3_right__assoc) ).

thf(f51,plain,
    ( ( f @ ( f @ a2 @ b ) @ c )
   != ( f @ a2 @ ( f @ b @ c ) ) ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[status(thm)],[f50,f48]) ).

thf(f48,plain,
    ! [X0: a,X1: a] :
      ( ( f @ X0 @ X1 )
      = ( f @ X1 @ X0 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0: a,X1: a] :
      ( ( f @ X0 @ X1 )
      = ( f @ X1 @ X0 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.9jZzHO5U8A/DTF2THF_30761.p',fact_1_commute) ).

thf(f50,plain,
    ( ( f @ ( f @ a2 @ b ) @ c )
   != ( f @ a2 @ ( f @ c @ b ) ) ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[status(thm)],[f40,f43]) ).

thf(f40,plain,
    ( ( f @ ( f @ a2 @ b ) @ c )
   != ( f @ ( f @ a2 @ c ) @ b ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f28]) ).

thf(f28,plain,
    ( ( f @ ( f @ a2 @ b ) @ c )
   != ( f @ ( f @ a2 @ c ) @ b ) ),
    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f12]) ).

thf(f12,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( f @ ( f @ a2 @ b ) @ c )
   != ( f @ ( f @ a2 @ c ) @ b ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f11]) ).

thf(f11,conjecture,
    ( ( f @ ( f @ a2 @ b ) @ c )
    = ( f @ ( f @ a2 @ c ) @ b ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.9jZzHO5U8A/DTF2THF_30761.p',conj_0) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : ITP209^3 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v8.1.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.17/0.35  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.17/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.17/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.17/0.35  % DateTime : Tue Feb 24 08:31:20 EST 2026
% 0.17/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.35  Running /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.25/0.47  ---- Original DTF file ---
% 0.25/0.47  thf(spec,logic,$$dhol).
% 0.25/0.47  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/0.47  % File     : ITP209^3 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v8.1.0.
% 0.25/0.47  % Domain   : Interactive Theorem Proving
% 0.25/0.47  % Problem  : Sledgehammer problem Syntax_Match 00088_002922
% 0.25/0.47  % Version  : [Des22] axioms.
% 0.25/0.47  % English  :
% 0.25/0.47  
% 0.25/0.47  % Refs     : [BH+15] Blanchette et al. (2015), Mining the Archive of Formal
% 0.25/0.47  %          : [Des22] Desharnais (2022), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.25/0.47  % Source   : [Des22]
% 0.25/0.47  % Names    : 0023_Syntax_Match_00088_002922 [Des22]
% 0.25/0.47  
% 0.25/0.47  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.25/0.47  % Rating   : 0.00 v8.2.0, 0.08 v8.1.0
% 0.25/0.47  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   17 (   6 unt;   6 typ;   0 def)
% 0.25/0.47  %            Number of atoms       :   20 (  13 equ;   0 cnn)
% 0.25/0.47  %            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
% 0.25/0.47  %            Number of connectives :   93 (   0   ~;   0   |;   1   &;  86   @)
% 0.25/0.47  %                                         (   0 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.25/0.47  %            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   4 avg)
% 0.25/0.47  %            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
% 0.25/0.47  %            Number of type conns  :   17 (  17   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
% 0.25/0.47  %            Number of symbols     :    6 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.25/0.47  %            Number of variables   :   35 (   1   ^;  34   !;   0   ?;  35   :)
% 0.25/0.47  % SPC      : TH0_THM_EQU_NAR
% 0.25/0.47  
% 0.25/0.47  % Comments : This file was generated by Isabelle (most likely Sledgehammer)
% 0.25/0.47  %            from the van Emde Boas Trees session in the Archive of Formal
% 0.25/0.47  %            proofs - 
% 0.25/0.47  %            www.isa-afp.org/browser_info/current/AFP/Van_Emde_Boas_Trees
% 0.25/0.47  %            2022-02-17 14:22:46.652
% 0.25/0.47  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/0.47  % Could-be-implicit typings (1)
% 0.25/0.47  thf(ty_n_tf__a,type,
% 0.25/0.47      a: $tType ).
% 0.25/0.47  
% 0.25/0.47  % Explicit typings (5)
% 0.25/0.47  thf(sy_c_Syntax__Match_Oac__operator_001tf__a,type,
% 0.25/0.47      syntax_ac_operator_a: ( a > a > a ) > $o ).
