↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : KLE027+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:58:39 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.08s 0.41s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.08s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   58 (  37 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  106 (  59 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   82 (  34   ~;  29   |;  12   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   11 (  11 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   90 (   3 sgn  54   !;   1   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(test_3,axiom,
    ! [X4,X5] :
      ( test(X4)
     => ( c(X4) = X5
      <=> complement(X4,X5) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_3) ).

fof(goals,conjecture,
    ! [X4,X5,X6,X7,X8] :
      ( ( test(X8)
        & test(X7) )
     => addition(multiplication(X7,addition(multiplication(X7,X4),multiplication(c(X7),X5))),multiplication(c(X7),X6)) = addition(multiplication(X7,X4),multiplication(c(X7),X6)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

fof(test_2,axiom,
    ! [X4,X5] :
      ( complement(X5,X4)
    <=> ( addition(X4,X5) = one
        & multiplication(X5,X4) = zero
        & multiplication(X4,X5) = zero ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_2) ).

fof(additive_commutativity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_commutativity) ).

fof(test_1,axiom,
    ! [X4] :
      ( test(X4)
    <=> ? [X5] : complement(X5,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_1) ).

fof(test_deMorgan1,axiom,
    ! [X4,X5] :
      ( ( test(X5)
        & test(X4) )
     => c(addition(X4,X5)) = multiplication(c(X4),c(X5)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+2.ax',test_deMorgan1) ).

fof(right_distributivity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] : multiplication(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(multiplication(X1,X2),multiplication(X1,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',right_distributivity) ).

fof(additive_associativity,axiom,
    ! [X3,X2,X1] : addition(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(addition(X1,X2),X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_associativity) ).

fof(multiplicative_associativity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] : multiplication(X1,multiplication(X2,X3)) = multiplication(multiplication(X1,X2),X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',multiplicative_associativity) ).

fof(left_annihilation,axiom,
    ! [X1] : multiplication(zero,X1) = zero,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',left_annihilation) ).

fof(additive_identity,axiom,
    ! [X1] : addition(X1,zero) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_identity) ).

fof(additive_idempotence,axiom,
    ! [X1] : addition(X1,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_idempotence) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X37,X38] :
      ( ( ~ test(X37)
        | c(X37) = X38
        | ~ complement(X37,X38) )
      & ( ~ test(X37)
        | complement(X37,X38)
        | c(X37) != X38 ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[test_3])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X4,X5,X6,X7,X8] :
        ( ( test(X8)
          & test(X7) )
       => addition(multiplication(X7,addition(multiplication(X7,X4),multiplication(c(X7),X5))),multiplication(c(X7),X6)) = addition(multiplication(X7,X4),multiplication(c(X7),X6)) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ test(X1)
    | c(X1) != X2
    | complement(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

fof(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( addition(multiplication(esk5_0,addition(multiplication(esk5_0,esk2_0),multiplication(c(esk5_0),esk3_0))),multiplication(c(esk5_0),esk4_0)) != addition(multiplication(esk5_0,esk2_0),multiplication(c(esk5_0),esk4_0))
    & test(esk6_0)
    & test(esk5_0) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X35,X36] :
      ( ( complement(X36,X35)
        | addition(X35,X36) != one
        | multiplication(X36,X35) != zero
        | multiplication(X35,X36) != zero )
      & ( ~ complement(X36,X35)
        | addition(X35,X36) = one )
      & ( ~ complement(X36,X35)
        | multiplication(X36,X35) = zero )
      & ( ~ complement(X36,X35)
        | multiplication(X35,X36) = zero ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[test_2])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ test(X1)
    | complement(X1,c(X1)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    test(esk5_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

fof(c_0_19,plain,
    ! [X9,X10] : addition(X9,X10) = addition(X10,X9),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_commutativity]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ complement(X2,X1)
    | addition(X1,X2) = one ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    complement(esk5_0,c(esk5_0)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ complement(X1,X2)
    | multiplication(X1,X2) = zero ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( ~ complement(X2,X1)
    | multiplication(X1,X2) = zero ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

fof(c_0_25,plain,
    ! [X31,X33,X34] :
      ( ( test(X33)
        | ~ complement(X34,X33) )
      & ( complement(esk1_1(X31),X31)
        | ~ test(X31) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[test_1])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( addition(X1,X2) != one
    | multiplication(X2,X1) != zero
    | multiplication(X1,X2) != zero
    | complement(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    addition(esk5_0,c(esk5_0)) = one,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(esk5_0,c(esk5_0)) = zero,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(c(esk5_0),esk5_0) = zero,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( ~ complement(X1,X2)
    | test(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).

