%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem : KLE027+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:52:12 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 2.30s 6.29s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.30s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 21
% Number of leaves : 20
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 94 ( 73 unt; 8 def)
% Number of atoms : 216 ( 99 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 8 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 77 ( 31 ~; 23 |; 17 &)
% ( 3 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 12 ( 10 usr; 9 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 7 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 119 ( 0 sgn 109 !; 10 ?; 42 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
! [X0,X1] : addition(X0,X1) = addition(X1,X0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_commutativity) ).
fof(f2,axiom,
! [X0,X1,X2] : addition(X2,addition(X1,X0)) = addition(addition(X2,X1),X0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_associativity) ).
fof(f3,axiom,
! [X0] : addition(X0,zero) = X0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_identity) ).
fof(f5,axiom,
! [X0,X1,X2] : multiplication(X0,multiplication(X1,X2)) = multiplication(multiplication(X0,X1),X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',multiplicative_associativity) ).
fof(f6,axiom,
! [X0] : multiplication(X0,one) = X0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',multiplicative_right_identity) ).
fof(f7,axiom,
! [X0] : multiplication(one,X0) = X0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',multiplicative_left_identity) ).
fof(f8,axiom,
! [X0,X1,X2] : multiplication(X0,addition(X1,X2)) = addition(multiplication(X0,X1),multiplication(X0,X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',right_distributivity) ).
fof(f9,axiom,
! [X0,X1,X2] : multiplication(addition(X0,X1),X2) = addition(multiplication(X0,X2),multiplication(X1,X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',left_distributivity) ).
fof(f11,axiom,
! [X0] : multiplication(zero,X0) = zero,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',left_annihilation) ).
fof(f14,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( complement(X1,X0)
<=> ( addition(X0,X1) = one
& multiplication(X1,X0) = zero
& multiplication(X0,X1) = zero ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_2) ).
fof(f15,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( test(X0)
=> ( c(X0) = X1
<=> complement(X0,X1) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_3) ).
fof(f17,conjecture,
! [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4] :
( ( test(X4)
& test(X3) )
=> addition(multiplication(X3,addition(multiplication(X3,X0),multiplication(c(X3),X1))),multiplication(c(X3),X2)) = addition(multiplication(X3,X0),multiplication(c(X3),X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).
fof(f18,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4] :
( ( test(X4)
& test(X3) )
=> addition(multiplication(X3,addition(multiplication(X3,X0),multiplication(c(X3),X1))),multiplication(c(X3),X2)) = addition(multiplication(X3,X0),multiplication(c(X3),X2)) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f17]) ).
fof(f19,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ test(X0)
| ( c(X0) = X1
<=> complement(X0,X1) ) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).
fof(f21,plain,
? [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4] :
( test(X4)
& test(X3)
& addition(multiplication(X3,addition(multiplication(X3,X0),multiplication(c(X3),X1))),multiplication(c(X3),X2)) != addition(multiplication(X3,X0),multiplication(c(X3),X2)) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).
fof(f22,plain,
? [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4] :
( test(X4)
& test(X3)
& addition(multiplication(X3,addition(multiplication(X3,X0),multiplication(c(X3),X1))),multiplication(c(X3),X2)) != addition(multiplication(X3,X0),multiplication(c(X3),X2)) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f21]) ).
fof(f26,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ( ~ complement(X1,X0)
| ( addition(X0,X1) = one
& multiplication(X1,X0) = zero
& multiplication(X0,X1) = zero ) )
& ( addition(X0,X1) != one
| zero != multiplication(X1,X0)
| zero != multiplication(X0,X1)
| complement(X1,X0) ) ),
inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).
fof(f27,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ( ~ complement(X1,X0)
| ( addition(X0,X1) = one
& multiplication(X1,X0) = zero
& multiplication(X0,X1) = zero ) )
& ( addition(X0,X1) != one
| zero != multiplication(X1,X0)
| zero != multiplication(X0,X1)
| complement(X1,X0) ) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f26]) ).
fof(f28,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ test(X0)
| ( ( c(X0) != X1
| complement(X0,X1) )
& ( ~ complement(X0,X1)
| c(X0) = X1 ) ) ),
inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f19]) ).
