↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : KLE089+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 04:35:41 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.30s 1.73s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.30s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   26 (  23 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   29 (  28 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    7 (   4   ~;   0   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   1  =>;   1  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   32 (   0 sgn  20   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(goals,conjecture,
    ! [X4,X5] :
      ( multiplication(domain(X4),X5) = zero
     <= addition(domain(X4),antidomain(X5)) = antidomain(X5) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

fof(left_distributivity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] : multiplication(addition(X1,X2),X3) = addition(multiplication(X1,X3),multiplication(X2,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',left_distributivity) ).

fof(domain1,axiom,
    ! [X4] : multiplication(antidomain(X4),X4) = zero,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+4.ax',domain1) ).

fof(additive_identity,axiom,
    ! [X1] : addition(X1,zero) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_identity) ).

fof(domain4,axiom,
    ! [X4] : domain(X4) = antidomain(antidomain(X4)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+4.ax',domain4) ).

fof(additive_commutativity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_commutativity) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X4,X5] :
        ( addition(domain(X4),antidomain(X5)) = antidomain(X5)
       => multiplication(domain(X4),X5) = zero ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X55,X56,X57] : multiplication(addition(X55,X56),X57) = addition(multiplication(X55,X57),multiplication(X56,X57)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[left_distributivity]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X62] : multiplication(antidomain(X62),X62) = zero,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[domain1]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X45] : addition(X45,zero) = X45,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_identity]) ).

fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( addition(domain(esk1_0),antidomain(esk2_0)) = antidomain(esk2_0)
    & multiplication(domain(esk1_0),esk2_0) != zero ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X66] : domain(X66) = antidomain(antidomain(X66)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[domain4]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    multiplication(addition(X1,X2),X3) = addition(multiplication(X1,X3),multiplication(X2,X3)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    multiplication(antidomain(X1),X1) = zero,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    addition(X1,zero) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

fof(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X40,X41] : addition(X40,X41) = addition(X41,X40),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_commutativity]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    addition(domain(esk1_0),antidomain(esk2_0)) = antidomain(esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    domain(X1) = antidomain(antidomain(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    multiplication(addition(X1,antidomain(X2)),X2) = multiplication(X1,X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    addition(antidomain(antidomain(esk1_0)),antidomain(esk2_0)) = antidomain(esk2_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(domain(esk1_0),esk2_0) != zero,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    multiplication(addition(antidomain(X1),X2),X1) = multiplication(X2,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    addition(antidomain(esk2_0),antidomain(antidomain(esk1_0))) = antidomain(esk2_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(antidomain(antidomain(esk1_0)),esk2_0) != zero,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_13]),c_0_24]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem    : KLE089+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.11  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.14/0.32  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.33  % DateTime   : Mon May  4 20:29:51 EDT 2026
% 0.14/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.34  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.30/1.73  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.30/1.73  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.30/1.73  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.30/1.73  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.30/1.73  % Total time : 1.371s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------