%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Etableau---0.67 % Problem : KLE092+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % Computer : n020.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Sun Jul 17 01:57:02 EDT 2022 % Result : Theorem 1.83s 0.68s % Output : CNFRefutation 1.83s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.00/0.11 % Problem : KLE092+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0. % 0.00/0.12 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % 0.10/0.32 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu % 0.10/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.10/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.10/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.10/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.10/0.32 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.10/0.32 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.10/0.32 % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 15:09:34 EDT 2022 % 0.10/0.32 % CPUTime : % 0.16/0.35 # No SInE strategy applied % 0.16/0.35 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN % 0.16/0.35 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn. % 0.16/0.35 # % 0.16/0.35 # Presaturation interreduction done % 0.16/0.35 # Number of axioms: 20 Number of unprocessed: 20 % 0.16/0.35 # Tableaux proof search. % 0.16/0.35 # APR header successfully linked. % 0.16/0.35 # Hello from C++ % 0.16/0.36 # The folding up rule is enabled... % 0.16/0.36 # Local unification is enabled... % 0.16/0.36 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... % 0.16/0.36 # 20 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification % 0.16/0.36 # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures. % 0.16/0.36 # There are 1 start rule candidates: % 0.16/0.36 # Found 18 unit axioms. % 0.16/0.36 # 1 start rule tableaux created. % 0.16/0.36 # 2 extension rule candidate clauses % 0.16/0.36 # 18 unit axiom clauses % 0.16/0.36 % 0.16/0.36 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. % 0.16/0.36 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1 % 0.16/0.36 # Creating equality axioms % 0.16/0.36 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses % 0.16/0.36 # Returning from population with 30 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux. % 0.16/0.36 # We now have 30 tableaux to operate on % 1.83/0.68 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. % 1.83/0.68 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 1.83/0.68 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 1.83/0.68 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 1.83/0.68 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. % 1.83/0.68 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 1.83/0.68 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 1.83/0.68 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 1.83/0.68 # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 1.83/0.68 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 1.83/0.68 # Begin clausification derivation % 1.83/0.68 % 1.83/0.68 # End clausification derivation % 1.83/0.68 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 1.83/0.68 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (multiplication(X1,zero)=zero)). % 1.83/0.68 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (multiplication(zero,X1)=zero)). % 1.83/0.68 cnf(i_0_3, plain, (addition(X1,zero)=X1)). % 1.83/0.68 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (multiplication(X1,one)=X1)). % 1.83/0.68 cnf(i_0_7, plain, (multiplication(one,X1)=X1)). % 1.83/0.68 cnf(i_0_4, plain, (addition(X1,X1)=X1)). % 1.83/0.68 cnf(i_0_18, plain, (multiplication(X1,coantidomain(X1))=zero)). % 1.83/0.68 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (multiplication(antidomain(X1),X1)=zero)). % 1.83/0.68 cnf(i_0_16, plain, (addition(antidomain(X1),antidomain(antidomain(X1)))=one)). % 1.83/0.68 cnf(i_0_20, plain, (addition(coantidomain(X1),coantidomain(coantidomain(X1)))=one)). % 1.83/0.68 cnf(i_0_2, plain, (addition(addition(X1,X2),X3)=addition(X1,addition(X2,X3)))). % 1.83/0.68 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (multiplication(multiplication(X1,X2),X3)=multiplication(X1,multiplication(X2,X3)))). % 1.83/0.68 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (addition(multiplication(X1,X2),multiplication(X1,X3))=multiplication(X1,addition(X2,X3)))). % 1.83/0.68 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (addition(multiplication(X1,X2),multiplication(X3,X2))=multiplication(addition(X1,X3),X2))). % 1.83/0.68 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (addition(antidomain(multiplication(X1,X2)),antidomain(multiplication(X1,antidomain(antidomain(X2)))))=antidomain(multiplication(X1,antidomain(antidomain(X2)))))). % 1.83/0.68 cnf(i_0_19, plain, (addition(coantidomain(multiplication(X1,X2)),coantidomain(multiplication(coantidomain(coantidomain(X1)),X2)))=coantidomain(multiplication(coantidomain(coantidomain(X1)),X2)))). % 1.83/0.68 cnf(i_0_1, plain, (addition(X1,X2)=addition(X2,X1))). % 1.83/0.68 cnf(i_0_22, negated_conjecture, (antidomain(antidomain(coantidomain(esk1_0)))!=coantidomain(esk1_0))). % 1.83/0.68 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (addition(X1,X2)=X2|~leq(X1,X2))). % 1.83/0.68 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (leq(X1,X2)|addition(X1,X2)!