↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : KLE086+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:44:17 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.14s 0.41s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   25 (  25 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   25 (  24 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    5 (   5   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   16 (   0 sgn   7   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(additive_commutativity,axiom,
    ! [A,B] : addition(A,B) = addition(B,A),
    file('theBenchmark.p',additive_commutativity) ).

fof(additive_identity,axiom,
    ! [A] : addition(A,zero) = A,
    file('theBenchmark.p',additive_identity) ).

fof(multiplicative_right_identity,axiom,
    ! [A] : multiplication(A,one) = A,
    file('theBenchmark.p',multiplicative_right_identity) ).

fof(domain1,axiom,
    ! [X0] : multiplication(antidomain(X0),X0) = zero,
    file('theBenchmark.p',domain1) ).

fof(domain3,axiom,
    ! [X0] : addition(antidomain(antidomain(X0)),antidomain(X0)) = one,
    file('theBenchmark.p',domain3) ).

fof(domain4,axiom,
    ! [X0] : domain(X0) = antidomain(antidomain(X0)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',domain4) ).

fof(goals,conjecture,
    domain(zero) = zero,
    file('theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

fof(goals_neg,negated_conjecture,
    domain(zero) != zero,
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).

cnf(c_24,negated_conjecture,
    domain(zero) != zero,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[goals_neg]) ).

cnf(c_30,plain,
    domain(A) = antidomain(antidomain(A)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[domain4]) ).

cnf(c_31,plain,
    addition(antidomain(antidomain(A)),antidomain(A)) = one,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[domain3]) ).

cnf(c_34,plain,
    multiplication(antidomain(A),A) = zero,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[domain1]) ).

cnf(c_42,plain,
    multiplication(A,one) = A,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[multiplicative_right_identity]) ).

cnf(c_45,plain,
    addition(A,zero) = A,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[additive_identity]) ).

cnf(c_47,plain,
    addition(A,B) = addition(B,A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[additive_commutativity]) ).

cnf(c_48,negated_conjecture,
    antidomain(antidomain(zero)) != zero,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_30,c_24]) ).

cnf(c_49,plain,
    addition(antidomain(A),antidomain(antidomain(A))) = one,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_47,c_31]) ).

cnf(c_83,plain,
    antidomain(one) = zero,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_42,c_34]) ).

cnf(c_105,plain,
    addition(zero,A) = A,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_47,c_45]) ).

cnf(c_131,plain,
    addition(zero,antidomain(antidomain(one))) = one,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_83,c_49]) ).

cnf(c_132,plain,
    addition(zero,antidomain(zero)) = one,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_83,c_131]) ).

cnf(c_124,plain,
    antidomain(zero) = one,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_105,c_132]) ).

cnf(c_133,negated_conjecture,
    antidomain(one) != zero,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_124,c_48]) ).

cnf(c_134,negated_conjecture,
    zero != zero,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_83,c_133]) ).

cnf(c_130,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_134]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : KLE086+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.36  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 19:20:29 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.37  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.10/0.37  % Process 2301086 was started by sandbox on n009,
% 0.10/0.37  % Fri Sep 25 19:20:29 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.14/0.37  
% 0.14/0.37  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.14/0.41  
% 0.14/0.41  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.41  
% 0.14/0.41  % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.01) seconds.
% 0.14/0.41  % Length of proof is 20.
% 0.14/0.41  % Level of proof is 4.
% 0.14/0.41  % Maximum clause weight is 33.000.
% 0.14/0.41  % Given clauses 25.
% 0.14/0.41  
% 0.14/0.41  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------