↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : KLE013+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:52:09 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 4.26s 1.66s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.26s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   17
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   73 (  48 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  129 (  73 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   93 (  37   ~;  29   |;  20   &)
%                                         (   4 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   99 (   0 sgn  92   !;   7   ?;  35   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : addition(X0,X1) = addition(X1,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_commutativity) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] : addition(X2,addition(X1,X0)) = addition(addition(X2,X1),X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_associativity) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X0] : addition(X0,X0) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_idempotence) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X0] : multiplication(X0,one) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',multiplicative_right_identity) ).

fof(f7,axiom,
    ! [X0] : multiplication(one,X0) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',multiplicative_left_identity) ).

fof(f8,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] : multiplication(X0,addition(X1,X2)) = addition(multiplication(X0,X1),multiplication(X0,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',right_distributivity) ).

fof(f9,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] : multiplication(addition(X0,X1),X2) = addition(multiplication(X0,X2),multiplication(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',left_distributivity) ).

fof(f13,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( test(X0)
    <=> ? [X1] : complement(X1,X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_1) ).

fof(f14,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( complement(X1,X0)
    <=> ( addition(X0,X1) = one
        & multiplication(X1,X0) = zero
        & multiplication(X0,X1) = zero ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_2) ).

fof(f15,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( test(X0)
     => ( c(X0) = X1
      <=> complement(X0,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_3) ).

fof(f17,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( test(X0)
        & test(X1) )
     => one = addition(addition(X0,X1),multiplication(c(X0),c(X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

fof(f18,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1] :
        ( ( test(X0)
          & test(X1) )
       => one = addition(addition(X0,X1),multiplication(c(X0),c(X1))) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f17]) ).

fof(f19,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
      ( test(X0)
      & test(X1)
      & one != addition(addition(X0,X1),multiplication(c(X0),c(X1))) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).

fof(f20,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
      ( test(X0)
      & test(X1)
      & one != addition(addition(X0,X1),multiplication(c(X0),c(X1))) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f19]) ).

fof(f22,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ test(X0)
      | ( c(X0) = X1
      <=> complement(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

fof(f23,plain,
    ( test(sK0)
    & test(sK1)
    & one != addition(addition(sK0,sK1),multiplication(c(sK0),c(sK1))) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1]),skolemize(X0,sK0),skolemize(X1,sK1)],[f20]) ).

fof(f24,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ test(X0)
      | ( ( c(X0) != X1
          | complement(X0,X1) )
        & ( ~ complement(X0,X1)
          | c(X0) = X1 ) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f22]) ).

fof(f25,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ( ~ test(X0)
        | ? [X1] : complement(X1,X0) )
      & ( ! [X1] : ~ complement(X1,X0)
        | test(X0) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).

fof(f26,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ( ~ test(X0)
        | ? [X2] : complement(X2,X0) )
      & ( ! [X1] : ~ complement(X1,X0)
        | test(X0) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f25]) ).

fof(f27,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ( ~ test(X0)
        | complement(sK2(X0),X0) )
      & ( ! [X1] : ~ complement(X1,X0)
        | test(X0) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK2]),skolemize(X2,sK2(X0))],[f26]) ).

fof(f28,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ~ complement(X1,X0)
        | ( addition(X0,X1) = one
          & multiplication(X1,X0) = zero
          & multiplication(X0,X1) = zero ) )
      & ( addition(X0,X1) != one
        | zero != multiplication(X1,X0)
        | zero != multiplication(X0,X1)
        | complement(X1,X0) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).

fof(f29,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ~ complement(X1,X0)
        | ( addition(X0,X1) = one
          & multiplication(X1,X0) = zero
          & multiplication(X0,X1) = zero ) )
      & ( addition(X0,X1) != one
        | zero != multiplication(X1,X0)
        | zero != multiplication(X0,X1)
        | complement(X1,X0) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f28]) ).