=X2)). % 1.83/0.68 cnf(i_0_28, plain, (X39=X39)). % 1.83/0.68 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 1.83/0.68 # Begin printing tableau % 1.83/0.68 # Found 6 steps % 1.83/0.68 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (multiplication(X7,zero)=zero), inference(start_rule)). % 1.83/0.68 cnf(i_0_37, plain, (multiplication(X7,zero)=zero), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_32])). % 1.83/0.68 cnf(i_0_72, plain, (multiplication(zero,zero)!=zero), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_10])). % 1.83/0.68 cnf(i_0_71, plain, (addition(multiplication(zero,zero),multiplication(X7,zero))=addition(zero,zero)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_31])). % 1.83/0.68 cnf(i_0_95, plain, (addition(zero,zero)!=zero), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_3])). % 1.83/0.68 cnf(i_0_93, plain, (addition(multiplication(zero,zero),multiplication(X7,zero))=zero), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_93, ...])). % 1.83/0.68 # End printing tableau % 1.83/0.68 # SZS output end % 1.83/0.68 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 1.83/0.68 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. % 1.83/0.68 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 1.83/0.68 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 1.83/0.68 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 1.83/0.68 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. % 1.83/0.68 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 1.83/0.68 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 1.83/0.68 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 1.83/0.68 # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 1.83/0.68 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 1.83/0.68 # Begin clausification derivation % 1.83/0.68 % 1.83/0.68 # End clausification derivation % 1.83/0.68 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 1.83/0.68 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (multiplication(X1,zero)=zero)). % 1.83/0.68 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (multiplication(zero,X1)=zero)). % 1.83/0.68 cnf(i_0_3, plain, (addition(X1,zero)=X1)). % 1.83/0.68 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (multiplication(X1,one)=X1)). % 1.83/0.68 cnf(i_0_7, plain, (multiplication(one,X1)=X1)). % 1.83/0.68 cnf(i_0_4, plain, (addition(X1,X1)=X1)). % 1.83/0.68 cnf(i_0_18, plain, (multiplication(X1,coantidomain(X1))=zero)). % 1.83/0.68 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (multiplication(antidomain(X1),X1)=zero)). % 1.83/0.68 cnf(i_0_16, plain, (addition(antidomain(X1),antidomain(antidomain(X1)))=one)). % 1.83/0.68 cnf(i_0_20, plain, (addition(coantidomain(X1),coantidomain(coantidomain(X1)))=one)). % 1.83/0.68 cnf(i_0_2, plain, (addition(addition(X1,X2),X3)=addition(X1,addition(X2,X3)))). % 1.83/0.68 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (multiplication(multiplication(X1,X2),X3)=multiplication(X1,multiplication(X2,X3)))). % 1.83/0.68 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (addition(multiplication(X1,X2),multiplication(X1,X3))=multiplication(X1,addition(X2,X3)))). % 1.83/0.68 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (addition(multiplication(X1,X2),multiplication(X3,X2))=multiplication(addition(X1,X3),X2))). % 1.83/0.68 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (addition(antidomain(multiplication(X1,X2)),antidomain(multiplication(X1,antidomain(antidomain(X2)))))=antidomain(multiplication(X1,antidomain(antidomain(X2)))))). % 1.83/0.68 cnf(i_0_19, plain, (addition(coantidomain(multiplication(X1,X2)),coantidomain(multiplication(coantidomain(coantidomain(X1)),X2)))=coantidomain(multiplication(coantidomain(coantidomain(X1)),X2)))). % 1.83/0.68 cnf(i_0_1, plain, (addition(X1,X2)=addition(X2,X1))). % 1.83/0.68 cnf(i_0_22, negated_conjecture, (antidomain(antidomain(coantidomain(esk1_0)))!=coantidomain(esk1_0))). % 1.83/0.68 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (addition(X1,X2)=X2|~leq(X1,X2))). % 1.83/0.68 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (leq(X1,X2)|addition(X1,X2)!=X2)). % 1.83/0.68 cnf(i_0_28, plain, (X39=X39)). % 1.83/0.68 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 1.83/0.68 # Begin printing tableau % 1.83/0.68 # Found 6 steps % 1.83/0.68 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (multiplication(X7,zero)=zero), inference(start_rule)). % 1.83/0.68 cnf(i_0_37, plain, (multiplication(X7,zero)=zero), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_33])). % 1.83/0.68 cnf(i_0_75, plain, (multiplication(zero,zero)!=zero), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_10])). % 1.83/0.68 cnf(i_0_74, plain, (multiplication(multiplication(zero,zero),multiplication(X7,zero))=multiplication(zero,zero)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_31])). % 1.83/0.68 cnf(i_0_95, plain, (multiplication(zero,zero)!=zero), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_10])). % 1.83/0.68 cnf(i_0_93, plain, (multiplication(multiplication(zero,zero),multiplication(X7,zero))=zero), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_93, ...])). % 1.83/0.68 # End printing tableau % 1.83/0.68 # SZS output end % 1.83/0.68 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 1.83/0.68 # Child (10274) has found a proof. % 1.83/0.68 % 1.83/0.68 # Proof search is over... % 1.83/0.68 # Freeing feature tree %------------------------------------------------------------------------------