% 0.25/0.47  
% 0.25/0.47  thf(sy_v_a,type,
% 0.25/0.47      a2: a ).
% 0.25/0.47  
% 0.25/0.47  thf(sy_v_b,type,
% 0.25/0.47      b: a ).
% 0.25/0.47  
% 0.25/0.47  thf(sy_v_c,type,
% 0.25/0.47      c: a ).
% 0.25/0.47  
% 0.25/0.47  thf(sy_v_f,type,
% 0.25/0.47      f: a > a > a ).
% 0.25/0.47  
% 0.25/0.47  % Relevant facts (10)
% 0.25/0.47  thf(fact_0_ac__operator__axioms,axiom,
% 0.25/0.47      syntax_ac_operator_a @ f ).
% 0.25/0.47  
% 0.25/0.47  % ac_operator_axioms
% 0.25/0.47  thf(fact_1_commute,axiom,
% 0.25/0.47      ! [A: a,B: a] :
% 0.25/0.47        ( ( f @ A @ B )
% 0.25/0.47        = ( f @ B @ A ) ) ).
% 0.25/0.47  
% 0.25/0.47  % commute
% 0.25/0.47  thf(fact_2_left__commute,axiom,
% 0.25/0.47      ! [A: a,B: a,C: a] :
% 0.25/0.47        ( ( f @ A @ ( f @ B @ C ) )
% 0.25/0.47        = ( f @ B @ ( f @ A @ C ) ) ) ).
% 0.25/0.47  
% 0.25/0.47  % left_commute
% 0.25/0.47  thf(fact_3_right__assoc,axiom,
% 0.25/0.47      ! [A: a,B: a,C: a] :
% 0.25/0.47        ( ( f @ ( f @ A @ B ) @ C )
% 0.25/0.47        = ( f @ A @ ( f @ B @ C ) ) ) ).
% 0.25/0.47  
% 0.25/0.47  % right_assoc
% 0.25/0.47  thf(fact_4_ac__operator_Ointro,axiom,
% 0.25/0.47      ! [F: a > a > a] :
% 0.25/0.47        ( ! [A2: a,B2: a,C2: a] :
% 0.25/0.47            ( ( F @ ( F @ A2 @ B2 ) @ C2 )
% 0.25/0.47            = ( F @ A2 @ ( F @ B2 @ C2 ) ) )
% 0.25/0.47       => ( ! [A2: a,B2: a] :
% 0.25/0.47              ( ( F @ A2 @ B2 )
% 0.25/0.47              = ( F @ B2 @ A2 ) )
% 0.25/0.47         => ( syntax_ac_operator_a @ F ) ) ) ).
% 0.25/0.47  
% 0.25/0.47  % ac_operator.intro
% 0.25/0.47  thf(fact_5_ac__operator_Ocommute,axiom,
% 0.25/0.47      ! [F: a > a > a,A: a,B: a] :
% 0.25/0.47        ( ( syntax_ac_operator_a @ F )
% 0.25/0.47       => ( ( F @ A @ B )
% 0.25/0.47          = ( F @ B @ A ) ) ) ).
% 0.25/0.47  
% 0.25/0.47  % ac_operator.commute
% 0.25/0.47  thf(fact_6_ac__operator_Oleft__assoc,axiom,
% 0.25/0.47      ! [F: a > a > a,A: a,B: a,C: a] :
% 0.25/0.47        ( ( syntax_ac_operator_a @ F )
% 0.25/0.47       => ( ( F @ A @ ( F @ B @ C ) )
% 0.25/0.47          = ( F @ ( F @ A @ B ) @ C ) ) ) ).
% 0.25/0.47  
% 0.25/0.47  % ac_operator.left_assoc
% 0.25/0.47  thf(fact_7_ac__operator_Oright__assoc,axiom,
% 0.25/0.47      ! [F: a > a > a,A: a,B: a,C: a] :
% 0.25/0.47        ( ( syntax_ac_operator_a @ F )
% 0.25/0.47       => ( ( F @ ( F @ A @ B ) @ C )
% 0.25/0.47          = ( F @ A @ ( F @ B @ C ) ) ) ) ).
% 0.25/0.47  
% 0.25/0.47  % ac_operator.right_assoc
% 0.25/0.47  thf(fact_8_ac__operator_Oleft__commute,axiom,
% 0.25/0.47      ! [F: a > a > a,A: a,B: a,C: a] :
% 0.25/0.47        ( ( syntax_ac_operator_a @ F )
% 0.25/0.47       => ( ( F @ A @ ( F @ B @ C ) )
% 0.25/0.47          = ( F @ B @ ( F @ A @ C ) ) ) ) ).
