↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : KLE010+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:58:34 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.82s 0.68s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.82s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   64 (  40 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  109 (  65 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   80 (  35   ~;  28   |;  11   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   97 (   2 sgn  46   !;   1   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(test_2,axiom,
    ! [X4,X5] :
      ( complement(X5,X4)
    <=> ( addition(X4,X5) = one
        & multiplication(X5,X4) = zero
        & multiplication(X4,X5) = zero ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_2) ).

fof(test_1,axiom,
    ! [X4] :
      ( test(X4)
    <=> ? [X5] : complement(X5,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_1) ).

fof(test_3,axiom,
    ! [X4,X5] :
      ( test(X4)
     => ( c(X4) = X5
      <=> complement(X4,X5) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_3) ).

fof(left_distributivity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] : multiplication(addition(X1,X2),X3) = addition(multiplication(X1,X3),multiplication(X2,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',left_distributivity) ).

fof(additive_identity,axiom,
    ! [X1] : addition(X1,zero) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_identity) ).

fof(goals,conjecture,
    ! [X4,X5] :
      ( ( test(X4)
        & test(X5) )
     => one = addition(addition(addition(addition(multiplication(X5,X4),multiplication(c(X5),X4)),multiplication(X4,X5)),multiplication(c(X4),X5)),multiplication(c(X4),c(X5))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

fof(additive_commutativity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_commutativity) ).

fof(multiplicative_left_identity,axiom,
    ! [X1] : multiplication(one,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',multiplicative_left_identity) ).

fof(additive_associativity,axiom,
    ! [X3,X2,X1] : addition(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(addition(X1,X2),X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_associativity) ).

fof(additive_idempotence,axiom,
    ! [X1] : addition(X1,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_idempotence) ).

fof(right_distributivity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] : multiplication(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(multiplication(X1,X2),multiplication(X1,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',right_distributivity) ).

fof(multiplicative_right_identity,axiom,
    ! [X1] : multiplication(X1,one) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',multiplicative_right_identity) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X32,X33] :
      ( ( complement(X33,X32)
        | addition(X32,X33) != one
        | multiplication(X33,X32) != zero
        | multiplication(X32,X33) != zero )
      & ( ~ complement(X33,X32)
        | addition(X32,X33) = one )
      & ( ~ complement(X33,X32)
        | multiplication(X33,X32) = zero )
      & ( ~ complement(X33,X32)
        | multiplication(X32,X33) = zero ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[test_2])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X28,X30,X31] :
      ( ( test(X30)
        | ~ complement(X31,X30) )
      & ( complement(esk1_1(X28),X28)
        | ~ test(X28) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[test_1])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X34,X35] :
      ( ( ~ test(X34)
        | c(X34) = X35
        | ~ complement(X34,X35) )
      & ( ~ test(X34)
        | complement(X34,X35)
        | c(X34) != X35 ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[test_3])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X21,X22,X23] : multiplication(addition(X21,X22),X23) = addition(multiplication(X21,X23),multiplication(X22,X23)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[left_distributivity]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ complement(X1,X2)
    | multiplication(X1,X2) = zero ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ test(X1)
    | complement(esk1_1(X1),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

fof(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X11] : addition(X11,zero) = X11,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_identity]) ).

fof(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X4,X5] :
        ( ( test(X4)
          & test(X5) )
       => one = addition(addition(addition(addition(multiplication(X5,X4),multiplication(c(X5),X4)),multiplication(X4,X5)),multiplication(c(X4),X5)),multiplication(c(X4),c(X5))) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ test(X1)
    | c(X1) != X2
    | complement(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

fof(c_0_21,plain,
    ! [X6,X7] : addition(X6,X7) = addition(X7,X6),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_commutativity]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    multiplication(addition(X1,X2),X3) = addition(multiplication(X1,X3),multiplication(X2,X3)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ test(X1)
    | multiplication(esk1_1(X1),X1) = zero ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    addition(X1,zero) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( ~ complement(X2,X1)
    | addition(X1,X2) = one ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

fof(c_0_26,plain,
    ! [X17] : multiplication(one,X17) = X17,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[multiplicative_left_identity]) ).

fof(c_0_27,plain,
    ! [X8,X9,X10] : addition(X10,addition(X9,X8)) = addition(addition(X10,X9),X8),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_associativity]) ).