fof(f29,plain,
( test(sK5)
& test(sK4)
& addition(multiplication(sK4,addition(multiplication(sK4,sK1),multiplication(c(sK4),sK2))),multiplication(c(sK4),sK3)) != addition(multiplication(sK4,sK1),multiplication(c(sK4),sK3)) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1,sK2,sK3,sK4,sK5]),skolemize(X0,sK1),skolemize(X1,sK2),skolemize(X2,sK3),skolemize(X3,sK4),skolemize(X4,sK5)],[f22]) ).
fof(f30,plain,
! [X0,X1] : addition(X0,X1) = addition(X1,X0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).
fof(f31,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] : addition(X2,addition(X1,X0)) = addition(addition(X2,X1),X0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).
fof(f32,plain,
! [X0] : addition(X0,zero) = X0,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).
fof(f34,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] : multiplication(X0,multiplication(X1,X2)) = multiplication(multiplication(X0,X1),X2),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).
fof(f35,plain,
! [X0] : multiplication(X0,one) = X0,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).
fof(f36,plain,
! [X0] : multiplication(one,X0) = X0,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).
fof(f37,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] : multiplication(X0,addition(X1,X2)) = addition(multiplication(X0,X1),multiplication(X0,X2)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).
fof(f38,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] : multiplication(addition(X0,X1),X2) = addition(multiplication(X0,X2),multiplication(X1,X2)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).
fof(f40,plain,
! [X0] : zero = multiplication(zero,X0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).
fof(f43,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ complement(X1,X0)
| addition(X0,X1) = one ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f27]) ).
fof(f44,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ complement(X1,X0)
| zero = multiplication(X1,X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f27]) ).
fof(f45,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ complement(X1,X0)
| zero = multiplication(X0,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f27]) ).
fof(f47,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ test(X0)
| c(X0) != X1
| complement(X0,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f28]) ).
fof(f51,plain,
test(sK4),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f29]) ).
fof(f52,plain,
addition(multiplication(sK4,addition(multiplication(sK4,sK1),multiplication(c(sK4),sK2))),multiplication(c(sK4),sK3)) != addition(multiplication(sK4,sK1),multiplication(c(sK4),sK3)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f29]) ).
fof(f53,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ test(X0)
| complement(X0,c(X0)) ),
inference(equality_resolution,[],[f47]) ).
tcf(c_49,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : addition(X0,X1) = addition(X1,X0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f30]) ).
tcf(c_50,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : addition(addition(X0,X1),X2) = addition(X0,addition(X1,X2)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f31]) ).
tcf(c_51,plain,
! [X0: $i] : addition(X0,zero) = X0,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f32]) ).
tcf(c_53,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : multiplication(multiplication(X0,X1),X2) = multiplication(X0,multiplication(X1,X2)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f34]) ).
tcf(c_54,plain,
! [X0: $i] : multiplication(X0,one) = X0,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f35]) ).
tcf(c_55,plain,
! [X0: $i] : multiplication(one,X0) = X0,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f36]) ).
tcf(c_56,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : addition(multiplication(X0,X1),multiplication(X0,X2)) = multiplication(X0,addition(X1,X2)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f37]) ).
tcf(c_57,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : addition(multiplication(X0,X1),multiplication(X2,X1)) = multiplication(addition(X0,X2),X1),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f38]) ).
tcf(c_59,plain,
! [X0: $i] : multiplication(zero,X0) = zero,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f40]) ).
tcf(c_63,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( multiplication(X1,X0) = zero )
| ~ complement(X0,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f45]) ).
tcf(c_64,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( multiplication(X0,X1) = zero )
| ~ complement(X0,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f44]) ).
tcf(c_65,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( addition(X1,X0) = one )
| ~ complement(X0,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f43]) ).
tcf(c_67,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( complement(X0,c(X0))
| ~ test(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f53]) ).
tcf(c_69,negated_conjecture,
addition(multiplication(sK4,addition(multiplication(sK4,sK1),multiplication(c(sK4),sK2))),multiplication(c(sK4),sK3)) != addition(multiplication(sK4,sK1),multiplication(c(sK4),sK3)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f52]) ).
tcf(c_70,negated_conjecture,
test(sK4),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f51]) ).
