↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : KLE082+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:52:21 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.77s 6.23s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.77s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   19
%            Number of leaves      :   16
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   84 (  80 unt;   6 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  155 (  91 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   15 (   7   ~;   0   |;   6   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   6 usr;   7 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   92 (   0 sgn  90   !;   2   ?;  46   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : addition(X0,X1) = addition(X1,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_commutativity) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] : addition(X2,addition(X1,X0)) = addition(addition(X2,X1),X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_associativity) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X0] : addition(X0,zero) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_identity) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X0] : addition(X0,X0) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_idempotence) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X0] : multiplication(X0,one) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',multiplicative_right_identity) ).

fof(f7,axiom,
    ! [X0] : multiplication(one,X0) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',multiplicative_left_identity) ).

fof(f8,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] : multiplication(X0,addition(X1,X2)) = addition(multiplication(X0,X1),multiplication(X0,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',right_distributivity) ).

fof(f9,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] : multiplication(addition(X0,X1),X2) = addition(multiplication(X0,X2),multiplication(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',left_distributivity) ).

fof(f14,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : domain(multiplication(X0,X1)) = domain(multiplication(X0,domain(X1))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+5.ax',domain2) ).

fof(f18,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ! [X2] :
          ( multiplication(domain(X2),antidomain(X2)) = zero
          & addition(domain(X2),antidomain(X2)) = one )
     => addition(antidomain(multiplication(X0,X1)),antidomain(multiplication(X0,domain(X1)))) = antidomain(multiplication(X0,domain(X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

fof(f19,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1] :
        ( ! [X2] :
            ( multiplication(domain(X2),antidomain(X2)) = zero
            & addition(domain(X2),antidomain(X2)) = one )
       => addition(antidomain(multiplication(X0,X1)),antidomain(multiplication(X0,domain(X1)))) = antidomain(multiplication(X0,domain(X1))) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f18]) ).

fof(f20,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
      ( ! [X2] :
          ( multiplication(domain(X2),antidomain(X2)) = zero
          & addition(domain(X2),antidomain(X2)) = one )
      & antidomain(multiplication(X0,domain(X1))) != addition(antidomain(multiplication(X0,X1)),antidomain(multiplication(X0,domain(X1)))) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f19]) ).

fof(f21,plain,
    ( ! [X2] :
        ( multiplication(domain(X2),antidomain(X2)) = zero
        & addition(domain(X2),antidomain(X2)) = one )
    & antidomain(multiplication(sK0,domain(sK1))) != addition(antidomain(multiplication(sK0,sK1)),antidomain(multiplication(sK0,domain(sK1)))) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1]),skolemize(X0,sK0),skolemize(X1,sK1)],[f20]) ).

fof(f22,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : addition(X0,X1) = addition(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f23,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : addition(X2,addition(X1,X0)) = addition(addition(X2,X1),X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f24,plain,
    ! [X0] : addition(X0,zero) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f25,plain,
    ! [X0] : addition(X0,X0) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

fof(f27,plain,
    ! [X0] : multiplication(X0,one) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

fof(f28,plain,
    ! [X0] : multiplication(one,X0) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

fof(f29,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : multiplication(X0,addition(X1,X2)) = addition(multiplication(X0,X1),multiplication(X0,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

fof(f30,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : multiplication(addition(X0,X1),X2) = addition(multiplication(X0,X2),multiplication(X1,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

fof(f34,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : domain(multiplication(X0,X1)) = domain(multiplication(X0,domain(X1))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).

fof(f38,plain,
    ! [X2] : zero = multiplication(domain(X2),antidomain(X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f21]) ).

fof(f39,plain,
    ! [X2] : one = addition(domain(X2),antidomain(X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f21]) ).

fof(f40,plain,
    antidomain(multiplication(sK0,domain(sK1))) != addition(antidomain(multiplication(sK0,sK1)),antidomain(multiplication(sK0,domain(sK1)))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f21]) ).

tcf(c_49,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : addition(X0,X1) = addition(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f22]) ).

tcf(c_50,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : addition(addition(X0,X1),X2) = addition(X0,addition(X1,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f23]) ).

tcf(c_51,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : addition(X0,zero) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f24]) ).

tcf(c_52,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : addition(X0,X0) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f25]) ).

tcf(c_54,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : multiplication(X0,one) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f27]) ).

tcf(c_55,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : multiplication(one,X0) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f28]) ).

tcf(c_56,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : addition(multiplication(X0,X1),multiplication(X0,X2)) = multiplication(X0,addition(X1,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f29]) ).

tcf(c_57,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : addition(multiplication(X0,X1),multiplication(X2,X1)) = multiplication(addition(X0,X2),X1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f30]) ).

