↑ Up

ConnectPP---0.7.2.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ConnectPP---0.7.2
% Problem  : KLE005+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 08:46:50 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.10s 0.42s
% Output   : Proof 0.10s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   53 (  34 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  110 (  72 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   97 (  40   ~;  39   |;  14   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   50 (   2 sgn  37   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(additive_commutativity,axiom,
    ! [A,B] : addition(A,B) = addition(B,A),
    file('KLE001+0.ax',additive_commutativity) ).

fof(additive_identity,axiom,
    ! [A] : addition(A,zero) = A,
    file('KLE001+0.ax',additive_identity) ).

fof(right_annihilation,axiom,
    ! [A] : multiplication(A,zero) = zero,
    file('KLE001+0.ax',right_annihilation) ).

fof(left_annihilation,axiom,
    ! [A] : multiplication(zero,A) = zero,
    file('KLE001+0.ax',left_annihilation) ).

fof(test_2,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( complement(X1,X0)
    <=> ( addition(X0,X1) = one
        & multiplication(X1,X0) = zero
        & multiplication(X0,X1) = zero ) ),
    file('KLE001+1.ax',test_2) ).

fof(test_3,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( test(X0)
     => ( c(X0) = X1
      <=> complement(X0,X1) ) ),
    file('KLE001+1.ax',test_3) ).

fof(test_4,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ test(X0)
     => c(X0) = zero ),
    file('KLE001+1.ax',test_4) ).

fof(goals,conjecture,
    c(one) = zero,
    file('theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

fof(f_1_1,plain,
    ! [A,B] : addition(A,B) = addition(B,A),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[additive_commutativity]) ).

fof(f_1_2,plain,
    ! [U_1,U_0] : addition(U_1,U_0) = addition(U_0,U_1),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f_1_1]) ).

cnf(f_1_3,plain,
    addition(U_1,U_0) = addition(U_0,U_1),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_1_2]) ).

fof(f_3_1,plain,
    ! [A] : addition(A,zero) = A,
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[additive_identity]) ).

fof(f_3_2,plain,
    ! [U_5] : addition(U_5,zero) = U_5,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f_3_1]) ).

cnf(f_3_3,plain,
    addition(U_5,zero) = U_5,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_3_2]) ).

fof(f_10_1,plain,
    ! [A] : multiplication(A,zero) = zero,
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[right_annihilation]) ).

fof(f_10_2,plain,
    ! [U_18] : multiplication(U_18,zero) = zero,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f_10_1]) ).

cnf(f_10_3,plain,
    multiplication(U_18,zero) = zero,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_10_2]) ).

fof(f_11_1,plain,
    ! [A] : multiplication(zero,A) = zero,
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[left_annihilation]) ).

fof(f_11_2,plain,
    ! [U_19] : multiplication(zero,U_19) = zero,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f_11_1]) ).

cnf(f_11_3,plain,
    multiplication(zero,U_19) = zero,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_11_2]) ).

fof(f_14_1,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( complement(X1,X0)
        | addition(X0,X1) != one
        | multiplication(X1,X0) != zero
        | multiplication(X0,X1) != zero )
      & ( ( addition(X0,X1) = one
          & multiplication(X1,X0) = zero
          & multiplication(X0,X1) = zero )
        | ~ complement(X1,X0) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[test_2]) ).

fof(f_14_2,plain,
    ! [U_32,U_31] :
      ( ( complement(U_31,U_32)
        | addition(U_32,U_31) != one
        | multiplication(U_31,U_32) != zero
        | multiplication(U_32,U_31) != zero )
      & ( ( addition(U_32,U_31) = one
          & multiplication(U_31,U_32) = zero
          & multiplication(U_32,U_31) = zero )
        | ~ complement(U_31,U_32) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f_14_1]) ).

fof(f_14_3,plain,
    ( ! [U_36,U_34] :
        ( complement(U_34,U_36)
        | addition(U_36,U_34) != one
        | multiplication(U_34,U_36) != zero
        | multiplication(U_36,U_34) != zero )
    & ! [U_35,U_33] :
        ( ( addition(U_35,U_33) = one
          & multiplication(U_33,U_35) = zero
          & multiplication(U_35,U_33) = zero )
        | ~ complement(U_33,U_35) ) ),
    inference(miniscope,[status(thm)],[f_14_2]) ).

