↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : KLE070+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:52:20 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 4.06s 6.30s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.06s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   36 (  36 unt;   4 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   58 (  35 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    7 (   7   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   5 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   40 (   0 sgn  38   !;   2   ?;  14   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : addition(X0,X1) = addition(X1,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_commutativity) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] : addition(X2,addition(X1,X0)) = addition(addition(X2,X1),X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_associativity) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X0] : multiplication(X0,one) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',multiplicative_right_identity) ).

fof(f8,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] : multiplication(X0,addition(X1,X2)) = addition(multiplication(X0,X1),multiplication(X0,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',right_distributivity) ).

fof(f15,axiom,
    ! [X0] : addition(domain(X0),one) = one,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+5.ax',domain3) ).

fof(f18,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1] : addition(domain(X0),multiplication(domain(X0),domain(X1))) = domain(X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

fof(f19,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1] : addition(domain(X0),multiplication(domain(X0),domain(X1))) = domain(X0),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f18]) ).

fof(f20,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] : domain(X0) != addition(domain(X0),multiplication(domain(X0),domain(X1))),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f19]) ).

fof(f21,plain,
    domain(sK0) != addition(domain(sK0),multiplication(domain(sK0),domain(sK1))),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1]),skolemize(X0,sK0),skolemize(X1,sK1)],[f20]) ).

fof(f22,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : addition(X0,X1) = addition(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f23,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : addition(X2,addition(X1,X0)) = addition(addition(X2,X1),X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f27,plain,
    ! [X0] : multiplication(X0,one) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

fof(f29,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : multiplication(X0,addition(X1,X2)) = addition(multiplication(X0,X1),multiplication(X0,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

fof(f35,plain,
    ! [X0] : one = addition(domain(X0),one),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

fof(f38,plain,
    domain(sK0) != addition(domain(sK0),multiplication(domain(sK0),domain(sK1))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f21]) ).

tcf(c_49,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : addition(X0,X1) = addition(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f22]) ).

tcf(c_50,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : addition(addition(X0,X1),X2) = addition(X0,addition(X1,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f23]) ).

tcf(c_54,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : multiplication(X0,one) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f27]) ).

tcf(c_56,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : addition(multiplication(X0,X1),multiplication(X0,X2)) = multiplication(X0,addition(X1,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f29]) ).

tcf(c_62,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : addition(domain(X0),one) = one,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f35]) ).

tcf(c_65,negated_conjecture,
    addition(domain(sK0),multiplication(domain(sK0),domain(sK1))) != domain(sK0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f38]) ).

tcf(c_79,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : addition(one,domain(X0)) = one,
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_62,c_50,c_49]) ).

tcf(c_120,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = domain(sK0),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_121,definition,
    iPr_def_11 = domain(sK1),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).

tcf(c_122,definition,
    iPr_def_12 = multiplication(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_11),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).

tcf(c_123,definition,
    iPr_def_13 = addition(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_12),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_13])],[]) ).

tcf(c_124,negated_conjecture,
    iPr_def_13 != iPr_def_10,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_65,c_121,c_122,c_120,c_123]) ).

tcf(c_202,plain,
    addition(one,iPr_def_11) = one,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_121,c_79]) ).

tcf(c_203,plain,
    addition(iPr_def_11,one) = one,
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_202,c_50,c_49]) ).

tcf(c_408,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : addition(multiplication(X0,iPr_def_11),multiplication(X0,one)) = multiplication(X0,one),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_203,c_56]) ).

tcf(c_420,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : addition(multiplication(X0,iPr_def_11),X0) = X0,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_408,c_54]) ).

tcf(c_421,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : addition(X0,multiplication(X0,iPr_def_11)) = X0,
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_420,c_50,c_49]) ).

tcf(c_534,plain,
    addition(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_12) = iPr_def_10,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_122,c_421]) ).

tcf(c_547,plain,
    iPr_def_10 = iPr_def_13,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_123,c_534]) ).

tcf(c_549,plain,
    iPr_def_10 != iPr_def_10,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_124,c_547]) ).

tcf(c_550,plain,
    $false,
    inference(equality_resolution_simp,[status(thm)],[c_549]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : KLE070+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/5.38  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.10/5.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/5.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/5.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/5.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/5.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/5.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/5.38  % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 18:55:32 UTC 2026
% 0.10/5.39  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/5.39  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.15/5.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/5.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/5.43  
% 0.15/5.43  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.15/5.43  
% 0.15/5.43  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.15/5.45  % Proving...
% 4.06/6.30  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 4.06/6.30  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 4.06/6.30  
% 4.06/6.30  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 4.06/6.30  
% 4.06/6.30  % ------  iProver source info
% 4.06/6.30  
% 4.06/6.30  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 4.06/6.30  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 4.06/6.30  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 4.06/6.30  
% 4.06/6.30  % ------ Parsing...
% 4.06/6.30  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% ------  preprocesses with Option_UEQ
% 4.06/6.30  % 
% 4.06/6.30  
% 4.06/6.30  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 4.06/6.30  
% 4.06/6.30  % ------ Preprocessing...% ------  preprocesses with Option_UEQ
% 4.06/6.30   gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 4.06/6.30  
% 4.06/6.30  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 4.06/6.30  % ------ Proving...
% 4.06/6.30  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 4.06/6.30  
% 4.06/6.30  % 
% 4.06/6.30  % clauses                               21
% 4.06/6.30  % conjectures                           1
% 4.06/6.30  % EPR                                   1
% 4.06/6.30  % Horn                                  21
% 4.06/6.30  % unary                                 21
% 4.06/6.30  % binary                                0
% 4.06/6.30  % lits                                  21
% 4.06/6.30  % lits eq                               21
% 4.06/6.30  % fd_pure                               0
% 4.06/6.30  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 4.06/6.30  % fd_cond                               0
% 4.06/6.30  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 4.06/6.30  % AC symbols                            1
% 4.06/6.30  
% 4.06/6.30  % ------ Schedule UEQ
% 4.06/6.30  
% 4.06/6.30  % ------ Option_UEQ Time Limit: 10.
% 4.06/6.30  
% 4.06/6.30  
% 4.06/6.30  % ------ 
% 4.06/6.30  % Current options:
% 4.06/6.30  % ------ 
% 4.06/6.30  
% 4.06/6.30  
% 4.06/6.30  % 
% 4.06/6.30  
% 4.06/6.30  % ------ Proving...
% 4.06/6.30  % 
% 4.06/6.30  
% 4.06/6.30  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 4.06/6.30  
% 4.06/6.30  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.06/6.30  
% 4.06/6.30  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------