tcf(c_61,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : domain(multiplication(X0,domain(X1))) = domain(multiplication(X0,X1)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f34]) ).

tcf(c_65,negated_conjecture,
    addition(antidomain(multiplication(sK0,sK1)),antidomain(multiplication(sK0,domain(sK1)))) != antidomain(multiplication(sK0,domain(sK1))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f40]) ).

tcf(c_66,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] : addition(domain(X0),antidomain(X0)) = one,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f39]) ).

tcf(c_67,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] : multiplication(domain(X0),antidomain(X0)) = zero,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f38]) ).

tcf(c_129,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = multiplication(sK0,sK1),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_130,definition,
    iPr_def_11 = antidomain(iPr_def_10),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).

tcf(c_131,definition,
    iPr_def_12 = domain(sK1),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).

tcf(c_132,definition,
    iPr_def_13 = multiplication(sK0,iPr_def_12),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_13])],[]) ).

tcf(c_133,definition,
    iPr_def_14 = antidomain(iPr_def_13),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_14])],[]) ).

tcf(c_134,definition,
    iPr_def_15 = addition(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_14),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_15])],[]) ).

tcf(c_135,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] : multiplication(domain(X0),antidomain(X0)) = zero,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_67]) ).

tcf(c_136,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] : addition(domain(X0),antidomain(X0)) = one,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_66]) ).

tcf(c_137,negated_conjecture,
    iPr_def_15 != iPr_def_14,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_65,c_131,c_132,c_133,c_129,c_130,c_134]) ).

tcf(c_226,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : addition(X0,addition(X1,X2)) = addition(X1,addition(X0,X2)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_49]) ).

tcf(c_255,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : addition(domain(X0),addition(X1,antidomain(X0))) = addition(X1,one),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_136,c_226]) ).

tcf(c_267,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : addition(zero,X0) = X0,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_51,c_49]) ).

tcf(c_275,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : domain(multiplication(X0,sK1)) = domain(multiplication(X0,iPr_def_12)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_131,c_61]) ).

tcf(c_278,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : multiplication(domain(multiplication(X0,X1)),antidomain(multiplication(X0,domain(X1)))) = zero,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_61,c_135]) ).

tcf(c_350,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : addition(domain(X0),antidomain(X0)) = addition(antidomain(X0),one),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_52,c_255]) ).

tcf(c_370,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : addition(domain(X0),antidomain(X0)) = addition(one,antidomain(X0)),
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_350,c_50,c_49]) ).

tcf(c_371,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : addition(one,antidomain(X0)) = one,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_370,c_136]) ).

tcf(c_378,plain,
    addition(one,iPr_def_11) = one,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_130,c_371]) ).

tcf(c_379,plain,
    addition(one,iPr_def_14) = one,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_133,c_371]) ).

tcf(c_385,plain,
    addition(iPr_def_14,one) = one,
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_379,c_50,c_49]) ).

tcf(c_386,plain,
    addition(iPr_def_11,one) = one,
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_378,c_50,c_49]) ).

tcf(c_463,plain,
    multiplication(domain(iPr_def_10),antidomain(multiplication(sK0,domain(sK1)))) = zero,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_129,c_278]) ).

tcf(c_480,plain,
    multiplication(domain(iPr_def_10),iPr_def_14) = zero,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_463,c_131,c_132,c_133]) ).

tcf(c_680,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : addition(multiplication(domain(X0),X1),multiplication(antidomain(X0),X1)) = multiplication(one,X1),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_136,c_57]) ).

tcf(c_720,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : addition(multiplication(X0,iPr_def_14),multiplication(X0,one)) = multiplication(X0,one),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_385,c_56]) ).

tcf(c_726,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : addition(multiplication(X0,iPr_def_14),X0) = X0,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_720,c_54]) ).

tcf(c_727,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : addition(X0,multiplication(X0,iPr_def_14)) = X0,
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_726,c_50,c_49]) ).

tcf(c_731,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : addition(multiplication(X0,iPr_def_11),multiplication(X0,one)) = multiplication(X0,one),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_386,c_56]) ).

tcf(c_737,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : addition(multiplication(X0,iPr_def_11),X0) = X0,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_731,c_54]) ).

tcf(c_738,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : addition(X0,multiplication(X0,iPr_def_11)) = X0,
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_737,c_50,c_49]) ).

tcf(c_810,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : addition(multiplication(domain(X0),X1),multiplication(antidomain(X0),X1)) = X1,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_680,c_55]) ).

tcf(c_940,plain,
    addition(zero,multiplication(antidomain(iPr_def_10),iPr_def_14)) = iPr_def_14,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_480,c_810]) ).

