↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : ITP220_1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:54:39 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 103.00s 16.85s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 103.00s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   20 (  16 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   28 (  10 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   20 (  12   ~;   4   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :   11 (  10 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   17 (  17 usr;   9 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   13 (   0 sgn  13   !;   0   ?;  13   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_sort1,type,
    fun_nat_bool: $tType ).

tff(decl_sort2,type,
    fun_nat_fun_nat_bool: $tType ).

tff(decl_sort3,type,
    nat: $tType ).

tff(decl_sort4,type,
    fun_nat_nat: $tType ).

tff(decl_sort5,type,
    num: $tType ).

tff(decl_sort6,type,
    fun_nat_fun_nat_nat: $tType ).

tff(decl_sort7,type,
    vEBT_VEBT: $tType ).

tff(decl_sort8,type,
    bool: $tType ).

tff(decl_sort9,type,
    fun_num_nat: $tType ).

tff(decl_sort10,type,
    fun_num_num: $tType ).

tff(decl_574,type,
    one_one_nat: nat ).

tff(decl_724,type,
    suc: fun_nat_nat ).

tff(decl_793,type,
    bit0: fun_num_num ).

tff(decl_795,type,
    one: num ).

tff(decl_804,type,
    numeral_numeral_nat: fun_num_nat ).

tff(decl_955,type,
    divide_divide_nat: fun_nat_fun_nat_nat ).

tff(decl_962,type,
    dvd_dvd_nat: fun_nat_fun_nat_bool ).

tff(decl_1084,type,
    vEBT_VEBT_membermima: vEBT_VEBT > fun_nat_bool ).

tff(decl_1092,type,
    vEBT_vebt_buildup: nat > vEBT_VEBT ).

tff(decl_1153,type,
    aa_nat_bool: ( nat * fun_nat_bool ) > bool ).

tff(decl_1156,type,
    aa_nat_nat: ( nat * fun_nat_nat ) > nat ).

tff(decl_1170,type,
    aa_nat_fun_nat_bool: ( nat * fun_nat_fun_nat_bool ) > fun_nat_bool ).

tff(decl_1172,type,
    aa_nat_fun_nat_nat: ( nat * fun_nat_fun_nat_nat ) > fun_nat_nat ).

tff(decl_1189,type,
    aa_num_nat: ( num * fun_num_nat ) > nat ).

tff(decl_1190,type,
    aa_num_num: ( num * fun_num_num ) > num ).

tff(decl_1308,type,
    pp: bool > $o ).

tff(decl_1309,type,
    va: nat ).

tff(decl_1310,type,
    y: nat ).

tff(conj_0,conjecture,
    ~ pp(aa_nat_bool(vEBT_VEBT_membermima(vEBT_vebt_buildup(aa_nat_nat(aa_nat_fun_nat_nat(divide_divide_nat,aa_nat_nat(suc,aa_nat_nat(suc,va))),aa_num_nat(numeral_numeral_nat,aa_num_num(bit0,one))))),y)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_0) ).

tff(fact_1__C3_OIH_C_I1_J,axiom,
    ! [X1: nat,X2: nat] :
      ( pp(aa_nat_bool(aa_nat_fun_nat_bool(dvd_dvd_nat,aa_num_nat(numeral_numeral_nat,aa_num_num(bit0,one))),aa_nat_nat(suc,aa_nat_nat(suc,va))))
     => ( ( X1 = aa_nat_nat(aa_nat_fun_nat_nat(divide_divide_nat,aa_nat_nat(suc,aa_nat_nat(suc,va))),aa_num_nat(numeral_numeral_nat,aa_num_num(bit0,one))) )
       => ~ pp(aa_nat_bool(vEBT_VEBT_membermima(vEBT_vebt_buildup(X1)),X2)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_1__C3_OIH_C_I1_J) ).

