%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : KLE058+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:58:45 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.26s 0.54s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.26s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 19 ( 19 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 19 ( 18 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 4 ( 4 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 1 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 16 ( 2 sgn 10 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(goals,conjecture,
domain(one) = one,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).
fof(domain3,axiom,
! [X4] : addition(domain(X4),one) = one,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+5.ax',domain3) ).
fof(additive_commutativity,axiom,
! [X1,X2] : addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_commutativity) ).
fof(domain1,axiom,
! [X4] : addition(X4,multiplication(domain(X4),X4)) = multiplication(domain(X4),X4),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+5.ax',domain1) ).
fof(multiplicative_right_identity,axiom,
! [X1] : multiplication(X1,one) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',multiplicative_right_identity) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
domain(one) != one,
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X8] : addition(domain(X8),one) = one,
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[domain3]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X23,X24] : addition(X23,X24) = addition(X24,X23),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_commutativity]) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
domain(one) != one,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X9] : addition(X9,multiplication(domain(X9),X9)) = multiplication(domain(X9),X9),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[domain1]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X6] : multiplication(X6,one) = X6,
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[multiplicative_right_identity]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
addition(domain(X1),one) = one,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
fof(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
domain(one) != one,
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
addition(X1,multiplication(domain(X1),X1)) = multiplication(domain(X1),X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
multiplication(X1,one) = X1,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
addition(one,domain(X1)) = one,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
domain(one) != one,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16]),c_0_17]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04 % Problem : KLE058+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.06 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.17/0.40 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.40 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.40 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.40 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.17/0.40 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.17/0.40 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.40 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.17/0.40 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 22:41:20 UTC 2026
% 0.17/0.41 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.41 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.20/0.49 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/0.54 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.26/0.54 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/0.54 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.54 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/0.54 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.54 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.54 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.54 % new_bool_3 with pid 1649529 completed with status 0
% 0.26/0.54 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.26/0.54 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/0.54 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.54 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/0.54 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.54 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.26/0.54 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.26/0.54 % Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.26/0.54 % Scheduled 8 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.26/0.54 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.54 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1649536 completed with status 0
% 0.26/0.54 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.26/0.54 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/0.54 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.54 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/0.54 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.54 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.26/0.54 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.26/0.54 % Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.26/0.54 % Scheduled 8 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.26/0.54 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.54 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.26/0.54
% 0.26/0.54 % Proof found!
% 0.26/0.54 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.26/0.54 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.26/0.54 % Parsed axioms : 18
% 0.26/0.54 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 1
% 0.26/0.54 % Initial clauses : 17
% 0.26/0.54 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.26/0.54 % Initial clauses in saturation : 17
% 0.26/0.54 % Processed clauses : 22
% 0.26/0.54 % ...of these trivial : 1
% 0.26/0.54 % ...subsumed : 2
% 0.26/0.54 % ...remaining for further processing : 19
% 0.26/0.54 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.26/0.54 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.26/0.54 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.26/0.54 % Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.26/0.54 % Generated clauses : 59
% 0.26/0.54 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 33
% 0.26/0.54 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.26/0.54 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.26/0.54 % Paramodulations : 59
% 0.26/0.54 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.26/0.54 % NegExts : 0
% 0.26/0.54 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.26/0.54 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.26/0.54 % Total rewrite steps : 66
% 0.26/0.54 % ...of those cached : 30
% 0.26/0.54 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.26/0.54 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.26/0.54 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.26/0.54 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.26/0.54 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.26/0.54 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.26/0.54 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.54 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.54 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.54 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.54 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.54 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.54 % Current number of processed clauses : 17
% 0.26/0.54 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 15
% 0.26/0.54 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.26/0.54 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.26/0.54 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.26/0.54 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 23
% 0.26/0.54 % ...number of literals in the above : 23
% 0.26/0.54 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.26/0.54 % Current number of archived clauses : 2
% 0.26/0.54 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.26/0.54 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.26/0.54 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.26/0.54 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.26/0.54 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.26/0.54 % BW rewrite match attempts : 10
% 0.26/0.54 % BW rewrite match successes : 9
% 0.26/0.54 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.26/0.54 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.26/0.54 % Termbank termtop insertions : 1072
% 0.26/0.54 % Search garbage collected termcells : 6
% 0.26/0.54
% 0.26/0.54 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/0.54 % User time : 0.006 s
% 0.26/0.54 % System time : 0.003 s
% 0.26/0.54 % Total time : 0.009 s
% 0.26/0.54 % Maximum resident set size: 3648 pages
% 0.26/0.54
% 0.26/0.54 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/0.54 % User time : 0.011 s
% 0.26/0.54 % System time : 0.007 s
% 0.26/0.54 % Total time : 0.018 s
% 0.26/0.54 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.26/0.54 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------