↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : KLE009+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:58:34 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.13s 0.44s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   41 (  21 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   85 (  42 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   77 (  33   ~;  25   |;  13   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   57 (   0 sgn  36   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(goals,conjecture,
    ! [X4,X5] :
      ( ( test(X4)
        & test(X5) )
     => ( leq(addition(addition(addition(multiplication(X4,X5),multiplication(X4,c(X5))),multiplication(c(X4),X5)),multiplication(c(X4),c(X5))),one)
        & leq(one,addition(addition(addition(multiplication(X4,X5),multiplication(X4,c(X5))),multiplication(c(X4),X5)),multiplication(c(X4),c(X5)))) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

fof(additive_commutativity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_commutativity) ).

fof(test_3,axiom,
    ! [X4,X5] :
      ( test(X4)
     => ( c(X4) = X5
      <=> complement(X4,X5) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_3) ).

fof(order,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( leq(X1,X2)
    <=> addition(X1,X2) = X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',order) ).

fof(test_2,axiom,
    ! [X4,X5] :
      ( complement(X5,X4)
    <=> ( addition(X4,X5) = one
        & multiplication(X5,X4) = zero
        & multiplication(X4,X5) = zero ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_2) ).

fof(right_distributivity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] : multiplication(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(multiplication(X1,X2),multiplication(X1,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',right_distributivity) ).

fof(multiplicative_right_identity,axiom,
    ! [X1] : multiplication(X1,one) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',multiplicative_right_identity) ).

fof(additive_associativity,axiom,
    ! [X3,X2,X1] : addition(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(addition(X1,X2),X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_associativity) ).

fof(additive_idempotence,axiom,
    ! [X1] : addition(X1,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_idempotence) ).

fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X4,X5] :
        ( ( test(X4)
          & test(X5) )
       => ( leq(addition(addition(addition(multiplication(X4,X5),multiplication(X4,c(X5))),multiplication(c(X4),X5)),multiplication(c(X4),c(X5))),one)
          & leq(one,addition(addition(addition(multiplication(X4,X5),multiplication(X4,c(X5))),multiplication(c(X4),X5)),multiplication(c(X4),c(X5)))) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).

fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( ~ leq(addition(addition(addition(multiplication(esk2_0,esk3_0),multiplication(esk2_0,c(esk3_0))),multiplication(c(esk2_0),esk3_0)),multiplication(c(esk2_0),c(esk3_0))),one)
      | ~ leq(one,addition(addition(addition(multiplication(esk2_0,esk3_0),multiplication(esk2_0,c(esk3_0))),multiplication(c(esk2_0),esk3_0)),multiplication(c(esk2_0),c(esk3_0)))) )
    & test(esk2_0)
    & test(esk3_0) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X6,X7] : addition(X6,X7) = addition(X7,X6),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_commutativity]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X34,X35] :
      ( ( ~ test(X34)
        | c(X34) = X35
        | ~ complement(X34,X35) )
      & ( ~ test(X34)
        | complement(X34,X35)
        | c(X34) != X35 ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[test_3])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ leq(addition(addition(addition(multiplication(esk2_0,esk3_0),multiplication(esk2_0,c(esk3_0))),multiplication(c(esk2_0),esk3_0)),multiplication(c(esk2_0),c(esk3_0))),one)
    | ~ leq(one,addition(addition(addition(multiplication(esk2_0,esk3_0),multiplication(esk2_0,c(esk3_0))),multiplication(c(esk2_0),esk3_0)),multiplication(c(esk2_0),c(esk3_0)))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

fof(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X26,X27] :
      ( ( leq(X26,X27)
        | addition(X26,X27) != X27 )
      & ( addition(X26,X27) = X27
        | ~ leq(X26,X27) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[order])])]) ).

fof(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X32,X33] :
      ( ( complement(X33,X32)
        | addition(X32,X33) != one
        | multiplication(X33,X32) != zero
        | multiplication(X32,X33) != zero )
      & ( ~ complement(X33,X32)
        | addition(X32,X33) = one )
      & ( ~ complement(X33,X32)
        | multiplication(X33,X32) = zero )
      & ( ~ complement(X33,X32)
        | multiplication(X32,X33) = zero ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[test_2])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ test(X1)
    | c(X1) != X2
    | complement(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ leq(addition(multiplication(c(esk2_0),c(esk3_0)),addition(multiplication(c(esk2_0),esk3_0),addition(multiplication(esk2_0,esk3_0),multiplication(esk2_0,c(esk3_0))))),one)
    | ~ leq(one,addition(multiplication(c(esk2_0),c(esk3_0)),addition(multiplication(c(esk2_0),esk3_0),addition(multiplication(esk2_0,esk3_0),multiplication(esk2_0,c(esk3_0)))))) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_14]),c_0_14]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( addition(X1,X2) != X2
    | leq(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

fof(c_0_20,plain,
    ! [X18,X19,X20] : multiplication(X18,addition(X19,X20)) = addition(multiplication(X18,X19),multiplication(X18,X20)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[right_distributivity]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ complement(X2,X1)
    | addition(X1,X2) = one ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ test(X1)
    | complement(X1,c(X1)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ leq(one,addition(multiplication(c(esk2_0),c(esk3_0)),addition(multiplication(c(esk2_0),esk3_0),addition(multiplication(esk2_0,esk3_0),multiplication(esk2_0,c(esk3_0))))))
    | addition(one,addition(multiplication(c(esk2_0),c(esk3_0)),addition(multiplication(c(esk2_0),esk3_0),addition(multiplication(esk2_0,esk3_0),multiplication(esk2_0,c(esk3_0)))))) != one ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    multiplication(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(multiplication(X1,X2),multiplication(X1,X3)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( ~ test(X1)
    | addition(X1,c(X1)) = one ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    test(esk3_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

fof(c_0_27,plain,
    ! [X16] : multiplication(X16,one) = X16,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[multiplicative_right_identity]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ leq(one,addition(multiplication(c(esk2_0),c(esk3_0)),addition(multiplication(c(esk2_0),esk3_0),multiplication(esk2_0,addition(esk3_0,c(esk3_0))))))
    | addition(one,addition(multiplication(c(esk2_0),c(esk3_0)),addition(multiplication(c(esk2_0),esk3_0),multiplication(esk2_0,addition(esk3_0,c(esk3_0)))))) != one ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    addition(esk3_0,c(esk3_0)) = one,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    multiplication(X1,one) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]) ).

