↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : KLE056+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:44:13 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.09s 0.47s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.09s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   24 (  20 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   28 (  27 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   10 (   6   ~;   0   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   13 (   3 sgn   5   !;   1   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(additive_identity,axiom,
    ! [A] : addition(A,zero) = A,
    file('theBenchmark.p',additive_identity) ).

fof(left_annihilation,axiom,
    ! [A] : multiplication(zero,A) = zero,
    file('theBenchmark.p',left_annihilation) ).

fof(domain1,axiom,
    ! [X0] : addition(X0,multiplication(domain(X0),X0)) = multiplication(domain(X0),X0),
    file('theBenchmark.p',domain1) ).

fof(goals,conjecture,
    ! [X0] :
      ( domain(X0) = zero
     => X0 = zero ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

fof(goals_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0] :
        ( domain(X0) = zero
       => X0 = zero ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).

fof(nnf_17,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( X0 != zero
      & domain(X0) = zero ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[goals_neg]) ).

fof(sk_goals_neg,plain,
    ( sK0 != zero
    & domain(sK0) = zero ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0]),skolemize(X0,sK0)],[nnf_17]) ).

cnf(c_20,negated_conjecture,
    sK0 != zero,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_goals_neg]) ).

cnf(c_21,negated_conjecture,
    domain(sK0) = zero,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_goals_neg]) ).

cnf(c_22,negated_conjecture,
    zero = domain(sK0),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_21]) ).

cnf(c_28,plain,
    multiplication(domain(A),A) = addition(A,multiplication(domain(A),A)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[domain1]) ).

cnf(c_29,plain,
    addition(A,multiplication(domain(A),A)) = multiplication(domain(A),A),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_28]) ).

cnf(c_30,plain,
    multiplication(zero,A) = zero,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[left_annihilation]) ).

cnf(c_55,plain,
    multiplication(domain(sK0),A) = zero,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_22,c_30]) ).

cnf(c_31,plain,
    multiplication(domain(sK0),A) = domain(sK0),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_22,c_55]) ).

cnf(c_42,plain,
    addition(A,zero) = A,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[additive_identity]) ).

cnf(c_43,plain,
    addition(A,domain(sK0)) = A,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_22,c_42]) ).

cnf(c_56,negated_conjecture,
    sK0 != domain(sK0),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_22,c_20]) ).

cnf(c_46,negated_conjecture,
    domain(sK0) != sK0,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_56]) ).

cnf(c_57,plain,
    addition(sK0,domain(sK0)) = multiplication(domain(sK0),sK0),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_31,c_29]) ).

cnf(c_58,plain,
    sK0 = multiplication(domain(sK0),sK0),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_43,c_57]) ).

cnf(c_59,plain,
    sK0 = domain(sK0),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_31,c_58]) ).

cnf(c_53,plain,
    domain(sK0) = sK0,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_59]) ).

cnf(c_54,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_53,c_46]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : KLE056+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.43  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.43  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.43  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.43  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.43  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.43  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.43  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.43  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 19:21:58 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.44  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.44  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.09/0.44  % Process 2039489 was started by sandbox on n015,
% 0.09/0.44  % Fri Sep 25 19:21:58 2026
% 0.09/0.44  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.09/0.44  
% 0.09/0.44  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.09/0.47  
% 0.09/0.47  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.09/0.47  
% 0.09/0.47  % Proof 1 at 0.00 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.09/0.47  % Length of proof is 16.
% 0.09/0.47  % Level of proof is 5.
% 0.09/0.47  % Maximum clause weight is 11.000.
% 0.09/0.47  % Given clauses 6.
% 0.09/0.47  
% 0.09/0.47  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------