%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : ePrincess---1.0 % Problem : KLE024+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s % Computer : n014.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Sun Jul 17 01:50:58 EDT 2022 % Result : Theorem 96.51s 64.21s % Output : Assurance 0s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----No solution output by system %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.03/0.12 % Problem : KLE024+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0. % 0.03/0.13 % Command : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s % 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu % 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 13:39:05 EDT 2022 % 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime : % 0.60/0.58 ____ _ % 0.60/0.58 ___ / __ \_____(_)___ ________ __________ % 0.60/0.58 / _ \/ /_/ / ___/ / __ \/ ___/ _ \/ ___/ ___/ % 0.60/0.58 / __/ ____/ / / / / / / /__/ __(__ |__ ) % 0.60/0.58 \___/_/ /_/ /_/_/ /_/\___/\___/____/____/ % 0.60/0.58 % 0.60/0.58 A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic % 0.60/0.59 (ePrincess v.1.0) % 0.60/0.59 % 0.60/0.59 (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2015 % 0.60/0.59 (c) Peter Backeman, 2014-2015 % 0.60/0.59 (contributions by Angelo Brillout, Peter Baumgartner) % 0.60/0.59 Free software under GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL). % 0.60/0.59 Bug reports to peter@backeman.se % 0.60/0.59 % 0.60/0.59 For more information, visit http://user.uu.se/~petba168/breu/ % 0.60/0.59 % 0.60/0.59 Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... % 0.60/0.64 Prover 0: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all % 1.73/0.96 Prover 0: Preprocessing ... % 2.60/1.26 Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ... % 20.41/5.93 Prover 1: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=normal +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all % 20.41/5.96 Prover 1: Preprocessing ... % 20.71/6.07 Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ... % 29.88/8.52 Prover 2: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all % 29.88/8.55 Prover 2: Preprocessing ... % 30.20/8.62 Prover 2: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 30.20/8.62 Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ... % 36.41/11.55 Prover 0: stopped % 36.70/11.75 Prover 3: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all % 36.70/11.78 Prover 3: Preprocessing ... % 36.98/11.82 Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ... % 80.76/53.08 Prover 3: stopped % 81.01/53.28 Prover 4: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=complete % 81.12/53.31 Prover 4: Preprocessing ... % 81.12/53.37 Prover 4: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 81.12/53.38 Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ... % 96.51/64.21 Prover 2: proved (5644ms) % 96.51/64.21 Prover 4: stopped % 96.51/64.21 Prover 1: stopped % 96.51/64.21 % 96.51/64.21 No countermodel exists, formula is valid % 96.51/64.21 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark % 96.51/64.21 % 96.51/64.22 Generating proof ... Warning: ignoring some quantifiers %------------------------------------------------------------------------------