tcf(c_88,negated_conjecture,
addition(multiplication(c(sK4),sK3),multiplication(sK4,addition(multiplication(sK4,sK1),multiplication(c(sK4),sK2)))) != addition(multiplication(sK4,sK1),multiplication(c(sK4),sK3)),
inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_69,c_50,c_49]) ).
tcf(c_470,definition,
iPr_def_10 = c(sK4),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).
tcf(c_471,definition,
iPr_def_11 = multiplication(iPr_def_10,sK3),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).
tcf(c_472,definition,
iPr_def_12 = multiplication(sK4,sK1),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).
tcf(c_473,definition,
iPr_def_13 = multiplication(iPr_def_10,sK2),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_13])],[]) ).
tcf(c_474,definition,
iPr_def_14 = addition(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_13),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_14])],[]) ).
tcf(c_475,definition,
iPr_def_15 = multiplication(sK4,iPr_def_14),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_15])],[]) ).
tcf(c_476,definition,
iPr_def_16 = addition(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_15),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_16])],[]) ).
tcf(c_477,definition,
iPr_def_17 = addition(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_11),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_17])],[]) ).
tcf(c_478,negated_conjecture,
iPr_def_16 != iPr_def_17,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_88,c_477,c_473,c_472,c_474,c_475,c_470,c_471,c_476]) ).
tcf(c_480,negated_conjecture,
test(sK4),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_70]) ).
tcf(c_748,plain,
addition(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_12) = iPr_def_17,
inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_477,c_50,c_49]) ).
tcf(c_758,plain,
( complement(sK4,iPr_def_10)
| ~ test(sK4) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_470,c_67]) ).
tcf(c_762,plain,
complement(sK4,iPr_def_10),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_758,c_480]) ).
tcf(c_773,plain,
! [X0: $i] : addition(zero,X0) = X0,
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_51,c_49]) ).
tcf(c_805,plain,
multiplication(iPr_def_10,sK4) = zero,
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_762,c_63]) ).
tcf(c_816,plain,
multiplication(sK4,iPr_def_10) = zero,
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_762,c_64]) ).
tcf(c_827,plain,
addition(iPr_def_10,sK4) = one,
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_762,c_65]) ).
tcf(c_1041,plain,
! [X0: $i] : multiplication(sK4,multiplication(iPr_def_14,X0)) = multiplication(iPr_def_15,X0),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_475,c_53]) ).
tcf(c_1042,plain,
! [X0: $i] : multiplication(iPr_def_10,multiplication(sK4,X0)) = multiplication(zero,X0),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_805,c_53]) ).
tcf(c_1043,plain,
! [X0: $i] : multiplication(sK4,multiplication(iPr_def_10,X0)) = multiplication(zero,X0),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_816,c_53]) ).
tcf(c_1046,plain,
! [X0: $i] : multiplication(sK4,multiplication(iPr_def_10,X0)) = zero,
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_1043,c_59]) ).
tcf(c_1047,plain,
! [X0: $i] : multiplication(iPr_def_10,multiplication(sK4,X0)) = zero,
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_1042,c_59]) ).
tcf(c_1177,plain,
! [X0: $i] : addition(multiplication(iPr_def_12,X0),multiplication(iPr_def_13,X0)) = multiplication(iPr_def_14,X0),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_474,c_57]) ).
tcf(c_1181,plain,
! [X0: $i] : addition(multiplication(iPr_def_10,X0),multiplication(sK4,X0)) = multiplication(one,X0),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_827,c_57]) ).
tcf(c_1202,plain,
! [X0: $i] : addition(multiplication(iPr_def_10,X0),multiplication(sK4,X0)) = X0,
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_1181,c_55]) ).
tcf(c_1272,plain,
multiplication(sK4,iPr_def_13) = zero,
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_473,c_1046]) ).
tcf(c_1287,plain,
multiplication(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_12) = zero,
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_472,c_1047]) ).
tcf(c_1298,plain,
! [X0: $i] : addition(multiplication(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_12),X0) = X0,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_773,c_1287]) ).
tcf(c_1302,plain,
! [X0: $i] : multiplication(multiplication(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_12),X0) = multiplication(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_12),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_59,c_1287]) ).
