↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : KLE007+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:44:02 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.15s 5.60s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   30 (  20 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   48 (  27 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   30 (  12   ~;   5   |;   8   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   31 (   0 sgn  14   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(additive_commutativity,axiom,
    ! [A,B] : addition(A,B) = addition(B,A),
    file('theBenchmark.p',additive_commutativity) ).

fof(multiplicative_left_identity,axiom,
    ! [A] : multiplication(one,A) = A,
    file('theBenchmark.p',multiplicative_left_identity) ).

fof(right_distributivity,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C] : multiplication(A,addition(B,C)) = addition(multiplication(A,B),multiplication(A,C)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',right_distributivity) ).

fof(test_2,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( complement(X1,X0)
    <=> ( addition(X0,X1) = one
        & multiplication(X1,X0) = zero
        & multiplication(X0,X1) = zero ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',test_2) ).

fof(test_3,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( test(X0)
     => ( c(X0) = X1
      <=> complement(X0,X1) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',test_3) ).

fof(goals,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( test(X0)
        & test(X1) )
     => one = addition(multiplication(addition(X0,c(X0)),X1),multiplication(addition(X0,c(X0)),c(X1))) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

fof(goals_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1] :
        ( ( test(X0)
          & test(X1) )
       => one = addition(multiplication(addition(X0,c(X0)),X1),multiplication(addition(X0,c(X0)),c(X1))) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).

fof(nnf_17,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
      ( addition(multiplication(addition(X0,c(X0)),X1),multiplication(addition(X0,c(X0)),c(X1))) != one
      & test(X0)
      & test(X1) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[goals_neg]) ).

fof(sk_goals_neg,plain,
    ( addition(multiplication(addition(sK1,c(sK1)),sK0),multiplication(addition(sK1,c(sK1)),c(sK0))) != one
    & test(sK1)
    & test(sK0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1]),skolemize(X0,sK1),skolemize(X1,sK0)],[nnf_17]) ).

cnf(c_22,negated_conjecture,
    test(sK0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_goals_neg]) ).

cnf(c_23,negated_conjecture,
    test(sK1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_goals_neg]) ).

cnf(c_24,plain,
    ( complement(A,B)
    | c(A) != B
    | ~ test(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[test_3]) ).

cnf(c_33,negated_conjecture,
    ( complement(sK1,A)
    | c(sK1) != A ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_24,c_23]) ).

cnf(c_34,negated_conjecture,
    ( complement(sK0,A)
    | c(sK0) != A ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_24,c_22]) ).

cnf(c_39,plain,
    addition(A,B) = addition(B,A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[additive_commutativity]) ).

cnf(c_45,plain,
    multiplication(one,A) = A,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[multiplicative_left_identity]) ).

cnf(c_46,plain,
    multiplication(A,addition(B,C)) = addition(multiplication(A,B),multiplication(A,C)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[right_distributivity]) ).

cnf(c_47,plain,
    addition(multiplication(A,B),multiplication(A,C)) = multiplication(A,addition(B,C)),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_46]) ).

cnf(c_54,plain,
    ( addition(B,A) = one
    | ~ complement(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[test_2]) ).

cnf(c_56,negated_conjecture,
    addition(multiplication(addition(sK1,c(sK1)),sK0),multiplication(addition(sK1,c(sK1)),c(sK0))) != one,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_goals_neg]) ).

cnf(c_57,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(addition(sK1,c(sK1)),addition(sK0,c(sK0))) != one,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_47,c_56]) ).

cnf(c_64,plain,
    complement(sK1,c(sK1)),
    inference(xxres,[status(thm)],[c_33]) ).

cnf(c_65,plain,
    complement(sK0,c(sK0)),
    inference(xxres,[status(thm)],[c_34]) ).

cnf(c_119,plain,
    addition(c(sK1),sK1) = one,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_64,c_54]) ).

cnf(c_111,plain,
    addition(sK1,c(sK1)) = one,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_39,c_119]) ).

cnf(c_120,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(one,addition(sK0,c(sK0))) != one,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_111,c_57]) ).

cnf(c_117,negated_conjecture,
    addition(sK0,c(sK0)) != one,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_45,c_120]) ).

cnf(c_121,plain,
    addition(c(sK0),sK0) = one,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_65,c_54]) ).

cnf(c_122,plain,
    addition(sK0,c(sK0)) = one,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_39,c_121]) ).

cnf(c_118,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_117,c_122]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : KLE007+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/5.58  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.11/5.58  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/5.58  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/5.58  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/5.58  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/5.58  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/5.58  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/5.58  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 19:12:05 UTC 2026
% 0.11/5.58  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/5.58  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.11/5.58  % Process 2647206 was started by sandbox on n011,
% 0.11/5.58  % Fri Sep 25 19:12:05 2026
% 0.11/5.58  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.11/5.59  
% 0.11/5.59  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.15/5.60  
% 0.15/5.60  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.15/5.60  
% 0.15/5.60  % Proof 1 at 0.00 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.15/5.60  % Length of proof is 23.
% 0.15/5.60  % Level of proof is 6.
% 0.15/5.60  % Maximum clause weight is 13.000.
% 0.15/5.60  % Given clauses 35.
% 0.15/5.60  
% 0.15/5.60  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------