cnf(f_14_7,plain,
    ( complement(U_34,U_36)
    | addition(U_36,U_34) != one
    | multiplication(U_34,U_36) != zero
    | multiplication(U_36,U_34) != zero ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_14_3]) ).

fof(f_15_1,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ( c(X0) = X1
          | ~ complement(X0,X1) )
        & ( complement(X0,X1)
          | c(X0) != X1 ) )
      | ~ test(X0) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[test_3]) ).

fof(f_15_2,plain,
    ! [U_38,U_37] :
      ( ( ( c(U_38) = U_37
          | ~ complement(U_38,U_37) )
        & ( complement(U_38,U_37)
          | c(U_38) != U_37 ) )
      | ~ test(U_38) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f_15_1]) ).

fof(f_15_3,plain,
    ! [U_38] :
      ( ( ! [U_40] :
            ( c(U_38) = U_40
            | ~ complement(U_38,U_40) )
        & ! [U_39] :
            ( complement(U_38,U_39)
            | c(U_38) != U_39 ) )
      | ~ test(U_38) ),
    inference(miniscope,[status(thm)],[f_15_2]) ).

cnf(f_15_5,plain,
    ( c(U_38) = U_40
    | ~ complement(U_38,U_40)
    | ~ test(U_38) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_15_3]) ).

fof(f_16_1,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( c(X0) = zero
      | test(X0) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[test_4]) ).

fof(f_16_2,plain,
    ! [U_41] :
      ( c(U_41) = zero
      | test(U_41) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f_16_1]) ).

cnf(f_16_3,plain,
    ( c(U_41) = zero
    | test(U_41) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_16_2]) ).

fof(f_17_1,negated_conjecture,
    c(one) != zero,
    inference(negate,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).

fof(f_17_2,negated_conjecture,
    c(one) != zero,
    inference(definitional_conversion,[status(esa)],[f_17_1]) ).

cnf(f_17_3,negated_conjecture,
    c(one) != zero,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_17_2]) ).

cnf(equality_3,axiom,
    ( Eq_x_0 = Eq_x_2
    | Eq_x_1 != Eq_x_2
    | Eq_x_0 != Eq_x_1 ),
    theory(equality,[transitivity]) ).

cnf(t1,plain,
    c(one) != zero,
    inference(start,[status(thm),parent(0:0)],[f_17_3]) ).

cnf(t2,plain,
    ( ~ complement(one,zero)
    | ~ test(one)
    | c(one) = zero ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t1:1)],[f_15_5]) ).

cnf(t3,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t2:1)],[t2:1,t1:1]) ).

cnf(t4,plain,
    ( c(one) = zero
    | test(one) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t2:2)],[f_16_3]) ).

cnf(t5,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t4:1)],[t4:1,t2:2]) ).

cnf(t6,plain,
    $false,
    inference(reduction,[status(thm),parent(t4:2)],[t4:2,t1:1]) ).

cnf(t7,plain,
    ( multiplication(one,zero) != zero
    | addition(zero,one) != one
    | multiplication(zero,one) != zero
    | complement(one,zero) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t2:3)],[f_14_7]) ).

cnf(t8,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t7:1)],[t7:1,t2:3]) ).

cnf(t9,plain,
    multiplication(zero,one) = zero,
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t7:2)],[f_11_3]) ).

cnf(t10,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t9:1)],[t9:1,t7:2]) ).

cnf(t11,plain,
    ( addition(one,zero) != one
    | addition(zero,one) != addition(one,zero)
    | addition(zero,one) = one ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t7:3)],[equality_3]) ).

cnf(t12,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t11:1)],[t11:1,t7:3]) ).

cnf(t13,plain,
    addition(zero,one) = addition(one,zero),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t11:2)],[f_1_3]) ).

cnf(t14,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t13:1)],[t13:1,t11:2]) ).

cnf(t15,plain,
    addition(one,zero) = one,
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t11:3)],[f_3_3]) ).

cnf(t16,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t15:1)],[t15:1,t11:3]) ).

cnf(t17,plain,
    multiplication(one,zero) = zero,
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t7:4)],[f_10_3]) ).

cnf(t18,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t17:1)],[t17:1,t7:4]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : KLE005+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.03  This is a FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ problem
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.37  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % DateTime : Sat Sep 19 11:45:09 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.42  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.10/0.42  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------