↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : KLE007+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:52:06 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 2.85s 1.27s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.85s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   59 (  41 unt;   5 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  131 (  59 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   73 (  30   ~;  20   |;  17   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    9 (   7 usr;   6 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   56 (   0 sgn  52   !;   4   ?;  13   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : addition(X0,X1) = addition(X1,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_commutativity) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] : addition(X2,addition(X1,X0)) = addition(addition(X2,X1),X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_associativity) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X0] : multiplication(X0,one) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',multiplicative_right_identity) ).

fof(f8,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] : multiplication(X0,addition(X1,X2)) = addition(multiplication(X0,X1),multiplication(X0,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',right_distributivity) ).

fof(f14,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( complement(X1,X0)
    <=> ( addition(X0,X1) = one
        & multiplication(X1,X0) = zero
        & multiplication(X0,X1) = zero ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_2) ).

fof(f15,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( test(X0)
     => ( c(X0) = X1
      <=> complement(X0,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_3) ).

fof(f19,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( test(X0)
        & test(X1) )
     => one = addition(multiplication(addition(X0,c(X0)),X1),multiplication(addition(X0,c(X0)),c(X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

fof(f20,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1] :
        ( ( test(X0)
          & test(X1) )
       => one = addition(multiplication(addition(X0,c(X0)),X1),multiplication(addition(X0,c(X0)),c(X1))) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f19]) ).

fof(f21,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ test(X0)
      | ( c(X0) = X1
      <=> complement(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

fof(f27,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
      ( test(X0)
      & test(X1)
      & one != addition(multiplication(addition(X0,c(X0)),X1),multiplication(addition(X0,c(X0)),c(X1))) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f20]) ).

fof(f28,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
      ( test(X0)
      & test(X1)
      & one != addition(multiplication(addition(X0,c(X0)),X1),multiplication(addition(X0,c(X0)),c(X1))) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f27]) ).

fof(f32,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ~ complement(X1,X0)
        | ( addition(X0,X1) = one
          & multiplication(X1,X0) = zero
          & multiplication(X0,X1) = zero ) )
      & ( addition(X0,X1) != one
        | zero != multiplication(X1,X0)
        | zero != multiplication(X0,X1)
        | complement(X1,X0) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).

fof(f33,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ~ complement(X1,X0)
        | ( addition(X0,X1) = one
          & multiplication(X1,X0) = zero
          & multiplication(X0,X1) = zero ) )
      & ( addition(X0,X1) != one
        | zero != multiplication(X1,X0)
        | zero != multiplication(X0,X1)
        | complement(X1,X0) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f32]) ).

fof(f34,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ test(X0)
      | ( ( c(X0) != X1
          | complement(X0,X1) )
        & ( ~ complement(X0,X1)
          | c(X0) = X1 ) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f21]) ).

fof(f35,plain,
    ( test(sK1)
    & test(sK2)
    & one != addition(multiplication(addition(sK1,c(sK1)),sK2),multiplication(addition(sK1,c(sK1)),c(sK2))) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1,sK2]),skolemize(X0,sK1),skolemize(X1,sK2)],[f28]) ).

fof(f36,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : addition(X0,X1) = addition(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f37,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : addition(X2,addition(X1,X0)) = addition(addition(X2,X1),X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f41,plain,
    ! [X0] : multiplication(X0,one) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

fof(f43,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : multiplication(X0,addition(X1,X2)) = addition(multiplication(X0,X1),multiplication(X0,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

fof(f49,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ complement(X1,X0)
      | addition(X0,X1) = one ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f33]) ).

fof(f53,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ test(X0)
      | c(X0) != X1
      | complement(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f34]) ).

fof(f58,plain,
    test(sK1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f35]) ).

fof(f59,plain,
    test(sK2),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f35]) ).

fof(f60,plain,
    one != addition(multiplication(addition(sK1,c(sK1)),sK2),multiplication(addition(sK1,c(sK1)),c(sK2))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f35]) ).

fof(f61,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ test(X0)
      | complement(X0,c(X0)) ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f53]) ).

tcf(c_49,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : addition(X0,X1) = addition(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f36]) ).

tcf(c_50,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : addition(addition(X0,X1),X2) = addition(X0,addition(X1,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f37]) ).

tcf(c_54,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : multiplication(X0,one) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f41]) ).

tcf(c_56,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : addition(multiplication(X0,X1),multiplication(X0,X2)) = multiplication(X0,addition(X1,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f43]) ).

tcf(c_65,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( addition(X1,X0) = one )
      | ~ complement(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f49]) ).

tcf(c_67,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( complement(X0,c(X0))
      | ~ test(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f61]) ).

tcf(c_71,negated_conjecture,
    addition(multiplication(addition(sK1,c(sK1)),sK2),multiplication(addition(sK1,c(sK1)),c(sK2))) != one,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f60]) ).

tcf(c_72,negated_conjecture,
    test(sK2),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f59]) ).