fof(c_0_31,plain,
    ! [X40,X41] :
      ( c(addition(X40,X41)) = multiplication(c(X40),c(X41))
      | ~ test(X41)
      | ~ test(X40) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[test_deMorgan1])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( ~ test(X1)
    | ~ complement(X1,X2)
    | c(X1) = X2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    complement(c(esk5_0),esk5_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_28])]),c_0_29])]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    test(c(esk5_0)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_21]) ).

fof(c_0_35,plain,
    ! [X21,X22,X23] : multiplication(X21,addition(X22,X23)) = addition(multiplication(X21,X22),multiplication(X21,X23)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[right_distributivity]) ).

fof(c_0_36,plain,
    ! [X11,X12,X13] : addition(X13,addition(X12,X11)) = addition(addition(X13,X12),X11),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_associativity]) ).

fof(c_0_37,plain,
    ! [X16,X17,X18] : multiplication(X16,multiplication(X17,X18)) = multiplication(multiplication(X16,X17),X18),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[multiplicative_associativity]) ).

fof(c_0_38,plain,
    ! [X28] : multiplication(zero,X28) = zero,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[left_annihilation]) ).

fof(c_0_39,plain,
    ! [X14] : addition(X14,zero) = X14,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_identity]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    ( ~ test(X2)
    | ~ test(X1)
    | c(addition(X1,X2)) = multiplication(c(X1),c(X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    c(c(esk5_0)) = esk5_0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_34])]) ).

fof(c_0_42,plain,
    ! [X15] : addition(X15,X15) = X15,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_idempotence]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
    addition(multiplication(esk5_0,addition(multiplication(esk5_0,esk2_0),multiplication(c(esk5_0),esk3_0))),multiplication(c(esk5_0),esk4_0)) != addition(multiplication(esk5_0,esk2_0),multiplication(c(esk5_0),esk4_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,plain,
    multiplication(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(multiplication(X1,X2),multiplication(X1,X3)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,plain,
    addition(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(addition(X1,X2),X3),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,plain,
    multiplication(X1,multiplication(X2,X3)) = multiplication(multiplication(X1,X2),X3),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,plain,
    multiplication(zero,X1) = zero,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,plain,
    addition(X1,zero) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ test(X1)
    | multiplication(c(X1),esk5_0) = c(addition(X1,c(esk5_0))) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_34]),c_0_41]) ).

cnf(c_0_50,plain,
    addition(X1,X1) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_42]) ).

cnf(c_0_51,negated_conjecture,
    addition(multiplication(esk5_0,multiplication(esk5_0,esk2_0)),addition(multiplication(esk5_0,multiplication(c(esk5_0),esk3_0)),multiplication(c(esk5_0),esk4_0))) != addition(multiplication(esk5_0,esk2_0),multiplication(c(esk5_0),esk4_0)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_44]),c_0_45]) ).

cnf(c_0_52,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(esk5_0,multiplication(c(esk5_0),X1)) = zero,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_28]),c_0_47]) ).

cnf(c_0_53,plain,
    addition(zero,X1) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_48,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_54,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(esk5_0,esk5_0) = esk5_0,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_34]),c_0_41]),c_0_50]),c_0_41]) ).

cnf(c_0_55,negated_conjecture,
    addition(multiplication(esk5_0,multiplication(esk5_0,esk2_0)),multiplication(c(esk5_0),esk4_0)) != addition(multiplication(esk5_0,esk2_0),multiplication(c(esk5_0),esk4_0)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_51,c_0_52]),c_0_53]) ).