% 0.25/0.47  
% 0.25/0.47  % ac_operator.left_commute
% 0.25/0.47  thf(fact_9_ac__operator__def,axiom,
% 0.25/0.47      ( syntax_ac_operator_a
% 0.25/0.47      = ( ^ [F2: a > a > a] :
% 0.25/0.47            ( ! [A3: a,B3: a,C3: a] :
% 0.25/0.47                ( ( F2 @ ( F2 @ A3 @ B3 ) @ C3 )
% 0.25/0.47                = ( F2 @ A3 @ ( F2 @ B3 @ C3 ) ) )
% 0.25/0.47            & ! [A3: a,B3: a] :
% 0.25/0.47                ( ( F2 @ A3 @ B3 )
% 0.25/0.47                = ( F2 @ B3 @ A3 ) ) ) ) ) ).
% 0.25/0.47  
% 0.25/0.47  % ac_operator_def
% 0.25/0.47  
% 0.25/0.47  % Conjectures (1)
% 0.25/0.47  thf(conj_0,conjecture,
% 0.25/0.47      ( ( f @ ( f @ a2 @ b ) @ c )
% 0.25/0.47      = ( f @ ( f @ a2 @ c ) @ b ) ) ).
% 0.25/0.47  
% 0.25/0.47  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/0.47  ------------------------
% 1.49/1.29  ---- Embedded in THF ---
% 1.49/1.30  %%% This output was generated by embedproblem, version 1.9.5 (library version 1.9).
% 1.49/1.30  %%% Generated on Tue Feb 24 08:31:21 EST 2026
% 1.49/1.30  %%% using '$$dhol' embedding, version 1.3.0.
% 1.49/1.30  %%% Logic specification used:
% 1.49/1.30  %%% thf(spec, logic, $$dhol).
% 1.49/1.30  
% 1.49/1.30  % SZS output start ListOfTHF for /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.9jZzHO5U8A/DTF2DTF30761.p
% See solution above
% 1.49/1.30  ------------------------
% 1.68/1.31  ---- Cleaned THF ---
% 1.68/1.31  thf(ty_n_tf__a,type,
% 1.68/1.31      a: $tType ).
% 1.68/1.31  
% 1.68/1.31  thf(sy_c_Syntax__Match_Oac__operator_001tf__a,type,
% 1.68/1.31      syntax_ac_operator_a: ( a > a > a ) > $o ).
% 1.68/1.31  
% 1.68/1.31  thf(sy_v_a,type,
% 1.68/1.31      a2: a ).
% 1.68/1.31  
% 1.68/1.31  thf(sy_v_b,type,
% 1.68/1.31      b: a ).
% 1.68/1.31  
% 1.68/1.31  thf(sy_v_c,type,
% 1.68/1.31      c: a ).
% 1.68/1.31  
% 1.68/1.31  thf(sy_v_f,type,
% 1.68/1.31      f: a > a > a ).
% 1.68/1.31  
% 1.68/1.31  thf(fact_0_ac__operator__axioms,axiom,
% 1.68/1.31      syntax_ac_operator_a @ f ).
% 1.68/1.31  
% 1.68/1.31  thf(fact_1_commute,axiom,
% 1.68/1.31      ! [A: a,B: a] :
% 1.68/1.31        ( ( f @ A @ B )
% 1.68/1.31        = ( f @ B @ A ) ) ).
% 1.68/1.31  
% 1.68/1.31  thf(fact_2_left__commute,axiom,
% 1.68/1.31      ! [A: a,B: a,C: a] :
% 1.68/1.31        ( ( f @ A @ ( f @ B @ C ) )
% 1.68/1.31        = ( f @ B @ ( f @ A @ C ) ) ) ).
% 1.68/1.31  
% 1.68/1.31  thf(fact_3_right__assoc,axiom,
% 1.68/1.31      ! [A: a,B: a,C: a] :
% 1.68/1.31        ( ( f @ ( f @ A @ B ) @ C )
% 1.68/1.31        = ( f @ A @ ( f @ B @ C ) ) ) ).
