%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : ITP234^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.1.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:04:50 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 50.96s 16.31s
% Output : CNFRefutation 50.96s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 10 ( 10 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 10 ( 9 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 166 ( 3 ~; 0 |; 0 &; 163 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 3 ( 3 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 11 ( 9 usr; 5 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 ^; 0 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_sort1,type,
nat: $tType ).
thf(decl_sort2,type,
list_VEBT_VEBT: $tType ).
thf(decl_sort3,type,
vEBT_VEBT: $tType ).
thf(decl_378,type,
list_u1324408373059187874T_VEBT: list_VEBT_VEBT > nat > vEBT_VEBT > list_VEBT_VEBT ).
thf(decl_401,type,
nth_VEBT_VEBT: list_VEBT_VEBT > nat > vEBT_VEBT ).
thf(decl_766,type,
vEBT_VEBT_high: nat > nat > nat ).
thf(decl_768,type,
vEBT_VEBT_low: nat > nat > nat ).
thf(decl_779,type,
vEBT_vebt_insert: vEBT_VEBT > nat > vEBT_VEBT ).
thf(decl_817,type,
i: nat ).
thf(decl_820,type,
mi: nat ).
thf(decl_821,type,
na: nat ).
thf(decl_823,type,
treeList: list_VEBT_VEBT ).
thf(conj_0,conjecture,
( ( nth_VEBT_VEBT @ ( list_u1324408373059187874T_VEBT @ treeList @ ( vEBT_VEBT_high @ mi @ na ) @ ( vEBT_vebt_insert @ ( nth_VEBT_VEBT @ treeList @ ( vEBT_VEBT_high @ mi @ na ) ) @ ( vEBT_VEBT_low @ mi @ na ) ) ) @ i )
= ( vEBT_vebt_insert @ ( nth_VEBT_VEBT @ treeList @ ( vEBT_VEBT_high @ mi @ na ) ) @ ( vEBT_VEBT_low @ mi @ na ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.jOT45Ur2Iq/E---3.1_600520.p',conj_0) ).
thf(fact_1_insprop,axiom,
( ( nth_VEBT_VEBT @ ( list_u1324408373059187874T_VEBT @ treeList @ ( vEBT_VEBT_high @ mi @ na ) @ ( vEBT_vebt_insert @ ( nth_VEBT_VEBT @ treeList @ ( vEBT_VEBT_high @ mi @ na ) ) @ ( vEBT_VEBT_low @ mi @ na ) ) ) @ ( vEBT_VEBT_high @ mi @ na ) )
= ( vEBT_vebt_insert @ ( nth_VEBT_VEBT @ treeList @ ( vEBT_VEBT_high @ mi @ na ) ) @ ( vEBT_VEBT_low @ mi @ na ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.jOT45Ur2Iq/E---3.1_600520.p',fact_1_insprop) ).
thf(fact_0_True,axiom,
( i
= ( vEBT_VEBT_high @ mi @ na ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.jOT45Ur2Iq/E---3.1_600520.p',fact_0_True) ).
thf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( ( nth_VEBT_VEBT @ ( list_u1324408373059187874T_VEBT @ treeList @ ( vEBT_VEBT_high @ mi @ na ) @ ( vEBT_vebt_insert @ ( nth_VEBT_VEBT @ treeList @ ( vEBT_VEBT_high @ mi @ na ) ) @ ( vEBT_VEBT_low @ mi @ na ) ) ) @ i )
!= ( vEBT_vebt_insert @ ( nth_VEBT_VEBT @ treeList @ ( vEBT_VEBT_high @ mi @ na ) ) @ ( vEBT_VEBT_low @ mi @ na ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0]) ).