fof(c_0_28,plain,
    ! [X12] : addition(X12,X12) = X12,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_idempotence]) ).

fof(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    ( one != addition(addition(addition(addition(multiplication(esk3_0,esk2_0),multiplication(c(esk3_0),esk2_0)),multiplication(esk2_0,esk3_0)),multiplication(c(esk2_0),esk3_0)),multiplication(c(esk2_0),c(esk3_0)))
    & test(esk2_0)
    & test(esk3_0) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_19])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( ~ test(X1)
    | complement(X1,c(X1)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( ~ test(X2)
    | multiplication(addition(X1,esk1_1(X2)),X2) = multiplication(X1,X2) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( ~ test(X1)
    | addition(X1,esk1_1(X1)) = one ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    multiplication(one,X1) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    addition(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(addition(X1,X2),X3),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    addition(X1,X1) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    one != addition(addition(addition(addition(multiplication(esk3_0,esk2_0),multiplication(c(esk3_0),esk2_0)),multiplication(esk2_0,esk3_0)),multiplication(c(esk2_0),esk3_0)),multiplication(c(esk2_0),c(esk3_0))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]) ).

fof(c_0_38,plain,
    ! [X18,X19,X20] : multiplication(X18,addition(X19,X20)) = addition(multiplication(X18,X19),multiplication(X18,X20)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[right_distributivity]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    ( ~ test(X1)
    | addition(X1,c(X1)) = one ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_30]),c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    ( ~ test(X1)
    | multiplication(X1,X1) = X1 ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    test(esk3_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    addition(X1,addition(X1,X2)) = addition(X1,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
    addition(multiplication(c(esk2_0),c(esk3_0)),addition(multiplication(c(esk2_0),esk3_0),addition(multiplication(esk2_0,esk3_0),addition(multiplication(esk3_0,esk2_0),multiplication(c(esk3_0),esk2_0))))) != one,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_31]),c_0_31]),c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,plain,
    addition(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(X3,addition(X1,X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,plain,
    multiplication(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(multiplication(X1,X2),multiplication(X1,X3)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_38]) ).

fof(c_0_46,plain,
    ! [X16] : multiplication(X16,one) = X16,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[multiplicative_right_identity]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,plain,
    ( ~ test(addition(X1,X2))
    | addition(X1,addition(X2,c(addition(X1,X2)))) = one ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(esk3_0,esk3_0) = esk3_0,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_41]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,plain,
    addition(X1,multiplication(X2,X1)) = multiplication(addition(X2,one),X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_34]),c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_50,plain,
    ( ~ test(X1)
    | addition(X1,one) = one ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_51,negated_conjecture,
    test(esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_52,negated_conjecture,
    addition(multiplication(esk2_0,esk3_0),addition(multiplication(addition(esk3_0,c(esk3_0)),esk2_0),multiplication(c(esk2_0),addition(esk3_0,c(esk3_0))))) != one,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_44]),c_0_22]),c_0_35]),c_0_44]),c_0_35]),c_0_45]),c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_53,plain,
    multiplication(X1,one) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_46]) ).

cnf(c_0_54,plain,
    addition(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(X2,addition(X1,X3)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_31]),c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_55,plain,
    ( ~ test(addition(X1,X2))
    | addition(X1,one) = one ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_47]) ).

cnf(c_0_56,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(addition(X1,one),esk3_0) = multiplication(addition(X1,esk3_0),esk3_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_48]),c_0_31]),c_0_49]) ).

cnf(c_0_57,negated_conjecture,
    addition(esk2_0,one) = one,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_51]) ).

