↑ Up

ET---2.0.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : KLE024+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 01:55:25 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.22s 1.41s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   30 (  18 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   67 (  42 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   60 (  23   ~;  19   |;  11   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   52 (   5 sgn  33   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(goals,conjecture,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] :
      ( ( test(X5)
        & test(X6) )
     => ( addition(multiplication(X4,c(X6)),multiplication(c(X5),X4)) = multiplication(c(X5),X4)
       => multiplication(multiplication(X5,X4),c(X6)) = zero ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',goals) ).

fof(test_2,axiom,
    ! [X4,X5] :
      ( complement(X5,X4)
    <=> ( multiplication(X4,X5) = zero
        & multiplication(X5,X4) = zero
        & addition(X4,X5) = one ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_2) ).

fof(test_3,axiom,
    ! [X4,X5] :
      ( test(X4)
     => ( c(X4) = X5
      <=> complement(X4,X5) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_3) ).

fof(right_distributivity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] : multiplication(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(multiplication(X1,X2),multiplication(X1,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',right_distributivity) ).

fof(multiplicative_associativity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] : multiplication(X1,multiplication(X2,X3)) = multiplication(multiplication(X1,X2),X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',multiplicative_associativity) ).

fof(left_annihilation,axiom,
    ! [X1] : multiplication(zero,X1) = zero,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',left_annihilation) ).

fof(additive_identity,axiom,
    ! [X1] : addition(X1,zero) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_identity) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X4,X5,X6] :
        ( ( test(X5)
          & test(X6) )
       => ( addition(multiplication(X4,c(X6)),multiplication(c(X5),X4)) = multiplication(c(X5),X4)
         => multiplication(multiplication(X5,X4),c(X6)) = zero ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X6,X7,X6,X7] :
      ( ( multiplication(X6,X7) = zero
        | ~ complement(X7,X6) )
      & ( multiplication(X7,X6) = zero
        | ~ complement(X7,X6) )
      & ( addition(X6,X7) = one
        | ~ complement(X7,X6) )
      & ( multiplication(X6,X7) != zero
        | multiplication(X7,X6) != zero
        | addition(X6,X7) != one
        | complement(X7,X6) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[test_2])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X6,X7,X7] :
      ( ( c(X6) != X7
        | complement(X6,X7)
        | ~ test(X6) )
      & ( ~ complement(X6,X7)
        | c(X6) = X7
        | ~ test(X6) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[test_3])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] : multiplication(X4,addition(X5,X6)) = addition(multiplication(X4,X5),multiplication(X4,X6)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[right_distributivity]) ).

fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( test(esk3_0)
    & test(esk4_0)
    & addition(multiplication(esk2_0,c(esk4_0)),multiplication(c(esk3_0),esk2_0)) = multiplication(c(esk3_0),esk2_0)
    & multiplication(multiplication(esk3_0,esk2_0),c(esk4_0)) != zero ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] : multiplication(X4,multiplication(X5,X6)) = multiplication(multiplication(X4,X5),X6),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[multiplicative_associativity]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( multiplication(X1,X2) = zero
    | ~ complement(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( complement(X1,X2)
    | ~ test(X1)
    | c(X1) != X2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

fof(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X2] : multiplication(zero,X2) = zero,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[left_annihilation]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    multiplication(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(multiplication(X1,X2),multiplication(X1,X3)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    addition(multiplication(esk2_0,c(esk4_0)),multiplication(c(esk3_0),esk2_0)) = multiplication(c(esk3_0),esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    multiplication(X1,multiplication(X2,X3)) = multiplication(multiplication(X1,X2),X3),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( multiplication(X1,X2) = zero
    | c(X1) != X2
    | ~ test(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    multiplication(zero,X1) = zero,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

fof(c_0_21,plain,
    ! [X2] : addition(X2,zero) = X2,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_identity]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(multiplication(esk3_0,esk2_0),c(esk4_0)) != zero,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    addition(multiplication(X1,multiplication(esk2_0,c(esk4_0))),multiplication(X1,multiplication(c(esk3_0),esk2_0))) = multiplication(X1,multiplication(c(esk3_0),esk2_0)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( multiplication(X1,multiplication(X2,X3)) = zero
    | c(X1) != X2
    | ~ test(X1) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    addition(X1,zero) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(esk3_0,multiplication(esk2_0,c(esk4_0))) != zero,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ( multiplication(X1,multiplication(esk2_0,c(esk4_0))) = zero
    | c(X1) != c(esk3_0)
    | ~ test(X1) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    test(esk3_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_28])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : KLE024+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 08:07:50 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.22/1.41  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_29fa5c60d0ee03ec4f64b055553dc135fbe4ee3a for 23 seconds:
% 0.22/1.41  # Preprocessing time       : 0.015 s
% 0.22/1.41  
% 0.22/1.41  # Proof found!
% 0.22/1.41  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.22/1.41  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/1.41  # Proof object total steps             : 30
% 0.22/1.41  # Proof object clause steps            : 15
% 0.22/1.41  # Proof object formula steps           : 15
% 0.22/1.41  # Proof object conjectures             : 10
% 0.22/1.41  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 7
% 0.22/1.41  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.22/1.41  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 9
% 0.22/1.41  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 7
% 0.22/1.41  # Proof object generating inferences   : 5
% 0.22/1.41  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 5
% 0.22/1.41  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.22/1.41  # Parsed axioms                        : 17
% 0.22/1.41  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.22/1.41  # Initial clauses                      : 26
% 0.22/1.41  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.22/1.41  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 26
% 0.22/1.41  # Processed clauses                    : 4005
% 0.22/1.41  # ...of these trivial                  : 246
% 0.22/1.41  # ...subsumed                          : 2987
% 0.22/1.41  # ...remaining for further processing  : 772
% 0.22/1.41  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 6
% 0.22/1.41  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.22/1.41  # Backward-subsumed                    : 92
% 0.22/1.41  # Backward-rewritten                   : 23
% 0.22/1.41  # Generated clauses                    : 70357
% 0.22/1.41  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 54198
% 0.22/1.41  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 3016
% 0.22/1.41  # Paramodulations                      : 70308
% 0.22/1.41  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.22/1.41  # Equation resolutions                 : 28
% 0.22/1.41  # Current number of processed clauses  : 649
% 0.22/1.41  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 46
% 0.22/1.41  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 10
% 0.22/1.41  #    Negative unit clauses             : 14
% 0.22/1.41  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 579
% 0.22/1.41  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 46508
% 0.22/1.41  # ...number of literals in the above   : 185488
% 0.22/1.41  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.22/1.41  # Current number of archived clauses   : 115
% 0.22/1.41  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 384036
% 0.22/1.41  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 206386
% 0.22/1.41  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 5163
% 0.22/1.41  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1670
% 0.22/1.41  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.22/1.41  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 338
% 0.22/1.41  # BW rewrite match successes           : 110
% 0.22/1.41  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.22/1.41  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.22/1.41  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 1517392
% 0.22/1.41  
% 0.22/1.41  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/1.41  # User time                : 0.720 s
% 0.22/1.41  # System time              : 0.029 s
% 0.22/1.41  # Total time               : 0.749 s
% 0.22/1.41  # Maximum resident set size: 43472 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------