↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : ITP256^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:04:56 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 124.27s 45.59s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 124.27s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   16 (   8 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   40 (   4 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   12 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  170 (  18   ~;  12   |;   7   &; 128   @)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   14 (   7 avg)
%            Number of types       :    5 (   4 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   14 (  12 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   17 (   0   ^;  17   !;   0   ?;  17   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_sort1,type,
    nat: $tType ).

thf(decl_sort2,type,
    vEBT_VEBT: $tType ).

thf(decl_sort3,type,
    set_VEBT_VEBT: $tType ).

thf(decl_sort4,type,
    list_VEBT_VEBT: $tType ).

thf(decl_512,type,
    set_VEBT_VEBT2: list_VEBT_VEBT > set_VEBT_VEBT ).

thf(decl_558,type,
    nth_VEBT_VEBT: list_VEBT_VEBT > nat > vEBT_VEBT ).

thf(decl_649,type,
    size_s6755466524823107622T_VEBT: list_VEBT_VEBT > nat ).

thf(decl_747,type,
    ord_less_nat: nat > nat > $o ).

thf(decl_1118,type,
    vEBT_V8194947554948674370ptions: vEBT_VEBT > nat > $o ).

thf(decl_1119,type,
    vEBT_VEBT_high: nat > nat > nat ).

thf(decl_1128,type,
    vEBT_invar_vebt: vEBT_VEBT > nat > $o ).

thf(decl_1132,type,
    vEBT_vebt_delete: vEBT_VEBT > nat > vEBT_VEBT ).

thf(decl_1222,type,
    member_VEBT_VEBT: vEBT_VEBT > set_VEBT_VEBT > $o ).

thf(decl_1228,type,
    na: nat ).

thf(decl_1230,type,
    treeList: list_VEBT_VEBT ).

thf(decl_1231,type,
    xa: nat ).

thf(conj_0,conjecture,
    vEBT_invar_vebt @ ( nth_VEBT_VEBT @ treeList @ ( vEBT_VEBT_high @ xa @ na ) ) @ na,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.lIANNzkE1O/E---3.1_605155.p',conj_0) ).

thf(fact_23__C4_OIH_C_I1_J,axiom,
    ! [X11: vEBT_VEBT] :
      ( ( member_VEBT_VEBT @ X11 @ ( set_VEBT_VEBT2 @ treeList ) )
     => ( ( vEBT_invar_vebt @ X11 @ na )
        & ! [X13: nat,X14: nat] :
            ( ( vEBT_V8194947554948674370ptions @ ( vEBT_vebt_delete @ X11 @ X13 ) @ X14 )
          <=> ( ( X13 != X14 )
              & ( vEBT_V8194947554948674370ptions @ X11 @ X14 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.lIANNzkE1O/E---3.1_605155.p',fact_23__C4_OIH_C_I1_J) ).

thf(fact_137_nth__mem,axiom,
    ! [X7: nat,X19: list_VEBT_VEBT] :
      ( ( ord_less_nat @ X7 @ ( size_s6755466524823107622T_VEBT @ X19 ) )
     => ( member_VEBT_VEBT @ ( nth_VEBT_VEBT @ X19 @ X7 ) @ ( set_VEBT_VEBT2 @ X19 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.lIANNzkE1O/E---3.1_605155.p',fact_137_nth__mem) ).

thf(fact_8__092_060open_062high_Ax_An_A_060_Alength_AtreeList_092_060close_062,axiom,
    ord_less_nat @ ( vEBT_VEBT_high @ xa @ na ) @ ( size_s6755466524823107622T_VEBT @ treeList ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.lIANNzkE1O/E---3.1_605155.p',fact_8__092_060open_062high_Ax_An_A_060_Alength_AtreeList_092_060close_062) ).

thf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( vEBT_invar_vebt @ ( nth_VEBT_VEBT @ treeList @ ( vEBT_VEBT_high @ xa @ na ) ) @ na ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0]) ).

thf(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X11: vEBT_VEBT] :
      ( ( member_VEBT_VEBT @ X11 @ ( set_VEBT_VEBT2 @ treeList ) )
     => ( ( vEBT_invar_vebt @ X11 @ na )
        & ! [X13: nat,X14: nat] :
            ( ( vEBT_V8194947554948674370ptions @ ( vEBT_vebt_delete @ X11 @ X13 ) @ X14 )
          <=> ( ( X13 != X14 )
              & ( vEBT_V8194947554948674370ptions @ X11 @ X14 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_23__C4_OIH_C_I1_J]) ).