fof(f30,plain,
    test(sK0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f23]) ).

fof(f31,plain,
    test(sK1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f23]) ).

fof(f32,plain,
    one != addition(addition(sK0,sK1),multiplication(c(sK0),c(sK1))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f23]) ).

fof(f33,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : multiplication(addition(X0,X1),X2) = addition(multiplication(X0,X2),multiplication(X1,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

fof(f34,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : multiplication(X0,addition(X1,X2)) = addition(multiplication(X0,X1),multiplication(X0,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

fof(f35,plain,
    ! [X0] : addition(X0,X0) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

fof(f36,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : addition(X2,addition(X1,X0)) = addition(addition(X2,X1),X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f37,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : addition(X0,X1) = addition(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f39,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ test(X0)
      | c(X0) != X1
      | complement(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f24]) ).

fof(f41,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ test(X0)
      | complement(sK2(X0),X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f27]) ).

fof(f44,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ complement(X1,X0)
      | addition(X0,X1) = one ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f29]) ).

fof(f48,plain,
    ! [X0] : multiplication(one,X0) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

fof(f49,plain,
    ! [X0] : multiplication(X0,one) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

fof(f53,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ test(X0)
      | complement(X0,c(X0)) ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f39]) ).

tcf(c_49,negated_conjecture,
    addition(addition(sK0,sK1),multiplication(c(sK0),c(sK1))) != one,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f32]) ).

tcf(c_50,negated_conjecture,
    test(sK1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f31]) ).

tcf(c_51,negated_conjecture,
    test(sK0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f30]) ).

tcf(c_52,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : addition(multiplication(X0,X1),multiplication(X2,X1)) = multiplication(addition(X0,X2),X1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f33]) ).

tcf(c_53,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : addition(multiplication(X0,X1),multiplication(X0,X2)) = multiplication(X0,addition(X1,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f34]) ).

tcf(c_54,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : addition(X0,X0) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f35]) ).

tcf(c_55,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : addition(addition(X0,X1),X2) = addition(X0,addition(X1,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f36]) ).

tcf(c_56,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : addition(X0,X1) = addition(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f37]) ).

tcf(c_59,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( complement(X0,c(X0))
      | ~ test(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f53]) ).

tcf(c_61,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( complement(sK2(X0),X0)
      | ~ test(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f41]) ).

tcf(c_66,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( addition(X1,X0) = one )
      | ~ complement(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f44]) ).

tcf(c_67,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : multiplication(one,X0) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f48]) ).

tcf(c_68,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : multiplication(X0,one) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f49]) ).

tcf(c_88,negated_conjecture,
    addition(sK0,addition(sK1,multiplication(c(sK0),c(sK1)))) != one,
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_49,c_55,c_56]) ).

tcf(c_700,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : addition(X0,addition(X1,X2)) = addition(X1,addition(X0,X2)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_55,c_56]) ).

tcf(c_708,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : addition(X0,addition(X1,X0)) = addition(X1,X0),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_54,c_700]) ).

tcf(c_776,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( addition(c(X0),X0) = one )
      | ~ test(X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_59,c_66]) ).

tcf(c_777,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( addition(X0,sK2(X0)) = one )
      | ~ test(X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_61,c_66]) ).

tcf(c_780,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( addition(X0,c(X0)) = one )
      | ~ test(X0) ),
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_776,c_55,c_56]) ).

tcf(c_786,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : addition(X0,addition(X0,X1)) = addition(X0,X1),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_56,c_708]) ).

tcf(c_1246,plain,
    addition(sK1,sK2(sK1)) = one,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_777]) ).

tcf(c_1266,plain,
    addition(sK1,one) = one,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1246,c_786]) ).

tcf(c_1273,plain,
    addition(one,sK1) = one,
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_1266,c_55,c_56]) ).

tcf(c_2479,plain,
    addition(sK1,c(sK1)) = one,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_780]) ).

