↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : KLE086+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:52:22 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.19s 1.09s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   17
%            Number of leaves      :   13
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   69 (  69 unt;   2 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  158 (  68 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    7 (   7   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   3 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   71 (   0 sgn  71   !;   0   ?;  39   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : addition(X0,X1) = addition(X1,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_commutativity) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] : addition(X2,addition(X1,X0)) = addition(addition(X2,X1),X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_associativity) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X0] : addition(X0,zero) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_identity) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X0] : addition(X0,X0) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_idempotence) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X0] : multiplication(X0,one) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',multiplicative_right_identity) ).

fof(f8,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] : multiplication(X0,addition(X1,X2)) = addition(multiplication(X0,X1),multiplication(X0,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',right_distributivity) ).

fof(f13,axiom,
    ! [X0] : multiplication(antidomain(X0),X0) = zero,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+4.ax',domain1) ).

fof(f14,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : addition(antidomain(multiplication(X0,X1)),antidomain(multiplication(X0,antidomain(antidomain(X1))))) = antidomain(multiplication(X0,antidomain(antidomain(X1)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+4.ax',domain2) ).

fof(f15,axiom,
    ! [X0] : addition(antidomain(antidomain(X0)),antidomain(X0)) = one,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+4.ax',domain3) ).

fof(f16,axiom,
    ! [X0] : domain(X0) = antidomain(antidomain(X0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+4.ax',domain4) ).

fof(f21,conjecture,
    domain(zero) = zero,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

fof(f22,negated_conjecture,
    domain(zero) != zero,
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f21]) ).

fof(f23,plain,
    zero != domain(zero),
    inference(flattening,[],[f22]) ).

fof(f24,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : addition(X0,X1) = addition(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f25,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : addition(X2,addition(X1,X0)) = addition(addition(X2,X1),X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f26,plain,
    ! [X0] : addition(X0,zero) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f27,plain,
    ! [X0] : addition(X0,X0) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

fof(f29,plain,
    ! [X0] : multiplication(X0,one) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

fof(f31,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : multiplication(X0,addition(X1,X2)) = addition(multiplication(X0,X1),multiplication(X0,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

fof(f35,plain,
    ! [X0] : zero = multiplication(antidomain(X0),X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).

fof(f36,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : antidomain(multiplication(X0,antidomain(antidomain(X1)))) = addition(antidomain(multiplication(X0,X1)),antidomain(multiplication(X0,antidomain(antidomain(X1))))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).

fof(f37,plain,
    ! [X0] : one = addition(antidomain(antidomain(X0)),antidomain(X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

fof(f38,plain,
    ! [X0] : antidomain(antidomain(X0)) = domain(X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).

fof(f43,plain,
    zero != domain(zero),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f23]) ).

fof(f44,plain,
    zero != antidomain(antidomain(zero)),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f43,f38]) ).

tcf(c_49,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : addition(X0,X1) = addition(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f24]) ).

tcf(c_50,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : addition(addition(X0,X1),X2) = addition(X0,addition(X1,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f25]) ).

tcf(c_51,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : addition(X0,zero) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f26]) ).

tcf(c_52,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : addition(X0,X0) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f27]) ).

tcf(c_54,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : multiplication(X0,one) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f29]) ).

tcf(c_56,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : addition(multiplication(X0,X1),multiplication(X0,X2)) = multiplication(X0,addition(X1,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f31]) ).

tcf(c_60,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : multiplication(antidomain(X0),X0) = zero,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f35]) ).

tcf(c_61,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : addition(antidomain(multiplication(X0,X1)),antidomain(multiplication(X0,antidomain(antidomain(X1))))) = antidomain(multiplication(X0,antidomain(antidomain(X1)))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f36]) ).

tcf(c_62,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : addition(antidomain(antidomain(X0)),antidomain(X0)) = one,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f37]) ).

tcf(c_66,negated_conjecture,
    antidomain(antidomain(zero)) != zero,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f44]) ).

tcf(c_82,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : addition(antidomain(X0),antidomain(antidomain(X0))) = one,
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_62,c_50,c_49]) ).

tcf(c_128,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = antidomain(zero),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_129,definition,
    iPr_def_11 = antidomain(iPr_def_10),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).

tcf(c_130,negated_conjecture,
    iPr_def_11 != zero,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_66,c_128,c_129]) ).

tcf(c_212,plain,
    addition(iPr_def_10,antidomain(iPr_def_10)) = one,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_128,c_82]) ).

tcf(c_214,plain,
    addition(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_11) = one,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_212,c_129]) ).

tcf(c_215,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : addition(antidomain(X0),antidomain(antidomain(X0))) = addition(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_11),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_82,c_214]) ).

tcf(c_217,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : multiplication(X0,addition(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_11)) = X0,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_54,c_214]) ).

tcf(c_219,plain,
    multiplication(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_10) = zero,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_129,c_60]) ).

tcf(c_220,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : multiplication(antidomain(X0),X0) = multiplication(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_10),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_60,c_219]) ).

tcf(c_223,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : addition(X0,multiplication(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_10)) = X0,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_51,c_219]) ).

tcf(c_224,plain,
    antidomain(multiplication(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_10)) = iPr_def_10,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_128,c_219]) ).

tcf(c_225,plain,
    multiplication(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_10) != iPr_def_11,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_130,c_219]) ).

tcf(c_234,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : addition(multiplication(X0,iPr_def_10),multiplication(X0,iPr_def_11)) = X0,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_217,c_56]) ).

tcf(c_264,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : addition(X0,addition(X0,X1)) = addition(X0,X1),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_52,c_50]) ).

