↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : KLE062+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:43:07 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 13.43s 4.33s
% Output   : Refutation 12.05s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   15
%            Number of leaves      :   20
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :  121 (  79 unt;   0 typ;   2 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  183 ( 156 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  718 (  88   ~;  52   |;   3   &; 570   @)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   10 (   8 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  156 (   0   ^; 154   !;   0   ?; 156   :)
%                                         (   0  !>;   0  ?*;   0  @-;   2  @+)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(multiplication_decl,type,
    multiplication: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(domain_decl,type,
    domain: $i > $i ).

thf(addition_decl,type,
    addition: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(zero_decl,type,
    zero: $i ).

thf(leq_decl,type,
    leq: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(one_decl,type,
    one: $i ).

thf(sk1_decl,type,
    sk1: $i ).

thf(sk2_decl,type,
    sk2: $i ).

thf(sk1_def,definition,
    ( sk1
    = ( @+[A: $i] :
          ~ ! [B: $i] :
              ( ( B @ domain @ ( A @ domain @ multiplication ) )
              = ( A @ domain @ ( B @ domain @ multiplication ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(sk2_def,definition,
    ( sk2
    = ( @+[A: $i] :
          ( ( A @ domain @ ( sk1 @ domain @ multiplication ) )
         != ( sk1 @ domain @ ( A @ domain @ multiplication ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(15,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( zero @ ( A @ multiplication ) )
      = zero ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',right_annihilation) ).

thf(64,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( zero @ ( A @ multiplication ) )
      = zero ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[15]) ).

thf(65,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( zero @ ( A @ multiplication ) )
      = zero ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[64]) ).

thf(66,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( zero @ ( A @ multiplication ) )
      = zero ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[65]) ).

thf(8,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( zero @ multiplication ) )
      = zero ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',left_annihilation) ).

thf(43,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( zero @ multiplication ) )
      = zero ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(44,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( zero @ multiplication ) )
      = zero ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[43]) ).

thf(45,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( zero @ multiplication ) )
      = zero ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[44]) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ domain @ ( A @ domain @ multiplication ) )
      = ( A @ domain @ ( B @ domain @ multiplication ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
        ( ( B @ domain @ ( A @ domain @ multiplication ) )
        = ( A @ domain @ ( B @ domain @ multiplication ) ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(20,plain,
    ~ ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
        ( ( B @ domain @ ( A @ domain @ multiplication ) )
        = ( A @ domain @ ( B @ domain @ multiplication ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(21,plain,
    ( ( sk2 @ domain @ ( sk1 @ domain @ multiplication ) )
   != ( sk1 @ domain @ ( sk2 @ domain @ multiplication ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[20]) ).

thf(22,plain,
    ( ( sk1 @ domain @ ( sk2 @ domain @ multiplication ) )
   != ( sk2 @ domain @ ( sk1 @ domain @ multiplication ) ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[21]) ).

thf(89,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( zero @ multiplication ) )
       != ( sk1 @ domain @ ( sk2 @ domain @ multiplication ) ) )
      | ( ( sk2 @ domain @ ( sk1 @ domain @ multiplication ) )
       != zero ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[45,22]) ).

thf(94,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A
       != ( sk1 @ domain ) )
      | ( ( sk2 @ domain )
       != zero )
      | ( ( sk2 @ domain @ ( sk1 @ domain @ multiplication ) )
       != zero ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[89]) ).

thf(101,plain,
    ( ( ( sk2 @ domain )
     != zero )
    | ( ( sk2 @ domain @ ( sk1 @ domain @ multiplication ) )
     != zero ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[94]) ).

thf(350,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( zero @ ( A @ multiplication ) )
       != ( sk2 @ domain @ ( sk1 @ domain @ multiplication ) ) )
      | ( ( sk2 @ domain )
       != zero )
      | ( zero != zero ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[66,101]) ).

thf(351,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( zero @ ( A @ multiplication ) )
       != ( sk2 @ domain @ ( sk1 @ domain @ multiplication ) ) )
      | ( ( sk2 @ domain )
       != zero ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[350]) ).

