↑ Up

CSE---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : KLE005+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 09:59:46 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 10.46s 10.60s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 10.53s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.09  % Problem    : KLE005+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.09  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.08/0.28  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.28  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.28  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.28  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.08/0.28  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.08/0.28  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.08/0.28  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.08/0.28  % DateTime   : Thu Jun 20 21:52:09 EDT 2024
% 0.08/0.28  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.13/0.45  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 10.46/10.59  %-------------------------------------------
% 10.46/10.59  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 10.46/10.59  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 10.46/10.59  % Transform   :cnf
% 10.46/10.59  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 10.46/10.59  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 10.46/10.59  
% 10.46/10.59  % Result      :Theorem 10.120000s
% 10.46/10.59  % Output      :CNFRefutation 10.120000s
% 10.46/10.59  %-------------------------------------------
% 10.46/10.60  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 10.46/10.60  % File     : KLE005+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 10.46/10.60  % Domain   : Kleene Algebra (Idempotent Test Semirings)
% 10.46/10.60  % Problem  : Complement - 0 is the complement of 1
% 10.46/10.60  % Version  : [Hoe08] axioms.
% 10.46/10.60  % English  :
% 10.46/10.60  
% 10.46/10.60  % Refs     : [Hoe08] Hoefner (2008), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 10.46/10.60  % Source   : [Hoe08]
% 10.46/10.60  % Names    :
% 10.46/10.60  
% 10.46/10.60  % Status   : Theorem
% 10.46/10.60  % Rating   : 0.06 v8.1.0, 0.03 v7.1.0, 0.04 v7.0.0, 0.03 v6.4.0, 0.08 v6.2.0, 0.12 v6.1.0, 0.17 v6.0.0, 0.13 v5.5.0, 0.07 v5.3.0, 0.15 v5.2.0, 0.10 v5.0.0, 0.08 v4.1.0, 0.04 v4.0.0
% 10.46/10.60  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   17 (  12 unt;   0 def)
% 10.46/10.60  %            Number of atoms       :   25 (  18 equ)
% 10.46/10.60  %            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
% 10.46/10.60  %            Number of connectives :    9 (   1   ~;   0   |;   2   &)
% 10.46/10.60  %                                         (   4 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 10.46/10.60  %            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
% 10.46/10.60  %            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
% 10.46/10.60  %            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   0 prp; 1-2 aty)
% 10.46/10.60  %            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
% 10.46/10.60  %            Number of variables   :   29 (  28   !;   1   ?)
% 10.46/10.60  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ
% 10.46/10.60  
% 10.46/10.60  % Comments : Equational encoding
% 10.46/10.60  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 10.46/10.60  %---Include axioms for idempotent test semiring
% 10.46/10.60  include('Axioms/KLE001+0.ax').
% 10.46/10.60  %---Include test axioms
% 10.46/10.60  include('Axioms/KLE001+1.ax').
% 10.46/10.60  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 10.46/10.60  fof(goals,conjecture,
% 10.46/10.60      c(one) = zero ).
% 10.46/10.60  
% 10.46/10.60  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 10.46/10.60  %-------------------------------------------
