%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : ITP222_1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:54:40 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 6.03s 3.28s
% Output : CNFRefutation 6.03s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 8 ( 8 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 8 ( 7 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 4 ( 4 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 2 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 2 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn 0 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_sort1,type,
extended_enat: $tType ).
tff(decl_sort2,type,
vEBT_VEBT: $tType ).
tff(decl_705,type,
extend5688581933313929465d_enat: extended_enat ).
tff(decl_1419,type,
vEBT_VEBT_elim_dead: ( extended_enat * vEBT_VEBT ) > vEBT_VEBT ).
tff(decl_1808,type,
summarya: vEBT_VEBT ).
tff(conj_0,conjecture,
vEBT_VEBT_elim_dead(summarya,extend5688581933313929465d_enat) = summarya,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_0) ).
tff(fact_1__C2_OIH_C_I2_J,axiom,
vEBT_VEBT_elim_dead(summarya,extend5688581933313929465d_enat) = summarya,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_1__C2_OIH_C_I2_J) ).
tff(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
vEBT_VEBT_elim_dead(summarya,extend5688581933313929465d_enat) != summarya,
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0]) ).
tff(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
vEBT_VEBT_elim_dead(summarya,extend5688581933313929465d_enat) != summarya,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
tff(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
vEBT_VEBT_elim_dead(summarya,extend5688581933313929465d_enat) != summarya,
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
tcf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
vEBT_VEBT_elim_dead(summarya,extend5688581933313929465d_enat) != summarya,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
tcf(c_0_6,plain,
vEBT_VEBT_elim_dead(summarya,extend5688581933313929465d_enat) = summarya,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_1__C2_OIH_C_I2_J]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : ITP222_1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.0.0.
% 0.00/0.06 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.37 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.38 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 22:11:18 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.43 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.43 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 6.03/3.28 % Version: 3.5.1
% 6.03/3.28 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 6.03/3.28 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 299 seconds (2392 total)
% 6.03/3.28 % Starting new_bool_3 with 897s (3) cores
% 6.03/3.28 % Starting new_bool_1 with 897s (3) cores
% 6.03/3.28 % Starting sh5l with 299s (1) cores
% 6.03/3.28 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 299s (1) cores
% 6.03/3.28 % new_bool_3 with pid 1324359 completed with status 0
% 6.03/3.28 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 6.03/3.28 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 6.03/3.28 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 299 seconds (2392 total)
% 6.03/3.28 % Starting new_bool_3 with 897s (3) cores
% 6.03/3.28 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 6.03/3.28 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 6.03/3.28 % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 6.03/3.28 % Scheduled 13 strats onto 3 cores with 896 seconds (896 total)
% 6.03/3.28 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 81s (1) cores
% 6.03/3.28 % Starting new_bool_3 with 90s (1) cores
% 6.03/3.28 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 68s (1) cores
% 6.03/3.28 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1324363 completed with status 0
% 6.03/3.28 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 6.03/3.28 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 6.03/3.28 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 299 seconds (2392 total)
% 6.03/3.28 % Starting new_bool_3 with 897s (3) cores
% 6.03/3.28 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 6.03/3.28 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 6.03/3.28 % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 6.03/3.28 % Scheduled 13 strats onto 3 cores with 896 seconds (896 total)
% 6.03/3.28 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 81s (1) cores
% 6.03/3.28 % Preprocessing time : 0.110 s
% 6.03/3.28
% 6.03/3.28 % Proof found!
% 6.03/3.28 % SZS status Theorem
% 6.03/3.28 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 6.03/3.28 % Parsed axioms : 13038
% 6.03/3.28 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 11428
% 6.03/3.28 % Initial clauses : 10429
% 6.03/3.28 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 137
% 6.03/3.28 % Initial clauses in saturation : 10292
% 6.03/3.28 % Processed clauses : 18
% 6.03/3.28 % ...of these trivial : 1
% 6.03/3.28 % ...subsumed : 1
% 6.03/3.28 % ...remaining for further processing : 15
% 6.03/3.28 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 6.03/3.28 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 6.03/3.28 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 6.03/3.28 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 6.03/3.28 % Generated clauses : 1
% 6.03/3.28 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1
% 6.03/3.28 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 6.03/3.28 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 6.03/3.28 % Paramodulations : 0
% 6.03/3.28 % Factorizations : 0
% 6.03/3.28 % NegExts : 0
% 6.03/3.28 % Equation resolutions : 1
% 6.03/3.28 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 6.03/3.28 % Total rewrite steps : 2
% 6.03/3.28 % ...of those cached : 0
% 6.03/3.28 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 6.03/3.28 % Propositional check models : 0
% 6.03/3.28 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 6.03/3.28 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 6.03/3.28 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 6.03/3.28 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 6.03/3.28 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 6.03/3.28 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 6.03/3.28 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 6.03/3.28 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 6.03/3.28 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 6.03/3.28 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 6.03/3.28 % Current number of processed clauses : 14
% 6.03/3.28 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 11
% 6.03/3.28 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 6.03/3.28 % Negative unit clauses : 3
% 6.03/3.28 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 6.03/3.28 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 10275
% 6.03/3.28 % ...number of literals in the above : 59049
% 6.03/3.28 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 6.03/3.28 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 6.03/3.28 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 6.03/3.28 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 6.03/3.28 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 6.03/3.28 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 6.03/3.28 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 6.03/3.28 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 6.03/3.28 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 6.03/3.28 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 6.03/3.28 % Condensation successes : 0
% 6.03/3.28 % Termbank termtop insertions : 844528
% 6.03/3.28 % Search garbage collected termcells : 180173
% 6.03/3.28
% 6.03/3.28 % -------------------------------------------------
% 6.03/3.28 % User time : 1.039 s
% 6.03/3.28 % System time : 0.097 s
% 6.03/3.28 % Total time : 1.137 s
% 6.03/3.28 % Maximum resident set size: 45500 pages
% 6.03/3.28
% 6.03/3.28 % -------------------------------------------------
% 6.03/3.28 % User time : 2.848 s
% 6.03/3.28 % System time : 0.208 s
% 6.03/3.28 % Total time : 3.056 s
% 6.03/3.28 % Maximum resident set size: 30208 pages
% 6.03/3.28 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------