↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : KLE027+2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 04:35:32 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.44s 1.78s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.44s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   54 (  35 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   97 (  51 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   73 (  30   ~;  24   |;  13   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   83 (   3 sgn  52   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(test_3,axiom,
    ! [X4,X5] :
      ( test(X4)
     => ( c(X4) = X5
      <=> complement(X4,X5) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_3) ).

fof(goals,conjecture,
    ! [X4,X5,X6,X7,X8] :
      ( ( test(X7)
        & test(X8) )
     => ( leq(addition(multiplication(X7,addition(multiplication(X7,X4),multiplication(c(X7),X5))),multiplication(c(X7),X6)),addition(multiplication(X7,X4),multiplication(c(X7),X6)))
        & leq(addition(multiplication(X7,X4),multiplication(c(X7),X6)),addition(multiplication(X7,addition(multiplication(X7,X4),multiplication(c(X7),X5))),multiplication(c(X7),X6))) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

fof(additive_commutativity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_commutativity) ).

fof(test_2,axiom,
    ! [X4,X5] :
      ( complement(X5,X4)
    <=> ( multiplication(X4,X5) = zero
        & multiplication(X5,X4) = zero
        & addition(X4,X5) = one ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_2) ).

fof(right_distributivity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] : multiplication(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(multiplication(X1,X2),multiplication(X1,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',right_distributivity) ).

fof(multiplicative_associativity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] : multiplication(X1,multiplication(X2,X3)) = multiplication(multiplication(X1,X2),X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',multiplicative_associativity) ).

fof(left_annihilation,axiom,
    ! [X1] : multiplication(zero,X1) = zero,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',left_annihilation) ).

fof(left_distributivity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] : multiplication(addition(X1,X2),X3) = addition(multiplication(X1,X3),multiplication(X2,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',left_distributivity) ).

fof(multiplicative_left_identity,axiom,
    ! [X1] : multiplication(one,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',multiplicative_left_identity) ).

fof(additive_identity,axiom,
    ! [X1] : addition(X1,zero) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_identity) ).

fof(order,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( leq(X1,X2)
    <=> addition(X1,X2) = X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',order) ).

fof(additive_idempotence,axiom,
    ! [X1] : addition(X1,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_idempotence) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X71,X72] :
      ( ( c(X71) != X72
        | complement(X71,X72)
        | ~ test(X71) )
      & ( ~ complement(X71,X72)
        | c(X71) = X72
        | ~ test(X71) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[test_3])])]) ).

fof(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X4,X5,X6,X7,X8] :
        ( ( test(X7)
          & test(X8) )
       => ( leq(addition(multiplication(X7,addition(multiplication(X7,X4),multiplication(c(X7),X5))),multiplication(c(X7),X6)),addition(multiplication(X7,X4),multiplication(c(X7),X6)))
          & leq(addition(multiplication(X7,X4),multiplication(c(X7),X6)),addition(multiplication(X7,addition(multiplication(X7,X4),multiplication(c(X7),X5))),multiplication(c(X7),X6))) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( complement(X1,X2)
    | c(X1) != X2
    | ~ test(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

fof(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( test(esk5_0)
    & test(esk6_0)
    & ( ~ leq(addition(multiplication(esk5_0,addition(multiplication(esk5_0,esk2_0),multiplication(c(esk5_0),esk3_0))),multiplication(c(esk5_0),esk4_0)),addition(multiplication(esk5_0,esk2_0),multiplication(c(esk5_0),esk4_0)))
      | ~ leq(addition(multiplication(esk5_0,esk2_0),multiplication(c(esk5_0),esk4_0)),addition(multiplication(esk5_0,addition(multiplication(esk5_0,esk2_0),multiplication(c(esk5_0),esk3_0))),multiplication(c(esk5_0),esk4_0))) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])])]) ).

fof(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X43,X44] : addition(X43,X44) = addition(X44,X43),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_commutativity]) ).

fof(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X69,X70] :
      ( ( multiplication(X69,X70) = zero
        | ~ complement(X70,X69) )
      & ( multiplication(X70,X69) = zero
        | ~ complement(X70,X69) )
      & ( addition(X69,X70) = one
        | ~ complement(X70,X69) )
      & ( multiplication(X69,X70) != zero
        | multiplication(X70,X69) != zero
        | addition(X69,X70) != one
        | complement(X70,X69) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[test_2])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( complement(X1,c(X1))
    | ~ test(X1) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    test(esk5_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ leq(addition(multiplication(esk5_0,addition(multiplication(esk5_0,esk2_0),multiplication(c(esk5_0),esk3_0))),multiplication(c(esk5_0),esk4_0)),addition(multiplication(esk5_0,esk2_0),multiplication(c(esk5_0),esk4_0)))
    | ~ leq(addition(multiplication(esk5_0,esk2_0),multiplication(c(esk5_0),esk4_0)),addition(multiplication(esk5_0,addition(multiplication(esk5_0,esk2_0),multiplication(c(esk5_0),esk3_0))),multiplication(c(esk5_0),esk4_0))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

fof(c_0_22,plain,
    ! [X55,X56,X57] : multiplication(X55,addition(X56,X57)) = addition(multiplication(X55,X56),multiplication(X55,X57)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[right_distributivity]) ).

