↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : KLE009+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:42:57 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 4.21s 2.55s
% Output   : Refutation 4.54s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :   17
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   36 (  23 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   71 (  39 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  329 (   4   ~;   0   |;  16   &; 290   @)
%                                         (   4 <=>;  15  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   16 (   5 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   10 (   8 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   65 (   0   ^;  62   !;   3   ?;  65   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(test_decl,type,
    test: $i > $o ).

thf(leq_decl,type,
    leq: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(one_decl,type,
    one: $i ).

thf(addition_decl,type,
    addition: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(multiplication_decl,type,
    multiplication: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(c_decl,type,
    c: $i > $i ).

thf(zero_decl,type,
    zero: $i ).

thf(complement_decl,type,
    complement: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(15,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( zero @ ( A @ multiplication ) )
      = zero ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',right_annihilation) ).

thf(78,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( zero @ ( A @ multiplication ) )
      = zero ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[15]) ).

thf(17,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( B @ addition ) @ ( A @ multiplication ) )
      = ( C @ ( A @ multiplication ) @ ( B @ ( A @ multiplication ) @ addition ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',right_distributivity) ).

thf(84,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( B @ addition ) @ ( A @ multiplication ) )
      = ( C @ ( A @ multiplication ) @ ( B @ ( A @ multiplication ) @ addition ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[17]) ).

thf(6,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( A @ test )
     => ( ( A @ c )
        = zero ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',test_4) ).

thf(33,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( A @ test )
     => ( ( A @ c )
        = zero ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(4,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( B @ multiplication ) @ ( A @ multiplication ) )
      = ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ multiplication ) @ multiplication ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',multiplicative_associativity) ).

thf(27,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( B @ multiplication ) @ ( A @ multiplication ) )
      = ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ multiplication ) @ multiplication ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(12,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( A @ test )
     => ( ( ( A @ c )
          = B )
      <=> ( B @ ( A @ complement ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',test_3) ).

thf(54,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( A @ test )
     => ( ( ( B @ ( A @ complement ) )
         => ( ( A @ c )
            = B ) )
        & ( ( ( A @ c )
            = B )
         => ( B @ ( A @ complement ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(18,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ leq ) )
    <=> ( ( B @ ( A @ addition ) )
        = B ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',order) ).

thf(87,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( ( B @ ( A @ addition ) )
          = B )
       => ( B @ ( A @ leq ) ) )
      & ( ( B @ ( A @ leq ) )
       => ( ( B @ ( A @ addition ) )
          = B ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[18]) ).

thf(14,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( one @ ( A @ multiplication ) )
      = A ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',multiplicative_right_identity) ).

thf(75,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( one @ ( A @ multiplication ) )
      = A ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[14]) ).

thf(9,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ test )
    <=> ? [B: $i] : ( A @ ( B @ complement ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',test_1) ).

thf(42,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ? [B: $i] : ( A @ ( B @ complement ) )
       => ( A @ test ) )
      & ( ( A @ test )
       => ? [B: $i] : ( A @ ( B @ complement ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( zero @ multiplication ) )
      = zero ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',left_annihilation) ).

thf(24,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( zero @ multiplication ) )
      = zero ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(16,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( zero @ ( A @ addition ) )
      = A ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',additive_identity) ).

thf(81,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( zero @ ( A @ addition ) )
      = A ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[16]) ).

thf(8,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( one @ multiplication ) )
      = A ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',multiplicative_left_identity) ).

thf(39,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( one @ multiplication ) )
      = A ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(10,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( A @ addition ) )
      = A ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',additive_idempotence) ).

thf(48,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( A @ addition ) )
      = A ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[10]) ).

thf(13,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( B @ complement ) )
    <=> ( ( ( B @ ( A @ addition ) )
          = one )
        & ( ( A @ ( B @ multiplication ) )
          = zero )
        & ( ( B @ ( A @ multiplication ) )
          = zero ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',test_2) ).

thf(63,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( ( ( B @ ( A @ addition ) )
            = one )
          & ( ( A @ ( B @ multiplication ) )
            = zero )
          & ( ( B @ ( A @ multiplication ) )
            = zero ) )
       => ( A @ ( B @ complement ) ) )
      & ( ( A @ ( B @ complement ) )
       => ( ( ( B @ ( A @ addition ) )
            = one )
          & ( ( A @ ( B @ multiplication ) )
            = zero )
          & ( ( B @ ( A @ multiplication ) )
            = zero ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[13]) ).

