↑ Up

SNARK---20120808r022.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : ITP001_1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v8.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 00:35:05 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 2.75s 2.95s
% Output   : Refutation 2.75s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   16 (  14 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   70 (   6 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   10 (   6   ~;   4   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of FOOLs       :   50 (  50 fml;   0 var)
%            Number arithmetic     :    7 (   0 atm;   0 fun;   6 num;   1 var)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr;   1 ari)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   22 (  20 usr;  10 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   0 usr;   2 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   14 (   0 sgn  14   !;   0   ?;  14   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(19,negated_conjecture,
    'reduced_row_echelon_form$'('a$'),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conjecture3) ).

tff(20,axiom,
    ~ 'is_zero_row_upt_k$'('i$','nat$'(1),'a$'),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom4) ).

tff(21,axiom,
    'is_zero_row_upt_k$'('zero$','nat$'(1),'a$'),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom5) ).

tff(22,axiom,
    ! [X: 'A_cols_vec_rows_vec$',Y: 'Nat$'] :
      ( ~ 'reduced_row_echelon_form$'(X)
      | 'fun_app$b'('reduced_row_echelon_form_upt_k$'(X),Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom7) ).

tff(23,axiom,
    'fun_app$c'('fun_app$d'('less$','zero$'),'i$'),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom8) ).

tff(35,axiom,
    ! [X: 'A_cols_vec_rows_vec$',Y: 'Nat$',Z: 'Rows$',U: 'Rows$'] :
      ( ~ 'fun_app$b'('reduced_row_echelon_form_upt_k$'(X),Y)
      | ~ 'is_zero_row_upt_k$'(Z,Y,X)
      | ~ 'fun_app$c'('fun_app$d'('less$',Z),U)
      | 'is_zero_row_upt_k$'(U,Y,X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom18) ).

tff(161,axiom,
    ! [X: 'Nat$',Y: 'Nat$'] : ( 'fun_app$h'('of_nat$','fun_app$l'('power$'(X),Y)) = 'fun_app$h'('power$a'('fun_app$h'('of_nat$',X)),Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom159) ).

tff(351,axiom,
    ! [X: 'Nat$'] : ( 'fun_app$l'('power$'(X),'nat$'(0)) = 'one$e' ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom244) ).

tff(353,axiom,
    ! [X: $int] : ( 'fun_app$h'('power$a'(X),'nat$'(0)) = 1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom246) ).

tff(930,axiom,
    ! [X: 'Nat$'] : ( 'nat$'('fun_app$h'('of_nat$',X)) = X ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom614) ).

tff(948,plain,
    ! [X: 'Nat$'] : 'fun_app$b'('reduced_row_echelon_form_upt_k$'('a$'),X),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[22,19]) ).

tff(1516,plain,
    ! [X: 'Nat$',Y: 'Nat$'] : ( 'nat$'('fun_app$h'('power$a'('fun_app$h'('of_nat$',X)),Y)) = 'fun_app$l'('power$'(X),Y) ),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[930,161,theory(equality)]) ).

tff(1534,plain,
    'nat$'(1) = 'one$e',
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[351,353,1516,theory(equality)]) ).

tff(1535,plain,
    ~ 'is_zero_row_upt_k$'('i$','one$e','a$'),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[20,1534,theory(equality)]) ).