thf(361,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( sk2 @ domain )
       != zero )
      | ( A
       != ( sk1 @ domain ) )
      | ( ( sk2 @ domain )
       != zero ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[351]) ).

thf(365,plain,
    ( ( sk2 @ domain )
   != zero ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[361]) ).

thf(18,axiom,
    ( ( zero @ domain )
    = zero ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',domain4) ).

thf(73,plain,
    ( ( zero @ domain )
    = zero ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[18]) ).

thf(74,plain,
    ( ( zero @ domain )
    = zero ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[73]) ).

thf(406,plain,
    ( ( ( sk2 @ domain )
     != ( zero @ domain ) )
    | ( zero != zero ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[74,365]) ).

thf(407,plain,
    ( ( sk2 @ domain )
   != ( zero @ domain ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[406]) ).

thf(408,plain,
    sk2 != zero,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[407]) ).

thf(11,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( one @ multiplication ) )
      = A ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',multiplicative_left_identity) ).

thf(52,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( one @ multiplication ) )
      = A ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[11]) ).

thf(7,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ leq ) )
    <=> ( ( B @ ( A @ addition ) )
        = B ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',order) ).

thf(35,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( ( B @ ( A @ addition ) )
          = B )
       => ( B @ ( A @ leq ) ) )
      & ( ( B @ ( A @ leq ) )
       => ( ( B @ ( A @ addition ) )
          = B ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(36,plain,
    ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
        ( ( ( B @ ( A @ addition ) )
          = B )
       => ( B @ ( A @ leq ) ) )
    & ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
        ( ( B @ ( A @ leq ) )
       => ( ( B @ ( A @ addition ) )
          = B ) ) ),
    inference(miniscope,[status(thm)],[35]) ).

thf(37,plain,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( D @ ( C @ leq ) )
        | ( ( D @ ( C @ addition ) )
         != D ) )
      & ( ( ( B @ ( A @ addition ) )
          = B )
        | ~ ( B @ ( A @ leq ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[36]) ).

thf(39,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ leq ) )
      | ( ( B @ ( A @ addition ) )
       != B ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[37]) ).

thf(41,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ leq ) )
      | ( ( B @ ( A @ addition ) )
       != B ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[39]) ).

thf(42,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ leq ) )
      | ( ( B @ ( A @ addition ) )
       != B ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[41]) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( B @ addition ) @ ( C @ addition ) )
      = ( A @ ( B @ ( C @ addition ) @ addition ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',additive_associativity) ).

thf(23,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( B @ addition ) @ ( C @ addition ) )
      = ( A @ ( B @ ( C @ addition ) @ addition ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(24,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( B @ addition ) @ ( C @ addition ) )
      = ( A @ ( B @ ( C @ addition ) @ addition ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[23]) ).

thf(25,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( B @ ( C @ addition ) @ addition ) )
      = ( A @ ( B @ addition ) @ ( C @ addition ) ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[24]) ).

thf(9,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( B @ multiplication ) @ ( A @ multiplication ) )
      = ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ multiplication ) @ multiplication ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',multiplicative_associativity) ).

thf(46,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( B @ multiplication ) @ ( A @ multiplication ) )
      = ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ multiplication ) @ multiplication ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(5,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( zero @ ( A @ addition ) )
      = A ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',additive_identity) ).

thf(29,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( zero @ ( A @ addition ) )
      = A ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(30,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( zero @ ( A @ addition ) )
      = A ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[29]) ).

thf(31,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( zero @ ( A @ addition ) )
      = A ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[30]) ).

thf(486,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( zero @ ( A @ addition ) )
       != ( C @ ( B @ addition ) ) )
      | ( C @ ( B @ leq ) )
      | ( A != C ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[31,42]) ).

thf(487,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( zero @ ( A @ leq ) )
      | ( A != zero ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[486:[bind(A,$thf( A )),bind(B,$thf( A )),bind(C,$thf( zero ))]]) ).

thf(492,plain,
    zero @ ( zero @ leq ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[487]) ).