thf(7,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ addition ) @ multiplication ) )
      = ( C @ ( B @ multiplication ) @ ( C @ ( A @ multiplication ) @ addition ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',left_distributivity) ).

thf(36,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ addition ) @ multiplication ) )
      = ( C @ ( B @ multiplication ) @ ( C @ ( A @ multiplication ) @ addition ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(5,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( B @ addition ) @ ( C @ addition ) )
      = ( A @ ( B @ ( C @ addition ) @ addition ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',additive_associativity) ).

thf(30,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( B @ addition ) @ ( C @ addition ) )
      = ( A @ ( B @ ( C @ addition ) @ addition ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(11,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ addition ) )
      = ( A @ ( B @ addition ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',additive_commutativity) ).

thf(51,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ addition ) )
      = ( A @ ( B @ addition ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[11]) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ test )
        & ( B @ test ) )
     => ( ( one @ ( B @ c @ ( A @ c @ multiplication ) @ ( B @ ( A @ c @ multiplication ) @ ( B @ c @ ( A @ multiplication ) @ ( B @ ( A @ multiplication ) @ addition ) @ addition ) @ addition ) @ leq ) )
        & ( B @ c @ ( A @ c @ multiplication ) @ ( B @ ( A @ c @ multiplication ) @ ( B @ c @ ( A @ multiplication ) @ ( B @ ( A @ multiplication ) @ addition ) @ addition ) @ addition ) @ ( one @ leq ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
        ( ( ( A @ test )
          & ( B @ test ) )
       => ( ( one @ ( B @ c @ ( A @ c @ multiplication ) @ ( B @ ( A @ c @ multiplication ) @ ( B @ c @ ( A @ multiplication ) @ ( B @ ( A @ multiplication ) @ addition ) @ addition ) @ addition ) @ leq ) )
          & ( B @ c @ ( A @ c @ multiplication ) @ ( B @ ( A @ c @ multiplication ) @ ( B @ c @ ( A @ multiplication ) @ ( B @ ( A @ multiplication ) @ addition ) @ addition ) @ addition ) @ ( one @ leq ) ) ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(19,plain,
    ~ ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
        ( ( ( A @ test )
          & ( B @ test ) )
       => ( ( one @ ( B @ c @ ( A @ c @ multiplication ) @ ( B @ ( A @ c @ multiplication ) @ ( B @ c @ ( A @ multiplication ) @ ( B @ ( A @ multiplication ) @ addition ) @ addition ) @ addition ) @ leq ) )
          & ( B @ c @ ( A @ c @ multiplication ) @ ( B @ ( A @ c @ multiplication ) @ ( B @ c @ ( A @ multiplication ) @ ( B @ ( A @ multiplication ) @ addition ) @ addition ) @ addition ) @ ( one @ leq ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(95,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[78,84,33,27,54,87,75,42,24,81,39,48,63,36,30,51,19]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : KLE009+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.15/0.40  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.40  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.40  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.40  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.15/0.40  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.15/0.40  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.40  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.40  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 19:14:29 UTC 2026
% 0.15/0.40  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.15/0.40  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.89/1.00  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.43/1.20  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (199ms). 
% 1.43/1.22  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 2.19/1.61  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.19/1.62  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.40/1.73  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 16 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.58/1.80  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 16 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.58/1.83  % [INFO] 	 Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF). 
% 2.58/1.84  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.58/1.84  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 4.21/2.55  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 4.21/2.55  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 4.21/2.55  % Time passed: 1990ms (effective reasoning time: 1323ms)
% 4.21/2.55  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 4.21/2.55  % Axioms used in derivation (16): additive_identity, test_3, test_4, left_annihilation, right_distributivity, multiplicative_right_identity, test_1, right_annihilation, additive_idempotence, additive_associativity, order, additive_commutativity, test_2, multiplicative_left_identity, multiplicative_associativity, left_distributivity
% 4.21/2.55  % No. of inferences in proof: 36
% 4.21/2.55  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1990 ms resp. 1323 ms w/o parsing
% 4.54/2.61  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.54/2.61  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------