% 10.46/10.60  % Proof found
% 10.46/10.60  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 10.46/10.60  % SZS output start Proof
% 10.53/10.60  %ClaNum:37(EqnAxiom:14)
% 10.53/10.60  %VarNum:89(SingletonVarNum:40)
% 10.53/10.60  %MaxLitNum:4
% 10.53/10.60  %MaxfuncDepth:2
% 10.53/10.60  %SharedTerms:4
% 10.53/10.60  %goalClause: 26
% 10.53/10.60  %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 10.53/10.60  [26]~E(f4(a6),a1)
% 10.53/10.60  [15]E(f2(x151,a1),a1)
% 10.53/10.60  [16]E(f2(a1,x161),a1)
% 10.53/10.60  [17]E(f3(x171,a1),x171)
% 10.53/10.60  [18]E(f2(x181,a6),x181)
% 10.53/10.60  [19]E(f2(a6,x191),x191)
% 10.53/10.60  [20]E(f3(x201,x201),x201)
% 10.53/10.60  [21]E(f3(x211,x212),f3(x212,x211))
% 10.53/10.60  [22]E(f3(f3(x221,x222),x223),f3(x221,f3(x222,x223)))
% 10.53/10.60  [23]E(f2(f2(x231,x232),x233),f2(x231,f2(x232,x233)))
% 10.53/10.60  [24]E(f3(f2(x241,x242),f2(x241,x243)),f2(x241,f3(x242,x243)))
% 10.53/10.60  [25]E(f3(f2(x251,x252),f2(x253,x252)),f2(f3(x251,x253),x252))
% 10.53/10.60  [27]P1(x271)+E(f4(x271),a1)
% 10.53/10.60  [29]~P1(x291)+P2(f5(x291),x291)
% 10.53/10.60  [28]P1(x281)+~P2(x282,x281)
% 10.53/10.60  [32]~P2(x322,x321)+E(f3(x321,x322),a6)
% 10.53/10.60  [33]~P2(x332,x331)+E(f2(x331,x332),a1)
% 10.53/10.60  [34]~P2(x341,x342)+E(f2(x341,x342),a1)
% 10.53/10.60  [35]~P3(x351,x352)+E(f3(x351,x352),x352)
% 10.53/10.60  [36]P3(x361,x362)+~E(f3(x361,x362),x362)
% 10.53/10.60  [30]~P1(x301)+P2(x301,x302)+~E(f4(x301),x302)
% 10.53/10.60  [31]~P1(x311)+~P2(x311,x312)+E(f4(x311),x312)
% 10.53/10.60  [37]P2(x371,x372)+~E(f3(x372,x371),a6)+~E(f2(x371,x372),a1)+~E(f2(x372,x371),a1)
% 10.53/10.60  %EqnAxiom
% 10.53/10.60  [1]E(x11,x11)
% 10.53/10.60  [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 10.53/10.60  [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 10.53/10.60  [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f2(x41,x43),f2(x42,x43))
% 10.53/10.60  [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f2(x53,x51),f2(x53,x52))
% 10.53/10.60  [6]~E(x61,x62)+E(f3(x61,x63),f3(x62,x63))
% 10.53/10.60  [7]~E(x71,x72)+E(f3(x73,x71),f3(x73,x72))
% 10.53/10.60  [8]~E(x81,x82)+E(f4(x81),f4(x82))
% 10.53/10.60  [9]~E(x91,x92)+E(f5(x91),f5(x92))
% 10.53/10.60  [10]~P1(x101)+P1(x102)+~E(x101,x102)
% 10.53/10.60  [11]P2(x112,x113)+~E(x111,x112)+~P2(x111,x113)
% 10.53/10.60  [12]P2(x123,x122)+~E(x121,x122)+~P2(x123,x121)
% 10.53/10.60  [13]P3(x132,x133)+~E(x131,x132)+~P3(x131,x133)
% 10.53/10.60  [14]P3(x143,x142)+~E(x141,x142)+~P3(x143,x141)
% 10.53/10.60  
% 10.53/10.60  %-------------------------------------------
% 10.53/10.61  cnf(38,plain,
% 10.53/10.61     (~P1(x381)+P2(x381,f4(x381))),
% 10.53/10.61     inference(equality_inference,[],[30])).
% 10.53/10.61  cnf(39,plain,
% 10.53/10.61     (P1(a6)),
% 10.53/10.61     inference(scs_inference,[],[26,27])).
% 10.53/10.61  cnf(47,plain,
% 10.53/10.61     (E(f3(x471,x471),x471)),
% 10.53/10.61     inference(rename_variables,[],[20])).
% 10.53/10.61  cnf(57,plain,
% 10.53/10.61     (P2(a1,x571)+~E(a6,x571)),
% 10.53/10.61     inference(scs_inference,[],[26,20,47,17,18,19,27,2,36,31,3,13,14,37,10,11,12])).
% 10.53/10.61  cnf(331,plain,
% 10.53/10.61     (E(x3311,f2(x3311,a6))),
% 10.53/10.61     inference(scs_inference,[],[18,2])).
% 10.53/10.61  cnf(348,plain,
% 10.53/10.61     (E(x3481,f2(a6,x3481))),
% 10.53/10.61     inference(scs_inference,[],[331,19,57,2])).
% 10.53/10.61  cnf(1502,plain,
% 10.53/10.61     (E(f2(a6,f4(a6)),a1)),
% 10.53/10.61     inference(scs_inference,[],[39,34,38])).
% 10.53/10.61  cnf(1504,plain,
% 10.53/10.61     ($false),
% 10.53/10.61     inference(scs_inference,[],[26,348,1502,2,3]),
% 10.53/10.61     ['proof']).
% 10.53/10.61  % SZS output end Proof
% 10.53/10.61  % Total time :10.120000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------