↑ Up

ConnectPP---0.7.2.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ConnectPP---0.7.2
% Problem  : KLE003+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 08:46:50 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.09s 0.39s
% Output   : Proof 0.09s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   22 (  10 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   48 (  30 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   47 (  21   ~;  14   |;  10   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   2 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   18 (   4 sgn  11   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(additive_idempotence,axiom,
    ! [A] : addition(A,A) = A,
    file('KLE001+0.ax',additive_idempotence) ).

fof(goals,conjecture,
    ( ! [X0] : addition(X0,X0) = X0
  <=> addition(one,one) = one ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

fof(f_4_1,plain,
    ! [A] : addition(A,A) = A,
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[additive_idempotence]) ).

fof(f_4_2,plain,
    ! [U_6] : addition(U_6,U_6) = U_6,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f_4_1]) ).

cnf(f_4_3,plain,
    addition(U_6,U_6) = U_6,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_4_2]) ).

fof(f_13_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ! [X0] : addition(X0,X0) = X0
    <=> addition(one,one) = one ),
    inference(negate,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).

fof(f_13_2,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( ? [X0] : addition(X0,X0) != X0
      & addition(one,one) = one )
    | ( addition(one,one) != one
      & ! [X0] : addition(X0,X0) = X0 ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[f_13_1]) ).

fof(f_13_3,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( ? [U_27] : addition(U_27,U_27) != U_27
      & addition(one,one) = one )
    | ( addition(one,one) != one
      & ! [U_26] : addition(U_26,U_26) = U_26 ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f_13_2]) ).

fof(f_13_4,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( addition(sK1,sK1) != sK1
      & addition(one,one) = one )
    | ( addition(one,one) != one
      & ! [U_26] : addition(U_26,U_26) = U_26 ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1]),skolemize(U_27,sK1)],[f_13_3]) ).

fof(f_13_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( addition(sK1,sK1) != sK1
      | ~ sP1 )
    & ( addition(one,one) = one
      | ~ sP1 )
    & ! [U_26] :
        ( addition(one,one) != one
        | ~ sP0(U_26) )
    & ! [U_26] :
        ( addition(U_26,U_26) = U_26
        | ~ sP0(U_26) )
    & ! [U_26] :
        ( sP1
        | sP0(U_26) ) ),
    inference(definitional_conversion,[status(esa),new_symbols(definitional,[sP0,sP1])],[f_13_4]) ).

cnf(f_13_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( sP1
    | sP0(U_26) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_13_5]) ).

cnf(f_13_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( addition(one,one) != one
    | ~ sP0(U_26) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_13_5]) ).

cnf(f_13_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( addition(sK1,sK1) != sK1
    | ~ sP1 ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_13_5]) ).

cnf(t1,plain,
    ( addition(one,one) != one
    | ~ sP0(U_264) ),
    inference(start,[status(thm),parent(0:0)],[f_13_8]) ).

cnf(t2,plain,
    ( sP1
    | sP0(U_264) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t1:1)],[f_13_6]) ).

cnf(t3,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t2:1)],[t2:1,t1:1]) ).

cnf(t4,plain,
    ( addition(sK1,sK1) != sK1
    | ~ sP1 ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t2:2)],[f_13_10]) ).

cnf(t5,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t4:1)],[t4:1,t2:2]) ).

cnf(t6,plain,
    addition(sK1,sK1) = sK1,
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t4:2)],[f_4_3]) ).

cnf(t7,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t6:1)],[t6:1,t4:2]) ).

cnf(t8,plain,
    addition(one,one) = one,
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t1:2)],[f_4_3]) ).

cnf(t9,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t8:1)],[t8:1,t1:2]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : KLE003+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.02  This is a FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ problem
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.36  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % DateTime : Sat Sep 19 11:45:54 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.39  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.09/0.39  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------