tcf(c_1304,plain,
! [X0: $i] : addition(X0,multiplication(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_12)) = X0,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_51,c_1287]) ).
tcf(c_1543,plain,
multiplication(sK4,iPr_def_13) = multiplication(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_12),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_1272,c_1287]) ).
tcf(c_1544,plain,
! [X0: $i] : multiplication(multiplication(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_12),X0) = multiplication(sK4,multiplication(iPr_def_13,X0)),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1543,c_53]) ).
tcf(c_1548,plain,
! [X0: $i] : multiplication(sK4,multiplication(iPr_def_13,X0)) = multiplication(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_12),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_1544,c_1302]) ).
tcf(c_2376,plain,
multiplication(sK4,iPr_def_12) = iPr_def_12,
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1298,c_1202]) ).
tcf(c_2484,plain,
! [X0: $i] : multiplication(sK4,multiplication(iPr_def_12,X0)) = multiplication(iPr_def_12,X0),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2376,c_53]) ).
tcf(c_5912,plain,
! [X0: $i] : multiplication(sK4,addition(multiplication(iPr_def_12,X0),multiplication(iPr_def_13,X0))) = multiplication(iPr_def_15,X0),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_1041,c_1177]) ).
tcf(c_5913,plain,
! [X0: $i] : multiplication(iPr_def_12,X0) = multiplication(iPr_def_15,X0),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_5912,c_56,c_1304,c_1548,c_2484]) ).
tcf(c_5917,plain,
multiplication(iPr_def_12,one) = iPr_def_15,
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_5913,c_54]) ).
tcf(c_5976,plain,
iPr_def_12 = iPr_def_15,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_5917,c_54]) ).
tcf(c_5980,plain,
addition(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_12) = iPr_def_16,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_476,c_5976]) ).
tcf(c_5981,plain,
iPr_def_16 = iPr_def_17,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_748,c_5980]) ).
tcf(c_5982,plain,
$false,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_5981,c_478]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : KLE027+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/5.37 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.10/5.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/5.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/5.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/5.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/5.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/5.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/5.37 % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 18:43:30 UTC 2026
% 0.10/5.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/5.37 Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.14/5.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/5.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/5.42
% 0.14/5.42 % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.14/5.42
% 0.14/5.42 % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.14/5.44 % Proving...
% 2.30/6.29 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.30/6.29 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.30/6.29
% 2.30/6.29 %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 2.30/6.29
% 2.30/6.29 % ------ iProver source info
% 2.30/6.29
% 2.30/6.29 % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 2.30/6.29 % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 2.30/6.29 % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.30/6.29
% 2.30/6.29 % ------ Parsing...
% 2.30/6.29 % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...%
% 2.30/6.29
% 2.30/6.29 % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e %
% 2.30/6.29
% 2.30/6.29 % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e %
% 2.30/6.29
% 2.30/6.29 % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 2.30/6.29 % ------ Proving...
% 2.30/6.29 % ------ Problem Properties
% 2.30/6.29
% 2.30/6.29 %
% 2.30/6.29 % clauses 31
% 2.30/6.29 % conjectures 3
% 2.30/6.29 % EPR 4
% 2.30/6.29 % Horn 30
% 2.30/6.29 % unary 22
% 2.30/6.29 % binary 7
% 2.30/6.29 % lits 43
% 2.30/6.29 % lits eq 28
% 2.30/6.29 % fd_pure 0
% 2.30/6.29 % fd_pseudo 0
% 2.30/6.29 % fd_cond 0
% 2.30/6.29 % fd_pseudo_cond 1
% 2.30/6.29 % AC symbols 1
% 2.30/6.29
% 2.30/6.29 % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 2.30/6.29
% 2.30/6.29 % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 2.30/6.29
% 2.30/6.29
% 2.30/6.29 % ------
% 2.30/6.29 % Current options:
% 2.30/6.29 % ------
% 2.30/6.29
% 2.30/6.29
% 2.30/6.29 %
% 2.30/6.29
% 2.30/6.29 % ------ Proving...
% 2.30/6.29 %
% 2.30/6.29
% 2.30/6.29 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.30/6.29
% 2.30/6.29 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.30/6.29
% 2.30/6.29
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------