thf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( vEBT_invar_vebt @ ( nth_VEBT_VEBT @ treeList @ ( vEBT_VEBT_high @ xa @ na ) ) @ na ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

thf(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X23239: vEBT_VEBT,X23240: nat,X23241: nat] :
      ( ( ( vEBT_invar_vebt @ X23239 @ na )
        | ~ ( member_VEBT_VEBT @ X23239 @ ( set_VEBT_VEBT2 @ treeList ) ) )
      & ( ( X23240 != X23241 )
        | ~ ( vEBT_V8194947554948674370ptions @ ( vEBT_vebt_delete @ X23239 @ X23240 ) @ X23241 )
        | ~ ( member_VEBT_VEBT @ X23239 @ ( set_VEBT_VEBT2 @ treeList ) ) )
      & ( ( vEBT_V8194947554948674370ptions @ X23239 @ X23241 )
        | ~ ( vEBT_V8194947554948674370ptions @ ( vEBT_vebt_delete @ X23239 @ X23240 ) @ X23241 )
        | ~ ( member_VEBT_VEBT @ X23239 @ ( set_VEBT_VEBT2 @ treeList ) ) )
      & ( ( X23240 = X23241 )
        | ~ ( vEBT_V8194947554948674370ptions @ X23239 @ X23241 )
        | ( vEBT_V8194947554948674370ptions @ ( vEBT_vebt_delete @ X23239 @ X23240 ) @ X23241 )
        | ~ ( member_VEBT_VEBT @ X23239 @ ( set_VEBT_VEBT2 @ treeList ) ) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])])]) ).

thf(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X24193: nat,X24194: list_VEBT_VEBT] :
      ( ~ ( ord_less_nat @ X24193 @ ( size_s6755466524823107622T_VEBT @ X24194 ) )
      | ( member_VEBT_VEBT @ ( nth_VEBT_VEBT @ X24194 @ X24193 ) @ ( set_VEBT_VEBT2 @ X24194 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_137_nth__mem])])]) ).

thf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( vEBT_invar_vebt @ ( nth_VEBT_VEBT @ treeList @ ( vEBT_VEBT_high @ xa @ na ) ) @ na ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

thf(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X1: vEBT_VEBT] :
      ( ( vEBT_invar_vebt @ X1 @ na )
      | ~ ( member_VEBT_VEBT @ X1 @ ( set_VEBT_VEBT2 @ treeList ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

thf(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X2: nat,X5: list_VEBT_VEBT] :
      ( ( member_VEBT_VEBT @ ( nth_VEBT_VEBT @ X5 @ X2 ) @ ( set_VEBT_VEBT2 @ X5 ) )
      | ~ ( ord_less_nat @ X2 @ ( size_s6755466524823107622T_VEBT @ X5 ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

thf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( vEBT_invar_vebt @ ( nth_VEBT_VEBT @ treeList @ ( vEBT_VEBT_high @ xa @ na ) ) @ na ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

thf(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X2: nat] :
      ( ( vEBT_invar_vebt @ ( nth_VEBT_VEBT @ treeList @ X2 ) @ na )
      | ~ ( ord_less_nat @ X2 @ ( size_s6755466524823107622T_VEBT @ treeList ) ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

thf(c_0_14,plain,
    ord_less_nat @ ( vEBT_VEBT_high @ xa @ na ) @ ( size_s6755466524823107622T_VEBT @ treeList ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_8__092_060open_062high_Ax_An_A_060_Alength_AtreeList_092_060close_062]) ).

