↑ Up

E-SAT---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem  : ITP239^3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:06:00 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 99.66s 36.15s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 99.66s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   16 (  16 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   16 (   8 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  136 (   3   ~;   0   |;   0   &; 133   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    5 (   4 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   17 (  15 usr;   8 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0   ^;   0   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_sort1,type,
    nat: $tType ).

thf(decl_sort2,type,
    num: $tType ).

thf(decl_sort3,type,
    list_VEBT_VEBT: $tType ).

thf(decl_sort4,type,
    vEBT_VEBT: $tType ).

thf(decl_209,type,
    one_one_nat: nat ).

thf(decl_380,type,
    nth_VEBT_VEBT: list_VEBT_VEBT > nat > vEBT_VEBT ).

thf(decl_406,type,
    suc: nat > nat ).

thf(decl_477,type,
    bit0: num > num ).

thf(decl_479,type,
    one: num ).

thf(decl_487,type,
    numeral_numeral_nat: num > nat ).

thf(decl_698,type,
    divide_divide_nat: nat > nat > nat ).

thf(decl_843,type,
    vEBT_VEBT_high: nat > nat > nat ).

thf(decl_845,type,
    vEBT_VEBT_low: nat > nat > nat ).

thf(decl_862,type,
    vEBT_vebt_member: vEBT_VEBT > nat > $o ).

thf(decl_919,type,
    deg: nat ).

thf(decl_924,type,
    na: nat ).

thf(decl_925,type,
    pr: nat ).

thf(decl_928,type,
    treeList: list_VEBT_VEBT ).

thf(decl_930,type,
    za: nat ).

thf(fact_9__092_060open_062deg_Adiv_A2_A_061_An_092_060close_062,axiom,
    ( ( divide_divide_nat @ deg @ ( numeral_numeral_nat @ ( bit0 @ one ) ) )
    = na ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.WVmyrVRLuB/E---3.1_1807083.p',fact_9__092_060open_062deg_Adiv_A2_A_061_An_092_060close_062) ).

thf(fact_1019_Suc__1,axiom,
    ( ( suc @ one_one_nat )
    = ( numeral_numeral_nat @ ( bit0 @ one ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.WVmyrVRLuB/E---3.1_1807083.p',fact_1019_Suc__1) ).

thf(conj_0,conjecture,
    vEBT_vebt_member @ ( nth_VEBT_VEBT @ treeList @ ( vEBT_VEBT_high @ za @ ( divide_divide_nat @ deg @ ( numeral_numeral_nat @ ( bit0 @ one ) ) ) ) ) @ ( vEBT_VEBT_low @ za @ ( divide_divide_nat @ deg @ ( numeral_numeral_nat @ ( bit0 @ one ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.WVmyrVRLuB/E---3.1_1807083.p',conj_0) ).

thf(fact_0_True,axiom,
    ( ( vEBT_VEBT_high @ za @ ( divide_divide_nat @ deg @ ( numeral_numeral_nat @ ( bit0 @ one ) ) ) )
    = pr ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.WVmyrVRLuB/E---3.1_1807083.p',fact_0_True) ).

thf(fact_2_abe,axiom,
    vEBT_vebt_member @ ( nth_VEBT_VEBT @ treeList @ ( vEBT_VEBT_high @ za @ ( divide_divide_nat @ deg @ ( numeral_numeral_nat @ ( bit0 @ one ) ) ) ) ) @ ( vEBT_VEBT_low @ za @ ( divide_divide_nat @ deg @ ( numeral_numeral_nat @ ( bit0 @ one ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.WVmyrVRLuB/E---3.1_1807083.p',fact_2_abe) ).

thf(c_0_5,plain,
    ( ( divide_divide_nat @ deg @ ( numeral_numeral_nat @ ( bit0 @ one ) ) )
    = na ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_9__092_060open_062deg_Adiv_A2_A_061_An_092_060close_062]) ).

thf(c_0_6,plain,
    ( ( suc @ one_one_nat )
    = ( numeral_numeral_nat @ ( bit0 @ one ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_1019_Suc__1]) ).