tcf(c_73,negated_conjecture,
    test(sK1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f58]) ).

tcf(c_218,plain,
    multiplication(addition(sK1,c(sK1)),addition(c(sK2),sK2)) != one,
    inference(ac_demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_71,c_56,c_50,c_49]) ).

tcf(c_219,plain,
    multiplication(addition(sK1,c(sK1)),addition(sK2,c(sK2))) != one,
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_218,c_50,c_49]) ).

tcf(c_380,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = c(sK1),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_381,definition,
    iPr_def_11 = addition(sK1,iPr_def_10),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).

tcf(c_382,definition,
    iPr_def_12 = c(sK2),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).

tcf(c_383,definition,
    iPr_def_13 = addition(sK2,iPr_def_12),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_13])],[]) ).

tcf(c_384,definition,
    iPr_def_14 = multiplication(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_13),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_14])],[]) ).

tcf(c_385,plain,
    iPr_def_14 != one,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_219,c_382,c_383,c_380,c_381,c_384]) ).

tcf(c_386,negated_conjecture,
    test(sK1),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_73]) ).

tcf(c_387,negated_conjecture,
    test(sK2),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_72]) ).

tcf(c_665,plain,
    addition(iPr_def_10,sK1) = iPr_def_11,
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_381,c_50,c_49]) ).

tcf(c_668,plain,
    addition(iPr_def_12,sK2) = iPr_def_13,
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_383,c_50,c_49]) ).

tcf(c_678,plain,
    ( complement(sK1,iPr_def_10)
    | ~ test(sK1) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_380,c_67]) ).

tcf(c_679,plain,
    ( complement(sK2,iPr_def_12)
    | ~ test(sK2) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_382,c_67]) ).

tcf(c_683,plain,
    complement(sK2,iPr_def_12),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_679,c_387]) ).

tcf(c_684,plain,
    complement(sK1,iPr_def_10),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_678,c_386]) ).

tcf(c_761,plain,
    addition(iPr_def_10,sK1) = one,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_684,c_65]) ).

tcf(c_762,plain,
    addition(iPr_def_12,sK2) = one,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_683,c_65]) ).

tcf(c_763,plain,
    one = iPr_def_13,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_762,c_668]) ).

tcf(c_764,plain,
    one = iPr_def_11,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_761,c_665]) ).

tcf(c_772,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : multiplication(X0,iPr_def_13) = X0,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_54,c_763]) ).

tcf(c_773,plain,
    iPr_def_13 != iPr_def_14,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_385,c_763]) ).

tcf(c_774,plain,
    iPr_def_11 = iPr_def_14,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_384,c_772]) ).

tcf(c_792,plain,
    iPr_def_11 = iPr_def_13,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_763,c_764]) ).

tcf(c_794,plain,
    $false,
    inference(ground_joinability,[status(thm)],[c_773,c_774,c_792]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : KLE007+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.08/0.35  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 18:34:04 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.35  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.12/0.39  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.39  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.40  
% 0.12/0.40  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.12/0.40  
% 0.12/0.40  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.12/0.41  % Proving...
% 2.85/1.27  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.85/1.27  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.85/1.27  
% 2.85/1.27  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 2.85/1.27  
% 2.85/1.27  % ------  iProver source info
% 2.85/1.27  
% 2.85/1.27  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 2.85/1.27  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 2.85/1.27  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.85/1.27  
% 2.85/1.27  % ------ Parsing...
% 2.85/1.27  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 2.85/1.27  
% 2.85/1.27  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 1  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 2.85/1.27  
% 2.85/1.27  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 2.85/1.27  
% 2.85/1.27  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 2.85/1.27  % ------ Proving...
% 2.85/1.27  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 2.85/1.27  
% 2.85/1.27  % 
% 2.85/1.27  % clauses                               30
% 2.85/1.27  % conjectures                           2
% 2.85/1.27  % EPR                                   4
% 2.85/1.27  % Horn                                  29
% 2.85/1.27  % unary                                 19
% 2.85/1.27  % binary                                7
% 2.85/1.27  % lits                                  46
% 2.85/1.27  % lits eq                               27
% 2.85/1.27  % fd_pure                               0
% 2.85/1.27  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 2.85/1.27  % fd_cond                               0
% 2.85/1.27  % fd_pseudo_cond                        1
% 2.85/1.27  % AC symbols                            1
% 2.85/1.27  
% 2.85/1.27  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 2.85/1.27  
% 2.85/1.27  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 2.85/1.27  
% 2.85/1.27  
% 2.85/1.27  % ------ 
% 2.85/1.27  % Current options:
% 2.85/1.27  % ------ 
% 2.85/1.27  
% 2.85/1.27  
% 2.85/1.27  % 
% 2.85/1.27  
% 2.85/1.27  % ------ Proving...
% 2.85/1.27  % 
% 2.85/1.27  
% 2.85/1.27  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.85/1.27  
% 2.85/1.27  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.85/1.27  
% 2.85/1.27  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------