↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : KLE004+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:52:06 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.06s 1.32s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.06s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   20
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   62 (  30 unt;   1 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  164 (  71 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  114 (  48   ~;  48   |;  12   &)
%                                         (   4 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   2 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   65 (   0 sgn  62   !;   3   ?;  21   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : addition(X0,X1) = addition(X1,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_commutativity) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X0] : addition(X0,zero) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_identity) ).

fof(f10,axiom,
    ! [X0] : multiplication(X0,zero) = zero,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',right_annihilation) ).

fof(f11,axiom,
    ! [X0] : multiplication(zero,X0) = zero,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',left_annihilation) ).

fof(f13,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( test(X0)
    <=> ? [X1] : complement(X1,X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_1) ).

fof(f14,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( complement(X1,X0)
    <=> ( addition(X0,X1) = one
        & multiplication(X1,X0) = zero
        & multiplication(X0,X1) = zero ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_2) ).

fof(f15,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( test(X0)
     => ( c(X0) = X1
      <=> complement(X0,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_3) ).

fof(f16,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ test(X0)
     => c(X0) = zero ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_4) ).

fof(f17,conjecture,
    c(zero) = one,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

fof(f18,negated_conjecture,
    c(zero) != one,
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f17]) ).

fof(f19,plain,
    one != c(zero),
    inference(flattening,[],[f18]) ).

fof(f20,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ test(X0)
      | ( c(X0) = X1
      <=> complement(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

fof(f21,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( test(X0)
      | c(X0) = zero ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).

fof(f22,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ( ~ test(X0)
        | ? [X1] : complement(X1,X0) )
      & ( ! [X1] : ~ complement(X1,X0)
        | test(X0) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).

fof(f23,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ( ~ test(X0)
        | ? [X2] : complement(X2,X0) )
      & ( ! [X1] : ~ complement(X1,X0)
        | test(X0) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f22]) ).

fof(f24,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ( ~ test(X0)
        | complement(sK0(X0),X0) )
      & ( ! [X1] : ~ complement(X1,X0)
        | test(X0) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0]),skolemize(X2,sK0(X0))],[f23]) ).

fof(f25,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ~ complement(X1,X0)
        | ( addition(X0,X1) = one
          & multiplication(X1,X0) = zero
          & multiplication(X0,X1) = zero ) )
      & ( addition(X0,X1) != one
        | zero != multiplication(X1,X0)
        | zero != multiplication(X0,X1)
        | complement(X1,X0) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).

fof(f26,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ~ complement(X1,X0)
        | ( addition(X0,X1) = one
          & multiplication(X1,X0) = zero
          & multiplication(X0,X1) = zero ) )
      & ( addition(X0,X1) != one
        | zero != multiplication(X1,X0)
        | zero != multiplication(X0,X1)
        | complement(X1,X0) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f25]) ).

fof(f27,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ test(X0)
      | ( ( c(X0) != X1
          | complement(X0,X1) )
        & ( ~ complement(X0,X1)
          | c(X0) = X1 ) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f20]) ).

fof(f28,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : addition(X0,X1) = addition(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f30,plain,
    ! [X0] : addition(X0,zero) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f37,plain,
    ! [X0] : zero = multiplication(X0,zero),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

fof(f38,plain,
    ! [X0] : zero = multiplication(zero,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

fof(f40,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ complement(X1,X0)
      | test(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f24]) ).

fof(f41,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ complement(X1,X0)
      | addition(X0,X1) = one ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f26]) ).

fof(f44,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( addition(X0,X1) != one
      | zero != multiplication(X1,X0)
      | zero != multiplication(X0,X1)
      | complement(X1,X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f26]) ).

fof(f45,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ test(X0)
      | c(X0) != X1
      | complement(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f27]) ).

fof(f47,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( test(X0)
      | zero = c(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f21]) ).

fof(f48,plain,
    one != c(zero),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f19]) ).

fof(f49,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ test(X0)
      | complement(X0,c(X0)) ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f45]) ).

tcf(c_49,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : addition(X0,X1) = addition(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f28]) ).

tcf(c_51,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : addition(X0,zero) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f30]) ).

tcf(c_58,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : multiplication(X0,zero) = zero,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f37]) ).

tcf(c_59,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : multiplication(zero,X0) = zero,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f38]) ).

tcf(c_60,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( test(X1)
      | ~ complement(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f40]) ).

tcf(c_62,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( complement(X1,X0)
      | ( multiplication(X1,X0) != zero )
      | ( multiplication(X0,X1) != zero )
      | ( addition(X0,X1) != one ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f44]) ).

tcf(c_65,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( addition(X1,X0) = one )
      | ~ complement(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f41]) ).

tcf(c_67,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( complement(X0,c(X0))
      | ~ test(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f49]) ).

tcf(c_68,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( test(X0)
      | ( c(X0) = zero ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f47]) ).

tcf(c_69,negated_conjecture,
    c(zero) != one,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f48]) ).