thf(19,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( one @ ( A @ domain @ addition ) )
      = one ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',domain3) ).

thf(75,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( one @ ( A @ domain @ addition ) )
      = one ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[19]) ).

thf(76,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( one @ ( A @ domain @ addition ) )
      = one ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[75]) ).

thf(77,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( one @ ( A @ domain @ addition ) )
      = one ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[76]) ).

thf(84,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( zero @ domain )
       != ( A @ domain ) )
      | ( ( one @ ( zero @ addition ) )
        = one ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[74,77]) ).

thf(85,plain,
    ( ( one @ ( zero @ addition ) )
    = one ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[84:[bind(A,$thf( zero ))]]) ).

thf(120,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( one @ ( zero @ addition ) )
       != ( B @ ( C @ addition ) ) )
      | ( ( A @ ( one @ addition ) )
        = ( A @ ( B @ addition ) @ ( C @ addition ) ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[85,25]) ).

thf(121,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( one @ addition ) @ ( zero @ addition ) )
      = ( A @ ( one @ addition ) ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[120:[bind(A,$thf( A )),bind(B,$thf( one )),bind(C,$thf( zero ))]]) ).

thf(14,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( one @ ( A @ multiplication ) )
      = A ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',multiplicative_right_identity) ).

thf(61,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( one @ ( A @ multiplication ) )
      = A ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[14]) ).

thf(62,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( one @ ( A @ multiplication ) )
      = A ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[61]) ).

thf(63,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( one @ ( A @ multiplication ) )
      = A ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[62]) ).

thf(53,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( one @ multiplication ) )
      = A ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[52]) ).

thf(54,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( one @ multiplication ) )
      = A ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[53]) ).

thf(154,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( one @ multiplication ) )
       != ( sk1 @ domain @ ( sk2 @ domain @ multiplication ) ) )
      | ( A
       != ( sk2 @ domain @ ( sk1 @ domain @ multiplication ) ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[54,22]) ).

thf(162,plain,
    ( ( ( sk2 @ domain @ ( sk1 @ domain @ multiplication ) )
     != ( sk1 @ domain ) )
    | ( ( sk2 @ domain )
     != one ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[154]) ).

thf(513,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( one @ ( A @ multiplication ) )
       != ( sk2 @ domain @ ( sk1 @ domain @ multiplication ) ) )
      | ( A
       != ( sk1 @ domain ) )
      | ( ( sk2 @ domain )
       != one ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[63,162]) ).

thf(522,plain,
    ( ( ( sk2 @ domain )
     != one )
    | ( ( sk1 @ domain )
     != ( sk1 @ domain ) )
    | ( ( sk2 @ domain )
     != one ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[513]) ).

thf(527,plain,
    ( ( sk2 @ domain )
   != one ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[522]) ).

thf(90,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( zero @ ( A @ multiplication ) )
       != ( sk1 @ domain @ ( sk2 @ domain @ multiplication ) ) )
      | ( ( sk2 @ domain @ ( sk1 @ domain @ multiplication ) )
       != zero ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[66,22]) ).

thf(98,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( sk1 @ domain )
       != zero )
      | ( A
       != ( sk2 @ domain ) )
      | ( ( sk2 @ domain @ ( sk1 @ domain @ multiplication ) )
       != zero ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[90]) ).

thf(99,plain,
    ( ( ( sk1 @ domain )
     != zero )
    | ( ( sk2 @ domain @ ( sk1 @ domain @ multiplication ) )
     != zero ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[98]) ).

thf(253,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( zero @ multiplication ) )
       != ( sk2 @ domain @ ( sk1 @ domain @ multiplication ) ) )
      | ( ( sk1 @ domain )
       != zero )
      | ( zero != zero ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[45,99]) ).

thf(254,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( zero @ multiplication ) )
       != ( sk2 @ domain @ ( sk1 @ domain @ multiplication ) ) )
      | ( ( sk1 @ domain )
       != zero ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[253]) ).

thf(267,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A
       != ( sk2 @ domain ) )
      | ( ( sk1 @ domain )
       != zero )
      | ( ( sk1 @ domain )
       != zero ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[254]) ).