% 1.68/1.31  
% 1.68/1.31  thf(fact_4_ac__operator_Ointro,axiom,
% 1.68/1.31      ! [F: a > a > a] :
% 1.68/1.31        ( ! [A2: a,B2: a,C2: a] :
% 1.68/1.31            ( ( F @ ( F @ A2 @ B2 ) @ C2 )
% 1.68/1.31            = ( F @ A2 @ ( F @ B2 @ C2 ) ) )
% 1.68/1.31       => ( ! [A2: a,B2: a] :
% 1.68/1.31              ( ( F @ A2 @ B2 )
% 1.68/1.31              = ( F @ B2 @ A2 ) )
% 1.68/1.31         => ( syntax_ac_operator_a @ F ) ) ) ).
% 1.68/1.31  
% 1.68/1.31  thf(fact_5_ac__operator_Ocommute,axiom,
% 1.68/1.31      ! [F: a > a > a,A: a,B: a] :
% 1.68/1.31        ( ( syntax_ac_operator_a @ F )
% 1.68/1.31       => ( ( F @ A @ B )
% 1.68/1.31          = ( F @ B @ A ) ) ) ).
% 1.68/1.31  
% 1.68/1.31  thf(fact_6_ac__operator_Oleft__assoc,axiom,
% 1.68/1.31      ! [F: a > a > a,A: a,B: a,C: a] :
% 1.68/1.31        ( ( syntax_ac_operator_a @ F )
% 1.68/1.31       => ( ( F @ A @ ( F @ B @ C ) )
% 1.68/1.31          = ( F @ ( F @ A @ B ) @ C ) ) ) ).
% 1.68/1.31  
% 1.68/1.31  thf(fact_7_ac__operator_Oright__assoc,axiom,
% 1.68/1.31      ! [F: a > a > a,A: a,B: a,C: a] :
% 1.68/1.31        ( ( syntax_ac_operator_a @ F )
% 1.68/1.31       => ( ( F @ ( F @ A @ B ) @ C )
% 1.68/1.31          = ( F @ A @ ( F @ B @ C ) ) ) ) ).
% 1.68/1.31  
% 1.68/1.31  thf(fact_8_ac__operator_Oleft__commute,axiom,
% 1.68/1.31      ! [F: a > a > a,A: a,B: a,C: a] :
% 1.68/1.31        ( ( syntax_ac_operator_a @ F )
% 1.68/1.31       => ( ( F @ A @ ( F @ B @ C ) )
% 1.68/1.31          = ( F @ B @ ( F @ A @ C ) ) ) ) ).
% 1.68/1.31  
% 1.68/1.31  thf(fact_9_ac__operator__def,axiom,
% 1.68/1.31      ( syntax_ac_operator_a
% 1.68/1.31      = ( ^ [F2: a > a > a] :
% 1.68/1.31            ( ! [A3: a,B3: a,C3: a] :
% 1.68/1.31                ( ( F2 @ ( F2 @ A3 @ B3 ) @ C3 )
% 1.68/1.31                = ( F2 @ A3 @ ( F2 @ B3 @ C3 ) ) )
% 1.68/1.31            & ! [A3: a,B3: a] :
% 1.68/1.31                ( ( F2 @ A3 @ B3 )
% 1.68/1.31                = ( F2 @ B3 @ A3 ) ) ) ) ) ).
% 1.68/1.31  
% 1.68/1.31  thf(conj_0,conjecture,
% 1.68/1.31      ( ( f @ ( f @ a2 @ b ) @ c )
% 1.68/1.31      = ( f @ ( f @ a2 @ c ) @ b ) ) ).
% 1.68/1.31  ------------------------
% 1.68/1.32  % (31038)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_30761 for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 1.68/1.32  % (31038)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.68/1.32  % (31038)------------------------------
% 1.68/1.32  % (31038)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.68/1.32  % (31038)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.68/1.32  % (31038)Termination phase: shuffling
% 1.68/1.32  
% 1.68/1.32  % (31038)Memory used [KB]: 1023
% 1.68/1.32  % (31038)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 1.68/1.32  % (31038)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.68/1.32  % (31038)------------------------------
% 1.68/1.32  % (31038)------------------------------
% 1.68/1.32  % (31039)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_30761 for (2999ds/275Mi)
% 1.68/1.33  % (31039)First to succeed.
% 1.68/1.33  % (31039)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.68/1.33  % SZS status Theorem for DTF2THF_30761
% 1.68/1.33  % SZS output start Proof for DTF2THF_30761
% 1.68/1.33  thf(type_def_5, type, a: $tType).
% 1.68/1.33  thf(func_def_0, type, a: $tType).
% 1.68/1.33  thf(func_def_1, type, syntax_ac_operator_a: (a > a > a) > $o).