tcf(c_416,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = c(zero),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_417,negated_conjecture,
    iPr_def_10 != one,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_69,c_416]) ).

tcf(c_658,plain,
    ( complement(zero,iPr_def_10)
    | ~ test(zero) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_416,c_67]) ).

tcf(c_672,plain,
    ( complement(zero,iPr_def_10)
    | ( c(zero) = zero ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_68,c_658]) ).

tcf(c_673,plain,
    ( complement(zero,iPr_def_10)
    | ( zero = iPr_def_10 ) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_672,c_416]) ).

tcf(c_700,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : addition(zero,X0) = X0,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_51,c_49]) ).

tcf(c_742,plain,
    ( ( zero = iPr_def_10 )
    | ( addition(iPr_def_10,zero) = one ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_673,c_65]) ).

tcf(c_953,plain,
    ( ( one = iPr_def_10 )
    | ( zero = iPr_def_10 ) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_742,c_51]) ).

tcf(c_962,plain,
    zero = iPr_def_10,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_953,c_417]) ).

tcf(c_969,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : addition(iPr_def_10,X0) = X0,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_700,c_962]) ).

tcf(c_971,plain,
    ( complement(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_10)
    | ~ test(iPr_def_10) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_658,c_962]) ).

tcf(c_973,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : multiplication(iPr_def_10,X0) = iPr_def_10,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_59,c_962]) ).

tcf(c_974,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : multiplication(X0,iPr_def_10) = iPr_def_10,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_58,c_962]) ).

tcf(c_1052,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( complement(X1,X0)
      | ( multiplication(X1,X0) != iPr_def_10 )
      | ( multiplication(X0,X1) != iPr_def_10 )
      | ( addition(X0,X1) != one ) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_62,c_962]) ).

tcf(c_1072,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( complement(X0,iPr_def_10)
      | ( X0 != one )
      | ( multiplication(iPr_def_10,X0) != iPr_def_10 )
      | ( multiplication(X0,iPr_def_10) != iPr_def_10 ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_969,c_1052]) ).

tcf(c_1076,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( complement(X0,iPr_def_10)
      | ( X0 != one ) ),
    inference(ground_joinability,[status(thm)],[c_1072,c_973,c_974]) ).

tcf(c_1182,plain,
    complement(one,iPr_def_10),
    inference(equality_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1076]) ).

tcf(c_1185,plain,
    test(iPr_def_10),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1182,c_60]) ).

tcf(c_1188,plain,
    complement(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_10),
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_971,c_1185]) ).

tcf(c_1285,plain,
    addition(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_10) = one,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1188,c_65]) ).

tcf(c_1294,plain,
    addition(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_10) != iPr_def_10,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_417,c_1285]) ).

tcf(c_1295,plain,
    $false,
    inference(ground_joinability,[status(thm)],[c_1294,c_969]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : KLE004+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.09/0.38  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.38  % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 18:34:14 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.38  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.13/0.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.43  
% 0.13/0.43  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.13/0.43  
% 0.13/0.43  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.13/0.45  % Proving...
% 3.06/1.32  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.06/1.32  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.06/1.32  
% 3.06/1.32  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 3.06/1.32  
% 3.06/1.32  % ------  iProver source info
% 3.06/1.32  
% 3.06/1.32  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 3.06/1.32  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 3.06/1.32  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.06/1.32  
% 3.06/1.32  % ------ Parsing...
% 3.06/1.32  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 3.06/1.32  
% 3.06/1.32  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 3.06/1.32  
% 3.06/1.32  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 3.06/1.32  
% 3.06/1.32  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 3.06/1.32  % ------ Proving...
% 3.06/1.32  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 3.06/1.32  
% 3.06/1.32  % 
% 3.06/1.32  % clauses                               22
% 3.06/1.32  % conjectures                           1
% 3.06/1.32  % EPR                                   2
% 3.06/1.32  % Horn                                  21
% 3.06/1.32  % unary                                 13
% 3.06/1.32  % binary                                7
% 3.06/1.32  % lits                                  34
% 3.06/1.32  % lits eq                               21
% 3.06/1.32  % fd_pure                               0
% 3.06/1.32  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 3.06/1.32  % fd_cond                               0
% 3.06/1.32  % fd_pseudo_cond                        1
% 3.06/1.32  % AC symbols                            1
% 3.06/1.32  
% 3.06/1.32  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 3.06/1.32  
% 3.06/1.32  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 3.06/1.32  
% 3.06/1.32  
% 3.06/1.32  % ------ 
% 3.06/1.32  % Current options:
% 3.06/1.32  % ------ 
% 3.06/1.32  
% 3.06/1.32  
% 3.06/1.32  % 
% 3.06/1.32  
% 3.06/1.32  % ------ Proving...
% 3.06/1.32  % 
% 3.06/1.32  
% 3.06/1.32  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.06/1.32  
% 3.06/1.32  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.06/1.32  
% 3.06/1.32  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------