↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : KLE021+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:52:10 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.93s 1.28s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.93s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   56 (  30 unt;   3 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  123 (  50 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   88 (  38   ~;  29   |;  13   &)
%                                         (   4 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   6 usr;   4 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   68 (   0 sgn  66   !;   2   ?;  17   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : addition(X0,X1) = addition(X1,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_commutativity) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] : addition(X2,addition(X1,X0)) = addition(addition(X2,X1),X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_associativity) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X0] : addition(X0,X0) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_idempotence) ).

fof(f7,axiom,
    ! [X0] : multiplication(one,X0) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',multiplicative_left_identity) ).

fof(f9,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] : multiplication(addition(X0,X1),X2) = addition(multiplication(X0,X2),multiplication(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',left_distributivity) ).

fof(f12,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( leq(X0,X1)
    <=> addition(X0,X1) = X1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',order) ).

fof(f14,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( complement(X1,X0)
    <=> ( addition(X0,X1) = one
        & multiplication(X1,X0) = zero
        & multiplication(X0,X1) = zero ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_2) ).

fof(f15,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( test(X0)
     => ( c(X0) = X1
      <=> complement(X0,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_3) ).

fof(f17,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( test(X1)
     => ( leq(addition(multiplication(X1,X0),multiplication(c(X1),X0)),X0)
        & leq(X0,addition(multiplication(X1,X0),multiplication(c(X1),X0))) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

fof(f18,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1] :
        ( test(X1)
       => ( leq(addition(multiplication(X1,X0),multiplication(c(X1),X0)),X0)
          & leq(X0,addition(multiplication(X1,X0),multiplication(c(X1),X0))) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f17]) ).

fof(f19,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( addition(X0,X1) = X1
     => leq(X0,X1) ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f12]) ).

fof(f20,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( addition(X0,X1) != X1
      | leq(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f19]) ).

fof(f21,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ test(X0)
      | ( c(X0) = X1
      <=> complement(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

fof(f23,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
      ( test(X1)
      & ( ~ leq(addition(multiplication(X1,X0),multiplication(c(X1),X0)),X0)
        | ~ leq(X0,addition(multiplication(X1,X0),multiplication(c(X1),X0))) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).

fof(f27,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ~ complement(X1,X0)
        | ( addition(X0,X1) = one
          & multiplication(X1,X0) = zero
          & multiplication(X0,X1) = zero ) )
      & ( addition(X0,X1) != one
        | zero != multiplication(X1,X0)
        | zero != multiplication(X0,X1)
        | complement(X1,X0) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).

fof(f28,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ~ complement(X1,X0)
        | ( addition(X0,X1) = one
          & multiplication(X1,X0) = zero
          & multiplication(X0,X1) = zero ) )
      & ( addition(X0,X1) != one
        | zero != multiplication(X1,X0)
        | zero != multiplication(X0,X1)
        | complement(X1,X0) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f27]) ).

fof(f29,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ test(X0)
      | ( ( c(X0) != X1
          | complement(X0,X1) )
        & ( ~ complement(X0,X1)
          | c(X0) = X1 ) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f21]) ).

fof(f30,plain,
    ( test(sK2)
    & ( ~ leq(addition(multiplication(sK2,sK1),multiplication(c(sK2),sK1)),sK1)
      | ~ leq(sK1,addition(multiplication(sK2,sK1),multiplication(c(sK2),sK1))) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1,sK2]),skolemize(X0,sK1),skolemize(X1,sK2)],[f23]) ).

fof(f31,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : addition(X0,X1) = addition(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f32,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : addition(X2,addition(X1,X0)) = addition(addition(X2,X1),X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f34,plain,
    ! [X0] : addition(X0,X0) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

fof(f37,plain,
    ! [X0] : multiplication(one,X0) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

fof(f39,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : multiplication(addition(X0,X1),X2) = addition(multiplication(X0,X2),multiplication(X1,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

fof(f42,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( addition(X0,X1) != X1
      | leq(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f20]) ).

fof(f45,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ complement(X1,X0)
      | addition(X0,X1) = one ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f28]) ).

fof(f49,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ test(X0)
      | c(X0) != X1
      | complement(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f29]) ).

fof(f52,plain,
    test(sK2),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f30]) ).

fof(f53,plain,
    ( ~ leq(addition(multiplication(sK2,sK1),multiplication(c(sK2),sK1)),sK1)
    | ~ leq(sK1,addition(multiplication(sK2,sK1),multiplication(c(sK2),sK1))) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f30]) ).

fof(f54,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ test(X0)
      | complement(X0,c(X0)) ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f49]) ).

tcf(c_49,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : addition(X0,X1) = addition(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f31]) ).

tcf(c_50,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : addition(addition(X0,X1),X2) = addition(X0,addition(X1,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f32]) ).

tcf(c_52,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : addition(X0,X0) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f34]) ).

tcf(c_55,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : multiplication(one,X0) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f37]) ).