tcf(c_2480,plain,
    addition(sK0,c(sK0)) = one,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_51,c_780]) ).

tcf(c_2514,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : addition(multiplication(X0,sK1),multiplication(X0,c(sK1))) = multiplication(X0,one),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2479,c_53]) ).

tcf(c_2519,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : addition(multiplication(X0,sK1),multiplication(X0,c(sK1))) = X0,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_2514,c_68]) ).

tcf(c_2535,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : addition(sK0,addition(c(sK0),X0)) = addition(one,X0),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2480,c_55]) ).

tcf(c_2540,plain,
    addition(c(sK0),one) = one,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2480,c_708]) ).

tcf(c_2542,plain,
    addition(one,c(sK0)) = one,
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_2540,c_55,c_56]) ).

tcf(c_2605,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : addition(multiplication(one,X0),multiplication(c(sK0),X0)) = multiplication(one,X0),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2542,c_52]) ).

tcf(c_2612,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : addition(X0,multiplication(c(sK0),X0)) = X0,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_2605,c_67]) ).

tcf(c_3212,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : addition(X0,addition(multiplication(c(sK0),X0),X1)) = addition(X0,X1),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2612,c_55]) ).

tcf(c_22485,plain,
    addition(sK1,multiplication(c(sK0),c(sK1))) = addition(sK1,c(sK0)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2519,c_3212]) ).

tcf(c_22626,plain,
    addition(sK1,multiplication(c(sK0),c(sK1))) = addition(c(sK0),sK1),
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_22485,c_55,c_56]) ).

tcf(c_22738,plain,
    addition(sK0,addition(c(sK0),sK1)) != one,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_88,c_22626]) ).

tcf(c_22739,plain,
    $false,
    inference(ground_joinability,[status(thm)],[c_22738,c_1273,c_2535]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : KLE013+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.36  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 18:39:04 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.37  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.42  
% 0.10/0.42  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.10/0.42  
% 0.10/0.42  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.10/0.43  % Proving...
% 4.26/1.66  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 4.26/1.66  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 4.26/1.66  
% 4.26/1.66  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 4.26/1.66  
% 4.26/1.66  % ------  iProver source info
% 4.26/1.66  
% 4.26/1.66  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 4.26/1.66  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 4.26/1.66  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 4.26/1.66  
% 4.26/1.66  % ------ Parsing...
% 4.26/1.66  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 4.26/1.66  
% 4.26/1.66  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 4.26/1.66  
% 4.26/1.66  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 4.26/1.66  
% 4.26/1.66  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 4.26/1.66  % ------ Proving...
% 4.26/1.66  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 4.26/1.66  
% 4.26/1.66  % 
% 4.26/1.66  % clauses                               23
% 4.26/1.66  % conjectures                           3
% 4.26/1.66  % EPR                                   3
% 4.26/1.66  % Horn                                  22
% 4.26/1.66  % unary                                 14
% 4.26/1.66  % binary                                7
% 4.26/1.66  % lits                                  35
% 4.26/1.66  % lits eq                               20
% 4.26/1.66  % fd_pure                               0
% 4.26/1.66  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 4.26/1.66  % fd_cond                               0
% 4.26/1.66  % fd_pseudo_cond                        1
% 4.26/1.66  % AC symbols                            1
% 4.26/1.66  
% 4.26/1.66  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 4.26/1.66  
% 4.26/1.66  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 4.26/1.66  
% 4.26/1.66  
% 4.26/1.66  % ------ 
% 4.26/1.66  % Current options:
% 4.26/1.66  % ------ 
% 4.26/1.66  
% 4.26/1.66  
% 4.26/1.66  % 
% 4.26/1.66  
% 4.26/1.66  % ------ Proving...
% 4.26/1.66  % 
% 4.26/1.66  
% 4.26/1.66  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 4.26/1.66  
% 4.26/1.66  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.26/1.66  
% 4.26/1.66  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------