%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Etableau---0.67 % Problem : KLE034+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % Computer : n018.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Sun Jul 17 01:56:44 EDT 2022 % Result : Theorem 0.18s 0.47s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.18s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.10/0.11 % Problem : KLE034+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0. % 0.10/0.12 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu % 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 11:55:31 EDT 2022 % 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime : % 0.12/0.36 # No SInE strategy applied % 0.12/0.36 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___110_C45_F1_PI_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4S % 0.12/0.36 # and selection function SelectNewComplexAHPNS. % 0.12/0.36 # % 0.12/0.36 # Presaturation interreduction done % 0.12/0.36 # Number of axioms: 30 Number of unprocessed: 30 % 0.12/0.36 # Tableaux proof search. % 0.12/0.36 # APR header successfully linked. % 0.12/0.36 # Hello from C++ % 0.12/0.36 # The folding up rule is enabled... % 0.12/0.36 # Local unification is enabled... % 0.12/0.36 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... % 0.12/0.36 # 30 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification % 0.12/0.36 # Creating start rules for all 6 conjectures. % 0.12/0.36 # There are 6 start rule candidates: % 0.12/0.36 # Found 17 unit axioms. % 0.12/0.36 # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on. % 0.12/0.36 # 6 start rule tableaux created. % 0.12/0.36 # 13 extension rule candidate clauses % 0.12/0.36 # 17 unit axiom clauses % 0.12/0.36 % 0.12/0.36 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. % 0.12/0.36 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 6 % 0.12/0.36 # Returning from population with 12 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux. % 0.12/0.36 # We now have 12 tableaux to operate on % 0.18/0.47 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.18/0.47 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.18/0.47 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.18/0.47 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.18/0.47 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. % 0.18/0.47 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.18/0.47 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.18/0.47 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.18/0.47 # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.18/0.47 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.18/0.47 # Begin clausification derivation % 0.18/0.47 % 0.18/0.47 # End clausification derivation % 0.18/0.47 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 0.18/0.47 cnf(i_0_29, negated_conjecture, (test(esk4_0))). % 0.18/0.47 cnf(i_0_30, negated_conjecture, (test(esk5_0))). % 0.18/0.47 cnf(i_0_28, negated_conjecture, (test(esk6_0))). % 0.18/0.47 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (multiplication(X1,zero)=zero)). % 0.18/0.47 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (multiplication(zero,X1)=zero)). % 0.18/0.47 cnf(i_0_3, plain, (addition(X1,zero)=X1)). % 0.18/0.47 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (multiplication(X1,one)=X1)). % 0.18/0.47 cnf(i_0_7, plain, (multiplication(one,X1)=X1)). % 0.18/0.47 cnf(i_0_4, plain, (addition(X1,X1)=X1)). % 0.18/0.47 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (multiplication(multiplication(X1,X2),X3)=multiplication(X1,multiplication(X2,X3)))). % 0.18/0.47 cnf(i_0_2, plain, (addition(addition(X1,X2),X3)=addition(X1,addition(X2,X3)))). % 0.18/0.47 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (addition(multiplication(X1,X2),multiplication(X1,X3))=multiplication(X1,addition(X2,X3)))). % 0.18/0.47 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (addition(multiplication(X1,X2),multiplication(X3,X2))=multiplication(addition(X1,X3),X2))). % 0.18/0.47 cnf(i_0_27, negated_conjecture, (leq(multiplication(esk4_0,multiplication(esk2_0,c(esk5_0))),zero))). % 0.18/0.47 cnf(i_0_26, negated_conjecture, (leq(multiplication(esk5_0,multiplication(esk3_0,c(esk6_0))),zero))). % 0.18/0.47 cnf(i_0_1, plain, (addition(X1,X2)=addition(X2,X1))). % 0.18/0.47 cnf(i_0_25, negated_conjecture, (~leq(multiplication(esk4_0,multiplication(esk2_0,multiplication(esk3_0,c(esk6_0)))),zero))). % 0.18/0.47 cnf(i_0_22, plain, (c(X1)=zero|test(X1))). % 0.18/0.47 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (test(X1)|~complement(X2,X1))). % 0.18/0.47 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (addition(X1,X2)=X2|~leq(X1,X2))). % 0.18/0.47 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (leq(X1,X2)|addition(X1,X2)!=X2)). % 0.18/0.47 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (complement(esk1_1(X1),X1)|~test(X1))). % 0.18/0.47 cnf(i_0_19, plain, (multiplication(X1,X2)=zero|~complement(X2,X1))). % 0.18/0.47 cnf(i_0_18, plain, (multiplication(X1,X2)=zero|~complement(X1,X2))). % 0.18/0.47 cnf(i_0_20, plain, (c(X1)=X2|~complement(X1,X2)|~test(X1))). % 0.18/0.47 cnf(i_0_17, plain, (addition(X1,X2)=one|~complement(X2,X1))). % 0.18/0.47 cnf(i_0_23, plain, (multiplication(c(X1),c(X2))=c(addition(X1,X2))|~test(X2)|~test(X1))). % 0.18/0.47 cnf(i_0_24, plain, (addition(c(X1),c(X2))=c(multiplication(X1,X2))|~test(X2)|~test(X1))). % 0.18/0.47 cnf(i_0_16, plain, (complement(X1,X2)|addition(X2,X1)!=one|multiplication(X1,X2)!=zero|multiplication(X2,X1)!=zero)). % 0.18/0.47 cnf(i_0_21, plain, (complement(X1,c(X1))|~test(X1))). % 0.18/0.47 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 0.18/0.47 # Begin printing tableau % 0.18/0.47 # Found 4 steps % 0.18/0.47 cnf(i_0_29, negated_conjecture, (test(esk4_0)), inference(start_rule)). % 0.18/0.47 cnf(i_0_37, plain, (test(esk4_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_15])). % 0.18/0.47 cnf(i_0_170, plain, (complement(esk1_1(esk4_0),esk4_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_19])). % 0.18/0.47 cnf(i_0_180, plain, (multiplication(esk4_0,esk1_1(esk4_0))=zero), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_180, ...])). % 0.18/0.47 # End printing tableau % 0.18/0.47 # SZS output end % 0.18/0.47 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 0.18/0.47 # Child (7299) has found a proof. % 0.18/0.47 % 0.18/0.47 # Proof search is over... % 0.18/0.47 # Freeing feature tree %------------------------------------------------------------------------------