↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : KLE037+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:44:10 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.13s 0.47s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   35 (  32 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   38 (  27 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   10 (   7   ~;   2   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   54 (   0 sgn  15   !;   1   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(additive_commutativity,axiom,
    ! [A,B] : addition(A,B) = addition(B,A),
    file('theBenchmark.p',additive_commutativity) ).

fof(additive_associativity,axiom,
    ! [C,B,A] : addition(A,addition(B,C)) = addition(addition(A,B),C),
    file('theBenchmark.p',additive_associativity) ).

fof(additive_idempotence,axiom,
    ! [A] : addition(A,A) = A,
    file('theBenchmark.p',additive_idempotence) ).

fof(multiplicative_left_identity,axiom,
    ! [A] : multiplication(one,A) = A,
    file('theBenchmark.p',multiplicative_left_identity) ).

fof(left_distributivity,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C] : multiplication(addition(A,B),C) = addition(multiplication(A,C),multiplication(B,C)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',left_distributivity) ).

fof(order,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( leq(A,B)
    <=> addition(A,B) = B ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',order) ).

fof(star_unfold_right,axiom,
    ! [A] : leq(addition(one,multiplication(A,star(A))),star(A)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',star_unfold_right) ).

fof(goals,conjecture,
    ! [X0] : leq(one,star(X0)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

fof(goals_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0] : leq(one,star(X0)),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).

cnf(c_18,plain,
    addition(A,B) = addition(B,A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[additive_commutativity]) ).

cnf(c_19,plain,
    addition(addition(A,B),C) = addition(A,addition(B,C)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[additive_associativity]) ).

cnf(c_21,plain,
    addition(A,A) = A,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[additive_idempotence]) ).

cnf(c_24,plain,
    multiplication(one,A) = A,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[multiplicative_left_identity]) ).

cnf(c_27,plain,
    multiplication(addition(A,B),C) = addition(multiplication(A,C),multiplication(B,C)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[left_distributivity]) ).

cnf(c_28,plain,
    addition(multiplication(A,B),multiplication(C,B)) = multiplication(addition(A,C),B),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_27]) ).

cnf(c_31,plain,
    ( addition(A,B) = B
    | ~ leq(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[order]) ).

cnf(c_32,plain,
    ( addition(A,B) != B
    | leq(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[order]) ).

cnf(c_33,plain,
    leq(addition(one,multiplication(A,star(A))),star(A)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[star_unfold_right]) ).

fof(nnf_17,plain,
    ? [X0] : ~ leq(one,star(X0)),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[goals_neg]) ).

fof(sk_goals_neg,plain,
    ~ leq(one,star(sK0)),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0]),skolemize(X0,sK0)],[nnf_17]) ).

cnf(c_37,negated_conjecture,
    ~ leq(one,star(sK0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_goals_neg]) ).

cnf(c_497,plain,
    addition(addition(A,B),C) = addition(B,addition(A,C)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_18,c_19]) ).

cnf(c_39,plain,
    addition(A,addition(B,C)) = addition(B,addition(A,C)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_19,c_497]) ).

cnf(c_498,plain,
    addition(A,B) = addition(A,addition(A,B)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_21,c_19]) ).

cnf(c_41,plain,
    addition(A,addition(A,B)) = addition(A,B),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_498]) ).

cnf(c_499,plain,
    addition(A,multiplication(B,A)) = multiplication(addition(one,B),A),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_24,c_28]) ).

cnf(c_50,plain,
    multiplication(addition(one,A),B) = addition(B,multiplication(A,B)),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_499]) ).

cnf(c_500,plain,
    addition(addition(one,multiplication(A,star(A))),star(A)) = star(A),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_31,c_33]) ).

cnf(c_501,plain,
    addition(star(A),addition(one,multiplication(A,star(A)))) = star(A),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_18,c_500]) ).

cnf(c_502,plain,
    addition(one,addition(star(A),multiplication(A,star(A)))) = star(A),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_39,c_501]) ).

cnf(c_58,plain,
    addition(one,multiplication(addition(one,A),star(A))) = star(A),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_502]) ).

cnf(c_83,negated_conjecture,
    addition(one,star(sK0)) != star(sK0),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_32,c_37]) ).

cnf(c_503,plain,
    addition(one,star(A)) = addition(one,multiplication(addition(one,A),star(A))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_58,c_41]) ).

cnf(c_495,plain,
    addition(one,star(A)) = star(A),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_58,c_503]) ).

cnf(c_496,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_495,c_83]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : KLE037+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.36  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 19:19:19 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.36  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.13/0.36  % Process 3917459 was started by sandbox2 on n002,
% 0.13/0.36  % Fri Sep 25 19:19:19 2026
% 0.13/0.36  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.13/0.47  
% 0.13/0.47  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.13/0.47  
% 0.13/0.47  % Proof 1 at 0.06 (+ 0.02) seconds.
% 0.13/0.47  % Length of proof is 25.
% 0.13/0.47  % Level of proof is 6.
% 0.13/0.47  % Maximum clause weight is 13.000.
% 0.13/0.47  % Given clauses 90.
% 0.13/0.47  
% 0.13/0.47  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------