↑ Up

Twee---2.7.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Twee---2.7
% Problem  : KLE058+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 11:39:44 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.09s 0.46s
% Output   : Proof 0.09s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : KLE058+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.36  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % DateTime : Sun Sep 27 13:08:14 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.36  Running run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.46  Command-line arguments: --lhs-weight 1 --flip-ordering --normalise-queue-percent 10 --cp-renormalise-threshold 10 --complete-subsets --ground-joining-incomplete-limit 15 --flatten-every 2
% 0.09/0.46  
% 0.09/0.46  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.09/0.46  
% 0.09/0.46  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.09/0.46  Axiom 1 (additive_commutativity): addition(X, Y) = addition(Y, X).
% 0.09/0.46  Axiom 2 (domain3): addition(domain(X), one) = one.
% 0.09/0.46  Axiom 3 (multiplicative_right_identity): multiplication(X, one) = X.
% 0.09/0.46  Axiom 4 (domain1): addition(X, multiplication(domain(X), X)) = multiplication(domain(X), X).
% 0.09/0.46  
% 0.09/0.46  Goal 1 (goals): domain(one) = one.
% 0.09/0.46  Proof:
% 0.09/0.46    domain(one)
% 0.09/0.46  = { by axiom 3 (multiplicative_right_identity) R->L }
% 0.09/0.46    multiplication(domain(one), one)
% 0.09/0.46  = { by axiom 4 (domain1) R->L }
% 0.09/0.46    addition(one, multiplication(domain(one), one))
% 0.09/0.46  = { by axiom 3 (multiplicative_right_identity) }
% 0.09/0.46    addition(one, domain(one))
% 0.09/0.46  = { by axiom 1 (additive_commutativity) R->L }
% 0.09/0.46    addition(domain(one), one)
% 0.09/0.46  = { by axiom 2 (domain3) }
% 0.09/0.46    one
% 0.09/0.46  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.09/0.46  
% 0.09/0.46  RESULT: Theorem (the conjecture is true).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------