tcf(c_57,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : addition(multiplication(X0,X1),multiplication(X2,X1)) = multiplication(addition(X0,X2),X1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f39]) ).

tcf(c_60,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( leq(X0,X1)
      | ( addition(X0,X1) != X1 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f42]) ).

tcf(c_66,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( addition(X1,X0) = one )
      | ~ complement(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f45]) ).

tcf(c_68,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( complement(X0,c(X0))
      | ~ test(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f54]) ).

tcf(c_70,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ leq(sK1,addition(multiplication(sK2,sK1),multiplication(c(sK2),sK1)))
    | ~ leq(addition(multiplication(sK2,sK1),multiplication(c(sK2),sK1)),sK1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f53]) ).

tcf(c_71,negated_conjecture,
    test(sK2),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f52]) ).

tcf(c_199,plain,
    ( ~ leq(sK1,multiplication(addition(c(sK2),sK2),sK1))
    | ~ leq(multiplication(addition(c(sK2),sK2),sK1),sK1) ),
    inference(ac_demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_70,c_57,c_57,c_50,c_49]) ).

tcf(c_200,plain,
    ( ~ leq(sK1,multiplication(addition(sK2,c(sK2)),sK1))
    | ~ leq(multiplication(addition(sK2,c(sK2)),sK1),sK1) ),
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_199,c_50,c_49]) ).

tcf(c_464,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = c(sK2),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_465,definition,
    iPr_def_11 = addition(sK2,iPr_def_10),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).

tcf(c_466,definition,
    iPr_def_12 = multiplication(iPr_def_11,sK1),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).

tcf(c_467,plain,
    ( ~ leq(iPr_def_12,sK1)
    | ~ leq(sK1,iPr_def_12) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_200,c_464,c_465,c_466]) ).

tcf(c_468,negated_conjecture,
    test(sK2),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_71]) ).

tcf(c_749,plain,
    addition(iPr_def_10,sK2) = iPr_def_11,
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_465,c_50,c_49]) ).

tcf(c_763,plain,
    ( complement(sK2,iPr_def_10)
    | ~ test(sK2) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_464,c_68]) ).

tcf(c_767,plain,
    complement(sK2,iPr_def_10),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_763,c_468]) ).

tcf(c_785,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : leq(X0,X0),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_52,c_60]) ).

tcf(c_847,plain,
    addition(iPr_def_10,sK2) = one,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_767,c_66]) ).

tcf(c_848,plain,
    one = iPr_def_11,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_847,c_749]) ).

tcf(c_855,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : multiplication(iPr_def_11,X0) = X0,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_55,c_848]) ).

tcf(c_857,plain,
    sK1 = iPr_def_12,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_466,c_855]) ).

tcf(c_858,plain,
    ~ leq(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_12),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_467,c_857]) ).

tcf(c_859,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_858,c_785]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : KLE021+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.36  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 18:39:20 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.37  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.13/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.42  
% 0.13/0.42  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.13/0.42  
% 0.13/0.42  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.13/0.43  % Proving...
% 0.93/1.28  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 0.93/1.28  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.93/1.28  
% 0.93/1.28  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 0.93/1.28  
% 0.93/1.28  % ------  iProver source info
% 0.93/1.28  
% 0.93/1.28  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 0.93/1.28  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 0.93/1.28  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 0.93/1.28  
% 0.93/1.28  % ------ Parsing...
% 0.93/1.28  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 0.93/1.28  
% 0.93/1.28  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 1  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 0.93/1.28  
% 0.93/1.28  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 0.93/1.28  
% 0.93/1.28  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 0.93/1.28  % ------ Proving...
% 0.93/1.28  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 0.93/1.28  
% 0.93/1.28  % 
% 0.93/1.28  % clauses                               26
% 0.93/1.28  % conjectures                           1
% 0.93/1.28  % EPR                                   3
% 0.93/1.28  % Horn                                  25
% 0.93/1.28  % unary                                 15
% 0.93/1.28  % binary                                9
% 0.93/1.28  % lits                                  40
% 0.93/1.28  % lits eq                               23
% 0.93/1.28  % fd_pure                               0
% 0.93/1.28  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 0.93/1.28  % fd_cond                               0
% 0.93/1.28  % fd_pseudo_cond                        1
% 0.93/1.28  % AC symbols                            1
% 0.93/1.28  
% 0.93/1.28  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 0.93/1.28  
% 0.93/1.28  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 0.93/1.28  
% 0.93/1.28  
% 0.93/1.28  % ------ 
% 0.93/1.28  % Current options:
% 0.93/1.28  % ------ 
% 0.93/1.28  
% 0.93/1.28  
% 0.93/1.28  % 
% 0.93/1.28  
% 0.93/1.28  % ------ Proving...
% 0.93/1.28  % 
% 0.93/1.28  
% 0.93/1.28  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.93/1.28  
% 0.93/1.28  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.93/1.28  
% 0.93/1.28  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------