thf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( ( nth_VEBT_VEBT @ ( list_u1324408373059187874T_VEBT @ treeList @ ( vEBT_VEBT_high @ mi @ na ) @ ( vEBT_vebt_insert @ ( nth_VEBT_VEBT @ treeList @ ( vEBT_VEBT_high @ mi @ na ) ) @ ( vEBT_VEBT_low @ mi @ na ) ) ) @ i )
!= ( vEBT_vebt_insert @ ( nth_VEBT_VEBT @ treeList @ ( vEBT_VEBT_high @ mi @ na ) ) @ ( vEBT_VEBT_low @ mi @ na ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
thf(c_0_5,plain,
( ( nth_VEBT_VEBT @ ( list_u1324408373059187874T_VEBT @ treeList @ ( vEBT_VEBT_high @ mi @ na ) @ ( vEBT_vebt_insert @ ( nth_VEBT_VEBT @ treeList @ ( vEBT_VEBT_high @ mi @ na ) ) @ ( vEBT_VEBT_low @ mi @ na ) ) ) @ ( vEBT_VEBT_high @ mi @ na ) )
= ( vEBT_vebt_insert @ ( nth_VEBT_VEBT @ treeList @ ( vEBT_VEBT_high @ mi @ na ) ) @ ( vEBT_VEBT_low @ mi @ na ) ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_1_insprop]) ).
thf(c_0_6,plain,
( i
= ( vEBT_VEBT_high @ mi @ na ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_0_True]) ).
thf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( ( nth_VEBT_VEBT @ ( list_u1324408373059187874T_VEBT @ treeList @ ( vEBT_VEBT_high @ mi @ na ) @ ( vEBT_vebt_insert @ ( nth_VEBT_VEBT @ treeList @ ( vEBT_VEBT_high @ mi @ na ) ) @ ( vEBT_VEBT_low @ mi @ na ) ) ) @ i )
!= ( vEBT_vebt_insert @ ( nth_VEBT_VEBT @ treeList @ ( vEBT_VEBT_high @ mi @ na ) ) @ ( vEBT_VEBT_low @ mi @ na ) ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
thf(c_0_8,plain,
( ( nth_VEBT_VEBT @ ( list_u1324408373059187874T_VEBT @ treeList @ i @ ( vEBT_vebt_insert @ ( nth_VEBT_VEBT @ treeList @ i ) @ ( vEBT_VEBT_low @ mi @ na ) ) ) @ i )
= ( vEBT_vebt_insert @ ( nth_VEBT_VEBT @ treeList @ i ) @ ( vEBT_VEBT_low @ mi @ na ) ) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_6]),c_0_6]),c_0_6]) ).
thf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_6]),c_0_6]),c_0_8]),c_0_6])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : ITP234^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.1.
% 0.00/0.06 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.23 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.23 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.23 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.23 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.23 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.23 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.23 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.23 % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 20:27:41 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.24 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.24 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.26/0.30 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 3.55/3.65 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.jOT45Ur2Iq/E---3.1_600520.p
% 50.96/16.31 % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 50.96/16.31 % partial match(1): HMLMSMSMSSLCHFA
% 50.96/16.31 % Preprocessing class: HMLMSMLMSSLCHFA.
% 50.96/16.31 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 50.96/16.31 % Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 50.96/16.31 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 50.96/16.31 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 50.96/16.31 % Starting new_bool_2 with 300s (1) cores
% 50.96/16.31 % new_bool_2 with pid 600543 completed with status 0
% 50.96/16.31 % Result found by new_bool_2
% 50.96/16.31 % partial match(1): HMLMSMSMSSLCHFA
% 50.96/16.31 % Preprocessing class: HMLMSMLMSSLCHFA.
% 50.96/16.31 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 50.96/16.31 % Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 50.96/16.31 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 50.96/16.31 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 50.96/16.31 % Starting new_bool_2 with 300s (1) cores
% 50.96/16.31 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 50.96/16.31 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 50.96/16.31 % Search class: HGHSM-SMLM32-DHFFFSBN
% 50.96/16.31 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 299 seconds (299 total)
% 50.96/16.31 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 30s (1) cores
% 50.96/16.31 % SubtermCWHack with pid 600546 completed with status 0
% 50.96/16.31 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 50.96/16.31 % partial match(1): HMLMSMSMSSLCHFA
% 50.96/16.31 % Preprocessing class: HMLMSMLMSSLCHFA.