cnf(c_0_58,negated_conjecture,
    addition(esk2_0,addition(multiplication(esk2_0,esk3_0),c(esk2_0))) != one,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_52,c_0_39]),c_0_34]),c_0_53]),c_0_41])]),c_0_44]),c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_59,plain,
    ( ~ test(X1)
    | addition(X1,addition(X2,c(X1))) = addition(X2,one) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_54,c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_60,plain,
    ( ~ test(multiplication(addition(X1,X3),X2))
    | addition(one,multiplication(X1,X2)) = one ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_55,c_0_22]),c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_61,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(addition(esk2_0,esk3_0),esk3_0) = esk3_0,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_56,c_0_57]),c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_62,negated_conjecture,
    addition(one,multiplication(esk2_0,esk3_0)) != one,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_58,c_0_59]),c_0_51])]),c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_63,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_60,c_0_61]),c_0_41])]),c_0_62]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : KLE010+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.36  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.36  % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 22:43:28 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.36  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.40  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.82/0.68  % Version: 3.5.1
% 1.82/0.68  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 1.82/0.68  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.82/0.68  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.82/0.68  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.82/0.68  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.82/0.68  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.82/0.68  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 1565074 completed with status 0
% 1.82/0.68  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 1.82/0.68  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 1.82/0.68  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.82/0.68  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.82/0.68  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 1.82/0.68  % No SInE strategy applied
% 1.82/0.68  % Search class: FGUSM-FFMF21-DFFFFFNN
% 1.82/0.68  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 1.82/0.68  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 1.82/0.68  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 1.82/0.68  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 169s (1) cores
% 1.82/0.68  % Starting new_bool_3 with 169s (1) cores
% 1.82/0.68  % Starting new_bool_1 with 169s (1) cores
% 1.82/0.68  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 1565079 completed with status 0
% 1.82/0.68  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 1.82/0.68  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 1.82/0.68  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.82/0.68  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.82/0.68  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 1.82/0.68  % No SInE strategy applied
% 1.82/0.68  % Search class: FGUSM-FFMF21-DFFFFFNN
% 1.82/0.68  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 1.82/0.68  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 1.82/0.68  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 1.82/0.68  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 1.82/0.68  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 1.82/0.68  
% 1.82/0.68  % Proof found!
% 1.82/0.68  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.82/0.68  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.82/0.68  % Parsed axioms                        : 17
% 1.82/0.68  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 1.82/0.68  % Initial clauses                      : 25
% 1.82/0.68  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 1.82/0.68  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 25
% 1.82/0.68  % Processed clauses                    : 3064
% 1.82/0.68  % ...of these trivial                  : 228
% 1.82/0.68  % ...subsumed                          : 2256
% 1.82/0.68  % ...remaining for further processing  : 580
% 1.82/0.68  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 280
% 1.82/0.68  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 1.82/0.68  % Backward-subsumed                    : 64
% 1.82/0.68  % Backward-rewritten                   : 144
% 1.82/0.68  % Generated clauses                    : 24746
% 1.82/0.68  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 16707
% 1.82/0.68  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 1.82/0.68  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 28
% 1.82/0.68  % Paramodulations                      : 24466
% 1.82/0.68  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 1.82/0.68  % NegExts                              : 0
% 1.82/0.68  % Equation resolutions                 : 280
% 1.82/0.68  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 1.82/0.68  % Total rewrite steps                  : 37160
% 1.82/0.68  % ...of those cached                   : 32353
% 1.82/0.68  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 1.82/0.68  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 1.82/0.68  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1.82/0.68  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 1.82/0.68  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1.82/0.68  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 1.82/0.68  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 1.82/0.68  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 1.82/0.68  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 1.82/0.68  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 1.82/0.68  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 1.82/0.68  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 1.82/0.68  % Current number of processed clauses  : 346
% 1.82/0.68  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 146
% 1.82/0.68  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 4
% 1.82/0.68  %    Negative unit clauses             : 8
% 1.82/0.68  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 188
% 1.82/0.68  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 13146
% 1.82/0.68  % ...number of literals in the above   : 30249
% 1.82/0.68  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 1.82/0.68  % Current number of archived clauses   : 233
% 1.82/0.68  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 19816
% 1.82/0.68  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 18771
% 1.82/0.68  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1983
% 1.82/0.68  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2702
% 1.82/0.68  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 1.82/0.68  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 255
% 1.82/0.68  % BW rewrite match successes           : 167
% 1.82/0.68  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 1.82/0.68  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 1.82/0.68  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 330995
% 1.82/0.68  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 180
% 1.82/0.68  
% 1.82/0.68  % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.82/0.68  % User time                : 0.205 s
% 1.82/0.68  % System time              : 0.015 s
% 1.82/0.68  % Total time               : 0.220 s
% 1.82/0.68  % Maximum resident set size: 3344 pages
% 1.82/0.68  
% 1.82/0.68  % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.82/0.68  % User time                : 1.104 s
% 1.82/0.68  % System time              : 0.063 s
% 1.82/0.68  % Total time               : 1.168 s
% 1.82/0.68  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 1.82/0.68  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------