cnf(c_0_56,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(esk5_0,multiplication(esk5_0,X1)) = multiplication(esk5_0,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_54]) ).

cnf(c_0_57,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_55,c_0_56])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01  % Problem  : KLE027+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.02  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.04/0.30  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.04/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.04/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.04/0.30  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.04/0.30  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.04/0.30  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.04/0.30  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.04/0.30  % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 22:39:06 UTC 2026
% 0.04/0.30  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.04/0.30  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.04/0.32  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.04/0.32  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.41  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.08/0.41  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.08/0.41  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.08/0.41  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.08/0.41  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.41  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.41  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.41  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 1012270 completed with status 0
% 0.08/0.41  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.08/0.41  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.08/0.41  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.08/0.41  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.08/0.41  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.08/0.41  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.08/0.41  % Search class: FGUSM-FFMF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.08/0.41  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.08/0.41  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.41  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.41  % Starting G-E--_200_B02_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0S with 136s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.41  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.41  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.41  % G-E--_200_B02_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0S with pid 1012278 completed with status 0
% 0.08/0.41  % Result found by G-E--_200_B02_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0S
% 0.08/0.41  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.08/0.41  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.08/0.41  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.08/0.41  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.08/0.41  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.08/0.41  % Search class: FGUSM-FFMF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.08/0.41  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.08/0.41  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.41  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.41  % Starting G-E--_200_B02_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0S with 136s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.41  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.08/0.41  
% 0.08/0.41  % Proof found!
% 0.08/0.41  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.08/0.41  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.08/0.41  % Parsed axioms                        : 19
% 0.08/0.41  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.08/0.41  % Initial clauses                      : 27
% 0.08/0.41  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.08/0.41  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 27
% 0.08/0.41  % Processed clauses                    : 937
% 0.08/0.41  % ...of these trivial                  : 78
% 0.08/0.41  % ...subsumed                          : 443
% 0.08/0.41  % ...remaining for further processing  : 416
% 0.08/0.41  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.08/0.41  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.08/0.41  % Backward-subsumed                    : 2
% 0.08/0.41  % Backward-rewritten                   : 88
% 0.08/0.41  % Generated clauses                    : 5148
% 0.08/0.41  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 3932
% 0.08/0.41  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.08/0.41  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.08/0.41  % Paramodulations                      : 5138
% 0.08/0.41  % Factorizations                       : 1
% 0.08/0.41  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.08/0.41  % Equation resolutions                 : 9
% 0.08/0.41  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.08/0.41  % Total rewrite steps                  : 7777
% 0.08/0.41  % ...of those cached                   : 6763
% 0.08/0.41  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.08/0.41  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.08/0.41  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.08/0.41  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.08/0.41  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.08/0.41  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.08/0.41  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.08/0.41  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.08/0.41  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.08/0.41  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.08/0.41  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.08/0.41  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.08/0.41  % Current number of processed clauses  : 326
% 0.08/0.41  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 136
% 0.08/0.41  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 4
% 0.08/0.41  %    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.08/0.41  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 186
% 0.08/0.41  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2964
% 0.08/0.41  % ...number of literals in the above   : 7577
% 0.08/0.41  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.08/0.41  % Current number of archived clauses   : 90
% 0.08/0.41  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 9966
% 0.08/0.41  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8758
% 0.08/0.41  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 426
% 0.08/0.41  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3160
% 0.08/0.41  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.08/0.41  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 175
% 0.08/0.41  % BW rewrite match successes           : 97
% 0.08/0.41  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.08/0.41  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.08/0.41  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 81759
% 0.08/0.41  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 219
% 0.08/0.41  
% 0.08/0.41  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.08/0.41  % User time                : 0.063 s
% 0.08/0.41  % System time              : 0.006 s
% 0.08/0.41  % Total time               : 0.069 s
% 0.08/0.41  % Maximum resident set size: 3396 pages
% 0.08/0.41  
% 0.08/0.41  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.08/0.41  % User time                : 0.321 s
% 0.08/0.41  % System time              : 0.026 s
% 0.08/0.41  % Total time               : 0.347 s
% 0.08/0.41  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.08/0.41  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------