↑ Up

ConnectPP---0.7.2.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ConnectPP---0.7.2
% Problem  : KLE059+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 08:46:57 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.13s 0.40s
% Output   : Proof 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   29 (  15 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   45 (  39 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   33 (  17   ~;   9   |;   5   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   24 (   0 sgn  10   !;   5   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(domain5,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : domain(addition(X0,X1)) = addition(domain(X0),domain(X1)),
    file('KLE001+5.ax',domain5) ).

fof(goals,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( addition(X0,X1) = X1
     => addition(domain(X0),domain(X1)) = domain(X1) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

fof(f_17_1,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : domain(addition(X0,X1)) = addition(domain(X0),domain(X1)),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[domain5]) ).

fof(f_17_2,plain,
    ! [U_31,U_30] : domain(addition(U_31,U_30)) = addition(domain(U_31),domain(U_30)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f_17_1]) ).

cnf(f_17_3,plain,
    domain(addition(U_31,U_30)) = addition(domain(U_31),domain(U_30)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_17_2]) ).

fof(f_18_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1] :
        ( addition(X0,X1) = X1
       => addition(domain(X0),domain(X1)) = domain(X1) ),
    inference(negate,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).

fof(f_18_2,negated_conjecture,
    ? [X0,X1] :
      ( addition(domain(X0),domain(X1)) != domain(X1)
      & addition(X0,X1) = X1 ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[f_18_1]) ).

fof(f_18_3,negated_conjecture,
    ? [U_33,U_32] :
      ( addition(domain(U_33),domain(U_32)) != domain(U_32)
      & addition(U_33,U_32) = U_32 ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f_18_2]) ).

fof(f_18_4,negated_conjecture,
    ? [U_32] :
      ( addition(domain(sK1),domain(U_32)) != domain(U_32)
      & addition(sK1,U_32) = U_32 ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1]),skolemize(U_33,sK1)],[f_18_3]) ).

fof(f_18_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( addition(domain(sK1),domain(sK2)) != domain(sK2)
    & addition(sK1,sK2) = sK2 ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK2]),skolemize(U_32,sK2)],[f_18_4]) ).

fof(f_18_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( addition(domain(sK1),domain(sK2)) != domain(sK2)
    & addition(sK1,sK2) = sK2 ),
    inference(definitional_conversion,[status(esa)],[f_18_5]) ).

cnf(f_18_7,negated_conjecture,
    addition(sK1,sK2) = sK2,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_18_6]) ).

cnf(f_18_8,negated_conjecture,
    addition(domain(sK1),domain(sK2)) != domain(sK2),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_18_6]) ).

cnf(equality_2,axiom,
    ( Eq_x_1 = Eq_x_0
    | Eq_x_0 != Eq_x_1 ),
    theory(equality,[symmetry]) ).

cnf(equality_3,axiom,
    ( Eq_x_0 = Eq_x_2
    | Eq_x_1 != Eq_x_2
    | Eq_x_0 != Eq_x_1 ),
    theory(equality,[transitivity]) ).

cnf(equality_6,axiom,
    ( domain(Eq_x_0) = domain(Eq_y_0)
    | Eq_x_0 != Eq_y_0 ),
    theory(equality,[substitution_functions]) ).

cnf(t1,plain,
    addition(domain(sK1),domain(sK2)) != domain(sK2),
    inference(start,[status(thm),parent(0:0)],[f_18_8]) ).

cnf(t2,plain,
    ( domain(sK2) != addition(domain(sK1),domain(sK2))
    | addition(domain(sK1),domain(sK2)) = domain(sK2) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t1:1)],[equality_2]) ).

cnf(t3,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t2:1)],[t2:1,t1:1]) ).

cnf(t4,plain,
    ( domain(addition(sK1,sK2)) != addition(domain(sK1),domain(sK2))
    | domain(sK2) != domain(addition(sK1,sK2))
    | domain(sK2) = addition(domain(sK1),domain(sK2)) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t2:2)],[equality_3]) ).

cnf(t5,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t4:1)],[t4:1,t2:2]) ).

cnf(t6,plain,
    ( sK2 != addition(sK1,sK2)
    | domain(sK2) = domain(addition(sK1,sK2)) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t4:2)],[equality_6]) ).

cnf(t7,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t6:1)],[t6:1,t4:2]) ).

cnf(t8,plain,
    ( addition(sK1,sK2) != sK2
    | sK2 = addition(sK1,sK2) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t6:2)],[equality_2]) ).

cnf(t9,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t8:1)],[t8:1,t6:2]) ).

cnf(t10,plain,
    addition(sK1,sK2) = sK2,
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t8:2)],[f_18_7]) ).

cnf(t11,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t10:1)],[t10:1,t8:2]) ).

cnf(t12,plain,
    domain(addition(sK1,sK2)) = addition(domain(sK1),domain(sK2)),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t4:3)],[f_17_3]) ).

cnf(t13,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t12:1)],[t12:1,t4:3]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : KLE059+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  This is a FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ problem
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.36  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.36  % DateTime : Sat Sep 19 11:51:02 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.40  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.13/0.40  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------