tcf(c_265,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : addition(antidomain(X0),addition(antidomain(antidomain(X0)),X1)) = addition(addition(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_11),X1),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_215,c_50]) ).

tcf(c_277,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : addition(antidomain(X0),addition(antidomain(antidomain(X0)),X1)) = addition(iPr_def_10,addition(iPr_def_11,X1)),
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_265,c_50,c_49]) ).

tcf(c_314,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : addition(multiplication(antidomain(addition(X0,X1)),X0),multiplication(antidomain(addition(X0,X1)),X1)) = multiplication(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_10),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_220,c_56]) ).

tcf(c_341,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : addition(antidomain(X0),addition(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_11)) = addition(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_11),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_215,c_264]) ).

tcf(c_356,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : addition(iPr_def_10,addition(iPr_def_11,antidomain(X0))) = addition(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_11),
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_341,c_50,c_49]) ).

tcf(c_471,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : addition(antidomain(multiplication(antidomain(antidomain(antidomain(X0))),X0)),antidomain(multiplication(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_10))) = antidomain(multiplication(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_10)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_220,c_61]) ).

tcf(c_479,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : addition(antidomain(multiplication(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_10)),antidomain(multiplication(antidomain(antidomain(antidomain(X0))),X0))) = antidomain(multiplication(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_10)),
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_471,c_50,c_49]) ).

tcf(c_480,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : addition(iPr_def_10,antidomain(multiplication(antidomain(antidomain(antidomain(X0))),X0))) = iPr_def_10,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_479,c_224]) ).

tcf(c_939,plain,
    addition(iPr_def_10,antidomain(multiplication(antidomain(antidomain(iPr_def_11)),iPr_def_10))) = iPr_def_10,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_129,c_480]) ).

tcf(c_1864,plain,
    antidomain(addition(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_11)) = multiplication(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_10),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_314,c_234]) ).

tcf(c_2202,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : addition(multiplication(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_10),addition(antidomain(multiplication(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_10)),X0)) = addition(iPr_def_10,addition(iPr_def_11,X0)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1864,c_277]) ).

tcf(c_2218,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : addition(multiplication(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_10),addition(iPr_def_10,X0)) = addition(iPr_def_10,addition(iPr_def_11,X0)),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_2202,c_224]) ).

tcf(c_2219,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : addition(iPr_def_10,addition(X0,multiplication(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_10))) = addition(iPr_def_10,addition(iPr_def_11,X0)),
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_2218,c_50,c_49]) ).

tcf(c_2220,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : addition(iPr_def_10,addition(iPr_def_11,X0)) = addition(iPr_def_10,X0),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_2219,c_223]) ).

tcf(c_2225,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : addition(iPr_def_10,antidomain(X0)) = addition(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_11),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_356,c_2220]) ).

tcf(c_2230,plain,
    addition(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_11) = iPr_def_10,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_939,c_2225]) ).

tcf(c_2231,plain,
    multiplication(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_10) = antidomain(iPr_def_10),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_1864,c_2230]) ).

tcf(c_2237,plain,
    multiplication(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_10) = iPr_def_11,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_2231,c_129]) ).

tcf(c_2238,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2237,c_225]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : KLE086+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.11/0.38  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.38  % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 18:53:20 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.38  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.11/0.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.43  
% 0.11/0.43  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.11/0.43  
% 0.11/0.43  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.11/0.45  % Proving...
% 1.19/1.09  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.19/1.09  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.19/1.09  
% 1.19/1.09  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 1.19/1.09  
% 1.19/1.09  % ------  iProver source info
% 1.19/1.09  
% 1.19/1.09  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 1.19/1.09  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 1.19/1.09  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.19/1.09  
% 1.19/1.09  % ------ Parsing...
% 1.19/1.09  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% ------  preprocesses with Option_UEQ
% 1.19/1.09  % 
% 1.19/1.09  
% 1.19/1.09  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 1.19/1.09  
% 1.19/1.09  % ------ Preprocessing...% ------  preprocesses with Option_UEQ
% 1.19/1.09   gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 1.19/1.09  
% 1.19/1.09  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 1.19/1.09  % ------ Proving...
% 1.19/1.09  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 1.19/1.09  
% 1.19/1.09  % 
% 1.19/1.09  % clauses                               20
% 1.19/1.09  % conjectures                           1
% 1.19/1.09  % EPR                                   1
% 1.19/1.09  % Horn                                  20
% 1.19/1.09  % unary                                 20
% 1.19/1.09  % binary                                0
% 1.19/1.09  % lits                                  20
% 1.19/1.09  % lits eq                               20
% 1.19/1.09  % fd_pure                               0
% 1.19/1.09  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 1.19/1.09  % fd_cond                               0
% 1.19/1.09  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 1.19/1.09  % AC symbols                            1
% 1.19/1.09  
% 1.19/1.09  % ------ Schedule UEQ
% 1.19/1.09  
% 1.19/1.09  % ------ Option_UEQ Time Limit: 10.
% 1.19/1.09  
% 1.19/1.09  
% 1.19/1.09  % ------ 
% 1.19/1.09  % Current options:
% 1.19/1.09  % ------ 
% 1.19/1.09  
% 1.19/1.09  
% 1.19/1.09  % 
% 1.19/1.09  
% 1.19/1.09  % ------ Proving...
% 1.19/1.09  % 
% 1.19/1.09  
% 1.19/1.09  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.19/1.09  
% 1.19/1.09  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.19/1.09  
% 1.19/1.09  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------