↑ Up

Beagle---0.9.52.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.52
% Problem  : KLE004+1 : TPTP v9.0.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Apr  9 07:04:32 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 16.34s 5.62s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 16.70s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   28 (  15 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   49 (  30 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   40 (  19   ~;  15   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   33 (  32   !;   1   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ leq > complement > test > multiplication > addition > #nlpp > c > zero > one > #skF_1

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': $i > $i ).

tff(c,type,
    c: $i > $i ).

tff(multiplication,type,
    multiplication: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(addition,type,
    addition: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(complement,type,
    complement: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(test,type,
    test: $i > $o ).

tff(one,type,
    one: $i ).

tff(leq,type,
    leq: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(zero,type,
    zero: $i ).

tff(f_135,negated_conjecture,
    c(zero) != one,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

tff(f_51,axiom,
    ! [A,B] : ( addition(A,B) = addition(B,A) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_commutativity) ).

tff(f_126,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( test(X0)
     => ( ( c(X0) = X1 )
      <=> complement(X0,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_3) ).

tff(f_120,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( complement(X1,X0)
    <=> ( ( multiplication(X0,X1) = zero )
        & ( multiplication(X1,X0) = zero )
        & ( addition(X0,X1) = one ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_2) ).

tff(f_55,axiom,
    ! [A] : ( addition(A,zero) = A ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_identity) ).

tff(f_74,axiom,
    ! [A] : ( multiplication(zero,A) = zero ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',left_annihilation) ).

tff(f_72,axiom,
    ! [A] : ( multiplication(A,zero) = zero ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',right_annihilation) ).

tff(f_112,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( test(X0)
    <=> ? [X1] : complement(X1,X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_1) ).

tff(c_46,plain,
    c(zero) != one,
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_135]) ).

tff(c_2,plain,
    ! [B_2,A_1] : ( addition(B_2,A_1) = addition(A_1,B_2) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_51]) ).

tff(c_42,plain,
    ! [X0_29] :
      ( complement(X0_29,c(X0_29))
      | ~ test(X0_29) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_126]) ).

tff(c_264,plain,
    ! [X0_49,X1_50] :
      ( ( addition(X0_49,X1_50) = one )
      | ~ complement(X1_50,X0_49) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_120]) ).

tff(c_270,plain,
    ! [X0_29] :
      ( ( addition(c(X0_29),X0_29) = one )
      | ~ test(X0_29) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_42,c_264]) ).

tff(c_472,plain,
    ! [X0_65] :
      ( ( addition(X0_65,c(X0_65)) = one )
      | ~ test(X0_65) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_2,c_270]) ).

tff(c_158,plain,
    ! [B_44,A_45] : ( addition(B_44,A_45) = addition(A_45,B_44) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_51]) ).

tff(c_6,plain,
    ! [A_6] : ( addition(A_6,zero) = A_6 ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_55]) ).

tff(c_174,plain,
    ! [A_45] : ( addition(zero,A_45) = A_45 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_158,c_6]) ).

tff(c_486,plain,
    ( ( c(zero) = one )
    | ~ test(zero) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_472,c_174]) ).

tff(c_502,plain,
    ~ test(zero),
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_46,c_486]) ).

tff(c_22,plain,
    ! [A_20] : ( multiplication(zero,A_20) = zero ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_74]) ).

tff(c_20,plain,
    ! [A_19] : ( multiplication(A_19,zero) = zero ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_72]) ).

tff(c_1440,plain,
    ! [X1_90,X0_91] :
      ( complement(X1_90,X0_91)
      | ( addition(X0_91,X1_90) != one )
      | ( multiplication(X1_90,X0_91) != zero )
      | ( multiplication(X0_91,X1_90) != zero ) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_120]) ).

tff(c_30,plain,
    ! [X0_23,X1_26] :
      ( test(X0_23)
      | ~ complement(X1_26,X0_23) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_112]) ).

tff(c_23167,plain,
    ! [X0_235,X1_236] :
      ( test(X0_235)
      | ( addition(X0_235,X1_236) != one )
      | ( multiplication(X1_236,X0_235) != zero )
      | ( multiplication(X0_235,X1_236) != zero ) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1440,c_30]) ).

tff(c_23251,plain,
    ! [A_19] :
      ( test(zero)
      | ( addition(zero,A_19) != one )
      | ( multiplication(zero,A_19) != zero ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_20,c_23167]) ).

tff(c_23299,plain,
    ! [A_19] :
      ( test(zero)
      | ( one != A_19 ) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_22,c_174,c_23251]) ).

tff(c_23300,plain,
    ! [A_19] : ( one != A_19 ),
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_502,c_23299]) ).

tff(c_23336,plain,
    $false,
    inference(reflexivity,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_23300]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : KLE004+1 : TPTP v9.0.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Apr  8 02:25:33 EDT 2025
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 16.34/5.62  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 16.34/5.63  
% 16.34/5.63  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------