% 50.96/16.31 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 50.96/16.31 % Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 50.96/16.31 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 50.96/16.31 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 50.96/16.31 % Starting new_bool_2 with 300s (1) cores
% 50.96/16.31 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 50.96/16.31 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 50.96/16.31 % Search class: HGHSM-SMLM32-DHFFFSBN
% 50.96/16.31 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 299 seconds (299 total)
% 50.96/16.31 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 30s (1) cores
% 50.96/16.31 % Preprocessing time : 0.139 s
% 50.96/16.31
% 50.96/16.31 % Proof found!
% 50.96/16.31 % SZS status Theorem
% 50.96/16.31 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 50.96/16.31 % Parsed axioms : 9032
% 50.96/16.31 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 6986
% 50.96/16.31 % Initial clauses : 6279
% 50.96/16.31 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 1799
% 50.96/16.31 % Initial clauses in saturation : 4480
% 50.96/16.31 % Processed clauses : 30833
% 50.96/16.31 % ...of these trivial : 6114
% 50.96/16.31 % ...subsumed : 16358
% 50.96/16.31 % ...remaining for further processing : 8360
% 50.96/16.31 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1283
% 50.96/16.31 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 50.96/16.31 % Backward-subsumed : 239
% 50.96/16.31 % Backward-rewritten : 366
% 50.96/16.31 % Generated clauses : 198034
% 50.96/16.31 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 167004
% 50.96/16.31 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 50.96/16.31 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 52
% 50.96/16.31 % Paramodulations : 196640
% 50.96/16.31 % Factorizations : 22
% 50.96/16.31 % NegExts : 0
% 50.96/16.31 % Equation resolutions : 1307
% 50.96/16.31 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 50.96/16.31 % Total rewrite steps : 64963
% 50.96/16.31 % ...of those cached : 55106
% 50.96/16.31 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 50.96/16.31 % Propositional check models : 0
% 50.96/16.31 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 50.96/16.31 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 50.96/16.31 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 50.96/16.31 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 50.96/16.31 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 50.96/16.31 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 50.96/16.31 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 50.96/16.31 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 50.96/16.31 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 50.96/16.31 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 50.96/16.31 % Current number of processed clauses : 7462
% 50.96/16.31 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 2986
% 50.96/16.31 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 18
% 50.96/16.31 % Negative unit clauses : 2454
% 50.96/16.31 % Non-unit-clauses : 2004
% 50.96/16.31 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 140123
% 50.96/16.31 % ...number of literals in the above : 365923
% 50.96/16.31 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 50.96/16.31 % Current number of archived clauses : 607
% 50.96/16.31 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 790658
% 50.96/16.31 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 362435
% 50.96/16.31 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2724
% 50.96/16.31 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1435477
% 50.96/16.31 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 50.96/16.31 % BW rewrite match attempts : 6916
% 50.96/16.31 % BW rewrite match successes : 412
% 50.96/16.31 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 50.96/16.31 % Condensation successes : 0
% 50.96/16.31 % Termbank termtop insertions : 3036744
% 50.96/16.31 % Search garbage collected termcells : 142305
% 50.96/16.31
% 50.96/16.31 % -------------------------------------------------
% 50.96/16.31 % User time : 11.231 s
% 50.96/16.31 % System time : 0.329 s
% 50.96/16.31 % Total time : 11.561 s
% 50.96/16.31 % Maximum resident set size: 35104 pages
% 50.96/16.31
% 50.96/16.31 % -------------------------------------------------
% 50.96/16.31 % User time : 12.158 s
% 50.96/16.31 % System time : 0.361 s
% 50.96/16.31 % Total time : 12.519 s
% 50.96/16.31 % Maximum resident set size: 24576 pages
% 50.96/16.31 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------