thf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : ITP256^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.1.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.19  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.19  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.19  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.19  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.19  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.19  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.19  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.19  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 20:39:50 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.19  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.19  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.24  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 4.57/4.63  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.lIANNzkE1O/E---3.1_605155.p
% 124.27/45.59  % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 124.27/45.59  % partial match(2): HMLMSMSMSSLCHFA
% 124.27/45.59  % Preprocessing class: HMLLSMLMSSLCHFA.
% 124.27/45.59  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 299 seconds (2392 total)
% 124.27/45.59  % Starting new_ho_10 with 1495s (5) cores
% 124.27/45.59  % Starting sh5l with 299s (1) cores
% 124.27/45.59  % Starting new_bool_1 with 299s (1) cores
% 124.27/45.59  % Starting new_bool_2 with 299s (1) cores
% 124.27/45.59  % new_bool_1 with pid 605170 completed with status 0
% 124.27/45.59  % Result found by new_bool_1
% 124.27/45.59  % partial match(2): HMLMSMSMSSLCHFA
% 124.27/45.59  % Preprocessing class: HMLLSMLMSSLCHFA.
% 124.27/45.59  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 299 seconds (2392 total)
% 124.27/45.59  % Starting new_ho_10 with 1495s (5) cores
% 124.27/45.59  % Starting sh5l with 299s (1) cores
% 124.27/45.59  % Starting new_bool_1 with 299s (1) cores
% 124.27/45.59  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 124.27/45.59  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 124.27/45.59  % Search class: HGHSM-SMLM32-DHFFFSBN
% 124.27/45.59  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 298 seconds (298 total)
% 124.27/45.59  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 30s (1) cores
% 124.27/45.59  % SubtermCWHack with pid 605173 completed with status 8
% 124.27/45.59  % Starting new_ho_10 with 179s (1) cores
% 124.27/45.59  % new_ho_10 with pid 605181 completed with status 0
% 124.27/45.59  % Result found by new_ho_10
% 124.27/45.59  % partial match(2): HMLMSMSMSSLCHFA
% 124.27/45.59  % Preprocessing class: HMLLSMLMSSLCHFA.
% 124.27/45.59  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 299 seconds (2392 total)
% 124.27/45.59  % Starting new_ho_10 with 1495s (5) cores
% 124.27/45.59  % Starting sh5l with 299s (1) cores
% 124.27/45.59  % Starting new_bool_1 with 299s (1) cores
% 124.27/45.59  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 124.27/45.59  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 124.27/45.59  % Search class: HGHSM-SMLM32-DHFFFSBN
% 124.27/45.59  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 298 seconds (298 total)
% 124.27/45.59  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 30s (1) cores
% 124.27/45.59  % SubtermCWHack with pid 605173 completed with status 8
% 124.27/45.59  % Starting new_ho_10 with 179s (1) cores
% 124.27/45.59  % Preprocessing time       : 0.079 s
% 124.27/45.59  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 124.27/45.59  
% 124.27/45.59  % Proof found!
% 124.27/45.59  % SZS status Theorem
% 124.27/45.59  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 124.27/45.59  % Parsed axioms                        : 10756
% 124.27/45.59  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 9096
% 124.27/45.59  % Initial clauses                      : 7022
% 124.27/45.59  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 2540
% 124.27/45.59  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 4482
% 124.27/45.59  % Processed clauses                    : 11358
% 124.27/45.59  % ...of these trivial                  : 199
% 124.27/45.59  % ...subsumed                          : 2995
% 124.27/45.59  % ...remaining for further processing  : 8164
% 124.27/45.59  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 5264
% 124.27/45.59  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 124.27/45.59  % Backward-subsumed                    : 44
% 124.27/45.59  % Backward-rewritten                   : 58
% 124.27/45.59  % Generated clauses                    : 97298
% 124.27/45.59  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 87342
% 124.27/45.59  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 124.27/45.59  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 131
% 124.27/45.59  % Paramodulations                      : 90844
% 124.27/45.59  % Factorizations                       : 22
% 124.27/45.59  % NegExts                              : 0
% 124.27/45.59  % Equation resolutions                 : 5298
% 124.27/45.59  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 124.27/45.59  % Total rewrite steps                  : 40366
% 124.27/45.59  % ...of those cached                   : 37430
% 124.27/45.59  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 124.27/45.59  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 124.27/45.59  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 124.27/45.59  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 124.27/45.59  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 124.27/45.59  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 124.27/45.59  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 124.27/45.59  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 124.27/45.59  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 124.27/45.59  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 124.27/45.59  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 124.27/45.59  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 124.27/45.59  % Current number of processed clauses  : 4115
% 124.27/45.59  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 451
% 124.27/45.59  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 6
% 124.27/45.59  %    Negative unit clauses             : 367
% 124.27/45.59  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 3291
% 124.27/45.59  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 83402
% 124.27/45.59  % ...number of literals in the above   : 467881
% 124.27/45.59  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 124.27/45.59  % Current number of archived clauses   : 3290
% 124.27/45.59  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 14418337
% 124.27/45.59  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 851888
% 124.27/45.59  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1762
% 124.27/45.59  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 470531
% 124.27/45.59  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 124.27/45.59  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 418
% 124.27/45.59  % BW rewrite match successes           : 121
% 124.27/45.59  % Condensation attempts                : 11358
% 124.27/45.59  % Condensation successes               : 79
% 124.27/45.59  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 5354856
% 124.27/45.59  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 181103
% 124.27/45.59  
% 124.27/45.59  % -------------------------------------------------
% 124.27/45.59  % User time                : 38.875 s
% 124.27/45.59  % System time              : 0.496 s
% 124.27/45.59  % Total time               : 39.371 s
% 124.27/45.59  % Maximum resident set size: 40184 pages
% 124.27/45.59  
% 124.27/45.59  % -------------------------------------------------
% 124.27/45.59  % User time                : 40.232 s
% 124.27/45.59  % System time              : 0.546 s
% 124.27/45.59  % Total time               : 40.778 s
% 124.27/45.59  % Maximum resident set size: 30208 pages
% 124.27/45.59  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------