tcf(c_941,plain,
    addition(zero,multiplication(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_14)) = iPr_def_14,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_940,c_130]) ).

tcf(c_942,plain,
    addition(multiplication(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_14),zero) = iPr_def_14,
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_941,c_50,c_49]) ).

tcf(c_1658,plain,
    multiplication(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_14) = iPr_def_14,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_942,c_51]) ).

tcf(c_1665,plain,
    addition(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_14) = iPr_def_11,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1658,c_727]) ).

tcf(c_1666,plain,
    iPr_def_11 = iPr_def_15,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_134,c_1665]) ).

tcf(c_1668,plain,
    iPr_def_11 != iPr_def_14,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_137,c_1666]) ).

tcf(c_2841,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : multiplication(domain(multiplication(X0,iPr_def_12)),antidomain(multiplication(X0,sK1))) = zero,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_275,c_135]) ).

tcf(c_3027,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : addition(zero,multiplication(antidomain(multiplication(X0,iPr_def_12)),antidomain(multiplication(X0,sK1)))) = antidomain(multiplication(X0,sK1)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2841,c_810]) ).

tcf(c_6245,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : multiplication(antidomain(multiplication(X0,iPr_def_12)),antidomain(multiplication(X0,sK1))) = antidomain(multiplication(X0,sK1)),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_3027,c_267]) ).

tcf(c_6258,plain,
    multiplication(antidomain(multiplication(sK0,iPr_def_12)),antidomain(iPr_def_10)) = antidomain(iPr_def_10),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_129,c_6245]) ).

tcf(c_6276,plain,
    multiplication(iPr_def_14,iPr_def_11) = iPr_def_11,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_6258,c_130,c_132,c_133]) ).

tcf(c_6690,plain,
    addition(iPr_def_14,iPr_def_11) = iPr_def_14,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_6276,c_738]) ).

tcf(c_6691,plain,
    addition(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_14) = iPr_def_14,
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_6690,c_50,c_49]) ).

tcf(c_6692,plain,
    iPr_def_11 = iPr_def_14,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_6691,c_1665]) ).

tcf(c_6693,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_6692,c_1668]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : KLE082+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/5.39  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.10/5.39  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/5.39  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/5.39  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/5.39  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/5.39  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/5.39  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/5.39  % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 18:52:45 UTC 2026
% 0.14/5.40  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/5.40  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.14/5.44  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/5.44  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/5.45  
% 0.14/5.45  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.14/5.45  
% 0.14/5.45  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.14/5.46  % Proving...
% 3.77/6.23  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.77/6.23  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.77/6.23  
% 3.77/6.23  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 3.77/6.23  
% 3.77/6.23  % ------  iProver source info
% 3.77/6.23  
% 3.77/6.23  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 3.77/6.23  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 3.77/6.23  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.77/6.23  
% 3.77/6.23  % ------ Parsing...
% 3.77/6.23  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% ------  preprocesses with Option_UEQ
% 3.77/6.23  % 
% 3.77/6.23  
% 3.77/6.23  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 3.77/6.23  
% 3.77/6.23  % ------ Preprocessing...% ------  preprocesses with Option_UEQ
% 3.77/6.23   gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 3.77/6.23  
% 3.77/6.23  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 3.77/6.23  % ------ Proving...
% 3.77/6.23  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 3.77/6.23  
% 3.77/6.23  % 
% 3.77/6.23  % clauses                               25
% 3.77/6.23  % conjectures                           3
% 3.77/6.23  % EPR                                   1
% 3.77/6.23  % Horn                                  25
% 3.77/6.23  % unary                                 25
% 3.77/6.23  % binary                                0
% 3.77/6.23  % lits                                  25
% 3.77/6.23  % lits eq                               25
% 3.77/6.23  % fd_pure                               0
% 3.77/6.23  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 3.77/6.23  % fd_cond                               0
% 3.77/6.23  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 3.77/6.23  % AC symbols                            1
% 3.77/6.23  
% 3.77/6.23  % ------ Schedule UEQ
% 3.77/6.23  
% 3.77/6.23  % ------ Option_UEQ Time Limit: 10.
% 3.77/6.23  
% 3.77/6.23  
% 3.77/6.23  % ------ 
% 3.77/6.23  % Current options:
% 3.77/6.23  % ------ 
% 3.77/6.23  
% 3.77/6.23  
% 3.77/6.23  % 
% 3.77/6.23  
% 3.77/6.23  % ------ Proving...
% 3.77/6.23  % 
% 3.77/6.23  
% 3.77/6.23  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.77/6.23  
% 3.77/6.23  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.77/6.23  
% 3.77/6.23  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------