tff(1536,plain,
    'is_zero_row_upt_k$'('zero$','one$e','a$'),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[21,1534,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(4336,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[35,1536,23,1535]),948]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13  % Problem  : ITP001_1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v8.1.0.
% 0.08/0.14  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Jun  2 17:04:40 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.47  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.48  * 
% 0.21/0.48  * 
% 0.21/0.49  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.21/0.49  * 
% 0.21/0.49  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.21/0.49  * 
% 0.21/0.49  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.21/0.49   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.21/0.49   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.21/0.49   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.21/0.49   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.21/0.49   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.21/0.49   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.21/0.49   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.21/0.49   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.21/0.49   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.21/0.49   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.21/0.49   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.21/0.49   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.21/0.49  * 
% 0.21/0.49  "."
% 0.21/0.49  * 
% 0.21/0.49  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-02T17:04:40
% 0.21/0.49  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n019.cluster.edu at 2022-06-02T17:04:40
% 0.48/0.70  WARNING:
% 0.48/0.70     |reduced_row_echelon_form$c| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.48/0.70  WARNING:
% 0.48/0.70     |reduced_row_echelon_form$d| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.48/0.70  WARNING:
% 0.48/0.70     |reduced_row_echelon_form$a| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.48/0.70  WARNING:
% 0.48/0.70     |reduced_row_echelon_form$i| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.48/0.70  WARNING:
% 0.48/0.70     |reduced_row_echelon_form$b| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.48/0.70  WARNING:
% 0.48/0.70     |reduced_row_echelon_form$j| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.48/0.70  WARNING:
% 0.48/0.70     |reduced_row_echelon_form$h| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.48/0.70  WARNING:
% 0.48/0.70     |reduced_row_echelon_form$e| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.48/0.70  WARNING:
% 0.48/0.70     |reduced_row_echelon_form$g| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.48/0.70  WARNING:
% 0.48/0.70     |reduced_row_echelon_form$f| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.48/0.70  WARNING:
% 0.48/0.70     |less_eq$b| is a 2-ary relation that occurs only positively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 2.75/2.95  
% 2.75/2.95  
% 2.75/2.95  #||
% 2.75/2.95  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.75/2.95  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 2.75/2.95  ||#
% 2.75/2.95  
% 2.75/2.95  ; Summary of computation:
% 2.75/2.95  ;     11682 formulas have been input or derived (from 429 formulas).
% 2.75/2.95  ;      4336 (37%) were retained.  Of these,
% 2.75/2.95  ;          442 (10%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 2.75/2.95  ;         3894 (90%) are still being kept.
% 2.75/2.95  ; 
% 2.75/2.95  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 2.75/2.95  ;     0.175   7%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 2.75/2.95  ;     0.021   1%   Assert                       (618 calls)
% 2.75/2.95  ;     0.365  15%   Process new row              (9,826 calls)
% 2.75/2.95  ;     0.280  11%   Resolution                   (856 calls)
% 2.75/2.95  ;     0.021   1%   Paramodulation               (428 calls)
% 2.75/2.95  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (33 calls)
% 2.75/2.95  ;     0.069   3%   Condensing                   (5,950 calls)
% 2.75/2.95  ;     0.770  31%   Forward subsumption          (5,950 calls)
% 2.75/2.95  ;     0.183   7%   Backward subsumption         (3,661 calls)
% 2.75/2.95  ;     0.093   4%   Clause clause subsumption    (18,865 calls)
% 2.75/2.95  ;     0.311  13%   Forward simplification       (9,736 calls)
% 2.75/2.95  ;     0.016   1%   Backward simplification      (4,057 calls)
% 2.75/2.95  ;     0.038   2%   Ordering                     (20,372 calls)
% 2.75/2.95  ;     0.000   0%   Ordering ac                  (2 calls)
% 2.75/2.95  ;     0.054   2%   Sortal reasoning             (68,188 calls)
% 2.75/2.95  ;     0.002   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 2.75/2.95  ;     0.064   3%   Other
% 2.75/2.95  ;     2.462        Total
% 2.75/2.95  ;     2.463        Real time
% 2.75/2.95  ; 
% 2.75/2.96  ; Term-hash-array has 4,948 terms in all.
