%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : ITP232^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.1.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:04:49 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 9.13s 5.84s
% Output : CNFRefutation 9.13s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 12 ( 8 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 16 ( 0 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 65 ( 8 ~; 2 |; 0 &; 53 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 6 avg)
% Number of types : 4 ( 3 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 9 ( 8 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 10 ( 0 ^; 6 !; 4 ?; 10 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_sort1,type,
nat: $tType ).
thf(decl_sort2,type,
vEBT_VEBT: $tType ).
thf(decl_sort3,type,
list_VEBT_VEBT: $tType ).
thf(decl_418,type,
nth_VEBT_VEBT: list_VEBT_VEBT > nat > vEBT_VEBT ).
thf(decl_836,type,
vEBT_V8194947554948674370ptions: vEBT_VEBT > nat > $o ).
thf(decl_837,type,
vEBT_VEBT_high: nat > nat > nat ).
thf(decl_853,type,
vEBT_VEBT_minNull: vEBT_VEBT > $o ).
thf(decl_887,type,
mi: nat ).
thf(decl_888,type,
na: nat ).
thf(decl_890,type,
treeList: list_VEBT_VEBT ).
thf(decl_1128,type,
esk221_1: vEBT_VEBT > nat ).
thf(conj_0,conjecture,
? [X261: nat] : ( vEBT_V8194947554948674370ptions @ ( nth_VEBT_VEBT @ treeList @ ( vEBT_VEBT_high @ mi @ na ) ) @ X261 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.OnAYYP29sN/E---3.1_1773787.p',conj_0) ).
thf(fact_0_not__min__Null__member,axiom,
! [X1: vEBT_VEBT] :
( ~ ( vEBT_VEBT_minNull @ X1 )
=> ? [X2: nat] : ( vEBT_V8194947554948674370ptions @ X1 @ X2 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.OnAYYP29sN/E---3.1_1773787.p',fact_0_not__min__Null__member) ).
thf(fact_1_False,axiom,
~ ( vEBT_VEBT_minNull @ ( nth_VEBT_VEBT @ treeList @ ( vEBT_VEBT_high @ mi @ na ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.OnAYYP29sN/E---3.1_1773787.p',fact_1_False) ).
thf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X261: nat] : ( vEBT_V8194947554948674370ptions @ ( nth_VEBT_VEBT @ treeList @ ( vEBT_VEBT_high @ mi @ na ) ) @ X261 ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0]) ).
thf(c_0_4,plain,
! [X1: vEBT_VEBT] :
( ~ ( vEBT_VEBT_minNull @ X1 )
=> ? [X2: nat] : ( vEBT_V8194947554948674370ptions @ X1 @ X2 ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_0_not__min__Null__member]) ).
thf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
! [X22942: nat] :
~ ( vEBT_V8194947554948674370ptions @ ( nth_VEBT_VEBT @ treeList @ ( vEBT_VEBT_high @ mi @ na ) ) @ X22942 ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])]) ).
thf(c_0_6,plain,
! [X25015: vEBT_VEBT] :
( ( vEBT_VEBT_minNull @ X25015 )
| ( vEBT_V8194947554948674370ptions @ X25015 @ ( esk221_1 @ X25015 ) ) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])]) ).
thf(c_0_7,plain,
~ ( vEBT_VEBT_minNull @ ( nth_VEBT_VEBT @ treeList @ ( vEBT_VEBT_high @ mi @ na ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_1_False]) ).
thf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
! [X2: nat] :
~ ( vEBT_V8194947554948674370ptions @ ( nth_VEBT_VEBT @ treeList @ ( vEBT_VEBT_high @ mi @ na ) ) @ X2 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
thf(c_0_9,plain,
! [X1: vEBT_VEBT] :
( ( vEBT_VEBT_minNull @ X1 )
| ( vEBT_V8194947554948674370ptions @ X1 @ ( esk221_1 @ X1 ) ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
thf(c_0_10,plain,
~ ( vEBT_VEBT_minNull @ ( nth_VEBT_VEBT @ treeList @ ( vEBT_VEBT_high @ mi @ na ) ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
thf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_10]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : ITP232^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.1.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.18 % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.18 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.18 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.18 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.18 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.18 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.18 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.08/0.18 % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 20:30:36 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.18 % CPUTime :
% 0.08/0.18 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.22 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 2.99/3.10 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.OnAYYP29sN/E---3.1_1773787.p
% 9.13/5.84 % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 9.13/5.84 % partial match(1): HMLMSMSMSSLCHFA
% 9.13/5.84 % Preprocessing class: HMLMSMLMSSLCHFA.
% 9.13/5.84 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 299 seconds (2392 total)
% 9.13/5.84 % Starting new_ho_10 with 1495s (5) cores
% 9.13/5.84 % Starting sh5l with 299s (1) cores
% 9.13/5.84 % Starting new_bool_1 with 299s (1) cores
% 9.13/5.84 % Starting new_bool_2 with 299s (1) cores
% 9.13/5.84 % new_bool_2 with pid 1773805 completed with status 0
% 9.13/5.84 % Result found by new_bool_2
% 9.13/5.84 % partial match(1): HMLMSMSMSSLCHFA
% 9.13/5.84 % Preprocessing class: HMLMSMLMSSLCHFA.
