↑ Up

Zipperpin---2.1.9999.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : KLE004+1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.f4OSrk2AHY true

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct  2 04:40:03 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 0.58s 0.79s
% Output   : Refutation 0.58s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   30 (  16 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   57 (  37 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  138 (  25   ~;  21   |;   2   &;  86   @)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    9 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   35 (   0   ^;  34   !;   1   ?;  35   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(multiplication_type,type,
    multiplication: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(c_type,type,
    c: $i > $i ).

thf(complement_type,type,
    complement: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(one_type,type,
    one: $i ).

thf(addition_type,type,
    addition: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(test_type,type,
    test: $i > $o ).

thf(zero_type,type,
    zero: $i ).

thf(left_annihilation,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( multiplication @ zero @ A )
      = zero ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl10,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( multiplication @ zero @ X0 )
      = zero ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[left_annihilation]) ).

thf(test_2,axiom,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( complement @ X1 @ X0 )
    <=> ( ( ( multiplication @ X0 @ X1 )
          = zero )
        & ( ( multiplication @ X1 @ X0 )
          = zero )
        & ( ( addition @ X0 @ X1 )
          = one ) ) ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl18,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( complement @ X0 @ X1 )
      | ( ( addition @ X1 @ X0 )
       != one )
      | ( ( multiplication @ X0 @ X1 )
       != zero )
      | ( ( multiplication @ X1 @ X0 )
       != zero ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[test_2]) ).

thf(test_1,axiom,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( test @ X0 )
    <=> ? [X1: $i] : ( complement @ X1 @ X0 ) ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl14,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( test @ X0 )
      | ~ ( complement @ X1 @ X0 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[test_1]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl66,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( multiplication @ X0 @ X1 )
       != zero )
      | ( ( multiplication @ X1 @ X0 )
       != zero )
      | ( ( addition @ X0 @ X1 )
       != one )
      | ( test @ X0 ) ),
    inference('dp-resolution',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl18,zip_derived_cl14]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl245,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( zero != zero )
      | ( ( multiplication @ X0 @ zero )
       != zero )
      | ( ( addition @ zero @ X0 )
       != one )
      | ( test @ zero ) ),
    inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl10,zip_derived_cl66]) ).

thf(right_annihilation,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( multiplication @ A @ zero )
      = zero ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl9,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( multiplication @ X0 @ zero )
      = zero ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[right_annihilation]) ).

thf(additive_identity,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( addition @ A @ zero )
      = A ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl2,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( addition @ X0 @ zero )
      = X0 ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[additive_identity]) ).

thf(additive_commutativity,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( addition @ A @ B )
      = ( addition @ B @ A ) ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl0,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( addition @ X1 @ X0 )
      = ( addition @ X0 @ X1 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[additive_commutativity]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl84,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( addition @ zero @ X0 )
      = X0 ),
    inference('s_sup+',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl2,zip_derived_cl0]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl256,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( zero != zero )
      | ( zero != zero )
      | ( X0 != one )
      | ( test @ zero ) ),
    inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl245,zip_derived_cl9,zip_derived_cl84]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl257,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( test @ zero )
      | ( X0 != one ) ),
    inference(simplify,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl256]) ).

thf(test_3,axiom,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( test @ X0 )
     => ( ( ( c @ X0 )
          = X1 )
      <=> ( complement @ X0 @ X1 ) ) ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl20,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ~ ( test @ X0 )
      | ( complement @ X0 @ X1 )
      | ( ( c @ X0 )
       != X1 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[test_3]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl17,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( addition @ X0 @ X1 )
        = one )
      | ~ ( complement @ X1 @ X0 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[test_2]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl65,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( c @ X0 )
       != X1 )
      | ~ ( test @ X0 )
      | ( ( addition @ X1 @ X0 )
        = one ) ),
    inference('dp-resolution',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl20,zip_derived_cl17]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl231,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( ( addition @ ( c @ X0 ) @ X0 )
        = one )
      | ~ ( test @ X0 ) ),
    inference(eq_res,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl65]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl2_001,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( addition @ X0 @ zero )
      = X0 ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[additive_identity]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl235,plain,
    ( ~ ( test @ zero )
    | ( one
      = ( c @ zero ) ) ),
    inference('s_sup+',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl231,zip_derived_cl2]) ).

thf(goals,conjecture,
    ( ( c @ zero )
    = one ) ).

thf(zf_stmt_0,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( c @ zero )
   != one ),
    inference('cnf.neg',[status(esa)],[goals]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl22,plain,
    ( ( c @ zero )
   != one ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl240,plain,
    ~ ( test @ zero ),
    inference('simplify_reflect-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl235,zip_derived_cl22]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl302,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : ( X0 != one ),
    inference(clc,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl257,zip_derived_cl240]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl303,plain,
    $false,
    inference(eq_res,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl302]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : KLE004+1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.06/0.13  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.f4OSrk2AHY true
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Wed Oct  1 14:08:23 EDT 2025
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.34  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.13/0.34  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.34  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.13/0.35  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.13/0.35  % Running in FO mode
% 0.56/0.66  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.56/0.66  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.56/0.66  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.58/0.73  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.58/0.74  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.58/0.77  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.58/0.78  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.58/0.78  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.58/0.78  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.58/0.79  % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 0.58/0.79  % BCE start: 23
% 0.58/0.79  % BCE eliminated: 2
% 0.58/0.79  % PE start: 21
% 0.58/0.79  logic: eq
% 0.58/0.79  % PE eliminated: 0
% 0.58/0.79  % done 41 iterations in 0.033s
% 0.58/0.79  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.58/0.79  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.58/0.79  
% 0.58/0.79  
% 0.58/0.79  % Terminating...
% 0.58/0.79  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 1.74/0.87  % Runner terminated.
% 1.74/0.88  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------