tff(fact_4_div2__Suc__Suc,axiom,
    ! [X3: nat] : ( aa_nat_nat(aa_nat_fun_nat_nat(divide_divide_nat,aa_nat_nat(suc,aa_nat_nat(suc,X3))),aa_num_nat(numeral_numeral_nat,aa_num_num(bit0,one))) = aa_nat_nat(suc,aa_nat_nat(aa_nat_fun_nat_nat(divide_divide_nat,X3),aa_num_nat(numeral_numeral_nat,aa_num_num(bit0,one)))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_4_div2__Suc__Suc) ).

tff(fact_525_Suc__1,axiom,
    aa_nat_nat(suc,one_one_nat) = aa_num_nat(numeral_numeral_nat,aa_num_num(bit0,one)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_525_Suc__1) ).

tff(fact_0_True,axiom,
    pp(aa_nat_bool(aa_nat_fun_nat_bool(dvd_dvd_nat,aa_num_nat(numeral_numeral_nat,aa_num_num(bit0,one))),aa_nat_nat(suc,aa_nat_nat(suc,va)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_0_True) ).

tff(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ~ pp(aa_nat_bool(vEBT_VEBT_membermima(vEBT_vebt_buildup(aa_nat_nat(aa_nat_fun_nat_nat(divide_divide_nat,aa_nat_nat(suc,aa_nat_nat(suc,va))),aa_num_nat(numeral_numeral_nat,aa_num_num(bit0,one))))),y)),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0]) ).

tff(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X1: nat,X2: nat] :
      ( pp(aa_nat_bool(aa_nat_fun_nat_bool(dvd_dvd_nat,aa_num_nat(numeral_numeral_nat,aa_num_num(bit0,one))),aa_nat_nat(suc,aa_nat_nat(suc,va))))
     => ( ( X1 = aa_nat_nat(aa_nat_fun_nat_nat(divide_divide_nat,aa_nat_nat(suc,aa_nat_nat(suc,va))),aa_num_nat(numeral_numeral_nat,aa_num_num(bit0,one))) )
       => ~ pp(aa_nat_bool(vEBT_VEBT_membermima(vEBT_vebt_buildup(X1)),X2)) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_1__C3_OIH_C_I1_J]) ).

tff(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X17026: nat] : ( aa_nat_nat(aa_nat_fun_nat_nat(divide_divide_nat,aa_nat_nat(suc,aa_nat_nat(suc,X17026))),aa_num_nat(numeral_numeral_nat,aa_num_num(bit0,one))) = aa_nat_nat(suc,aa_nat_nat(aa_nat_fun_nat_nat(divide_divide_nat,X17026),aa_num_nat(numeral_numeral_nat,aa_num_num(bit0,one)))) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_4_div2__Suc__Suc]) ).

tff(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    pp(aa_nat_bool(vEBT_VEBT_membermima(vEBT_vebt_buildup(aa_nat_nat(aa_nat_fun_nat_nat(divide_divide_nat,aa_nat_nat(suc,aa_nat_nat(suc,va))),aa_num_nat(numeral_numeral_nat,aa_num_num(bit0,one))))),y)),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

tff(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X16714: nat,X16715: nat] :
      ( ~ pp(aa_nat_bool(vEBT_VEBT_membermima(vEBT_vebt_buildup(X16714)),X16715))
      | ( X16714 != aa_nat_nat(aa_nat_fun_nat_nat(divide_divide_nat,aa_nat_nat(suc,aa_nat_nat(suc,va))),aa_num_nat(numeral_numeral_nat,aa_num_num(bit0,one))) )
      | ~ pp(aa_nat_bool(aa_nat_fun_nat_bool(dvd_dvd_nat,aa_num_nat(numeral_numeral_nat,aa_num_num(bit0,one))),aa_nat_nat(suc,aa_nat_nat(suc,va)))) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])]) ).

tcf(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X1: nat] : aa_nat_nat(aa_nat_fun_nat_nat(divide_divide_nat,aa_nat_nat(suc,aa_nat_nat(suc,X1))),aa_num_nat(numeral_numeral_nat,aa_num_num(bit0,one))) = aa_nat_nat(suc,aa_nat_nat(aa_nat_fun_nat_nat(divide_divide_nat,X1),aa_num_nat(numeral_numeral_nat,aa_num_num(bit0,one)))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

tcf(c_0_11,plain,
    aa_nat_nat(suc,one_one_nat) = aa_num_nat(numeral_numeral_nat,aa_num_num(bit0,one)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_525_Suc__1]) ).

