↑ Up

E-SAT---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem  : ITP236^3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:05:59 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 6.87s 4.73s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 6.87s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   12 (   9 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   15 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   37 (   6   ~;   2   |;   0   &;  28   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   5 avg)
%            Number of types       :    4 (   3 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    7 (   6 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    5 (   0   ^;   4   !;   1   ?;   5   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_sort1,type,
    nat: $tType ).

thf(decl_sort2,type,
    vEBT_VEBT: $tType ).

thf(decl_sort3,type,
    list_VEBT_VEBT: $tType ).

thf(decl_498,type,
    nth_VEBT_VEBT: list_VEBT_VEBT > nat > vEBT_VEBT ).

thf(decl_1034,type,
    vEBT_V8194947554948674370ptions: vEBT_VEBT > nat > $o ).

thf(decl_1133,type,
    maxs: nat ).

thf(decl_1137,type,
    thesis: $o ).

thf(decl_1138,type,
    treeList: list_VEBT_VEBT ).

thf(decl_1180,type,
    esk38_0: nat ).

thf(conj_1,conjecture,
    thesis,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.XfJTdoF88M/E---3.1_1136549.p',conj_1) ).

thf(conj_0,hypothesis,
    ! [X19008: nat] :
      ( ( vEBT_V8194947554948674370ptions @ ( nth_VEBT_VEBT @ treeList @ maxs ) @ X19008 )
     => thesis ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.XfJTdoF88M/E---3.1_1136549.p',conj_0) ).

thf(fact_0__092_060open_062_092_060exists_062x_O_Aboth__member__options_A_ItreeList_A_B_Amaxs_J_Ax_092_060close_062,axiom,
    ? [X1: nat] : ( vEBT_V8194947554948674370ptions @ ( nth_VEBT_VEBT @ treeList @ maxs ) @ X1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.XfJTdoF88M/E---3.1_1136549.p',fact_0__092_060open_062_092_060exists_062x_O_Aboth__member__options_A_ItreeList_A_B_Amaxs_J_Ax_092_060close_062) ).

thf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ thesis,
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_1]) ).

thf(c_0_4,hypothesis,
    ! [X24341: nat] :
      ( ~ ( vEBT_V8194947554948674370ptions @ ( nth_VEBT_VEBT @ treeList @ maxs ) @ X24341 )
      | thesis ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[conj_0])]) ).

thf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ thesis,
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

thf(c_0_6,plain,
    vEBT_V8194947554948674370ptions @ ( nth_VEBT_VEBT @ treeList @ maxs ) @ esk38_0,
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_0__092_060open_062_092_060exists_062x_O_Aboth__member__options_A_ItreeList_A_B_Amaxs_J_Ax_092_060close_062])]) ).

thf(c_0_7,hypothesis,
    ! [X1: nat] :
      ( thesis
      | ~ ( vEBT_V8194947554948674370ptions @ ( nth_VEBT_VEBT @ treeList @ maxs ) @ X1 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

thf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ~ thesis,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

thf(c_0_9,plain,
    vEBT_V8194947554948674370ptions @ ( nth_VEBT_VEBT @ treeList @ maxs ) @ esk38_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

thf(c_0_10,hypothesis,
    ! [X1: nat] :
      ~ ( vEBT_V8194947554948674370ptions @ ( nth_VEBT_VEBT @ treeList @ maxs ) @ X1 ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).