% 9.13/5.84 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 299 seconds (2392 total)
% 9.13/5.84 % Starting new_ho_10 with 1495s (5) cores
% 9.13/5.84 % Starting sh5l with 299s (1) cores
% 9.13/5.84 % Starting new_bool_1 with 299s (1) cores
% 9.13/5.84 % Starting new_bool_2 with 299s (1) cores
% 9.13/5.84 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 9.13/5.84 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 9.13/5.84 % Search class: HGHSM-SMLM32-DHFFFSBN
% 9.13/5.84 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 299 seconds (299 total)
% 9.13/5.84 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 30s (1) cores
% 9.13/5.84 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1773807 completed with status 0
% 9.13/5.84 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 9.13/5.84 % partial match(1): HMLMSMSMSSLCHFA
% 9.13/5.84 % Preprocessing class: HMLMSMLMSSLCHFA.
% 9.13/5.84 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 299 seconds (2392 total)
% 9.13/5.84 % Starting new_ho_10 with 1495s (5) cores
% 9.13/5.84 % Starting sh5l with 299s (1) cores
% 9.13/5.84 % Starting new_bool_1 with 299s (1) cores
% 9.13/5.84 % Starting new_bool_2 with 299s (1) cores
% 9.13/5.84 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 9.13/5.84 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 9.13/5.84 % Search class: HGHSM-SMLM32-DHFFFSBN
% 9.13/5.84 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 299 seconds (299 total)
% 9.13/5.84 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 30s (1) cores
% 9.13/5.84 % Preprocessing time : 0.103 s
% 9.13/5.84
% 9.13/5.84 % Proof found!
% 9.13/5.84 % SZS status Theorem
% 9.13/5.84 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 9.13/5.84 % Parsed axioms : 10550
% 9.13/5.84 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 8377
% 9.13/5.84 % Initial clauses : 6516
% 9.13/5.84 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 1832
% 9.13/5.84 % Initial clauses in saturation : 4684
% 9.13/5.84 % Processed clauses : 3144
% 9.13/5.84 % ...of these trivial : 256
% 9.13/5.84 % ...subsumed : 1438
% 9.13/5.84 % ...remaining for further processing : 1450
% 9.13/5.84 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 251
% 9.13/5.84 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 9.13/5.84 % Backward-subsumed : 11
% 9.13/5.84 % Backward-rewritten : 49
% 9.13/5.84 % Generated clauses : 6408
% 9.13/5.84 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 4887
% 9.13/5.84 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 9.13/5.84 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 5
% 9.13/5.84 % Paramodulations : 6119
% 9.13/5.84 % Factorizations : 12
% 9.13/5.84 % NegExts : 0
% 9.13/5.84 % Equation resolutions : 260
% 9.13/5.84 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 9.13/5.84 % Total rewrite steps : 2280
% 9.13/5.84 % ...of those cached : 1678
% 9.13/5.84 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 9.13/5.84 % Propositional check models : 0
% 9.13/5.84 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 9.13/5.84 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 9.13/5.84 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 9.13/5.84 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 9.13/5.84 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 9.13/5.84 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 9.13/5.84 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 9.13/5.84 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 9.13/5.84 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 9.13/5.84 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 9.13/5.84 % Current number of processed clauses : 1223
% 9.13/5.84 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 544
% 9.13/5.84 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 9.13/5.84 % Negative unit clauses : 473
% 9.13/5.84 % Non-unit-clauses : 206
% 9.13/5.84 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 6418
% 9.13/5.84 % ...number of literals in the above : 22306
% 9.13/5.84 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 9.13/5.84 % Current number of archived clauses : 60
% 9.13/5.84 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 14960
% 9.13/5.84 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 12737
% 9.13/5.84 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 260
% 9.13/5.84 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 74488
% 9.13/5.84 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 9.13/5.84 % BW rewrite match attempts : 529
% 9.13/5.84 % BW rewrite match successes : 22
% 9.13/5.84 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 9.13/5.84 % Condensation successes : 0
% 9.13/5.84 % Termbank termtop insertions : 611050
% 9.13/5.84 % Search garbage collected termcells : 159781
% 9.13/5.84
% 9.13/5.84 % -------------------------------------------------
% 9.13/5.84 % User time : 1.237 s
% 9.13/5.84 % System time : 0.106 s
% 9.13/5.84 % Total time : 1.343 s
% 9.13/5.84 % Maximum resident set size: 38860 pages
% 9.13/5.84
% 9.13/5.84 % -------------------------------------------------
% 9.13/5.84 % User time : 2.545 s
% 9.13/5.84 % System time : 0.159 s
% 9.13/5.84 % Total time : 2.704 s
% 9.13/5.84 % Maximum resident set size: 28928 pages
% 9.13/5.84 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------