tcf(c_0_12,plain,
    pp(aa_nat_bool(aa_nat_fun_nat_bool(dvd_dvd_nat,aa_num_nat(numeral_numeral_nat,aa_num_num(bit0,one))),aa_nat_nat(suc,aa_nat_nat(suc,va)))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_0_True]) ).

tcf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    pp(aa_nat_bool(vEBT_VEBT_membermima(vEBT_vebt_buildup(aa_nat_nat(aa_nat_fun_nat_nat(divide_divide_nat,aa_nat_nat(suc,aa_nat_nat(suc,va))),aa_num_nat(numeral_numeral_nat,aa_num_num(bit0,one))))),y)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

tcf(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X1: nat,X2: nat] :
      ( ~ pp(aa_nat_bool(vEBT_VEBT_membermima(vEBT_vebt_buildup(X1)),X2))
      | ( X1 != aa_nat_nat(aa_nat_fun_nat_nat(divide_divide_nat,aa_nat_nat(suc,aa_nat_nat(suc,va))),aa_num_nat(numeral_numeral_nat,aa_num_num(bit0,one))) )
      | ~ pp(aa_nat_bool(aa_nat_fun_nat_bool(dvd_dvd_nat,aa_num_nat(numeral_numeral_nat,aa_num_num(bit0,one))),aa_nat_nat(suc,aa_nat_nat(suc,va)))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

tcf(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X1: nat] : aa_nat_nat(aa_nat_fun_nat_nat(divide_divide_nat,aa_nat_nat(suc,aa_nat_nat(suc,X1))),aa_nat_nat(suc,one_one_nat)) = aa_nat_nat(suc,aa_nat_nat(aa_nat_fun_nat_nat(divide_divide_nat,X1),aa_nat_nat(suc,one_one_nat))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_11]) ).

tcf(c_0_16,plain,
    pp(aa_nat_bool(aa_nat_fun_nat_bool(dvd_dvd_nat,aa_nat_nat(suc,one_one_nat)),aa_nat_nat(suc,aa_nat_nat(suc,va)))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_11]) ).

tcf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    pp(aa_nat_bool(vEBT_VEBT_membermima(vEBT_vebt_buildup(aa_nat_nat(aa_nat_fun_nat_nat(divide_divide_nat,aa_nat_nat(suc,aa_nat_nat(suc,va))),aa_nat_nat(suc,one_one_nat)))),y)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_11]) ).

