↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : KLE002+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:52:05 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 2.20s 1.31s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   33 (  18 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   52 (  29 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   41 (  22   ~;  13   |;   3   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   55 (   0 sgn  52   !;   3   ?;  22   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : addition(X0,X1) = addition(X1,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_commutativity) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] : addition(X2,addition(X1,X0)) = addition(addition(X2,X1),X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_associativity) ).

fof(f9,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] : multiplication(addition(X0,X1),X2) = addition(multiplication(X0,X2),multiplication(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',left_distributivity) ).

fof(f12,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( leq(X0,X1)
    <=> addition(X0,X1) = X1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',order) ).

fof(f13,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( leq(X0,X1)
     => leq(multiplication(X0,X2),multiplication(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

fof(f14,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1,X2] :
        ( leq(X0,X1)
       => leq(multiplication(X0,X2),multiplication(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f13]) ).

fof(f15,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( leq(X0,X1)
      & ~ leq(multiplication(X0,X2),multiplication(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).

fof(f16,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ~ leq(X0,X1)
        | addition(X0,X1) = X1 )
      & ( addition(X0,X1) != X1
        | leq(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).

fof(f17,plain,
    ( leq(sK0,sK1)
    & ~ leq(multiplication(sK0,sK2),multiplication(sK1,sK2)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2]),skolemize(X0,sK0),skolemize(X1,sK1),skolemize(X2,sK2)],[f15]) ).

fof(f18,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : addition(X0,X1) = addition(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f19,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : addition(X2,addition(X1,X0)) = addition(addition(X2,X1),X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f26,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : multiplication(addition(X0,X1),X2) = addition(multiplication(X0,X2),multiplication(X1,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

fof(f29,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ leq(X0,X1)
      | addition(X0,X1) = X1 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).

fof(f30,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( addition(X0,X1) != X1
      | leq(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).

fof(f31,plain,
    leq(sK0,sK1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).

fof(f32,plain,
    ~ leq(multiplication(sK0,sK2),multiplication(sK1,sK2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).

tcf(c_49,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : addition(X0,X1) = addition(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).

tcf(c_50,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : addition(addition(X0,X1),X2) = addition(X0,addition(X1,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f19]) ).

tcf(c_57,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : addition(multiplication(X0,X1),multiplication(X2,X1)) = multiplication(addition(X0,X2),X1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f26]) ).

tcf(c_60,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( leq(X0,X1)
      | ( addition(X0,X1) != X1 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f30]) ).

tcf(c_61,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( addition(X0,X1) = X1 )
      | ~ leq(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f29]) ).

tcf(c_62,negated_conjecture,
    ~ leq(multiplication(sK0,sK2),multiplication(sK1,sK2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f32]) ).

tcf(c_63,negated_conjecture,
    leq(sK0,sK1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f31]) ).

tcf(c_74,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( addition(X0,X1) != X1 )
      | leq(X0,X1) ),
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_60]) ).

tcf(c_75,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( leq(X0,X1)
      | ( addition(X0,X1) != X1 ) ),
    inference(renaming,[status(thm)],[c_74]) ).

tcf(c_76,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( addition(X0,X1) = X1 )
      | ~ leq(X0,X1) ),
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_61]) ).

tcf(c_145,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( multiplication(sK1,sK2) != X1 )
      | ( multiplication(sK0,sK2) != X0 )
      | ( addition(X0,X1) != X1 ) ),
    inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_75,c_62]) ).

tcf(c_146,plain,
    addition(multiplication(sK0,sK2),multiplication(sK1,sK2)) != multiplication(sK1,sK2),
    inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_145]) ).

tcf(c_150,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( addition(X0,X1) = X1 )
      | ( X1 != sK1 )
      | ( X0 != sK0 ) ),
    inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_76,c_63]) ).

tcf(c_151,plain,
    addition(sK0,sK1) = sK1,
    inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_150]) ).

tcf(c_198,plain,
    multiplication(addition(sK0,sK1),sK2) != multiplication(sK1,sK2),
    inference(ac_demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_146,c_57,c_50,c_49]) ).

tcf(c_200,plain,
    multiplication(sK1,sK2) != multiplication(sK1,sK2),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_198,c_151]) ).

tcf(c_201,plain,
    $false,
    inference(equality_resolution_simp,[status(thm)],[c_200]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : KLE002+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.13/0.38  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.13/0.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.13/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.38  % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 18:38:27 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.38  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.13/0.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.44  
% 0.13/0.44  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.13/0.44  
% 0.13/0.44  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.13/0.45  % Proving...
% 2.20/1.31  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.20/1.31  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.20/1.31  
% 2.20/1.31  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 2.20/1.31  
% 2.20/1.31  % ------  iProver source info
% 2.20/1.31  
% 2.20/1.31  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 2.20/1.31  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 2.20/1.31  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.20/1.31  
% 2.20/1.31  % ------ Parsing...
% 2.20/1.31  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 2.20/1.31  
% 2.20/1.31  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe_e % 
% 2.20/1.31  
% 2.20/1.31  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.20/1.31  
% 2.20/1.31  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.20/1.31  
% 2.20/1.31  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------