% 1.68/1.33  thf(func_def_2, type, a2: a).
% 1.68/1.33  thf(func_def_3, type, b: a).
% 1.68/1.33  thf(func_def_4, type, c: a).
% 1.68/1.33  thf(func_def_5, type, f: a > a > a).
% 1.68/1.33  thf(func_def_17, type, sK0: (a > a > a) > a).
% 1.68/1.33  thf(func_def_18, type, sK1: (a > a > a) > a).
% 1.68/1.33  thf(func_def_19, type, sK2: (a > a > a) > a).
% 1.68/1.33  thf(func_def_20, type, sK3: (a > a > a) > a).
% 1.68/1.33  thf(func_def_21, type, sK4: (a > a > a) > a).
% 1.68/1.33  thf(func_def_23, type, ph6: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)).
% 1.68/1.33  thf(f52,plain,(
% 1.68/1.33    $false),
% 1.68/1.33    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f51,f43])).
% 1.68/1.33  thf(f43,plain,(
% 1.68/1.33    ( ! [X2 : a,X0 : a,X1 : a] : (((f @ X1 @ (f @ X0 @ X2)) = (f @ (f @ X1 @ X0) @ X2))) )),
% 1.68/1.33    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f30])).
% 1.68/1.33  thf(f30,plain,(
% 1.68/1.33    ! [X0 : a,X1 : a,X2 : a] : ((f @ X1 @ (f @ X0 @ X2)) = (f @ (f @ X1 @ X0) @ X2))),
% 1.68/1.33    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f4])).
% 1.68/1.33  thf(f4,axiom,(
% 1.68/1.33    ! [X1 : a,X0 : a,X2 : a] : ((f @ X0 @ (f @ X1 @ X2)) = (f @ (f @ X0 @ X1) @ X2))),
% 1.68/1.33    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.9jZzHO5U8A/DTF2THF_30761.p',fact_3_right__assoc)).
% 1.68/1.33  thf(f51,plain,(
% 1.68/1.33    ((f @ (f @ a2 @ b) @ c) != (f @ a2 @ (f @ b @ c)))),
% 1.68/1.33    inference(forward_demodulation,[status(thm)],[f50,f48])).
% 1.68/1.33  thf(f48,plain,(
% 1.68/1.33    ( ! [X0 : a,X1 : a] : (((f @ X0 @ X1) = (f @ X1 @ X0))) )),
% 1.68/1.33    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f2])).
% 1.68/1.33  thf(f2,axiom,(
% 1.68/1.33    ! [X0 : a,X1 : a] : ((f @ X0 @ X1) = (f @ X1 @ X0))),
% 1.68/1.33    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.9jZzHO5U8A/DTF2THF_30761.p',fact_1_commute)).
% 1.68/1.33  thf(f50,plain,(
% 1.68/1.33    ((f @ (f @ a2 @ b) @ c) != (f @ a2 @ (f @ c @ b)))),
% 1.68/1.33    inference(forward_demodulation,[status(thm)],[f40,f43])).
% 1.68/1.33  thf(f40,plain,(
% 1.68/1.33    ((f @ (f @ a2 @ b) @ c) != (f @ (f @ a2 @ c) @ b))),
% 1.68/1.33    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f28])).
% 1.68/1.33  thf(f28,plain,(
% 1.68/1.33    ((f @ (f @ a2 @ b) @ c) != (f @ (f @ a2 @ c) @ b))),
% 1.68/1.33    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f12])).
% 1.68/1.33  thf(f12,negated_conjecture,(
% 1.68/1.33    ~((f @ (f @ a2 @ b) @ c) = (f @ (f @ a2 @ c) @ b))),
% 1.68/1.33    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f11])).
% 1.68/1.33  thf(f11,conjecture,(
% 1.68/1.33    ((f @ (f @ a2 @ b) @ c) = (f @ (f @ a2 @ c) @ b))),
% 1.68/1.33    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.9jZzHO5U8A/DTF2THF_30761.p',conj_0)).
% 1.68/1.33  % SZS output end Proof for DTF2THF_30761
% 1.68/1.33  % (31039)------------------------------
% 1.68/1.33  % (31039)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.68/1.33  % (31039)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.68/1.33  
% 1.68/1.33  % (31039)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.68/1.33  % (31039)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.68/1.33  % (31039)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 1.68/1.33  % (31039)------------------------------
% 1.68/1.33  % (31039)------------------------------
% 1.68/1.33  % (31033)Success in time 0.013 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------