thf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( vEBT_vebt_member @ ( nth_VEBT_VEBT @ treeList @ ( vEBT_VEBT_high @ za @ ( divide_divide_nat @ deg @ ( numeral_numeral_nat @ ( bit0 @ one ) ) ) ) ) @ ( vEBT_VEBT_low @ za @ ( divide_divide_nat @ deg @ ( numeral_numeral_nat @ ( bit0 @ one ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0]) ).

thf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( ( vEBT_VEBT_high @ za @ ( divide_divide_nat @ deg @ ( numeral_numeral_nat @ ( bit0 @ one ) ) ) )
    = pr ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_0_True]) ).

thf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( ( divide_divide_nat @ deg @ ( suc @ one_one_nat ) )
    = na ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).

thf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( vEBT_vebt_member @ ( nth_VEBT_VEBT @ treeList @ ( vEBT_VEBT_high @ za @ ( divide_divide_nat @ deg @ ( numeral_numeral_nat @ ( bit0 @ one ) ) ) ) ) @ ( vEBT_VEBT_low @ za @ ( divide_divide_nat @ deg @ ( numeral_numeral_nat @ ( bit0 @ one ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

thf(c_0_11,plain,
    vEBT_vebt_member @ ( nth_VEBT_VEBT @ treeList @ ( vEBT_VEBT_high @ za @ ( divide_divide_nat @ deg @ ( numeral_numeral_nat @ ( bit0 @ one ) ) ) ) ) @ ( vEBT_VEBT_low @ za @ ( divide_divide_nat @ deg @ ( numeral_numeral_nat @ ( bit0 @ one ) ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_2_abe]) ).

thf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ( vEBT_VEBT_high @ za @ na )
    = pr ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_6]),c_0_9]) ).

thf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( vEBT_vebt_member @ ( nth_VEBT_VEBT @ treeList @ ( vEBT_VEBT_high @ za @ ( divide_divide_nat @ deg @ ( numeral_numeral_nat @ ( bit0 @ one ) ) ) ) ) @ ( vEBT_VEBT_low @ za @ ( divide_divide_nat @ deg @ ( numeral_numeral_nat @ ( bit0 @ one ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

thf(c_0_14,plain,
    vEBT_vebt_member @ ( nth_VEBT_VEBT @ treeList @ pr ) @ ( vEBT_VEBT_low @ za @ na ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_6]),c_0_9]),c_0_12]),c_0_6]),c_0_9]) ).