thf(270,plain,
    ( ( sk1 @ domain )
   != zero ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[267]) ).

thf(86,plain,
    ( ( ( sk2 @ domain )
     != ( sk1 @ domain ) )
    | ( ( sk2 @ domain )
     != ( sk1 @ domain ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[22]) ).

thf(100,plain,
    ( ( sk2 @ domain )
   != ( sk1 @ domain ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[86]) ).

thf(102,plain,
    sk2 != sk1,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[100]) ).

thf(4,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( A @ addition ) )
      = A ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',additive_idempotence) ).

thf(26,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( A @ addition ) )
      = A ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(27,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( A @ addition ) )
      = A ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[26]) ).

thf(28,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( A @ addition ) )
      = A ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[27]) ).

thf(17,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( A @ domain @ multiplication ) @ ( A @ addition ) )
      = ( A @ ( A @ domain @ multiplication ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',domain1) ).

thf(70,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( A @ domain @ multiplication ) @ ( A @ addition ) )
      = ( A @ ( A @ domain @ multiplication ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[17]) ).

thf(465,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( one @ addition ) @ ( zero @ addition ) )
       != ( C @ ( B @ addition ) ) )
      | ( C @ ( B @ leq ) )
      | ( ( A @ ( one @ addition ) )
       != C ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[121,42]) ).

thf(466,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( one @ addition ) @ ( zero @ leq ) )
      | ( ( A @ ( one @ addition ) )
       != ( A @ ( one @ addition ) ) ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[465:[bind(A,$thf( E )),bind(B,$thf( zero )),bind(C,$thf( E @ ( one @ addition ) ))]]) ).

thf(488,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( one @ addition ) @ ( zero @ leq ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[466]) ).

thf(6,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ addition ) )
      = ( A @ ( B @ addition ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',additive_commutativity) ).

thf(32,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ addition ) )
      = ( A @ ( B @ addition ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(33,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ addition ) )
      = ( A @ ( B @ addition ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[32]) ).

thf(34,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ addition ) )
      = ( A @ ( B @ addition ) ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[33]) ).

thf(10,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ addition ) @ multiplication ) )
      = ( C @ ( B @ multiplication ) @ ( C @ ( A @ multiplication ) @ addition ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',left_distributivity) ).

thf(49,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ addition ) @ multiplication ) )
      = ( C @ ( B @ multiplication ) @ ( C @ ( A @ multiplication ) @ addition ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[10]) ).

thf(478,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( one @ ( zero @ addition ) )
       != ( B @ ( A @ addition ) ) )
      | ( B @ ( A @ leq ) )
      | ( one != B ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[85,42]) ).

thf(479,plain,
    ( ( one @ ( zero @ leq ) )
    | ( one != one ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[478:[bind(A,$thf( zero )),bind(B,$thf( one ))]]) ).

thf(494,plain,
    one @ ( zero @ leq ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[479]) ).

thf(47,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( B @ multiplication ) @ ( A @ multiplication ) )
      = ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ multiplication ) @ multiplication ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[46]) ).

thf(48,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ multiplication ) @ multiplication ) )
      = ( C @ ( B @ multiplication ) @ ( A @ multiplication ) ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[47]) ).

thf(16,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ addition ) @ domain )
      = ( B @ domain @ ( A @ domain @ addition ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',domain5) ).

thf(67,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ addition ) @ domain )
      = ( B @ domain @ ( A @ domain @ addition ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[16]) ).

thf(301,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( B @ ( A @ addition ) )
       != ( one @ ( C @ domain @ addition ) ) )
      | ( ( A @ ( B @ addition ) )
        = one ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[34,77]) ).

thf(302,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ domain @ ( one @ addition ) )
      = one ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[301:[bind(A,$thf( D @ domain )),bind(B,$thf( one )),bind(C,$thf( D ))]]) ).

thf(331,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ domain @ ( one @ addition ) )
      = one ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[302]) ).