fof(c_0_31,plain,
    ! [X8,X9,X10] : addition(X10,addition(X9,X8)) = addition(addition(X10,X9),X8),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_associativity]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ leq(one,addition(multiplication(c(esk2_0),c(esk3_0)),addition(esk2_0,multiplication(c(esk2_0),esk3_0))))
    | addition(one,addition(multiplication(c(esk2_0),c(esk3_0)),addition(esk2_0,multiplication(c(esk2_0),esk3_0)))) != one ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]),c_0_30]),c_0_30]),c_0_14]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    addition(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(addition(X1,X2),X3),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    test(esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

fof(c_0_35,plain,
    ! [X12] : addition(X12,X12) = X12,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_idempotence]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    ( addition(one,addition(multiplication(c(esk2_0),c(esk3_0)),addition(esk2_0,multiplication(c(esk2_0),esk3_0)))) != one
    | addition(one,addition(multiplication(c(esk2_0),c(esk3_0)),addition(esk2_0,multiplication(c(esk2_0),esk3_0)))) != addition(multiplication(c(esk2_0),c(esk3_0)),addition(esk2_0,multiplication(c(esk2_0),esk3_0))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    addition(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(X3,addition(X1,X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    addition(esk2_0,c(esk2_0)) = one,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    addition(X1,X1) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]),c_0_24]),c_0_29]),c_0_30]),c_0_38]),c_0_39]),c_0_37]),c_0_24]),c_0_29]),c_0_30]),c_0_38]),c_0_37]),c_0_24]),c_0_29]),c_0_30]),c_0_38]),c_0_39])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : KLE009+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.37  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.13/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.13/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.37  % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 22:33:12 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.37  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.44  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.13/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.44  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.44  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.44  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.44  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.44  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 779743 completed with status 0
% 0.13/0.44  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.13/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.44  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.44  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.13/0.44  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.13/0.44  % Search class: FGHSM-FFMF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.44  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.13/0.44  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.44  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.44  % Starting U----_210g_02_B07_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.44  % Starting G-E--_208_B00_00_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S00EN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.44  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.44  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 779749 completed with status 0
% 0.13/0.44  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.13/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.44  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.44  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.13/0.44  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.13/0.44  % Search class: FGHSM-FFMF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.44  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.13/0.44  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.44  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.44  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.13/0.44  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.13/0.44  
% 0.13/0.44  % Proof found!
% 0.13/0.44  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.13/0.44  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.13/0.44  % Parsed axioms                        : 17
% 0.13/0.44  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.13/0.44  % Initial clauses                      : 25
% 0.13/0.44  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.13/0.44  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 25
% 0.13/0.44  % Processed clauses                    : 105
% 0.13/0.44  % ...of these trivial                  : 8
% 0.13/0.44  % ...subsumed                          : 2
% 0.13/0.44  % ...remaining for further processing  : 95
% 0.13/0.44  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 4
% 0.13/0.44  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.13/0.44  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.13/0.44  % Backward-rewritten                   : 18
% 0.13/0.44  % Generated clauses                    : 251
% 0.13/0.44  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 140
% 0.13/0.44  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.13/0.44  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
% 0.13/0.44  % Paramodulations                      : 247
% 0.13/0.44  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.13/0.44  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.13/0.44  % Equation resolutions                 : 4
% 0.13/0.44  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.13/0.44  % Total rewrite steps                  : 359
% 0.13/0.44  % ...of those cached                   : 221
% 0.13/0.44  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.13/0.44  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.13/0.44  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.13/0.44  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.13/0.44  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.13/0.44  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.13/0.44  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.13/0.44  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.13/0.44  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.13/0.44  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.13/0.44  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.13/0.44  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.13/0.44  % Current number of processed clauses  : 51
% 0.13/0.44  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 29
% 0.13/0.44  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2
% 0.13/0.44  %    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.13/0.44  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 20
% 0.13/0.44  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 77
% 0.13/0.44  % ...number of literals in the above   : 122
% 0.13/0.44  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.13/0.44  % Current number of archived clauses   : 43
% 0.13/0.44  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 185
% 0.13/0.44  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 161
% 0.13/0.44  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 3
% 0.13/0.44  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 62
% 0.13/0.44  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.13/0.44  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 44
% 0.13/0.44  % BW rewrite match successes           : 42
% 0.13/0.44  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.13/0.44  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.13/0.44  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 3839
% 0.13/0.44  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 190
% 0.13/0.44  
% 0.13/0.44  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.44  % User time                : 0.009 s
% 0.13/0.44  % System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.13/0.44  % Total time               : 0.011 s
% 0.13/0.44  % Maximum resident set size: 3652 pages
% 0.13/0.44  
% 0.13/0.44  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.44  % User time                : 0.031 s
% 0.13/0.44  % System time              : 0.012 s
% 0.13/0.44  % Total time               : 0.043 s
% 0.13/0.44  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.13/0.44  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------