↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : KLE002+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:44:01 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.10s 0.39s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.10s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   16 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   23 (   9 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   14 (   7   ~;   2   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   23 (   0 sgn  11   !;   3   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(left_distributivity,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C] : multiplication(addition(A,B),C) = addition(multiplication(A,C),multiplication(B,C)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',left_distributivity) ).

fof(order,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( leq(A,B)
    <=> addition(A,B) = B ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',order) ).

fof(goals,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( leq(X0,X1)
     => leq(multiplication(X0,X2),multiplication(X1,X2)) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

fof(goals_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1,X2] :
        ( leq(X0,X1)
       => leq(multiplication(X0,X2),multiplication(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).

cnf(c_22,plain,
    multiplication(addition(A,B),C) = addition(multiplication(A,C),multiplication(B,C)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[left_distributivity]) ).

cnf(c_25,plain,
    ( addition(A,B) = B
    | ~ leq(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[order]) ).

cnf(c_26,plain,
    ( addition(A,B) != B
    | leq(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[order]) ).

fof(nnf_13,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ~ leq(multiplication(X0,X2),multiplication(X1,X2))
      & leq(X0,X1) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[goals_neg]) ).

fof(sk_goals_neg,plain,
    ( ~ leq(multiplication(sK0,sK2),multiplication(sK1,sK2))
    & leq(sK0,sK1) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2]),skolemize(X0,sK0),skolemize(X1,sK1),skolemize(X2,sK2)],[nnf_13]) ).

cnf(c_27,negated_conjecture,
    leq(sK0,sK1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_goals_neg]) ).

cnf(c_28,negated_conjecture,
    ~ leq(multiplication(sK0,sK2),multiplication(sK1,sK2)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_goals_neg]) ).

cnf(c_39,negated_conjecture,
    addition(sK0,sK1) = sK1,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_25,c_27]) ).

cnf(c_40,negated_conjecture,
    addition(multiplication(sK0,sK2),multiplication(sK1,sK2)) != multiplication(sK1,sK2),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_26,c_28]) ).

cnf(c_51,plain,
    multiplication(sK1,A) = addition(multiplication(sK0,A),multiplication(sK1,A)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_39,c_22]) ).

cnf(c_49,plain,
    addition(multiplication(sK0,A),multiplication(sK1,A)) = multiplication(sK1,A),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_51]) ).

cnf(c_50,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_49,c_40]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04  % Problem  : KLE002+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.37  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 19:12:31 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.37  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.10/0.37  % Process 1417961 was started by sandbox on n010,
% 0.10/0.37  % Fri Sep 25 19:12:31 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.10/0.38  
% 0.10/0.38  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.10/0.39  
% 0.10/0.39  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.10/0.39  
% 0.10/0.39  % Proof 1 at 0.00 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.10/0.39  % Length of proof is 12.
% 0.10/0.39  % Level of proof is 4.
% 0.10/0.39  % Maximum clause weight is 28.000.
% 0.10/0.39  % Given clauses 23.
% 0.10/0.39  
% 0.10/0.39  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------