fof(c_0_23,plain,
    ! [X50,X51,X52] : multiplication(X50,multiplication(X51,X52)) = multiplication(multiplication(X50,X51),X52),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[multiplicative_associativity]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( multiplication(X1,X2) = zero
    | ~ complement(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    complement(esk5_0,c(esk5_0)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

fof(c_0_26,plain,
    ! [X62] : multiplication(zero,X62) = zero,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[left_annihilation]) ).

fof(c_0_27,plain,
    ! [X58,X59,X60] : multiplication(addition(X58,X59),X60) = addition(multiplication(X58,X60),multiplication(X59,X60)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[left_distributivity]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( addition(X1,X2) = one
    | ~ complement(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

fof(c_0_29,plain,
    ! [X54] : multiplication(one,X54) = X54,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[multiplicative_left_identity]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( multiplication(X1,X2) = zero
    | ~ complement(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ leq(addition(multiplication(esk5_0,esk2_0),multiplication(c(esk5_0),esk4_0)),addition(multiplication(c(esk5_0),esk4_0),multiplication(esk5_0,addition(multiplication(esk5_0,esk2_0),multiplication(c(esk5_0),esk3_0)))))
    | ~ leq(addition(multiplication(c(esk5_0),esk4_0),multiplication(esk5_0,addition(multiplication(esk5_0,esk2_0),multiplication(c(esk5_0),esk3_0)))),addition(multiplication(esk5_0,esk2_0),multiplication(c(esk5_0),esk4_0))) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    multiplication(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(multiplication(X1,X2),multiplication(X1,X3)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    multiplication(X1,multiplication(X2,X3)) = multiplication(multiplication(X1,X2),X3),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(esk5_0,c(esk5_0)) = zero,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    multiplication(zero,X1) = zero,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).

fof(c_0_36,plain,
    ! [X48] : addition(X48,zero) = X48,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_identity]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    multiplication(addition(X1,X2),X3) = addition(multiplication(X1,X3),multiplication(X2,X3)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    addition(esk5_0,c(esk5_0)) = one,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_25]),c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    multiplication(one,X1) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(c(esk5_0),esk5_0) = zero,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_25]) ).

fof(c_0_41,plain,
    ! [X63,X64] :
      ( ( ~ leq(X63,X64)
        | addition(X63,X64) = X64 )
      & ( addition(X63,X64) != X64
        | leq(X63,X64) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[order])]) ).

fof(c_0_42,plain,
    ! [X49] : addition(X49,X49) = X49,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_idempotence]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ leq(addition(multiplication(esk5_0,esk2_0),multiplication(c(esk5_0),esk4_0)),addition(multiplication(c(esk5_0),esk4_0),addition(multiplication(esk5_0,multiplication(esk5_0,esk2_0)),multiplication(esk5_0,multiplication(c(esk5_0),esk3_0)))))
    | ~ leq(addition(multiplication(c(esk5_0),esk4_0),addition(multiplication(esk5_0,multiplication(esk5_0,esk2_0)),multiplication(esk5_0,multiplication(c(esk5_0),esk3_0)))),addition(multiplication(esk5_0,esk2_0),multiplication(c(esk5_0),esk4_0))) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(esk5_0,multiplication(c(esk5_0),X1)) = zero,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,plain,
    addition(X1,zero) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
    addition(multiplication(esk5_0,X1),multiplication(c(esk5_0),X1)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]),c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(c(esk5_0),multiplication(esk5_0,X1)) = zero,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_40]),c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,plain,
    ( leq(X1,X2)
    | addition(X1,X2) != X2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_41]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,plain,
    addition(X1,X1) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_42]) ).

cnf(c_0_50,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ leq(addition(multiplication(esk5_0,esk2_0),multiplication(c(esk5_0),esk4_0)),addition(multiplication(esk5_0,multiplication(esk5_0,esk2_0)),multiplication(c(esk5_0),esk4_0)))
    | ~ leq(addition(multiplication(esk5_0,multiplication(esk5_0,esk2_0)),multiplication(c(esk5_0),esk4_0)),addition(multiplication(esk5_0,esk2_0),multiplication(c(esk5_0),esk4_0))) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_44]),c_0_45]),c_0_21]),c_0_44]),c_0_45]),c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_51,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(esk5_0,multiplication(esk5_0,X1)) = multiplication(esk5_0,X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_47]),c_0_45]) ).

cnf(c_0_52,plain,
    leq(X1,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_48,c_0_49]) ).

cnf(c_0_53,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_51]),c_0_52]),c_0_51]),c_0_52])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13  % Problem    : KLE027+2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.16/0.34  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.16/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.16/0.34  % DateTime   : Mon May  4 20:26:44 EDT 2026
% 0.16/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.16/0.35  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.44/1.78  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.44/1.78  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.44/1.78  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.44/1.78  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.44/1.79  % Total time : 1.374s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------