thf(336,plain,
    ( ( ( sk1 @ domain )
     != ( zero @ domain ) )
    | ( zero != zero ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[74,270]) ).

thf(337,plain,
    ( ( sk1 @ domain )
   != ( zero @ domain ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[336]) ).

thf(338,plain,
    sk1 != zero,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[337]) ).

thf(38,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( B @ ( A @ addition ) )
        = B )
      | ~ ( B @ ( A @ leq ) ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[37]) ).

thf(40,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( B @ ( A @ leq ) )
      | ( ( B @ ( A @ addition ) )
        = B ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[38]) ).

thf(12,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( B @ addition ) @ ( A @ multiplication ) )
      = ( C @ ( A @ multiplication ) @ ( B @ ( A @ multiplication ) @ addition ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',right_distributivity) ).

thf(55,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( B @ addition ) @ ( A @ multiplication ) )
      = ( C @ ( A @ multiplication ) @ ( B @ ( A @ multiplication ) @ addition ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(13,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ multiplication ) @ domain )
      = ( B @ domain @ ( A @ multiplication ) @ domain ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',domain2) ).

thf(58,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ multiplication ) @ domain )
      = ( B @ domain @ ( A @ multiplication ) @ domain ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[13]) ).

thf(595,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( B @ addition ) )
       != ( C @ ( one @ addition ) ) )
      | ( B @ ( A @ addition ) @ ( zero @ leq ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[34,488]) ).

thf(596,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( one @ ( A @ addition ) @ ( zero @ leq ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[595:[bind(A,$thf( A )),bind(B,$thf( one )),bind(C,$thf( A ))]]) ).

thf(169,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( one @ ( A @ multiplication ) )
       != ( sk1 @ domain @ ( sk2 @ domain @ multiplication ) ) )
      | ( A
       != ( sk2 @ domain @ ( sk1 @ domain @ multiplication ) ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[63,22]) ).

thf(178,plain,
    ( ( ( sk1 @ domain )
     != one )
    | ( ( sk2 @ domain @ ( sk1 @ domain @ multiplication ) )
     != ( sk2 @ domain ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[169]) ).

thf(469,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( one @ ( A @ domain @ addition ) )
       != ( C @ ( B @ addition ) ) )
      | ( C @ ( B @ leq ) )
      | ( one != C ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[77,42]) ).

thf(470,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( one @ ( A @ domain @ leq ) )
      | ( one != one ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[469:[bind(A,$thf( D )),bind(B,$thf( D @ domain )),bind(C,$thf( one ))]]) ).

thf(491,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( one @ ( A @ domain @ leq ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[470]) ).

thf(1332,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[365,408,52,73,22,35,43,42,25,20,46,29,492,121,61,527,74,270,85,102,28,70,488,77,45,64,32,34,54,49,494,66,48,63,67,331,338,31,40,26,55,23,75,58,596,178,491,100]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : KLE062+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.14/0.39  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.39  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.39  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.39  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.14/0.39  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.14/0.39  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.39  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.39  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 19:19:54 UTC 2026
% 0.14/0.40  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.40  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.90/0.97  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.31/1.17  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (196ms). 
% 1.31/1.18  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 2.05/1.59  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.05/1.59  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.29/1.69  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 17 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.48/1.75  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 17 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.48/1.79  % [INFO] 	 Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF). 
% 2.48/1.79  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.70/1.80  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 13.43/4.32  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 13.43/4.32  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 13.43/4.32  % Time passed: 3787ms (effective reasoning time: 3134ms)
% 13.43/4.32  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 13.43/4.33  % Axioms used in derivation (17): additive_identity, domain4, domain5, domain3, left_annihilation, multiplicative_right_identity, right_annihilation, multiplicative_left_identity, domain1, additive_idempotence, additive_associativity, right_distributivity, domain2, order, additive_commutativity, multiplicative_associativity, left_distributivity
% 13.43/4.33  % No. of inferences in proof: 119
% 13.43/4.33  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 3787 ms resp. 3134 ms w/o parsing
% 12.05/4.40  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 12.05/4.40  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------