tcf(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X1: nat] : ~ pp(aa_nat_bool(vEBT_VEBT_membermima(vEBT_vebt_buildup(aa_nat_nat(suc,aa_nat_nat(aa_nat_fun_nat_nat(divide_divide_nat,va),aa_nat_nat(suc,one_one_nat))))),X1)),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_11]),c_0_15]),c_0_11]),c_0_16])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_15]),c_0_18]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : ITP220_1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.0.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.40  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.40  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.40  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.40  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.13/0.40  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.13/0.40  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.40  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.40  % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 22:10:03 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.41  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.41  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.46  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.46  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 103.00/16.85  % Version: 3.5.1
% 103.00/16.85  % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 103.00/16.85  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 103.00/16.85  % Starting new_bool_3 with 900s (3) cores
% 103.00/16.85  % Starting new_bool_1 with 900s (3) cores
% 103.00/16.85  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 103.00/16.85  % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 300s (1) cores
% 103.00/16.85  % new_bool_1 with pid 1856897 completed with status 0
% 103.00/16.85  % Result found by new_bool_1
% 103.00/16.85  % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 103.00/16.85  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 103.00/16.85  % Starting new_bool_3 with 900s (3) cores
% 103.00/16.85  % Starting new_bool_1 with 900s (3) cores
% 103.00/16.85  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 103.00/16.85  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 103.00/16.85  % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 103.00/16.85  % Scheduled 13 strats onto 3 cores with 899 seconds (899 total)
% 103.00/16.85  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 81s (1) cores
% 103.00/16.85  % Starting new_bool_1 with 90s (1) cores
% 103.00/16.85  % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 68s (1) cores
% 103.00/16.85  % G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with pid 1856903 completed with status 0
% 103.00/16.85  % Result found by G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI
% 103.00/16.85  % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 103.00/16.85  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 103.00/16.85  % Starting new_bool_3 with 900s (3) cores
% 103.00/16.85  % Starting new_bool_1 with 900s (3) cores
% 103.00/16.85  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 103.00/16.85  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 103.00/16.85  % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 103.00/16.85  % Scheduled 13 strats onto 3 cores with 899 seconds (899 total)
% 103.00/16.85  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 81s (1) cores
% 103.00/16.85  % Starting new_bool_1 with 90s (1) cores
% 103.00/16.85  % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 68s (1) cores
% 103.00/16.85  % Preprocessing time       : 0.382 s
% 103.00/16.85  
% 103.00/16.85  % Proof found!
% 103.00/16.85  % SZS status Theorem
% 103.00/16.85  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 103.00/16.85  % Parsed axioms                        : 11990
% 103.00/16.85  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 8404
% 103.00/16.85  % Initial clauses                      : 8940
% 103.00/16.85  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 1545
% 103.00/16.85  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 7395
% 103.00/16.85  % Processed clauses                    : 7514
% 103.00/16.85  % ...of these trivial                  : 328
% 103.00/16.85  % ...subsumed                          : 1181
% 103.00/16.85  % ...remaining for further processing  : 6004
% 103.00/16.85  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 2250
% 103.00/16.85  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 103.00/16.85  % Backward-subsumed                    : 61
% 103.00/16.85  % Backward-rewritten                   : 98
% 103.00/16.85  % Generated clauses                    : 233899
% 103.00/16.85  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 220924
% 103.00/16.85  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 103.00/16.85  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 59
% 103.00/16.85  % Paramodulations                      : 232192
% 103.00/16.85  % Factorizations                       : 49
% 103.00/16.85  % NegExts                              : 0
% 103.00/16.85  % Equation resolutions                 : 2333
% 103.00/16.85  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 103.00/16.85  % Total rewrite steps                  : 62869
% 103.00/16.85  % ...of those cached                   : 54817
% 103.00/16.85  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 103.00/16.85  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 103.00/16.85  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 103.00/16.85  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 103.00/16.85  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 103.00/16.85  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 103.00/16.85  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 103.00/16.85  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 103.00/16.85  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 103.00/16.85  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 103.00/16.85  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 103.00/16.85  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 103.00/16.85  % Current number of processed clauses  : 4610
% 103.00/16.85  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 611
% 103.00/16.85  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 53
% 103.00/16.85  %    Negative unit clauses             : 146
% 103.00/16.85  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 3800
% 103.00/16.85  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 220764
% 103.00/16.85  % ...number of literals in the above   : 1061169
% 103.00/16.85  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 103.00/16.85  % Current number of archived clauses   : 159
% 103.00/16.85  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 13041960
% 103.00/16.85  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 821162
% 103.00/16.85  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1061
% 103.00/16.85  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 41710
% 103.00/16.85  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 103.00/16.85  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 8586
% 103.00/16.85  % BW rewrite match successes           : 316
% 103.00/16.85  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 103.00/16.85  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 103.00/16.85  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 9072215
% 103.00/16.85  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 169444
% 103.00/16.85  
% 103.00/16.85  % -------------------------------------------------
% 103.00/16.85  % User time                : 15.172 s
% 103.00/16.85  % System time              : 0.242 s
% 103.00/16.85  % Total time               : 15.414 s
% 103.00/16.85  % Maximum resident set size: 47376 pages
% 103.00/16.85  
% 103.00/16.85  % -------------------------------------------------
% 103.00/16.85  % User time                : 43.440 s
% 103.00/16.85  % System time              : 0.644 s
% 103.00/16.85  % Total time               : 44.084 s
% 103.00/16.85  % Maximum resident set size: 28672 pages
% 103.00/16.85  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------