%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Etableau---0.67 % Problem : KLE063+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % Computer : n021.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Sun Jul 17 01:56:54 EDT 2022 % Result : Theorem 0.20s 0.44s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.07/0.12 % Problem : KLE063+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0. % 0.07/0.13 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu % 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 11:19:15 EDT 2022 % 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime : % 0.14/0.37 # No SInE strategy applied % 0.14/0.37 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN % 0.14/0.37 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn. % 0.14/0.37 # % 0.14/0.37 # Presaturation interreduction done % 0.14/0.37 # Number of axioms: 20 Number of unprocessed: 20 % 0.14/0.37 # Tableaux proof search. % 0.14/0.37 # APR header successfully linked. % 0.14/0.37 # Hello from C++ % 0.14/0.37 # The folding up rule is enabled... % 0.14/0.37 # Local unification is enabled... % 0.14/0.37 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... % 0.14/0.37 # 20 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification % 0.14/0.37 # Creating start rules for all 2 conjectures. % 0.14/0.37 # There are 2 start rule candidates: % 0.14/0.37 # Found 18 unit axioms. % 0.14/0.37 # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on. % 0.14/0.37 # 2 start rule tableaux created. % 0.14/0.37 # 2 extension rule candidate clauses % 0.14/0.37 # 18 unit axiom clauses % 0.14/0.37 % 0.14/0.37 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. % 0.14/0.37 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 2 % 0.14/0.37 # Creating equality axioms % 0.14/0.37 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses % 0.14/0.37 # Returning from population with 29 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux. % 0.14/0.37 # We now have 29 tableaux to operate on % 0.20/0.44 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.20/0.44 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.20/0.44 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.20/0.44 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.20/0.44 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. % 0.20/0.44 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.20/0.44 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.20/0.44 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.20/0.44 # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.20/0.44 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.20/0.44 # Begin clausification derivation % 0.20/0.44 % 0.20/0.44 # End clausification derivation % 0.20/0.44 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 0.20/0.44 cnf(i_0_17, plain, (domain(zero)=zero)). % 0.20/0.44 cnf(i_0_20, negated_conjecture, (addition(esk1_0,multiplication(domain(esk2_0),esk1_0))=multiplication(domain(esk2_0),esk1_0))). % 0.20/0.44 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (multiplication(X1,zero)=zero)). % 0.20/0.44 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (multiplication(zero,X1)=zero)). % 0.20/0.44 cnf(i_0_3, plain, (addition(X1,zero)=X1)). % 0.20/0.44 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (multiplication(X1,one)=X1)). % 0.20/0.44 cnf(i_0_4, plain, (addition(X1,X1)=X1)). % 0.20/0.44 cnf(i_0_7, plain, (multiplication(one,X1)=X1)). % 0.20/0.44 cnf(i_0_18, plain, (addition(domain(X1),domain(X2))=domain(addition(X1,X2)))). % 0.20/0.44 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (domain(multiplication(X1,domain(X2)))=domain(multiplication(X1,X2)))). % 0.20/0.44 cnf(i_0_16, plain, (addition(one,domain(X1))=one)). % 0.20/0.44 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (addition(X1,multiplication(domain(X1),X1))=multiplication(domain(X1),X1))). % 0.20/0.44 cnf(i_0_2, plain, (addition(addition(X1,X2),X3)=addition(X1,addition(X2,X3)))). % 0.20/0.44 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (multiplication(multiplication(X1,X2),X3)=multiplication(X1,multiplication(X2,X3)))). % 0.20/0.44 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (addition(multiplication(X1,X2),multiplication(X1,X3))=multiplication(X1,addition(X2,X3)))). % 0.20/0.44 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (addition(multiplication(X1,X2),multiplication(X3,X2))=multiplication(addition(X1,X3),X2))). % 0.20/0.44 cnf(i_0_1, plain, (addition(X1,X2)=addition(X2,X1))). % 0.20/0.44 cnf(i_0_19, negated_conjecture, (domain(addition(esk1_0,esk2_0))!=domain(esk2_0))). % 0.20/0.44 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (addition(X1,X2)=X2|~leq(X1,X2))). % 0.20/0.44 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (leq(X1,X2)|addition(X1,X2)!=X2)). % 0.20/0.44 cnf(i_0_35, plain, (X36=X36)). % 0.20/0.44 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 0.20/0.44 # Begin printing tableau % 0.20/0.44 # Found 7 steps % 0.20/0.44 cnf(i_0_17, plain, (domain(zero)=zero), inference(start_rule)). % 0.20/0.44 cnf(i_0_43, plain, (domain(zero)=zero), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_38])). % 0.20/0.44 cnf(i_0_75, plain, (domain(zero)!=zero), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_17])). % 0.20/0.44 cnf(i_0_74, plain, (zero=zero), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_38])). % 0.20/0.44 cnf(i_0_97, plain, (zero=addition(zero,zero)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_12])). % 0.20/0.44 cnf(i_0_99, plain, (addition(zero,zero)!=zero), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_3])). % 0.20/0.44 cnf(i_0_102, plain, (leq(zero,zero)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_102, ...])). % 0.20/0.44 # End printing tableau % 0.20/0.44 # SZS output end % 0.20/0.44 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 0.20/0.44 # Child (11547) has found a proof. % 0.20/0.44 % 0.20/0.44 # Proof search is over... % 0.20/0.44 # Freeing feature tree %------------------------------------------------------------------------------