%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : KLE006+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:59:02 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.12s 0.45s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 17 ( 6 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 44 ( 22 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 10 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 45 ( 18 ~; 15 |; 7 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 10 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 22 ( 0 sgn 14 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(test_3,axiom,
! [X4,X5] :
( test(X4)
=> ( c(X4) = X5
<=> complement(X4,X5) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_3) ).
fof(goals,conjecture,
! [X4] :
( test(X4)
=> one = addition(X4,c(X4)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).
fof(test_2,axiom,
! [X4,X5] :
( complement(X5,X4)
<=> ( addition(X4,X5) = one
& multiplication(X5,X4) = zero
& multiplication(X4,X5) = zero ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_2) ).
fof(additive_commutativity,axiom,
! [X1,X2] : addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_commutativity) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X34,X35] :
( ( ~ test(X34)
| c(X34) = X35
| ~ complement(X34,X35) )
& ( ~ test(X34)
| complement(X34,X35)
| c(X34) != X35 ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[test_3])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X4] :
( test(X4)
=> one = addition(X4,c(X4)) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X32,X33] :
( ( complement(X33,X32)
| addition(X32,X33) != one
| multiplication(X33,X32) != zero
| multiplication(X32,X33) != zero )
& ( ~ complement(X33,X32)
| addition(X32,X33) = one )
& ( ~ complement(X33,X32)
| multiplication(X33,X32) = zero )
& ( ~ complement(X33,X32)
| multiplication(X32,X33) = zero ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[test_2])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( ~ test(X1)
| c(X1) != X2
| complement(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X6,X7] : addition(X6,X7) = addition(X7,X6),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_commutativity]) ).
fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( one != addition(esk2_0,c(esk2_0))
& test(esk2_0) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ complement(X2,X1)
| addition(X1,X2) = one ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ test(X1)
| complement(X1,c(X1)) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
one != addition(esk2_0,c(esk2_0)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ test(X1)
| addition(X1,c(X1)) = one ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
test(esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : KLE006+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.38 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.38 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.38 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.38 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 22:38:24 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.43 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.43 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.45 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.12/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.45 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.45 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.45 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.45 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 3748889 completed with status 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.12/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.45 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.45 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.12/0.45 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.12/0.45 % Search class: FGUSM-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.45 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.12/0.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.45 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.45 % Starting G-E--_208_C18AMC_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.45 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.45 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 3748894 completed with status 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.12/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.45 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.45 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.12/0.45 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.12/0.45 % Search class: FGUSM-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.45 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.12/0.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.45 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.45 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.12/0.45 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.12/0.45
% 0.12/0.45 % Proof found!
% 0.12/0.45 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.12/0.45 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.12/0.45 % Parsed axioms : 17
% 0.12/0.45 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Initial clauses : 24
% 0.12/0.45 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Initial clauses in saturation : 24
% 0.12/0.45 % Processed clauses : 48
% 0.12/0.45 % ...of these trivial : 1
% 0.12/0.45 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % ...remaining for further processing : 47
% 0.12/0.45 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.12/0.45 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Generated clauses : 34
% 0.12/0.45 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 17
% 0.12/0.45 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Paramodulations : 33
% 0.12/0.45 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % NegExts : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.12/0.45 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Total rewrite steps : 16
% 0.12/0.45 % ...of those cached : 4
% 0.12/0.45 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.45 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.45 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.45 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.45 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.45 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.45 % Current number of processed clauses : 22
% 0.12/0.45 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 9
% 0.12/0.45 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.12/0.45 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.12/0.45 % Non-unit-clauses : 11
% 0.12/0.45 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 17
% 0.12/0.45 % ...number of literals in the above : 27
% 0.12/0.45 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Current number of archived clauses : 24
% 0.12/0.45 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 17
% 0.12/0.45 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 16
% 0.12/0.45 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.12/0.45 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % BW rewrite match attempts : 27
% 0.12/0.45 % BW rewrite match successes : 22
% 0.12/0.45 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.12/0.46 % Termbank termtop insertions : 1400
% 0.12/0.46 % Search garbage collected termcells : 156
% 0.12/0.46
% 0.12/0.46 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/0.46 % User time : 0.006 s
% 0.12/0.46 % System time : 0.004 s
% 0.12/0.46 % Total time : 0.010 s
% 0.12/0.46 % Maximum resident set size: 3648 pages
% 0.12/0.46
% 0.12/0.46 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/0.46 % User time : 0.012 s
% 0.12/0.46 % System time : 0.015 s
% 0.12/0.46 % Total time : 0.027 s
% 0.12/0.46 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.12/0.46 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------