thf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_6]),c_0_9]),c_0_12]),c_0_6]),c_0_9]),c_0_14])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : ITP239^3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.1.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.07/0.19  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.19  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.19  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.19  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.07/0.19  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.07/0.19  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.07/0.19  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.07/0.19  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 20:30:38 UTC 2026
% 0.07/0.19  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.07/0.19  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.07/0.24  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 1.95/2.04  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.WVmyrVRLuB/E---3.1_1807083.p
% 99.66/36.15  % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 99.66/36.15  % partial match(1): HMLMSMSMSSLCHFA
% 99.66/36.15  % Preprocessing class: HMLMSMLMSSLCHFA.
% 99.66/36.15  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 299 seconds (2392 total)
% 99.66/36.15  % Starting new_ho_10 with 1495s (5) cores
% 99.66/36.15  % Starting sh5l with 299s (1) cores
% 99.66/36.15  % Starting new_bool_1 with 299s (1) cores
% 99.66/36.15  % Starting new_bool_2 with 299s (1) cores
% 99.66/36.15  % new_bool_2 with pid 1807147 completed with status 0
% 99.66/36.15  % Result found by new_bool_2
% 99.66/36.15  % partial match(1): HMLMSMSMSSLCHFA
% 99.66/36.15  % Preprocessing class: HMLMSMLMSSLCHFA.
% 99.66/36.15  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 299 seconds (2392 total)
% 99.66/36.15  % Starting new_ho_10 with 1495s (5) cores
% 99.66/36.15  % Starting sh5l with 299s (1) cores
% 99.66/36.15  % Starting new_bool_1 with 299s (1) cores
% 99.66/36.15  % Starting new_bool_2 with 299s (1) cores
% 99.66/36.15  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 99.66/36.15  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 99.66/36.15  % Search class: HGHSM-SMLM32-DHFFFFBN
% 99.66/36.15  % partial match(1): HGHSM-SMLM32-DHFFFSBN
% 99.66/36.15  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 297 seconds (297 total)
% 99.66/36.15  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 30s (1) cores
% 99.66/36.15  % SubtermCWHack with pid 1807150 completed with status 0
% 99.66/36.15  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 99.66/36.15  % partial match(1): HMLMSMSMSSLCHFA
% 99.66/36.15  % Preprocessing class: HMLMSMLMSSLCHFA.
% 99.66/36.15  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 299 seconds (2392 total)
% 99.66/36.15  % Starting new_ho_10 with 1495s (5) cores
% 99.66/36.15  % Starting sh5l with 299s (1) cores
% 99.66/36.15  % Starting new_bool_1 with 299s (1) cores
% 99.66/36.15  % Starting new_bool_2 with 299s (1) cores
% 99.66/36.15  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 99.66/36.15  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 99.66/36.15  % Search class: HGHSM-SMLM32-DHFFFFBN
% 99.66/36.15  % partial match(1): HGHSM-SMLM32-DHFFFSBN
% 99.66/36.15  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 297 seconds (297 total)
% 99.66/36.15  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 30s (1) cores
% 99.66/36.15  % Preprocessing time       : 0.131 s
% 99.66/36.15  
% 99.66/36.15  % Proof found!
% 99.66/36.15  % SZS status Theorem
% 99.66/36.15  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 99.66/36.15  % Parsed axioms                        : 11244
% 99.66/36.15  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 7135
% 99.66/36.15  % Initial clauses                      : 11379
% 99.66/36.15  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 2021
% 99.66/36.15  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 9358
% 99.66/36.15  % Processed clauses                    : 61974
% 99.66/36.15  % ...of these trivial                  : 11335
% 99.66/36.15  % ...subsumed                          : 31910
% 99.66/36.15  % ...remaining for further processing  : 18728
% 99.66/36.15  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 3187
% 99.66/36.15  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 99.66/36.15  % Backward-subsumed                    : 649
% 99.66/36.15  % Backward-rewritten                   : 830
% 99.66/36.15  % Generated clauses                    : 438543
% 99.66/36.15  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 371535
% 99.66/36.15  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 99.66/36.15  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 63
% 99.66/36.15  % Paramodulations                      : 435133
% 99.66/36.15  % Factorizations                       : 36
% 99.66/36.15  % NegExts                              : 0
% 99.66/36.15  % Equation resolutions                 : 3286
% 99.66/36.15  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 99.66/36.15  % Total rewrite steps                  : 158944
% 99.66/36.15  % ...of those cached                   : 128676
% 99.66/36.15  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 99.66/36.15  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 99.66/36.15  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 99.66/36.15  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 99.66/36.15  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 99.66/36.15  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 99.66/36.15  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 99.66/36.15  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 99.66/36.15  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 99.66/36.15  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 99.66/36.15  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 99.66/36.15  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 99.66/36.15  % Current number of processed clauses  : 16499
% 99.66/36.15  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 6500
% 99.66/36.15  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 46
% 99.66/36.15  %    Negative unit clauses             : 6289
% 99.66/36.15  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 3664
% 99.66/36.15  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 318120
% 99.66/36.15  % ...number of literals in the above   : 781775
% 99.66/36.15  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 99.66/36.15  % Current number of archived clauses   : 1481
% 99.66/36.15  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3662704
% 99.66/36.15  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2098210
% 99.66/36.15  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 3785
% 99.66/36.15  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 24648089
% 99.66/36.15  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 99.66/36.15  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 30005
% 99.66/36.15  % BW rewrite match successes           : 990
% 99.66/36.15  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 99.66/36.15  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 99.66/36.15  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 6315242
% 99.66/36.15  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 200299
% 99.66/36.15  
% 99.66/36.15  % -------------------------------------------------
% 99.66/36.15  % User time                : 31.921 s
% 99.66/36.15  % System time              : 0.340 s
% 99.66/36.15  % Total time               : 32.261 s
% 99.66/36.15  % Maximum resident set size: 52936 pages
% 99.66/36.15  
% 99.66/36.15  % -------------------------------------------------
% 99.66/36.15  % User time                : 33.470 s
% 99.66/36.15  % System time              : 0.398 s
% 99.66/36.15  % Total time               : 33.868 s
% 99.66/36.15  % Maximum resident set size: 30976 pages
% 99.66/36.15  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------