thf(c_0_11,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : ITP236^3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.1.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.07/0.20  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.20  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.20  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.20  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.07/0.20  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.07/0.20  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.07/0.20  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.07/0.20  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 20:28:27 UTC 2026
% 0.07/0.20  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.07/0.20  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.07/0.25  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 1.95/2.07  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.XfJTdoF88M/E---3.1_1136549.p
% 6.87/4.73  % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 6.87/4.73  % partial match(2): HMLMSMSMSSLCHFA
% 6.87/4.73  % Preprocessing class: HMLLSMLMSSLCHFA.
% 6.87/4.73  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 299 seconds (2392 total)
% 6.87/4.73  % Starting new_ho_10 with 1495s (5) cores
% 6.87/4.73  % Starting sh5l with 299s (1) cores
% 6.87/4.73  % Starting new_bool_1 with 299s (1) cores
% 6.87/4.73  % Starting new_bool_2 with 299s (1) cores
% 6.87/4.73  % new_bool_2 with pid 1136565 completed with status 0
% 6.87/4.73  % Result found by new_bool_2
% 6.87/4.73  % partial match(2): HMLMSMSMSSLCHFA
% 6.87/4.73  % Preprocessing class: HMLLSMLMSSLCHFA.
% 6.87/4.73  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 299 seconds (2392 total)
% 6.87/4.73  % Starting new_ho_10 with 1495s (5) cores
% 6.87/4.73  % Starting sh5l with 299s (1) cores
% 6.87/4.73  % Starting new_bool_1 with 299s (1) cores
% 6.87/4.73  % Starting new_bool_2 with 299s (1) cores
% 6.87/4.73  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 6.87/4.73  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 6.87/4.73  % Search class: HGHSM-SMLM32-DHFFFSBN
% 6.87/4.73  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 299 seconds (299 total)
% 6.87/4.73  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 30s (1) cores
% 6.87/4.73  % SubtermCWHack with pid 1136566 completed with status 0
% 6.87/4.73  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 6.87/4.73  % partial match(2): HMLMSMSMSSLCHFA
% 6.87/4.73  % Preprocessing class: HMLLSMLMSSLCHFA.
% 6.87/4.73  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 299 seconds (2392 total)
% 6.87/4.73  % Starting new_ho_10 with 1495s (5) cores
% 6.87/4.73  % Starting sh5l with 299s (1) cores
% 6.87/4.73  % Starting new_bool_1 with 299s (1) cores
% 6.87/4.73  % Starting new_bool_2 with 299s (1) cores
% 6.87/4.73  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 6.87/4.73  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 6.87/4.73  % Search class: HGHSM-SMLM32-DHFFFSBN
% 6.87/4.73  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 299 seconds (299 total)
% 6.87/4.73  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 30s (1) cores
% 6.87/4.73  % Preprocessing time       : 0.102 s
% 6.87/4.73  
% 6.87/4.73  % Proof found!
% 6.87/4.73  % SZS status Theorem
% 6.87/4.73  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 6.87/4.73  % Parsed axioms                        : 11120
% 6.87/4.73  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 8959
% 6.87/4.73  % Initial clauses                      : 6517
% 6.87/4.73  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 1886
% 6.87/4.73  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 4631
% 6.87/4.73  % Processed clauses                    : 815
% 6.87/4.73  % ...of these trivial                  : 64
% 6.87/4.73  % ...subsumed                          : 292
% 6.87/4.73  % ...remaining for further processing  : 459
% 6.87/4.73  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 117
% 6.87/4.73  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 6.87/4.73  % Backward-subsumed                    : 6
% 6.87/4.73  % Backward-rewritten                   : 8
% 6.87/4.73  % Generated clauses                    : 670
% 6.87/4.73  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 433
% 6.87/4.73  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 6.87/4.73  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 6.87/4.73  % Paramodulations                      : 525
% 6.87/4.73  % Factorizations                       : 6
% 6.87/4.73  % NegExts                              : 0
% 6.87/4.73  % Equation resolutions                 : 123
% 6.87/4.73  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 6.87/4.73  % Total rewrite steps                  : 283
% 6.87/4.73  % ...of those cached                   : 161
% 6.87/4.73  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 6.87/4.73  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 6.87/4.73  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 6.87/4.73  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 6.87/4.73  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 6.87/4.73  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 6.87/4.73  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 6.87/4.73  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 6.87/4.73  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 6.87/4.73  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 6.87/4.73  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 6.87/4.73  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 6.87/4.73  % Current number of processed clauses  : 353
% 6.87/4.73  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 194
% 6.87/4.73  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 6.87/4.73  %    Negative unit clauses             : 96
% 6.87/4.73  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 63
% 6.87/4.73  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 4249
% 6.87/4.73  % ...number of literals in the above   : 18196
% 6.87/4.73  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 6.87/4.73  % Current number of archived clauses   : 15
% 6.87/4.73  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1375
% 6.87/4.73  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1276
% 6.87/4.73  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 98
% 6.87/4.73  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2757
% 6.87/4.73  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 6.87/4.73  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 38
% 6.87/4.73  % BW rewrite match successes           : 8
% 6.87/4.73  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 6.87/4.73  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 6.87/4.73  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 561999
% 6.87/4.73  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 164113
% 6.87/4.73  
% 6.87/4.73  % -------------------------------------------------
% 6.87/4.73  % User time                : 1.048 s
% 6.87/4.73  % System time              : 0.102 s
% 6.87/4.73  % Total time               : 1.150 s
% 6.87/4.73  % Maximum resident set size: 39756 pages
% 6.87/4.73  
% 6.87/4.73  % -------------------------------------------------
% 6.87/4.73  % User time                : 2.482 s
% 6.87/4.73  % System time              : 0.144 s
% 6.87/4.73  % Total time               : 2.626 s
% 6.87/4.73  % Maximum resident set size: 29952 pages
% 6.87/4.73  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------