% 2.75/2.96  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 3,526 entries (3,526 at peak, 3,661 added, 135 deleted).
% 2.75/2.96  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 32,299 nodes (32,299 at peak, 33,816 added, 1,517 deleted).
% 2.75/2.96  ;  Retrieved 27,482 possibly forward subsuming rows in 5,950 calls.
% 2.75/2.96  ;  Retrieved 1,728 possibly backward subsumed rows in 3,661 calls.
% 2.75/2.96  ; Path-index has 4,832 entries (4,832 at peak, 5,141 added, 309 deleted).
% 2.75/2.96  ; Path-index has 8,184 nodes (8,184 at peak, 8,408 added, 224 deleted).
% 2.75/2.96  ; Trie-index has 4,832 entries (4,832 at peak, 5,141 added, 309 deleted).
% 2.75/2.96  ; Trie-index has 10,127 nodes (10,127 at peak, 10,667 added, 540 deleted).
% 2.75/2.96  ; Retrieved 25,984 generalization terms in 62,090 calls.
% 2.75/2.96  ; Retrieved 474 instance terms in 405 calls.
% 2.75/2.96  ; Retrieved 252,610 unifiable terms in 5,398 calls.
% 2.75/2.96  ; 
% 2.75/2.96  ; The agenda of rows to process has 50 entries:
% 2.75/2.96  ;     2 with value 14              2 with value 26               4 with value 37
% 2.75/2.96  ;     2 with value 16              2 with value 27               2 with value 40
% 2.75/2.96  ;     1 with value 21              3 with value 29               4 with value 42
% 2.75/2.96  ;     2 with value 22              2 with value 31               1 with value 44
% 2.75/2.96  ;     1 with value 23              3 with value 33               2 with value 48
% 2.75/2.96  ;     4 with value 24              4 with value 35               2 with value 49
% 2.75/2.96  ;     2 with value 25              1 with value 36               4 with value 53
% 2.75/2.96  ; The agenda of input rows to give has 204 entries:
% 2.75/2.96  ;    12 with value 23              4 with value 32               2 with value 40
% 2.75/2.96  ;    18 with value 24             13 with value 33               9 with value 43
% 2.75/2.96  ;    23 with value 25              3 with value 34               4 with value 44
% 2.75/2.96  ;    10 with value 26             10 with value 35               2 with value 45
% 2.75/2.96  ;    12 with value 27              7 with value 36               7 with value 46
% 2.75/2.96  ;    12 with value 28              7 with value 37               1 with value 51
% 2.75/2.96  ;    14 with value 29             10 with value 38               3 with value 53
% 2.75/2.96  ;    11 with value 30              5 with value 39               1 with value 57
% 2.75/2.96  ;     4 with value 31
% 2.75/2.96  ; The agenda of rows to give has 3284 entries:
% 2.75/2.96  ;     6 with value (4 5)          91 with value (4 27)          35 with value (4 48)
% 2.75/2.96  ;     1 with value (4 6)         157 with value (4 28)          27 with value (4 49)
% 2.75/2.96  ;     3 with value (4 7)          95 with value (4 29)          24 with value (4 50)
% 2.75/2.96  ;    19 with value (4 8)         124 with value (4 30)          22 with value (4 51)
% 2.75/2.96  ;     6 with value (4 9)         112 with value (4 31)          21 with value (4 52)
% 2.75/2.96  ;    26 with value (4 10)        113 with value (4 32)           9 with value (4 53)
% 2.75/2.96  ;    22 with value (4 11)         86 with value (4 33)          22 with value (4 54)
% 2.75/2.96  ;    37 with value (4 12)         91 with value (4 34)          24 with value (4 55)
% 2.75/2.96  ;    30 with value (4 13)        109 with value (4 35)          29 with value (4 56)
% 2.75/2.96  ;    54 with value (4 14)         71 with value (4 36)           9 with value (4 57)
% 2.75/2.96  ;    86 with value (4 15)         58 with value (4 37)           3 with value (4 58)
% 2.75/2.96  ;    59 with value (4 16)         59 with value (4 38)           4 with value (4 59)
% 2.75/2.96  ;    50 with value (4 17)         79 with value (4 39)          21 with value (4 60)
% 2.75/2.96  ;    70 with value (4 18)         46 with value (4 40)           1 with value (4 61)
% 2.75/2.96  ;    88 with value (4 19)         64 with value (4 41)           5 with value (4 62)
% 2.75/2.96  ;   115 with value (4 20)         56 with value (4 42)           1 with value (4 63)
% 2.75/2.96  ;   102 with value (4 21)         61 with value (4 43)           2 with value (4 64)
% 2.75/2.96  ;   132 with value (4 22)         39 with value (4 44)           4 with value (4 65)
% 2.75/2.96  ;   117 with value (4 23)         50 with value (4 45)           4 with value (4 66)
% 2.75/2.96  ;   153 with value (4 24)         35 with value (4 46)           2 with value (4 67)
% 2.75/2.96  ;    95 with value (4 25)         43 with value (4 47)           4 with value (4 69)
% 2.75/2.96  ;   101 with value (4 26)
% 2.75/2.96  Evaluation took:
% 2.75/2.96    2.465 seconds of real time
% 2.75/2.96    2.245405 seconds of user run time
% 2.75/2.96    0.219297 seconds of system run time
% 2.75/2.96    [Run times include 0.205 seconds GC run time.]
% 2.75/2.96    0 calls to %EVAL
% 2.75/2.96    0 page faults and
% 2.75/2.96    222,446,880 bytes consed.
% 2.75/2.96  :PROOF-FOUND
% 2.75/2.96  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-02T17:04:43
% 2.75/2.96  :PROOF-FOUND
% 2.75/2.96  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------