↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : KLE024+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 04:35:31 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.89s 1.90s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.89s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   46 (  28 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   86 (  54 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   66 (  26   ~;  22   |;  11   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   68 (   4 sgn  36   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(test_3,axiom,
    ! [X4,X5] :
      ( test(X4)
     => ( c(X4) = X5
      <=> complement(X4,X5) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_3) ).

fof(test_2,axiom,
    ! [X4,X5] :
      ( complement(X5,X4)
    <=> ( multiplication(X4,X5) = zero
        & multiplication(X5,X4) = zero
        & addition(X4,X5) = one ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_2) ).

fof(right_distributivity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] : multiplication(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(multiplication(X1,X2),multiplication(X1,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',right_distributivity) ).

fof(additive_identity,axiom,
    ! [X1] : addition(X1,zero) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_identity) ).

fof(additive_commutativity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_commutativity) ).

fof(multiplicative_right_identity,axiom,
    ! [X1] : multiplication(X1,one) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',multiplicative_right_identity) ).

fof(goals,conjecture,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] :
      ( ( test(X5)
        & test(X6) )
     => ( addition(multiplication(X4,c(X6)),multiplication(c(X5),X4)) = multiplication(c(X5),X4)
       => multiplication(multiplication(X5,X4),c(X6)) = zero ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

fof(multiplicative_associativity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] : multiplication(X1,multiplication(X2,X3)) = multiplication(multiplication(X1,X2),X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',multiplicative_associativity) ).

fof(left_annihilation,axiom,
    ! [X1] : multiplication(zero,X1) = zero,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',left_annihilation) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X67,X68] :
      ( ( c(X67) != X68
        | complement(X67,X68)
        | ~ test(X67) )
      & ( ~ complement(X67,X68)
        | c(X67) = X68
        | ~ test(X67) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[test_3])])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X65,X66] :
      ( ( multiplication(X65,X66) = zero
        | ~ complement(X66,X65) )
      & ( multiplication(X66,X65) = zero
        | ~ complement(X66,X65) )
      & ( addition(X65,X66) = one
        | ~ complement(X66,X65) )
      & ( multiplication(X65,X66) != zero
        | multiplication(X66,X65) != zero
        | addition(X65,X66) != one
        | complement(X66,X65) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[test_2])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( complement(X1,X2)
    | c(X1) != X2
    | ~ test(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X51,X52,X53] : multiplication(X51,addition(X52,X53)) = addition(multiplication(X51,X52),multiplication(X51,X53)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[right_distributivity]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( multiplication(X1,X2) = zero
    | ~ complement(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( complement(X1,c(X1))
    | ~ test(X1) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

fof(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X44] : addition(X44,zero) = X44,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_identity]) ).

fof(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X39,X40] : addition(X39,X40) = addition(X40,X39),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_commutativity]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    multiplication(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(multiplication(X1,X2),multiplication(X1,X3)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( multiplication(X1,c(X1)) = zero
    | ~ test(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    addition(X1,zero) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( addition(X1,X2) = one
    | ~ complement(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

fof(c_0_22,plain,
    ! [X49] : multiplication(X49,one) = X49,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[multiplicative_right_identity]) ).

fof(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X4,X5,X6] :
        ( ( test(X5)
          & test(X6) )
       => ( addition(multiplication(X4,c(X6)),multiplication(c(X5),X4)) = multiplication(c(X5),X4)
         => multiplication(multiplication(X5,X4),c(X6)) = zero ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).

fof(c_0_24,plain,
    ! [X46,X47,X48] : multiplication(X46,multiplication(X47,X48)) = multiplication(multiplication(X46,X47),X48),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[multiplicative_associativity]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( multiplication(X1,addition(X2,c(X1))) = multiplication(X1,X2)
    | ~ test(X1) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( addition(X1,c(X1)) = one
    | ~ test(X1) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_14]),c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    multiplication(X1,one) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).

fof(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ( test(esk3_0)
    & test(esk4_0)
    & addition(multiplication(esk2_0,c(esk4_0)),multiplication(c(esk3_0),esk2_0)) = multiplication(c(esk3_0),esk2_0)
    & multiplication(multiplication(esk3_0,esk2_0),c(esk4_0)) != zero ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_23])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    multiplication(X1,multiplication(X2,X3)) = multiplication(multiplication(X1,X2),X3),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( multiplication(X1,X1) = X1
    | ~ test(X1) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    test(esk3_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]) ).

fof(c_0_32,plain,
    ! [X58] : multiplication(zero,X58) = zero,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[left_annihilation]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( multiplication(X1,multiplication(X2,c(multiplication(X1,X2)))) = zero
    | ~ test(multiplication(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(esk3_0,esk3_0) = esk3_0,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    multiplication(zero,X1) = zero,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(esk3_0,multiplication(esk3_0,c(esk3_0))) = zero,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),c_0_31])]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(esk3_0,multiplication(esk3_0,X1)) = multiplication(esk3_0,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    ( multiplication(X1,multiplication(c(X1),X2)) = zero
    | ~ test(X1) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_18]),c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(esk3_0,c(esk3_0)) = zero,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(multiplication(esk3_0,esk2_0),c(esk4_0)) != zero,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    ( multiplication(X1,addition(X2,multiplication(c(X1),X3))) = multiplication(X1,X2)
    | ~ test(X1) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_38]),c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    addition(multiplication(esk2_0,c(esk4_0)),multiplication(c(esk3_0),esk2_0)) = multiplication(c(esk3_0),esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(esk3_0,multiplication(c(esk3_0),X1)) = zero,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_39]),c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(esk3_0,multiplication(esk2_0,c(esk4_0))) != zero,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]),c_0_43]),c_0_31])]),c_0_44]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : KLE024+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.16/0.33  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.16/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.16/0.33  % DateTime   : Mon May  4 20:26:41 EDT 2026
% 0.16/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.16/0.35  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.89/1.90  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.89/1.90  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.89/1.90  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.89/1.90  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.89/1.90  % Total time : 1.372s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------